Echo Sounder
A single-beam echo sounder gives one number: depth under the transducer. Multibeam sweeps a fan of beams across the track and builds a swath, which is why hydrographic survey vessels carry multibeam and merchant ships carry single beam.
Read more — Echo Sounder explained ▾
What sets an echo sounder apart from other depth instruments
An echo sounder measures depth by timing the return of an acoustic pulse from a transducer mounted in the hull to the seabed and back. The instrument does not measure position or speed; it only reports the water column beneath (or, for multibeam, beside) the ship. On a merchant vessel the transducer is usually a single-beam unit sending one narrow vertical pulse, reporting one depth value. A multibeam echo sounder fires a fan of beams across the ship's track in a single ping, producing a swath of depth points instead of a line. That difference in beam geometry is what separates a bridge navigation instrument from a hydrographic survey tool, even though both work on the same time-of-flight principle.
Main components
Transducer
Piezoelectric element in a sea chest or hull fitting, below the waterline, often with a retractable fairing so it can be serviced without dry-docking on larger ships.
Transceiver / transmitter-receiver unit
Generates the excitation pulse, amplifies the return echo, and passes a digitised signal to the processing unit.
Display and processing unit
Shows depth as a numeric readout and/or a scrolling depth trace, and on SOLAS-class units drives an audible/visual shallow-water alarm.
Keel offset and draught correction
Set at commissioning so the reported figure matches depth below keel, below transducer, or below the waterline, whichever the operator has selected — a frequent source of confusion during pilotage.
Selection and sizing
- Operating frequency: high frequency (150-200 kHz) for coastal and harbour work with fine resolution in shallow water; low frequency (10-50 kHz) for deep-sea sounding where high frequency signals attenuate before reaching the bottom.
- Maximum sounding depth required for the trade the ship runs in.
- Single beam versus multibeam — multibeam is only justified where swath coverage is the actual deliverable, such as dredging support or survey work, not general navigation.
- Integration: NMEA output to the ECDIS and VDR, since a standalone display with no data output no longer meets modern bridge integration expectations.
Regulations and class
SOLAS Chapter V, Regulation 19, requires an echo sounding device on ships of specified sizes as part of the mandatory navigational equipment carriage requirements. Class societies survey the unit as part of the periodic navigation equipment survey, checking calibration against a known depth and confirming alarm function. There is no IMO type-approval regime specific to echo sounders in the way there is for GMDSS equipment, but the transducer installation itself is often subject to class approval of the hull penetration.
Typical faults
| Fault | Cause | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Erratic or dropped depth readings | Aeration under the transducer from hull fouling, cavitation, or heavy pitching in ballast condition | Officer of the watch loses confidence in the display and may miss a genuine shoaling alarm |
| Fixed offset error | Draught correction left at the yard commissioning value after a change of loading condition | Reported depth below keel is wrong by the amount of the draught change, most dangerous when fully loaded |
| No signal / blank display | Transducer cable chafe or corrosion at the hull gland, common on older steel hulls | Total loss of depth information, forcing reliance on chart depth alone |
| Ghost bottom / second echo | Signal bouncing off the thermocline or a dense plankton layer | False shallow reading that can trigger unnecessary alarms or, worse, mask the real bottom return |
What to look for in a supplier
- Type approval certificate covering the specific SOLAS carriage requirement, not just a generic marine mark.
- Availability of a retractable transducer fairing if the ship needs to service the unit afloat.
- Documented NMEA 0183/2000 output list matching what the ECDIS and VDR actually require.
- Spares support for the transducer specifically, since it is the component most likely to need replacement after grounding contact or cavitation damage.
Check the draught correction setting every time the loading condition changes materially — a depth-below-keel reading that was accurate light-loaded can be dangerously optimistic once the ship is down to her marks.

36 manufacturers · 289 models
Furuno
59Kongsberg
35
- High cost
- Integration with motion sensor
- Data management
- Very high angular resolution (up to 800 beams) gives dense point clouds in shallow water
- Lightweight and compact – can be pole‑mounted, hull‑mounted or fitted on ROV/AUV platforms
- Fast real‑time processing with Kongsberg’s SIS software suite
- Broad frequency range (200–400 kHz) balances penetration and resolution for 0‑200 m depths
- Low power consumption compared with lower‑frequency multibeam systems
- Higher purchase and integration cost than single‑beam or low‑resolution multibeam units
- Requires accurate motion reference unit (MRU) integration to achieve full performance
- Large data volumes demand robust onboard storage and post‑processing capability
- Limited maximum depth compared with lower‑frequency multibeams (e.g., 12 kHz systems)
- Performance can degrade in highly turbulent or bubbly water conditions
JRC (Japan Radio Co)
26Tokyo Keiki
25Hondex
19
Simrad
17
- Very high data volumes
- Complex calibration
- Processing power requirements
- Broadband chirp allows simultaneous multi‑frequency operation for detailed fish stock and seabed mapping
- High signal‑to‑noise ratio and low side‑lobe levels improve target detection accuracy
- Fully integrated with Kongsberg SIS software for real‑time processing and visualization
- Configurable pulse lengths and power settings suit a wide range of depths and targets
- Very large raw data volumes require substantial storage and processing capability on board
- Calibration procedures are complex and need trained personnel or external services
- Higher purchase and installation cost compared with conventional single‑frequency echo sounders
- Performance at the highest frequencies degrades quickly in deep, high‑absorption water
- Complex calibration
- Data processing requirements
- Transducer array cost
- Multi‑frequency operation (e.g., 12/38/70/200 kHz) enables flexible survey modes and better penetration in varied water depths.
