Stern Tube Seal
A stern tube seal is the last barrier between the sea and the ship's interior where the propeller shaft passes through the hull, and unlike a bearing it is a wear item by design — the sealing lips or faces are meant to wear against a liner that must itself be renewed on a schedule.
Read more — Stern Tube Seal explained ▾
What the stern tube seal actually does
The stern tube seal keeps seawater out of the stern tube and, on oil-lubricated systems, keeps lubricating oil from leaking into the sea. It sits where the rotating propeller shaft passes through the stationary stern tube, so it must seal a moving surface continuously, at whatever depth the propeller sits below the waterline, for years between dry dockings. Two designs dominate: lip-type seals, where several spring-loaded rubber lips ride against a shaft liner, and face-type (mechanical) seals, where a rotating and a stationary carbon or bronze face are held together by springs and hydraulic pressure. Face seals tolerate more shaft misalignment and are now standard on larger tonnage; lip seals remain common on smaller vessels for their lower cost.
Main components
Seal rings or lip elements
A lip-type unit typically has an aft set of lips facing the sea and a forward set facing the stern tube lubricant, with a drain between them to catch and monitor any leakage past the outboard lips before it becomes a pollution event.
Shaft liner or sleeve
The sealing surface itself, a bronze or stainless steel liner shrunk or bonded onto the shaft, must be smooth and free of pitting; the seal element wears against this liner, not against the shaft steel.
Housing and spring-loaded faces (face seals)
In a face-type seal the housing carries the stationary ring while a rotating ring turns with the shaft, held in contact by springs; a header tank supplies sealing oil at a small positive pressure above sea pressure so any leakage path runs oil outward, not seawater inward.
Selection and sizing
The seal is matched to the shaft, not chosen independently:
- Shaft diameter and the operating depth of the propeller, which sets the sea pressure the aft seal faces must hold.
- Lubrication type of the stern tube, oil or water, since seal materials and drain arrangements differ between the two.
- Maximum allowable shaft misalignment and whirl, particularly on ships with a long, flexible shaft line.
- Air seal option for dry-docking, allowing compressed air to be admitted between seal sets so the vessel can be surveyed afloat rather than always in dry dock.
Regulations and class
MARPOL Annex I addresses oil-lubricated stern tubes as a pollution source, which is one reason the industry has shifted toward water-lubricated systems or seal designs with a monitored oil-to-sea interface. Class rules require periodic survey of the stern tube seal and shaft, typically tied to a five-year special survey cycle, with a tailshaft survey interval that can be extended if continuous shaft condition monitoring is fitted and approved. Oil content in any overboard drain from the seal system is subject to the same discharge limits as other machinery space bilge water.
Typical faults
| Fault | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Worn or hardened lip elements | Increasing seawater ingress into the stern tube, diluting or contaminating the lubricant |
| Scored or pitted shaft liner | New seal lips wear rapidly against the damaged surface and leakage returns within months |
| Loss of sealing oil header pressure | Pressure balance reverses, allowing seawater to enter past the aft face seal |
| Shaft misalignment beyond seal tolerance | Uneven wear on the sealing faces and premature failure on one side only |
| Blocked drain between lip sets | Leakage is not detected early because the monitoring point itself is fouled |
What to look for in a supplier
- Exact liner and seal dimensions matched to the shaft as fitted, since aftermarket seals built to a slightly different tolerance shorten life significantly.
- Experience with underwater seal replacement by divers where dry-docking is not scheduled, if the vessel needs the work done afloat.
- Availability of the correct sealing oil grade and a supply plan for the header tank, not just the seal hardware itself.
- A record of class approval for the specific seal type, since an unapproved substitute can complicate the tailshaft survey.
Track the trend in stern tube oil consumption and water content over months, not just the pass or fail at survey; a slowly rising water percentage in the lubricant is the seal telling you it is wearing out long before it leaks visibly.
