Water Mist System
A water mist system fights fire with a fine spray at 80-200 bar rather than a flood of water or gas, cooling the fire and displacing oxygen locally without the total-space evacuation risk of CO2 or the weight penalty of a flooding foam system.
Read more — Water Mist System explained ▾
What sets water mist apart from other fixed suppression
Where a CO2 flooding system displaces the oxygen in an entire compartment and a foam system blankets a surface, a water mist system atomises water into droplets small enough, typically under 200 microns, to absorb heat by rapid evaporation and locally starve the fire of oxygen as steam expands, while still being water that a crew can safely walk through, unlike CO2. High-pressure systems such as HI-FOG use pump units at 80-140 bar; low-pressure systems run closer to 10-15 bar with larger droplets and rely more on cooling than on oxygen displacement. The choice between them shapes pipe sizing, pump selection and nozzle spacing throughout the design.
Main components
Pump unit
Electrically or diesel driven positive-displacement pump raising fresh or sea water to system working pressure, usually duplicated for redundancy with an emergency power connection.
Water supply and tank
A dedicated fresh water tank sized to the design duration, commonly 30 minutes for machinery spaces, sometimes topped up from a sea water connection for extended discharge.
Section valves and distribution piping
Each protected zone has its own section valve, so a fire in one machinery space or cabin zone triggers only that section rather than the whole ship.
Nozzles
Open or closed sprinkler-type nozzles depending on application; engine rooms typically use open nozzles on a deluge principle triggered by the detection system, while accommodation zones often use closed, heat-activated nozzles similar to a conventional sprinkler.
Detection and control panel
Linked to the ship's fire detection system so that a confirmed alarm in a zone automatically opens that zone's section valve and starts the pump.
Selection and sizing
System choice depends on the protected space: engine rooms and pump rooms with three-dimensional fire risk favour high-pressure total flooding mist; accommodation and cabin areas are commonly protected as an alternative to conventional sprinklers under SOLAS II-2/10, using the same detection zoning as the fire alarm system. Nozzle density and section valve zoning are set by the system's type approval test protocol for the specific hazard category, not by a generic rule of thumb.
Regulations and class
Water mist systems used as an alternative to fixed sprinkler or CO2 systems must meet the performance standard in IMO MSC/Circ.1165, or the equivalent revised guidelines, and are approved against fire test protocols rather than prescriptive pipe-sizing rules, since droplet size and pressure vary by manufacturer. FSS Code Chapter 8 covers fixed water-based systems generally, with SOLAS II-2/10 setting out where a fixed system is required by ship type and space. Annual servicing and a manufacturer-specified overhaul of the pump unit and nozzles is typical under class-approved maintenance schemes.
Typical faults
- Nozzle blockage from scale or paint overspray during maintenance: reduced or absent discharge from that nozzle in a real fire, often undetected until the next test.
- Section valve seized closed: a whole zone loses protection even though the pump and panel test normally.
- Pump unit accumulator or pressure switch drift: delayed pump start, slower buildup to design pressure after activation.
- Fresh water tank low or contaminated: insufficient discharge duration, or nozzle fouling from sediment.
- Detection zone mismatch after a space reconfiguration: new equipment or bulkheads added without updating nozzle coverage.
What to look for in a supplier
- Type approval certificate referencing the specific hazard category, machinery space, accommodation or galley duct, the ship needs protected.
- Documented fire test basis for the nozzle and pressure combination, since water mist performance is not interchangeable between manufacturers.
- Spare nozzle and section valve availability matched to the installed system, not a generic replacement.
- Service network capable of the pump unit's specified overhaul interval without shipping the whole unit ashore.
Check nozzle orifices for paint or scale every time the space is worked on, not just at the annual service - a partially blocked nozzle looks fine on a pressure test but delivers almost nothing in a real discharge.
3 manufacturers · 9 models
Marioff
4Marioff (Carrier)
4- High-pressure pump failure
- Nozzle blockage from water quality
- Accumulator pre-charge loss
- Control valve stiction
- Extremely low water consumption compared with conventional sprinkler systems, reducing flood damage in cargo holds.