- Integrated real‑time processing and data logging reduces the need for external software packages.
- Robust marine‑grade hardware with built‑in GPS integration simplifies installation on survey vessels.
- High depth accuracy (±0.2% of range) suitable for hydrographic charting standards.
- User‑friendly interface with customizable display layouts.
- Calibration and set‑up are complex, requiring trained personnel and detailed documentation.
- Transducer arrays for the required frequencies can be expensive and must be matched to vessel draft.
- Advanced data processing demands higher‑end onboard computers or dedicated workstations.
- Licensing for some optional software modules adds to total ownership cost.
Sperry Marine
17Koden
12JRC
9
- Transducer face erosion
- Display backlight failure
- Sounding alarm malfunction
- Dual‑frequency operation provides both long‑range (50 kHz) and high‑resolution (200 kHz) sounding.
- Maximum depth capability of 3000 m covers most deep‑water routes and offshore operations.
- IMO approval ensures compliance with international navigation standards.
- Proven reliability in sea‑going service, especially on vessels requiring continuous deep‑water depth data.
- Transducer face erosion can increase maintenance intervals in abrasive water conditions.
- Display backlight failure has been reported, potentially affecting night‑time readability.
- Sounding alarm malfunction may require periodic functional checks to ensure safety alerts work.
- Battery degradation
- Transducer cable damage
- Water ingress in housing
- Lightweight and easily deployable on any vessel
- Battery powered – no need for ship power integration
- Quick set‑up for emergency depth checks
- Adequate resolution for shallow to moderate depths (≤300 m)
- Simple quarterly battery maintenance
- Limited maximum depth compared with hull‑mounted units
- Battery degradation can reduce reliability over time
- Transducer cable is prone to damage in rough handling
- Housing may allow water ingress if seals fail
- Not intended for continuous, long‑term operation
SAM Electronics
7Elac Nautik
6
- Legacy brand — Wärtsilä support
- Spare parts availability
- Display aging
- Dual‑frequency operation covers both shallow (high‑freq) and deep (low‑freq) water ranges
- IMO type approved, meeting international safety standards
- Robust German engineering known for long‑term reliability
- Wärtsilä after‑sales support available in many regions
- Legacy brand – limited direct manufacturer support; reliance on Wärtsilä
- Spare parts may have longer lead times or be scarce
- Display unit shows signs of aging and may not integrate easily with modern bridge systems
- Potentially less feature‑rich UI compared to newer competitors
Airmar
5Consilium Marine
5Raytheon Anschütz
5Skipper
5Skipper Electronics
5Alphatron Marine
4Deuta-Werke
4Teledyne RESON
4
- Very high cost
- Complex mounting
- Data volume management
- Very high angular resolution with 512 beams
- 200–400 kHz frequency range ideal for shallow water surveys
- Real‑time data acquisition suitable for charting and dredging operations
- Proven reliability in harbor and coastal survey projects
- Integrated with Teledyne RESON processing software suite
- High purchase and integration cost
- Complex mounting requiring precise alignment and vessel modifications
- Large data volumes demand robust storage and processing infrastructure
- Higher power and cooling requirements than low‑frequency units
- Depth capability limited compared with lower‑frequency multibeam systems
Teledyne RDI
3JMC
2ChartWorld
1Garmin Marine
1HawkEye
1MARIS
1Navico / Simrad
1Norcross
1Odom Hydrographic
1- Calibration bar checks
- Analog heave input
- Recorder issues
- Dual‑frequency operation provides both deep water (24 kHz) and high‑resolution shallow water (200 kHz) capability.
- Survey‑grade accuracy suitable for charting and engineering surveys.
- Relatively low purchase and operating cost compared with multibeam systems.
- Compact size and modest power draw allow installation on small workboats and coastal vessels.
- Single‑beam coverage limits survey speed; multiple passes required for area mapping.
- Analog heave input and recorder interfaces can be prone to calibration drift and require regular maintenance.
- Limited depth range compared with modern broadband multibeam units (typically <2000 m).
- Older electronics may lack built‑in networking (e.g., NMEA 2000) without retrofit.
OSI Maritime
1PC Maritime
1R2Sonic
1- Specialized installation
- Software licensing
- Motion sensor dependency
- Selectable 200–400 kHz frequency provides very fine resolution in depths up to ~50 m.
- Compact footprint fits small workboats and retrofits on larger vessels.
- Integrated with R2Sonic’s real‑time processing software for immediate data quality checks.
- Broad swath coverage (up to 120°) speeds up coastal survey projects.
- Requires a dedicated motion sensor package; performance degrades without precise attitude data.
- Installation is specialised and may need R2Sonic‑approved installers.
- Software operates on a licensing model, adding recurring cost.
- High‑frequency operation limits maximum depth compared with lower‑frequency multibeams.