Typical Manufacturers
5 manufacturers · 12 models
SKF
8- Compact design saves space within the stern tube assembly
- Integrated bearing support simplifies installation and alignment
- Low friction reduces power loss and improves fuel efficiency
- Replaceable sealing elements enable straightforward maintenance
- SKF’s proven material quality offers long service intervals
- Limited to shaft diameters up to about 250 mm, unsuitable for larger shafts
- Single‑lip configuration provides lower pressure capability than some double‑lip designs
- Requires precise alignment during installation to avoid premature wear
- May need a dedicated lubrication system for optimal performance
- Higher initial purchase price compared with basic rubber lip seals
- Very small axial length – ideal where space inside the stern tube is restricted
- Dual‑lip, spring‑loaded design gives reliable sealing over a wide pressure range
- Low friction and reduced wear extend service intervals and lower maintenance costs
- Easy retrofit onto existing SKF bearing arrangements; compatible with standard lubrication systems
- Robust against moderate shaft misalignment and vibration
- Higher unit cost compared with basic single‑lip seals
- Installation requires careful alignment and torque control to achieve full performance
- Limited to shaft diameters up to about 400 mm; not suitable for larger shafts
- May need a dedicated seal oil supply or pressure regulator in some applications
- Not intended for extremely high‑speed shafts (>200 rpm) where heat buildup can be critical
- Compact design saves installation space in the stern tube area
- Integrated bearing reduces component count and simplifies maintenance
- Low friction operation improves propeller efficiency
- Optimised for shaft diameters up to 400 mm with high sealing reliability
- Oil‑lubricated system provides easy routine servicing
- Rated primarily for medium‑speed vessels; not ideal for high‑speed applications
- Maximum pressure rating lower than heavy‑duty, high‑thrust seals
- Requires precise alignment and correct oil supply during installation
- Higher initial purchase cost compared with basic lip seals
- Not suitable for shafts larger than 500 mm
- Very small axial length – allows reduced stern‑tube diameter and saves space
- Low friction carbon/metal sealing faces give high efficiency and low power loss
- Oil‑lubricated design provides excellent wear resistance and long service intervals
- Rated for pressures up to ~30 bar, suitable for most medium‑speed marine applications
- Straight‑forward installation with SKF’s standard mounting kit
- Requires a reliable oil supply system; not suited for water‑lubricated installations
- Maximum shaft speed limited (typically ≤200 rpm) – unsuitable for high‑speed shafts
- Higher upfront cost compared with simple lip seals or basic mechanical seals
- Installation tolerances are tight; misalignment can lead to premature wear
- Limited temperature range relative to some specialty ceramic‑ceramic seals
- Very small axial length – saves valuable stern‑tube space on crowded hulls
- Integrated bearing reduces the need for separate thrust bearings
- Low friction and low power loss compared with larger mechanical seals
- Proven SKF material technology gives good resistance to seawater corrosion
- Standardised mounting simplifies installation and replacement
- Designed primarily for moderate‑speed vessels; not ideal for high‑speed (>12 kn) applications
- Maximum pressure rating lower than that of full‑size mechanical seals
- Requires regular oil lubrication monitoring to maintain seal performance
- Not suited for extreme temperature or highly aggressive media beyond normal seawater
- Initial purchase price higher than basic lip‑seal solutions
- Continuous oil film reduces friction and wear on the seal faces
- High reliability with low leakage rates even at high shaft speeds
- Long service intervals; compatible with standard SKF bearings
- Simple installation – fits standard stern tube dimensions for 300 mm shafts
- Class‑approved designs available for major classification societies
- Requires a reliable oil supply and pressure control system
- Sensitive to oil contamination; filtration must be maintained
- Higher initial cost compared with basic water‑lubricated seals
- Not suitable where oil is limited or prohibited (e.g., some environmentally sensitive vessels)
- Installation tolerances are tighter than for simple mechanical seals
- Proven reliability in high‑pressure marine environments
- Self‑adjusting lip accommodates minor misalignment and shaft wear
- Low friction reduces power loss and shaft heating
- Long service intervals when supplied with clean lubricating oil
- Requires a dedicated oil supply, filtration and monitoring system
- Potential for oil leakage if the lubrication circuit is not properly maintained
- Higher upfront cost compared with simple mechanical seals
- Provides a constant film of oil, reducing wear and extending seal life on large-diameter shafts.
