"> Tank Cleaning System (COW/Butterworth) - Equipment Database

Tank Cleaning System (COW/Butterworth)

high IMO Required 13 models total

Crude oil washing uses the cargo itself, pumped hot through fixed machines, to strip wax and sludge from tank walls during discharge, while Butterworth machines wash with seawater or slop between voyages; both share the same rotating nozzle hardware but serve different points in the cargo cycle.

Read more — Tank Cleaning System (COW/Butterworth) explained

What makes this type

Tank cleaning systems on tankers use fixed, remotely or hydraulically driven rotating nozzle machines mounted through the tank top to wash internal surfaces without anyone entering the tank. Crude oil washing (COW) uses heated crude cargo, drawn from the ship's own cargo system during discharge, as the washing medium; the oil dissolves wax and paraffin deposits that plain water cannot touch, and MARPOL made COW mandatory on eligible new crude carriers because it recovers cargo residue instead of discharging it. Butterworth machines, named after the original manufacturer but now a generic term, wash with seawater or recycled slop and are used for product change, gas-freeing preparation, or general tank cleaning where crude washing does not apply. Both use the same basic mechanism: a programmed or continuously rotating nozzle head delivering high-pressure jets in a pattern that covers the full tank internal surface over a wash cycle.

Fixed tank cleaning machine arrangement
Section through a cargo tank showing a deck-mounted tank cleaning machine with its drive unit, the lance and rotating nozzle lowered into the tank, the supply line, and the programmed spray pattern reaching the tank shell.

Main components

Deck-mounted machine and hydraulic or mechanical drive

Sits on a deck stool above a tank cleaning opening, driven by a hydraulic motor or, on older mechanical types, by water turbine action from the jet itself.

Rotating nozzle head

Produces a two-plane rotation pattern so the jet sweeps the full internal surface over a programmed cycle time, typically covering the tank in one or more fixed-height positions or a continuous programmable pattern.

Supply piping and heating arrangement

Delivers washing medium at the required pressure and, for COW, at elevated temperature drawn from the cargo heating system.

Portable vs fixed machines

Fixed machines are permanently piped in; portable machines are rigged through deck openings for spot cleaning where fixed coverage is insufficient.

Control station

Local or remote control of wash sequence, pressure and duration, interlocked on COW systems with inert gas and oxygen content monitoring in the tank.

Selection / Sizing

  • Tank geometry and internal structure (stringers, swash bulkheads) that determine machine placement and number of positions needed for full coverage.
  • Required wash pressure and flow rate, generally higher for COW to achieve adequate oil-jet cleaning energy.
  • Cargo type range: COW is only applicable to crude oil cargoes; product and chemical tankers rely on Butterworth-type washing exclusively.
  • Compatibility with the ship's tank cleaning heater and cargo pump capacity, since COW draws directly from the cargo system.

Regulations / Class

MARPOL Annex I requires COW systems and a COW operations and equipment manual on eligible new crude oil tankers, with the wash pattern and machine coverage subject to approval as part of that manual. Tank atmosphere must be monitored for oxygen content during COW operations per the manual's procedures, since washing crude in an enriched atmosphere is a well-known explosion risk. Classification societies survey the fixed piping, machine mountings and heating arrangement as part of the cargo system survey.

Typical faults

FaultConsequence
Nozzle bearing wear causing erratic or stalled rotationUneven coverage leaves wax and sludge patches, increasing manual cleaning burden and gas-freeing time
Hydraulic drive seal failureLoss of drive pressure, machine stops mid-cycle, oil contamination of the hydraulic system
Deck stool or gland leakageVapour or product leak at deck level, a fire and pollution risk during operation
Heating coil scaling reducing wash medium temperatureReduced COW cleaning effectiveness, more residue left for manual mucking
Program controller fault on programmable machinesMachine defaults to a fixed spray position, missing sections of the tank surface

What to look for in a supplier

  • Documented coverage pattern calculations for the specific tank geometry, not a generic machine placement drawing.
  • Spares and service support recognising yard-standard interchangeability requirements on many fleets.
  • Materials compatible with the cargo range if the ship also carries chemicals or specialty products through the same tanks.
  • Track record with the class society's COW manual approval process, since a poorly documented submission delays newbuilding delivery.

A machine that sounds different on start-up, even briefly, is usually a bearing going before it is a drive fault; log it and inspect at the next tank entry rather than waiting for it to stall mid-wash.

