Power Management System
A power management system decides which generators run, shares load between them, and sheds non-essential consumers before an overload trips the whole board, turning what would otherwise be a manual watchkeeping task into an automatic sequence measured in seconds.
Read more — Power Management System explained ▾
What makes this type
A power management system (PMS) is the control layer sitting above the generator and switchboard protection relays, deciding automatically which generators start, stop, synchronise and share load, and which consumers get shed if demand exceeds available capacity. It is distinct from the switchboard protection itself: protection relays trip breakers to prevent damage after a fault, while the PMS tries to prevent the fault condition, an overload or blackout, from happening in the first place by managing load ahead of time. On ships with dynamic positioning or heavy dredging and crane loads, the PMS is what keeps generator loading within safe limits as demand swings rapidly, rather than relying on an engineer to bring a standby set on line manually in time.
Main components
Load sharing controller
Compares real and reactive load between running generators and trims governor and AVR setpoints so each set carries its proportional share, typically holding kW sharing within a few percent.
Automatic synchroniser
Matches voltage, frequency and phase of an incoming generator to the busbar before closing the breaker, either check-synchronising or running full auto-sync sequences.
Load-dependent start/stop logic
Starts standby generators as load approaches a set threshold and stops surplus sets once load falls, based on configurable margins and timers to avoid hunting.
Load shedding module
Trips pre-ranked non-essential consumers, in priority tiers, the instant available generation falls below demand, to prevent a full blackout.
Blackout recovery / preferential trip sequence
Automatically restarts and resynchronises generators and restores essential loads in a fixed order after a blackout, rather than leaving that sequence to be done manually under pressure.
Selection / Sizing
- Number of generators and their individual and combined kW/kVA rating, which sets the sharing and shedding logic thresholds.
- DP class notation (if any): DP2/DP3 vessels need PMS logic that respects single-failure criteria, isolating faults to one bus section.
- Interface requirements with the integrated automation system and any thruster or drilling load management already on board.
- Redundancy of the PMS controller itself: a single PMS controller failure should not be able to blackout the ship.
- Configurability of load shedding priority tables to match the actual consumer list, not a generic default.
Regulations / Class
Classification societies require documented load shedding and blackout recovery arrangements as part of the electrical installation survey, and DP-notated vessels have additional requirements under the class DP notation (such as DNV DYNPOS or ABS DPS) covering independence between redundant power groups. SOLAS Ch. II-1 requires an emergency source of power independent of the main PMS logic. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is typically required for DP2/DP3 vessels to demonstrate that a single PMS fault cannot cause loss of position.
Typical faults
| Fault | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Load sharing drift between governors from ageing sensors | One generator carries disproportionate load, running hotter and closer to overload trip |
| Shedding priority table not updated after a refit added consumers | Essential load gets shed, or a non-essential load survives and worsens an overload |
| Synchroniser check-sync window set too tight | Standby generator repeatedly fails to close onto the bus, delaying load pickup |
| Software logic corruption or unbacked parameter changes after commissioning | Unpredictable start/stop or shed behaviour discovered only during an actual overload event |
| Loss of communication between PMS and generator controllers | System falls back to manual mode without alerting the watchkeeper in time |
What to look for in a supplier
- A track record of PMS integration with the specific generator and switchboard manufacturer already on board, not just a generic controller.
- FMEA documentation available for DP-classed vessels, ready to submit to class and the DP verification body.
- On-board configurability of shedding tables and start/stop thresholds without requiring a factory visit for every change.
- Redundant controller architecture for vessels where a single PMS fault is not an acceptable risk.
After any change to the ship's consumer list, walk the load shedding priority table again; a PMS that still sheds by an outdated list is worse than no automatic shedding at all, because the crew trusts it.
