AIS
AIS broadcasts a ship's identity, position, course and speed over VHF at short intervals, so nearby traffic and shore stations can see it independent of radar detection, which is why it works as well in a crowded anchorage as it does in open water at night.
Read more — AIS explained ▾
What Sets AIS Apart from Radar and Radio
Radar detects a target by reflection and tells the watchkeeper where something is, but not what it is or where it is heading with any certainty until it has been tracked for a while. AIS is different: each fitted ship transmits its own identity, position from GPS, course, speed and voyage details directly, so any other AIS-equipped ship or shore station receives accurate data the moment the signal is picked up, without needing line of sight the way radar does or reliance on someone answering a VHF call. The trade-off is that AIS only shows what other stations choose, or are required, to transmit; a target with its AIS switched off or a small craft under the carriage threshold remains invisible on the AIS display even though it may show clearly on radar.
Main Components
Transponder Class A
SOLAS-mandated ships carry a Class A unit, transmitting at higher power and shorter reporting intervals than the Class B units fitted on smaller leisure or fishing vessels, with priority access to the VHF data channels.
GPS Position Input
AIS relies on an internal or ship's GPS receiver for position and timing; a degraded or lost GPS fix propagates directly into every AIS target that receives the ship's transmission, an easily overlooked failure mode.
VHF Data Link Transceiver
Two dedicated marine VHF channels carry AIS traffic using a time-division scheme so multiple ships can transmit without constant collision of messages, each unit self-organising its transmission slot.
Minimum Keyboard Display or Integration
A basic AIS unit has its own minimum display for entering voyage data and viewing targets, though on most ships AIS data is overlaid onto the radar or ECDIS display rather than read from its own separate screen.
Selection and Sizing
There is no sizing calculation as with a pump or valve; the relevant decision is Class A versus Class B for vessels below the mandatory carriage threshold, and whether the installation integrates with VDR, ECDIS and radar or stands alone. Antenna placement matters more than most crews expect, since a poorly sited VHF antenna with significant mast or superstructure shadowing genuinely reduces range and reliability.
Regulations and Class
- SOLAS Chapter V, Regulation 19 requires AIS on all ships of 300 gross tonnage and above engaged on international voyages, all cargo ships of 500 gross tonnage and above on any voyage, and all passenger ships regardless of size.
- The equipment must meet IMO performance standards for AIS and be type-approved; static data such as ship name, call sign and IMO number must be kept accurate and updated after any change.
- AIS data feeds the ship's Voyage Data Recorder where fitted, and inaccurate or missing AIS data has been a factor examined in collision investigations.
Typical Faults
| Fault | Consequence |
|---|---|
| GPS antenna cable or connector corroded | Position transmitted to other ships drifts or freezes, misleading nearby traffic |
| Static data entered incorrectly after a name change or charter | Ship displays under the wrong identity to VTS and other vessels |
| VHF antenna or coax degraded | Reduced transmission range, ship effectively invisible on AIS to traffic beyond a shortened range |
| Navigation status left on a stale setting, such as anchored while under way | Other ships' collision avoidance assessment of the vessel's intentions is wrong |
What to Look for in a Supplier
- Type approval certificate for the current IMO AIS performance standard and confirmation the firmware is not an outdated revision.
- Clean integration with the ship's existing ECDIS, radar and VDR without a proprietary interface that locks out future equipment changes.
- Antenna and cable specification suited to the ship's actual mast height and VHF routing, not a generic short run assumption.
Check and correct the voyage data and navigation status fields yourself at watch handover; an AIS unit left showing the wrong destination or status for days is a small thing that looks bad the moment a VTS operator or investigator checks the record.
