"> Main Engine (2-Stroke Crosshead) - Equipment Database

Main Engine (2-Stroke Crosshead)

medium 557 models total

The crosshead is what separates the piston from the connecting rod and crankcase, so the cylinder liner only ever sees vertical force; that single design choice is what allows the long stroke, uniflow scavenging and fully separate cylinder lubrication that define this engine type.

Read more — Main Engine (2-Stroke Crosshead) explained

What Defines a Crosshead Two-Stroke

A crosshead sits between the piston rod and the connecting rod, taking the side thrust generated as the rod swings through its arc so that the cylinder liner above it only ever experiences vertical force from the piston. That is the single feature that makes the long-stroke, low-speed two-stroke possible: without it, the liner would wear rapidly under combined vertical and side loading, the way it does in a trunk-piston engine. The crosshead also physically separates the combustion space above from the crankcase below, which is why a two-stroke crosshead engine runs entirely separate cylinder oil and system oil circuits, unlike a trunk-piston engine sharing one oil system between piston skirt and crankcase. Uniflow scavenging through a single hydraulically operated exhaust valve at the cylinder head follows directly from this layout, and the engine drives the propeller directly without a gearbox, turning at roughly 70 to 100 revolutions per minute on most current designs.

Two-stroke crosshead main engine, cross-section
Cross-section of a two-stroke crosshead main engine cylinder unit showing the exhaust valve, piston, piston rod, stuffing box, uniflow scavenge ports fed from the scavenge air receiver, the crosshead with its pin and guide shoes, the connecting rod and the crankshaft.

Main Components

  • Crosshead bearing and guide shoes – take the side thrust and guide the piston rod's straight-line travel.
  • Piston rod and stuffing box – the stuffing box seals the crankcase off from the scavenge air space below the cylinder.
  • Exhaust valve – hydraulically actuated on modern electronically controlled engines, cam-driven on older mechanical designs, opening at a precisely timed point in the cycle for uniflow scavenging.
  • Turbocharger(s) and scavenge air cooler – supply and cool the combustion air the engine needs at its rated output.
  • Cylinder lubricators – inject cylinder oil through quills at defined crank angles, a feed rate that is actively tuned rather than fixed.
  • Fuel injection system – electronically controlled common-rail on current designs, mechanical camshaft-driven on older engines still widely in service.

Selection and Sizing

Bore, stroke and cylinder count are chosen to deliver the required propulsive power at a propeller speed that suits the hull, since the engine drives the shaft directly with no reduction gear. The choice between an electronically controlled and a mechanical camshaft-driven engine affects part-load fuel consumption, smoke performance and how well the engine tolerates slow steaming. Fuel flexibility is now a major sizing decision in its own right, with heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil, and dual-fuel LNG or methanol variants all available from the major licensed builders, each with different space and system implications for the rest of the engine room.

Regulations and Class

MARPOL Annex VI sets NOx limits by engine build date, Tier II globally and the tighter Tier III inside Emission Control Areas, met either through engine tuning alone or with exhaust gas recirculation or selective catalytic reduction fitted alongside the engine. The IMO Energy Efficiency Design Index influences engine power and rating selection at the newbuild stage. Class rules require periodic survey of crankshaft deflection and crosshead and guide clearances, and many class societies now accept continuous condition monitoring of cylinder pressure and scavenge parameters in place of some fixed overhaul intervals, provided the monitoring programme itself is approved.

Typical Faults

  • Cylinder oil feed rate mismatched to fuel sulphur content – too little causes liner scuffing, too much wastes oil and can itself accelerate wear.
  • Piston rod stuffing box packing wear – lets crankcase oil mist leak into the scavenge space, a known source of scavenge fires if it goes unnoticed.
  • Exhaust valve spindle or seat burning – shows up as a loss of compression and an exhaust temperature deviation on that cylinder relative to the others.
  • Turbocharger fouling or bearing wear – reduces scavenge air pressure, leading to incomplete combustion and increased soot.
  • Crosshead bearing wear from inadequate lubrication or misalignment – an abnormal bearing temperature trend that, left unaddressed, ends in bearing failure.

What to Look for in a Supplier or Builder

  • A licensed builder's documented quality track record and after-sales service network in the ship's actual trading area.
  • Spare parts commonality with sister engines already operating in the fleet, which shortens both lead time and crew learning curve.
  • A performance and condition monitoring data package suitable for both warranty claims and class continuous survey acceptance.
  • Documented fuel flexibility testing where a dual-fuel variant is being specified.