- Fast fire knock‑down due to rapid droplet evaporation and heat absorption.
- Meets SOLAS requirements for cargo space protection (IMO D‑2 approved).
- Environmentally benign – no chemicals or halons are used.
- Can be integrated with ship automation for remote activation and monitoring.
- Requires continuous supply of demineralised water; poor water quality can cause nozzle blockage.
- High‑pressure pump and accumulator need regular testing and maintenance (annual pump test, 5‑year nozzle inspection).
- Initial capital cost is higher than traditional CO₂ or foam systems.
- Less effective on certain hazardous cargoes that demand foam or inert gas suppression.
- Control valve stiction can delay full discharge if not inspected regularly.
- HP pump seal failure
- Nozzle blockage
- Section valve malfunction
- Water tank contamination
- SOLAS D‑2 approved – meets international safety regulations for engine rooms
- Environmentally friendly – no CO₂ or halogen agents, low runoff volume
- Fast response and high heat absorption efficiency at 140 bar pressure
- Compact installation footprint compared to traditional CO₂ cylinders
- Reduced collateral water damage due to fine mist droplets
- Requires robust high‑pressure components; higher initial capital cost
- Sensitive to water quality – nozzle blockage and pump seal failures reported if not maintained
- Annual pump and nozzle testing adds operational overhead
- Less effective on Class D (metal) fires compared with dry powder systems
- Dependence on a clean, dedicated water tank; contamination can impair performance
- Nozzle blockage from hard water
- Pump motor failure
- Section valve leak
- Extremely low water consumption (≈0.5 L/min per nozzle) reduces damage to equipment and furnishings.
- Fast fire knock‑down; most compartment fires suppressed within 30 seconds of activation.
- Human‑safe: no toxic chemicals, safe for occupied spaces during discharge.
- Meets IMO SOLAS FSS Code requirements for accommodation fire protection on passenger vessels.
- Fine mist penetrates concealed voids and quickly cools the fire zone.
- Nozzles are prone to blockage if supplied water is hard or contains sediments; requires strict water‑quality monitoring.
- High‑pressure pump and motor demand regular preventive maintenance and spare parts inventory.
- Initial capital cost higher than conventional sprinkler systems.
- System testing and certification intervals are more rigorous, adding operational overhead.
- Section valve leaks have been reported if corrosion control is inadequate.
- HP nozzle clogging
- Accumulator bladder failure
- Detection sensor contamination
- Instant discharge of fine mist at 140 bar suppresses fire within milliseconds
- No chemical agents; environmentally friendly and safe for crew
- Low water consumption compared with conventional sprinkler systems, reducing engine damage
- Compact design fits in tight engine‑room spaces around turbochargers
- SOLAS approved, meeting international safety standards
- High‑pressure pump increases power demand and maintenance requirements
- Nozzles can clog if water quality is poor; requires filtration
- Accumulator bladder may fail and needs periodic inspection/replacement
- Detection sensors can become contaminated by oil/grease, affecting reliability
- Limited protection scope – only turbocharger casings, not full‑engine compartments
Danfoss (Semco)
1- Pump pressure fluctuation
- Nozzle orifice blockage
- Section valve failure
- Very low water consumption compared with conventional sprinkler systems
- Fast fire knock‑down due to fine droplet size (≈50–200 µm)
- Compact pump and nozzle package – saves valuable deck space
- IMO SOLAS approved for machinery spaces, cargo holds and accommodation areas
- Minimal post‑fire water damage, reducing clean‑up time
- Requires high‑pressure pumps that need regular maintenance and skilled service personnel
- Nozzle orifice can become blocked if feed water quality is not properly filtered
- System coverage per module is limited; large spaces may need several zones and additional piping
- Higher upfront capital cost than traditional sprinkler systems
- Periodic performance testing is mandatory to retain certification