10 manufacturers · 10 models
AMEC
1- Display resolution
- GPS accuracy
- Service availability in Europe
- IMO‑approved Class A compliance meets mandatory SOLAS requirements
- Very low power consumption (≈12.5 W) reduces onboard energy load
- Competitive price point for budget‑focused operators
- Simple plug‑and‑play installation with standard NMEA output
- Compact unit suitable for limited bridge space
- Reported issues with display resolution on the built‑in screen
- GPS accuracy sometimes below expected maritime standards
- Limited after‑sales support and spare‑part availability in Europe
- No documented redundancy (single‑receiver architecture)
- Firmware updates may be slower compared with larger OEMs
em-trak
1
- Compact antenna limitations
- Limited display
- Service network
- Budget‑friendly price for a full Class A solution
- Low power consumption (12.5 W) suitable for small vessels
- Compact unit fits limited bridge space
- IMO‑approved performance meets regulatory requirements
- Easy integration with standard NMEA‑0183 bridge displays
- Small antenna limits effective range compared with larger AIS sets
- Limited built‑in display; requires external monitor for full functionality
- Service and support network may be sparse in some regions
- No advanced features such as AIS‑VTS, satellite AIS or dual‑frequency operation
Kongsberg
1
- Integration dependency on K-Bridge
- Standalone mode limitations
- Configuration complexity
- Full integration with Kongsberg K‑Bridge bridge suite for seamless data exchange
- IMO type‑approved Class A performance meeting SOLAS requirements
- Low power consumption (12.5 W) suitable for energy‑constrained installations
- Supports both integrated and standalone operation, offering flexibility
- Proven reliability on large commercial vessels
- Standalone mode offers reduced functionality compared with full K‑Bridge integration
- Configuration can be complex and may require specialist support
- Dependence on K‑Bridge for advanced features limits use on non‑Kongsberg bridges
- Higher acquisition cost than basic, generic AIS units
McMurdo
1- LRIT connectivity issues
- Power supply sensitivity
- GPS antenna aging
- Class A AIS compliance with IMO approval
- Combines AIS and LRIT, reducing the number of bridge installations
- Low power consumption (≈12.5 W)
- Compact, single‑point installation simplifies cabling
- Suitable for vessels that must meet both AIS and LRIT reporting
- Reported LRIT connectivity reliability issues
- Sensitive to unstable power supply conditions
- GPS antenna may age faster than the unit itself, affecting performance
- Limited redundancy compared with separate AIS and LRIT units
Saab
1
- Expensive replacement parts
- Software license expiry
- Ethernet interface issues
- Class A compliance (IMO approved) for full VTS functionality
- Low power consumption (12.5 W)
- High‑resolution target tracking suited to busy traffic areas
- Designed for integration with Saab R5 bridge displays and other bridge systems
- Robust marine‑grade construction
- Replacement parts are expensive
- Software license must be renewed periodically, adding operating cost
- Reported Ethernet interface reliability issues in some installations
- Higher upfront cost compared with basic AIS units
Sailor (Cobham)
1- VHF antenna sharing issues
- DSC interference
- Power supply sensitivity
- Seamless integration with Sailor VHF units simplifies installation and configuration
- Low power consumption (12.5 W) reduces load on the vessel's electrical system
- IMO type‑approved for SOLAS compliance, ensuring regulatory acceptance
- Compact design suitable for limited bridge space
- Proven reliability on a wide range of commercial vessels
- Requires a dedicated AIS antenna; sharing with VHF can cause performance loss
- Known DSC interference when the same VHF channel is used for both services
- Sensitive to power‑supply voltage fluctuations, necessitating stable conditioning
- Limited on‑board GNSS capability – often relies on external GPS input
SRT
1
- Limited service network
- Display resolution
- Antenna connector corrosion
- Meets full Class A AIS performance specifications
- Low power consumption (12.5 W)
- IMO approved – compliant with SOLAS/AIS regulations
- Cost‑effective option for smaller commercial vessels
- Compact installation footprint
- Limited global service and support network
- Display resolution lower than premium bridge units
- Antenna connector prone to corrosion in salty environments
- May lack advanced integration features (e.g., full NMEA 2000 bridge networking)
- Durability not proven on high‑stress, long‑haul vessels
Transas
1
- Transas to Wärtsilä transition
- Software support
- Hardware aging
- IMO‑approved Class A performance meeting SOLAS requirements
- Low power consumption (12.5 W) for continuous operation
- Seamless integration with Transas/Wärtsilä bridge displays and navigation software
- Proven reliability on a wide range of large commercial vessels
- Continued support from Wärtsilä after the Transas acquisition
- Hardware aging – units installed before 2015 may require refurbishment
- Transition issues reported when migrating from legacy Transas software to Wärtsilä platforms
- Limited availability of newer AIS VDE (VHF Data Exchange) features compared with latest competitors
- Software support depends on Wärtsilä service contracts, which can be costly in remote regions
Vesper Marine
1
- Class B power limitations
- Target capacity
- WiFi module issues
- Very low power draw (≈2 W), extending battery life on small vessels
- Compact and easy to install on recreational or small commercial boats
- Provides mandatory AIS broadcast for non‑SOLAS compliance
- Integrated Wi‑Fi output enables simple connection to bridge displays or mobile apps
- Limited transmission range and target capacity compared with Class A units
- Power output restrictions can reduce performance in high‑traffic areas
- Reported reliability issues with the built‑in Wi‑Fi module
- Not SOLAS approved, therefore unsuitable for large commercial ships
Weatherdock
1
- Limited range Class B
- USB interface issues
- Antenna quality
- Low power consumption (≈2 W) suitable for battery‑operated installations
- Plug‑and‑play USB connection simplifies integration with bridge computers or tablets
- Compact, lightweight design ideal for small workboats and inland vessels
- German engineering offers reliable build quality at a modest price point
- Class B range (typically ≤10 NM) is limited compared to Class A units
- Reported occasional USB interface stability issues under harsh vibration
- Standard antenna may be less robust for high‑wind or offshore environments
- No built‑in VHF voice channel; requires separate radio for full communication