Speed Log
A speed log's working principle decides what it actually measures: an electromagnetic log gives speed through the water only, while a Doppler log gives speed over the seabed until it loses bottom lock and falls back to water-track, a switch that can go unnoticed on the bridge.
Read more — Speed Log explained ▾
What sets a speed log apart from the rest of the navigation suite
A speed log measures the ship's own speed and, on some types, distance run, feeding that into ECDIS, radar for true motion and the automatic identification system for calculated course over ground. It is a different job from the echo sounder, which measures water depth under the keel, and from the voyage data recorder, which only records what other instruments already report. Within speed logs there are two working principles that give genuinely different information: an electromagnetic, or EM, log measures speed through the water only, by sensing the voltage induced as seawater flows past an electrode; a Doppler log measures speed relative to the seabed when in bottom-track range, switching to water-track, effectively the same measurement as an EM log, once the seabed is too deep to return a usable signal.
Main components
EM log sensor
A retractable probe fitted through the hull carries a pair of electrodes exposed to the flow of water past the hull. A hull valve lets the probe be withdrawn for cleaning or before dry-docking without flooding the compartment.
Doppler log transducer
A transducer, usually with two or four angled beams, is mounted flush in the hull and transmits acoustic pulses toward the seabed. The frequency shift in the returned echo gives speed over ground; a second, near-vertical beam pair can add athwartship speed for docking use.
Processing and display unit
The electronics unit converts the raw sensor signal into speed and, where fitted, integrates it over time to give distance run, then distributes the data over serial or network interfaces to ECDIS, radar, the VDR and the engine control system.
Selection and sizing
- Bottom-track depth range for a Doppler log, since a unit with a shallow maximum range reverts to water-track far from what the officer expects
- Single-axis versus dual-axis output, dual-axis units add athwartship speed and are increasingly specified for docking assistance on larger ships
- Sensor draft and hull location, chosen to stay clear of bow thruster wash and hull vibration sources that degrade the signal
Regulations and class
SOLAS Chapter V regulation 19 requires ships of a given gross tonnage to carry a speed and distance measuring device, and the equipment must meet the IMO performance standard for such devices, which sets a maximum permissible error, commonly summarised as within about two per cent of speed or 0.2 knots, whichever is greater. Approved units carry type approval certification referencing that performance standard, checked at survey alongside the rest of the navigation equipment fit.
Typical faults
- EM sensor fouled by marine growth or paint overspray, producing a speed reading that drifts low without an obvious alarm
- Doppler log losing bottom lock in deep water and silently switching to water-track, so speed over ground readings quietly become speed through water
- Retractable EM probe seized in the extended position, forcing a diver or dry-dock intervention before the hull valve can be closed safely
- Calibration drift after hull cleaning or propeller change, since the log's speed correction factor is set against the ship's actual hull condition
What to look for in a supplier
- Type approval certificate referencing the current IMO performance standard for speed and distance measuring equipment
- Clear indication on the display of which mode, bottom-track or water-track, is currently active for Doppler units
- Interface support for the ship's actual ECDIS and VDR models without a protocol converter
- Availability of a diver-serviceable or retractable sensor housing suited to the ship's dry-docking interval
Before trusting a Doppler log's speed over ground figure in coastal waters, check the display is actually in bottom-track mode; a silent fallback to water-track has put more than one ship's dead reckoning out by the set and drift of the current.
8 manufacturers · 10 models
Consilium
2
- Transducer window replacement at drydock
- Complex calibration procedure
- Power supply sensitivity
- Very high accuracy and low drift compared with electromagnetic logs
- Real‑time integration with bridge navigation systems (ECDIS, AIS)
- Robust performance in cold North Sea and Baltic conditions
- IMO type approval ensures compliance for international voyages
- Transducer window often requires replacement during dry‑dock periods
- Calibration procedure is complex and demands trained personnel
- Sensitive to power‑supply fluctuations; may need dedicated stabiliser
- Higher initial cost than basic electromagnetic logs
- Sensor rod biofouling
- Calibration drift
- Retractable mechanism seal
- Simple EM principle – no rotating parts, reducing mechanical wear
- IMO approved for SOLAS compliance, meeting mandatory reporting requirements
- Relatively inexpensive compared with Doppler or acoustic logs
- Compact installation; fits easily on most bridge consoles
- Quick deployment and retraction via a single rod
- Sensor rod prone to biofouling, especially in warm, nutrient‑rich waters
- Calibration can drift over time, requiring periodic verification
- Retractable mechanism seal may leak or seize if not maintained
- Accuracy degrades at very high speeds (>30 kn) and in turbulent sea states
- Limited redundancy – only one measurement channel
JRC
2
- Transducer cavitation damage at high speed
- Bottom lock loss in deep water
- Display processor failure