Trend cylinder pressure and exhaust temperature data over time rather than reacting to a single reading; a slow drift on one cylinder tells you far more than any individual snapshot does.

5 manufacturers · 557 models

MAN Energy Solutions

287
5S70ME-C10.5
· 16450.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
5
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
18200 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈169 g/kWh) for high efficiency
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control for optimal performance and emissions compliance
  • Robust crosshead design provides excellent durability and long service intervals
  • High torque at low rpm simplifies reduction gearing and propeller design
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Low operating speed leads to longer start‑up times and slower response to rapid load changes
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful maintenance of the crosshead seals
  • Auxiliary systems (cooling, exhaust treatment) add complexity for IMO Tier III compliance
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerLR2/Handymax TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)LNG CarrierCruise Ship
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >15 MW main propulsion power, demand high fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption, and have sufficient engine‑room volume for a low‑speed crosshead unit. Avoid if vessel size or weight constraints are critical, budget is highly limited, or rapid load‑change response is required.
Use Cases: Primarily installed as the main propulsion engine on large ocean‑going cargo vessels where high torque at very low rpm is essential; also used in dual‑fuel configurations to drive auxiliary generators for onboard power generation.
6S70ME-C10.5
· 19740.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
21840 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈169 g/kWh) improves operating economics on long voyages
  • Fuel‑flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly, extending service intervals
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven track record on ultra‑large vessels with high reliability and long service life
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and heavy foundations
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to operations requiring rapid load changes
  • Requires a sophisticated lubrication and cooling system, increasing auxiliary plant complexity
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but each overhaul is extensive and costly
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Ultra‑large container ship (10 000+ TEU)Cruise liner
Certifications: IMO Type Approval for low‑speed marine diesel enginesDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power output, excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to use a range of marine fuels on large ocean‑going vessels where engine room space is ample. Avoid if vessel size or weight constraints are critical, rapid load changes are frequent, or capital budget limits preclude low‑speed engine investment.
Use Cases: The 6S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships, providing reliable thrust for long‑haul routes. It can also serve as a prime mover for combined heat‑and‑power (CHP) arrangements on cruise ships where waste heat recovery is advantageous.
7S70ME-C10.5
· 23030.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke marine diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
25480 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈169 g/kWh) reduces fuel costs on long voyages.
  • Super‑long stroke design provides lower specific fuel consumption and better torque characteristics.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system offers precise load management, diagnostics and integration with ship automation.
  • Proven reliability in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers with extensive service history.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • High capital expenditure compared with medium‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Requires specialised crew for crosshead bearing and cylinder liner maintenance.
  • Optimised for low‑speed service; not suitable for high‑speed container or passenger ships.
  • May need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III limits in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCCapesize Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≥10,000 TEU)Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV Class ApprovedABS Class Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency, low‑speed main engine for very large vessels where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if the ship has space constraints, requires higher shaft speeds, or aims to use gas‑fuel dual‑fuel technology.
Use Cases: The 7S70ME‑C10.5 is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships, providing steady low‑speed thrust for long‑haul routes while meeting IMO emission standards with optional after‑treatment.
8S70ME-C10.5
· 26320.0 kW · two-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Cylinders
8
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
29120 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈29 MW) suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • Low specific fuel consumption (169 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Widely class‑approved (DNV, ABS, LR) and can be equipped for IMO Tier III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial hull space and reinforced foundations
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke maintenance (crosshead bearing, cylinder liner wear)
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions may exceed Tier III limits in emission control areas
  • Limited suitability for vessels under ~15 MW power requirement
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ship (≥18 000 TEU)Very large bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)Cruise liner (high‑speed variants)