4000h
Service Interval

Typical Manufacturers

Scanjet Cloud

4 manufacturers · 13 models

Scanjet

6
Scanjet Scanjet SC30T Tank Cleaning Machine
Scanjet SC30T Tank Cleaning Machine
30 m³/h at 8 bar · Marine Equipment · centrifugal pump tank cleaning system
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Nozzle wear/erosion
  • Turbine bearing seizure
  • Drive shaft seal leak
Service: Nozzle replacement every 2000 hrs COW service. Disassemble and inspect annually.
Spare Parts: Scanjet: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • High flow rate provides efficient crude and product tank cleaning
  • Modular nozzle design allows quick replacement (recommended every 2000 hrs)
  • Annual disassembly enables thorough inspection of turbine bearings and shaft seals
  • Compatible with standard Butterworth couplings for easy integration
Weaknesses
  • Nozzle wear/erosion can increase operating costs if not monitored
  • Turbine bearing seizure has been reported, requiring vigilant maintenance
  • Drive‑shaft seal leaks may develop if annual inspection is missed
  • Requires scheduled nozzle replacement to maintain performance
Typical Vessels: Oil tankerProduct tankerChemical tanker
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven COW system with easy‑replaceable nozzles and routine inspection points on oil or chemical tankers. Avoid if: you prefer low‑maintenance designs without turbine bearings or if you cannot commit to the recommended 2000 hr nozzle change interval.
Use Cases: The SC30T is typically installed on crude carriers, product tankers and chemical tankers for regular cargo oil washing, ballast water cleaning, and pre‑loading tank preparation in ports where compliance with IMO COW regulations is required.
Scanjet SC30 Tank Cleaning Machine unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_jet
Coverage
small
Medium
crude_oil_wash
Programmable tank cleaning machine (small tanks)
Scanjet SC40 Tank Cleaning Machine unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_jet
Coverage
medium
Medium
crude_oil_wash
Programmable tank cleaning machine (medium tanks)
Scanjet SC50 Tank Cleaning Machine unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_jet
Coverage
medium-large
Medium
crude_oil_wash
Programmable tank cleaning machine (medium-large tanks)
Scanjet SC60 Tank Cleaning Machine unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_jet
Coverage
large
Medium
crude_oil_wash
Programmable tank cleaning machine (large tanks)
Scanjet SC75 Tank Cleaning Machine unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_jet
Coverage
extra-large
Medium
crude_oil_wash
Programmable tank cleaning machine (extra-large tanks)

Alfa Laval

5
Alfa Laval Gamajet VIII Tank Cleaning unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_impingement
rotary impingement, 360 deg coverage
Alfa Laval Gamajet D Tank Cleaning unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_impingement
compact rotary impingement
Alfa Laval Toftejorg TZ-80 Tank Cleaning unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_impingement
large tank, COW-approved
Alfa Laval Toftejorg TZ-53 Tank Cleaning unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_impingement
medium tank
Alfa Laval Toftejorg Sani Mega Tank Cleaning unverified
· COW / hot water
Cleaning type
rotary_impingement
high-impact cleaning

Cloud

1
Cloud Cloud AE-44 Tank Cleaning Machine
Cloud AE-44 Tank Cleaning Machine
35 m³/h at 10 bar · Marine Equipment · Butterworth COW system
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Gear drive internal wear
  • Nozzle plugging
  • Shadow zone coverage issues
Service: Pressure test after overhaul. Inspect gear drive at dry-dock.
Spare Parts: Cloud: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • Integrated gear‑drive pump provides consistent high pressure for effective crude oil removal
  • Modular nozzle arrangement allows quick change‑over between cleaning patterns
  • Compact footprint fits within existing tank vent manifolds on medium‑size tankers
  • Designed for both water and steam cleaning modes, giving operational flexibility
Weaknesses
  • Gear drive prone to internal wear requiring regular dry‑dock inspection
  • Nozzle plugging reported in high‑viscosity crude washes, increasing downtime
  • Shadow‑zone coverage can be incomplete without supplemental portable units
  • Maintenance intervals are shorter than some competing screw‑compressor designs
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerChemical Tanker (when equipped for compatible fluids)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven COW system with integrated high‑pressure pump and have dry‑dock capacity for gear‑drive inspection. Avoid if: your operation cannot tolerate frequent gear‑drive maintenance or requires guaranteed full‑coverage cleaning without supplemental equipment.
Use Cases: The AE-44 is typically installed on mid‑size crude oil tankers (30 000–80 000 dwt) to perform onboard washing of cargo tanks after discharge, reducing shore‑based cleaning costs and complying with MARPOL Annex I requirements.

Kongsberg

1
Kongsberg Maritime AS Avd Skonnertvegen K-Gauge Tank Gauging System
K-Gauge Tank Gauging System
Per Hersteller-Datenblatt · Marine Equipment · Radar-based tank gauging system
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Ladepumpen-Verschleiß durch abrasives Ladegut
  • Ladeleitungs-Ventil-Undichtigkeit
  • Inertgas-System O2-Analysator Kalibrierungsdrift
  • Tankreinigungs-Düsen-Erosion
Service: Ladepumpen-Leistungstest jährlich. Ventildichtigkeit-Test jährlich. MARPOL Oil Record Book Dokumentation.
Spare Parts: Kongsberg Maritime AS Avd Skonnertvegen: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • ±0.5 % level accuracy across a wide range of liquids, including crude oil and chemicals
  • Full integration with Kongsberg’s cargo management suite and ship automation (e.g., inert‑gas monitoring)
  • Remote diagnostics and data logging simplify compliance with MARPOL Oil Record Book requirements
  • Robust housing certified for harsh marine environments; low maintenance compared to mechanical gauges
  • DNV‑approved class documentation simplifies installation approvals
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than traditional float or dip‑stick gauges
  • Installation requires precise sensor alignment and may involve structural modifications to tank heads
  • Dependence on electronic components makes the system vulnerable to power surges or EMI without proper protection
  • Specialized training needed for calibration, troubleshooting, and firmware updates
  • Spare parts (radar transducers) are not as widely stocked as mechanical gauge components
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerChemical tanker
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high‑resolution, real‑time tank level data for strict cargo accounting, regulatory compliance (MARPOL), and integration with existing Kongsberg automation. Avoid if: budget constraints favor low‑cost mechanical gauges or the vessel’s operational profile does not demand continuous monitoring.
Use Cases: The system is commonly installed on newbuild oil and chemical tankers to meet class society requirements for cargo measurement, support automated loading/unloading sequences, and provide accurate data for ballast planning and stability calculations. It is also retrofitted on existing vessels undergoing upgrades to digital cargo management systems.