- Low friction torque loss compared with many mechanical seals.
- Can accommodate slight misalignment and axial movement without leakage.
- Proven track record in marine propulsion applications; compatible with existing SKF oil‑lubrication systems.
- Requires a dedicated oil supply, filtration and pressure monitoring system.
- Potential for oil leakage if the lubrication circuit fails or is improperly maintained.
- Higher initial cost and installation complexity than dry mechanical seals.
- Maintenance intervals depend on oil quality; contaminated oil can accelerate wear.
Blohm+Voss
1- Chromium liner scoring
- Seal ring wear
- Oil leakage
- Spring failure
- Compact design reduces overall stern tube length and bearing load on the shaft.
- Integrated spring maintains constant contact pressure, improving seal reliability over a range of operating speeds.
- Chromium liner offers good wear resistance and low friction for medium‑speed shafts.
- Seal rings are designed for straightforward replacement during scheduled dry‑dock periods.
- Reported scoring of the chromium liner can lead to premature wear if alignment is poor.
- Seal ring material may wear faster than expected in high‑temperature oil environments.
- Spring fatigue has been observed, resulting in loss of sealing pressure and oil leakage.
- Limited to specific shaft diameter ranges; not suitable for very large or high‑power shafts.
Duramax
1
- Seal lip degradation
- Shaft liner groove wear
- Aft seal seawater ingress
- Robust dual‑lip construction provides redundancy against seal failure
- Corrosion‑resistant elastomer and metal components extend service life in seawater environments
- Standardized dimensions fit a wide range of shaft diameters, simplifying retrofits
- Low maintenance interval; only visual inspection required at each dry‑dock
- Proven track record on medium‑speed propulsion systems
- Requires precise alignment during installation; misalignment can accelerate wear
- Higher friction torque compared with some oil‑free or magnetic seals
- Aft seal may be prone to seawater ingress if inspection is neglected
- Limited operating temperature range relative to specialty high‑temp seals
- Unit cost higher than basic single‑lip alternatives
Kemel
1
- Seal face wear
- Stuffing box leak
- Spring corrosion
- Robust mechanical design with proven service history in merchant vessels
- Straightforward installation and alignment procedures
- Oil consumption can be monitored for early leak detection
- Compatible with a wide range of shaft diameters used on medium‑speed propulsion systems
- Relatively low initial cost compared with more complex oil‑free designs
- Seal face wear is a common failure mode, requiring periodic inspection and possible re‑grinding or replacement
- Spring corrosion can occur in high‑sulphur or contaminated oil environments
- Oil leakage risk if oil consumption monitoring is not performed diligently
- Limited to conventional shaft line configurations; not suitable for podded or azipod drives
- May require higher maintenance intervals than advanced magnetic or oil‑free seals
Wärtsilä
1
- Seal lip wear
- Air pressure loss
- Oil leakage to sea (environmental!)
- Spring deterioration
- Very low risk of oil leakage to the sea, supporting environmental compliance
- Simple mechanical design with no rotating seals, reducing wear points
- Seal lip can be inspected and replaced without major disassembly, easing maintenance
- Operates on modest air pressure (0.2 bar over draught) and integrates with existing ship air systems
- Proven performance on a range of vessel classes
- Requires a reliable compressed‑air supply; loss of pressure leads to immediate leakage risk
- Seal lip wear and spring deterioration need regular monitoring and replacement
- Less suitable for very high shaft speeds or highly vibratory installations where the air cushion may be disturbed
- Higher initial purchase cost compared with basic mechanical seals
- Needs precise pressure control equipment and routine checks