8 manufacturers · 13 models
Kongsberg Maritime
4ABB
2Kongsberg
2- Generatorwicklung-Isolationsdegradation
- AVR Spannungsregler-Fehlfunktion
- Kupplung Schwingungsdämpfer Verschleiß
- Gleichstrommaschine Bürstenverschleiß
- Highly modular – can be scaled from small vessels to large multi‑generator ships
- Unified HMI gives crew a single view of all power assets, reducing workload
- Built‑in redundancy and automatic load‑sharing improve reliability and fuel efficiency
- Remote diagnostics and data logging simplify maintenance planning
- Class‑approved (DNV) with documented installation guidelines
- High upfront capital cost compared with basic generator controllers
- Complex installation and commissioning require specialised Kongsberg support
- Training needed for crew to exploit full functionality
- Known field issues include AVR regulator faults and generator insulation degradation, requiring vigilant maintenance
- Limited compatibility with legacy analog control panels without retrofit kits
- Generatorwicklung-Isolationsdegradation
- AVR Spannungsregler-Fehlfunktion
- Kupplung Schwingungsdämpfer Verschleiß
- Gleichstrommaschine Bürstenverschleiß
- Integrated monitoring and diagnostics with the Kongsberg Vessel Automation Suite
- Redundant architecture meeting DNV standards for high availability
- Modular design that can be scaled to different riser power loads
- Automated load shedding and fault isolation to protect critical equipment
- Remote access capability for condition‑based maintenance
- High initial capital cost compared with generic power panels
- Requires specialized training for operation and maintenance
- Installation can be time‑intensive due to integration with existing ship systems
- Limited to vessels that already use Kongsberg automation infrastructure
- Spare‑parts inventory may be constrained in remote offshore locations
ComAp
1
- Speed/voltage regulation instability
- Sync check failure
- Display module failure
- Communication timeout
- Integrated load‑sharing and automatic synchronization across up to four gensets
- WebSupervisor remote monitoring with real‑time diagnostics via Ethernet or cellular links
- Modular design with built‑in protection functions (over‑/under‑frequency, over‑voltage, reverse power)
- Supports standard marine communication protocols (Modbus TCP/IP, CAN bus) for easy integration
- Compact, rack‑mountable unit reduces installation space and wiring complexity
- Initial configuration requires specialized software training and careful parameter setting
- Software updates are mandatory to maintain compatibility with newer vessel IT systems
- Display module failures have been reported, necessitating spare parts inventory
- Limited to genset power ratings up to roughly 2 MW per unit (outside this range a different controller is needed)
- Higher upfront cost compared with basic analog controllers
DEIF
1- Communication bus failure (CAN/Modbus)
- Load sharing instability
- Blackout recovery sequence failure
- Sensor input error
- Modular architecture allows scaling to any number of generator sets
- Automatic load‑sharing and blackout recovery reduces crew workload and improves safety
- Supports both CAN and Modbus buses for flexible integration with existing ship systems
- Remote diagnostics and firmware updates via DEIF service portal
- Redundant controller options increase system reliability
- Complex configuration and commissioning require specialised engineering support
- Known susceptibility to communication‑bus failures if wiring or termination is poor
- Software‑driven operation means regular firmware updates are mandatory to avoid bugs
- Higher upfront cost compared with basic manual load‑shedding panels
- Dependence on DEIF service for troubleshooting may limit in‑house repair capability
SELCO
1- CT input circuit fault
- Relay output contact wear
- Settings drift after power loss
- Communication module failure
- All‑in‑one protection suite (over/under voltage, frequency, reverse power, loss of excitation, overcurrent, etc.)
- Built‑in communication options (Modbus/NMEA 2000) for easy integration with vessel automation systems
- User‑friendly LCD interface and PC configuration software for quick setup and parameter changes
- Self‑diagnostic and alarm logging to aid preventive maintenance
- Compact, marine‑rated enclosure suitable for tight engine‑room spaces
- Protection settings may drift after a complete power loss, requiring re‑verification
- Relay contact wear reported in long‑term service; periodic secondary injection testing is mandatory
- CT input circuit faults have been observed, necessitating careful wiring and shielding
- Communication module failures can occur, potentially isolating the relay from the ship network
- Does not provide generator load‑sharing control – a separate controller is needed for that function