- Accurate speed measurement in deep water (up to 400 m)
- IMO type approval for compliance with international regulations
- Robust performance on long ocean voyages and offshore operations
- Integrated display processor simplifies bridge integration
- Annual transducer inspection schedule supports preventive maintenance
- Transducer susceptible to cavitation damage at high vessel speeds
- Bottom‑track lock can be lost in very deep or turbulent water conditions
- Reported occasional failures of the display/processor unit
- Requires regular inspection and possible replacement of transducer elements
- Higher initial cost compared with basic paddlewheel logs
- Sensor rod fouling
- Retractable rod seal leaks
- Calibration drift
- No moving parts in the water, reducing mechanical wear and maintenance
- IMO Type Approval ensures compliance with SOLAS navigation requirements
- Retractable sensor rod can be safely stowed for dry‑dock or when not in use
- Annual calibration procedure maintains measurement accuracy
- Sensor rod is susceptible to fouling in heavy biofouling environments
- Seal on the retractable rod may develop leaks, requiring periodic inspection
- Calibration drift can occur if annual recalibration is missed
- Requires compatible bridge integration; not a plug‑and‑play solution for all vessels
Kongsberg
1
- Sensor probe biofouling
- Calibration shift with hull fouling
- Interface issues
- Non‑contact measurement – no rotating paddles, resulting in very low mechanical wear
- High accuracy over a wide range of speeds and sea states
- Integrated directly with K‑Bridge for seamless data display and logging
- Effective in shallow draft vessels where paddle wheels are impractical
- Low routine maintenance compared with mechanical logs
- Probe surface can suffer biofouling, degrading accuracy if not regularly cleaned
- Calibration may drift when hull fouling changes the flow profile around the sensor
- Requires a clean‑hull installation area; retrofits on heavily fouled ships can be difficult
- Electromagnetic interference from nearby high‑power equipment can affect readings
- Higher upfront cost than basic paddlewheel speed logs
Raytheon Anschütz
1- Tight integration with autopilot — standalone issues
- Calibration procedure tied to autopilot
- Sensor aging
- High accuracy with electromagnetic Doppler measurement, no moving parts to wear out
- Seamless integration with Raytheon Anschütz autopilot for instant speed feedback
- Low maintenance requirement compared with mechanical pitot tubes or paddle wheels
- Proven reliability on vessels equipped with the full Raytheon autopilot suite
- Calibration is tied to the autopilot software, limiting independent use
- Sensor performance can degrade over time (aging of EM transducers) requiring periodic recalibration
- Standalone operation is limited; not ideal for ships using a different autopilot brand
- Potential electromagnetic interference in heavily instrumented bridge areas
SAM Electronics
1
- Legacy hardware
- Wärtsilä transition support
- Calibration data loss
- No rotating components – virtually zero mechanical wear and low maintenance
- High measurement accuracy (±0.1 kn) across a wide speed range
- Fast response time suitable for dynamic positioning and fuel‑efficiency monitoring
- Compact installation on hull with minimal protrusion
- Integrated data output compatible with common bridge consoles
- Performance degrades in low‑conductivity water (e.g., fresh or brackish water)
- Sensitive to hull fouling and magnetic interference from nearby equipment
- Requires periodic calibration; loss of calibration data has been reported on legacy units
- Limited redundancy – many operators pair it with a mechanical log for safety
Skipper
1- Limited service network outside Scandinavia
- Transducer compatibility
- Display issues
- High accuracy in low‑temperature sea water conditions
- IMO approved, meeting international navigation standards
- Compact bridge‑mounted unit with built‑in display
- Robust housing suited to Arctic and sub‑Arctic environments
- Limited service and spare‑parts network outside Scandinavia
- Transducer compatibility restricted to Skipper‑specified models
- Occasional display firmware glitches reported by users
- Less flexible integration with non‑Skipper bridge systems
Sperry Marine
1
- Integration dependency on VisionMaster
- Transducer gate valve issues
- Calibration complexity
- High accuracy Doppler measurement suitable for performance monitoring
- Full standalone operation when VisionMaster integration is not used
- IMO type‑approved, meeting international navigation standards
- Designed specifically for seamless integration with Sperry Marine bridge consoles
- Robust transducer construction for long‑term marine service
- Optimal functionality relies on VisionMaster integration; limited features on other bridges
- Known gate‑valve wear in the transducer can require periodic maintenance
- Calibration procedures are complex and often need specialist support
- Spare parts and service expertise are primarily tied to Sperry Marine networks
- Higher initial cost compared with basic mechanical logs
Tokimec
1- Legacy brand confusion
- Spare parts availability
- Sensor rod aging
- No moving parts – low mechanical wear and maintenance
- Accurate at low to moderate speeds on steel hulls
- IMO type approval satisfies SOLAS speed‑log requirements
- Proven field service record on many commercial vessels
- Compatible with standard bridge integration packages
- Sensor rod can age, leading to drift if not recalibrated
- Spare‑parts availability reduced after brand transition to Tokyo Keiki
- Legacy Tokimec branding may cause procurement confusion
- Performance degrades on non‑magnetic (composite or aluminum) hulls
- Limited depth range compared with Doppler‑based logs