Bollard
A bollard is a fixed steel post welded to the deck for taking a mooring line's eye or bight, simple in principle, but its holding capacity depends entirely on how well the load is spread into the deck structure beneath it, not on the casting alone.
Read more — Bollard explained ▾
What sets a bollard apart
A bollard looks like the simplest piece of equipment on deck, but it carries some of the highest concentrated loads a ship's structure sees: the full pull of a mooring line, sometimes two lines crossed on the same pair of posts, transmitted through a small footprint into the deck plating. What makes a bollard fit for purpose is not the casting itself, which is usually a straightforward design, but the doubler plates, brackets and reinforcement welded beneath the deck to spread that load into the surrounding structure. A bollard bolted or welded onto unreinforced deck plating will eventually tear the plating around its base long before the casting itself fails. This is the key distinction from other deck fittings such as padeyes or fairleads: a bollard is rated by the mooring line load path through the whole local structure, not by the strength of the fitting in isolation.
Main types
- Single bollard — one post, used for lighter duty or where deck space is tight
- Double (twin) bollard — the standard mooring bollard, two posts on a common base allowing a line to be figure-eighted for a secure, adjustable hold
- Bitts — a related fitting, typically lower and heavier, common at the towing point or where very high loads concentrate
- Warping drum end posts — bollards that double as a powered warping point on some vessels
Selection and sizing
- Safe working load matched to the mooring line pull the fitting is expected to take, per the ship's mooring arrangement plan
- Base plate and underdeck reinforcement designed together with the bollard, not specified as separate items
- Post diameter and height suited to the mooring line size actually used, so the line does not chafe on a post that is too small
- Position relative to fairleads, so the mooring line runs at a fair lead angle rather than across a sharp edge
Regulations and class
Classification society rules for mooring equipment set the required safe working loads for bollards based on the ship's equipment number, and specify how the load is to be verified through the deck structure, not just the casting. Survey checks include visual inspection for cracking at the weld toe between bollard and deck, a common fatigue point given the cyclic loading mooring lines apply.
Typical faults
| Fault | Cause | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Weld cracking at the base | Fatigue from repeated mooring loads, or a single overload event | Progressive weakening, risk of the bollard tearing free under load |
| Deck plating deformation around the base | Inadequate underdeck reinforcement for the loads actually applied | Local structural damage that can spread if not repaired |
| Wasted or grooved post surface | Years of mooring line chafe against the same contact point | Reduced post diameter concentrates load on the mooring line and accelerates line wear |
| Corrosion at the deck-to-base joint | Trapped moisture at a poorly sealed base joint | Hidden thinning of the base plate, only found on close inspection |
What to look for in a supplier
- A bollard supplied with a matching underdeck reinforcement drawing, not the casting alone
- Safe working load certification tied to the ship's actual equipment number, not a generic catalogue rating
- Post dimensions suited to the mooring line size in service, confirmed against current line diameter rather than the original build specification if lines have since changed
- Welding procedure and material grade compatible with the surrounding deck steel
Look under the deck, not just at the bollard, during inspection: cracking or deformation in the reinforcement below is often the true early warning, and it is invisible from the deck surface where everyone normally looks.
1 manufacturers · 5 models
Generic (Class Approved)
5- Foundation weld cracking
- Bollard body corrosion
- Base plate wastage
- High SWL (50 t) suitable for large vessels
- Robust cast‑steel construction offers good impact resistance
- Class approved – meets basic regulatory requirements
- Simple single‑bollard design simplifies installation and maintenance
- Allows routine NDT of foundation welds during dry‑dock periods
- Foundation welds prone to cracking if not properly designed or inspected
- Cast steel can suffer corrosion in aggressive marine environments without diligent coating upkeep
- Base plate wear may require periodic resurfacing or replacement
- Single‑point arrangement limits flexibility for multi‑line mooring arrangements
- Heavy deadweight may necessitate deck reinforcement on lighter vessels
- Foundation bolt elongation
- Horn tip cracking
- Base corrosion
- High SWL (100 t) provides ample margin for large vessels and heavy towing loads
- Double‑bollard arrangement offers redundancy; one side can be used while the other remains secured
- Robust cast‑steel construction gives excellent impact resistance and long service life
- Class approval simplifies regulatory acceptance during vessel surveys
- Standard bolt‑on foundation allows retrofit to existing deck structures
- Heavy overall weight increases deck reinforcement requirements
- Known failure modes include foundation bolt elongation, horn tip cracking and base corrosion if not inspected regularly
- Double configuration occupies more deck space than a single bollard
- Requires annual torque check of foundation bolts and periodic NDT of horn tips at dry‑dock
- Horn root cracking
- Foundation deformation
- Paint system failure
- High SWL (150 t) suitable for large vessels and offshore units
- Double arrangement allows two lines on a single fitting, reducing deck clutter
- Robust cast‑steel construction provides long service life when properly maintained
- Class approval ensures compliance with statutory mooring requirements
- Straightforward NDT access to horn roots for condition monitoring
- Large footprint can limit placement on vessels with restricted deck space
- Horn‑root cracking reported if inspection and repaint cycles are missed
- Foundation must be engineered to resist deformation under high loads
- Requires regular dry‑dock NDT and high‑build paint system, increasing maintenance cost
- Heavy weight adds to overall vessel deadweight (exact figure not disclosed)
- Foundation stress cracking
- Horn misalignment from impact
- Corrosion under paint
- High working load (200 t) suitable for large vessels and offshore units
- Triple arrangement allows simultaneous handling of multiple lines
- Robust cast‑steel construction with class approval ensures structural integrity
- Straightforward NDT inspection at dry‑dock
- Can be realigned after impact without full replacement
- Foundation stress can cause cracking if not properly engineered
- Horn may become misaligned after vessel or tug impact
- Potential for corrosion under paint if maintenance is neglected
- Requires substantial deck reinforcement and foundation work
- Large footprint limits placement on smaller vessels
- Surface wear from rope friction
- Foundation corrosion
- Paint wear
- High strength-to-weight ratio due to cast steel construction
- Kidney shape accommodates multiple rope angles, enhancing mooring flexibility
- Suitable for heavy-duty applications with an 80-tonne SWL
- Can be used on a variety of vessel types for mooring operations
- Annual repainting and regular polishing of contact surfaces can extend its lifespan
- Surface wear from rope friction can lead to maintenance needs
- Foundation corrosion is a potential issue if not properly installed or maintained
- Requires regular maintenance to prevent paint wear and ensure longevity
- May not be suitable for vessels requiring bollards with higher SWL
- Cast steel construction may be heavier than other materials