Certifications: DNVABSLloyd's RegisterIMO Tier III (when fitted with SCR/after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large tankers or container ships and value fuel flexibility and low fuel consumption. Avoid on smaller vessels where space, weight and capital cost outweigh the power benefits, or when strict NOx limits apply without ready access to after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 8S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, mega‑container ships and large bulk carriers, providing reliable high thrust for long voyages while allowing operators to switch between heavy fuel oil and low‑sulphur alternatives depending on market and regulatory conditions.
9S70ME-C10.5 unverified
· 29610.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29610
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific fuel consumption performance (≈176‑180 g/kWh) reducing operating costs on long voyages.
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and low‑sulphur fuels without major hardware changes.
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in VLCCs and capesize bulk carriers.
  • Integrated MAN ME‑C after‑treatment package (EGR + SCR) enables IMO Tier III emissions compliance.
  • Compact length for a low‑speed engine of this power class, facilitating installation in existing hull forms.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but repairs are more complex, demanding skilled personnel and specialised tooling.
  • Limited rpm range (≈80‑100 rpm) makes the unit unsuitable for vessels that need higher shaft speeds.
Typical Vessels: VLCCProduct TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise Ferry
Certifications: DNVIMO Tier III (with SCR after‑treatment)ABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient engine for large, low‑speed vessels and must meet strict emission limits. Avoid if vessel size or weight constraints prohibit a low‑speed engine, or if higher shaft speeds are required for propulsion.
Use Cases: The 9S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed on very large crude carriers, product tankers, capesize bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships where its high power output, fuel flexibility and low emissions profile deliver economic advantage over long transoceanic routes.
10S70ME-C10.5 unverified
· 32900.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈33 MW) in a relatively compact low‑speed package
  • Electronically controlled fuel injection provides excellent fuel efficiency and lower emissions
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Proven reliability of the MAN S70ME‑C family with extensive service network
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with older mechanically controlled engines
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Advanced electronic control system needs skilled maintenance personnel and spare‑parts logistics
  • Not a dual‑fuel (LNG) solution – limited to HFO/MDO
  • Low‑speed design unsuitable for vessels that demand high rpm auxiliary power
Typical Vessels: VLCCAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise liner
Certifications: IMO Tier III (with SCR after‑treatment option)DNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine for large tankers or bulk carriers, want electronic fuel control for efficiency and emissions compliance, and value MAN's global support network. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, space is limited, or the vessel requires dual‑fuel LNG capability.
Use Cases: The 10S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and large container vessels, providing reliable high thrust for long‑haul voyages while meeting IMO NOx Tier III limits when equipped with after‑treatment.
11S70ME-C10.5 unverified
· 36190.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
36190
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈36 MW) at low rpm, ideal for direct drive of large propellers
  • Low specific fuel consumption thanks to MAN’s ME‑C electronic control system
  • Meets IMO Tier III emissions when equipped with SCR, supporting MARPOL Annex VI compliance
  • Robust crosshead design provides long service intervals and high reliability in harsh conditions
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO as well as marine diesel oil (MDO) for operational versatility
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit suitability for retrofits on smaller hulls
  • Requires high‑quality maintenance programmes; wear parts are expensive
  • Fixed low rpm limits use on vessels that need higher shaft speeds or variable speed operation
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than those of slower‑speed, larger‑bore engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large bulk carriers (>150 k dwt)LNG/LPG carriers (large class)High‑capacity container ships (≈10,000 TEU) where low‑speed propulsion is preferred
Certifications: IMO Type Approval – D‑2DNV GL Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >35 MW of shaft power at very low rpm for a large hull, prioritize fuel efficiency and Tier III emissions compliance, and have the budget for a high‑specification slow‑speed engine. Avoid if vessel size is limited, higher propeller speeds are required, or capital cost and retrofit space constraints dominate the decision.
Use Cases: The 11S70ME-C10.5 powers the main shaft of ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers on long-haul routes, where its high efficiency reduces fuel burn over thousands of nautical miles. It is also installed in newbuild LNG/LPG carriers that demand low‑speed direct drive propulsion while meeting strict emission regulations.
12S70ME-C10.5 unverified
· 39480.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39480
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm package, eliminating the need for reduction gearing on many hulls
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven MAN reliability record with extensive service network worldwide
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑C) enables precise monitoring and optimisation of performance
  • Can be equipped with SCR after‑treatment to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but each overhaul is costly and resource intensive
  • Spare‑part logistics can be challenging for vessels operating in remote regions
  • Optimised for very large ships; may be over‑spec for medium‑size or feeder vessels
Typical Vessels: VLCC/ULCC TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (>200 kt)Ultra‑large Container Ship (15 000+ TEU)LNG Carrier (oil‑fired variant)Cruise Ship (high‑power propulsion)
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >35 MW of low‑speed power for a very large vessel, value MAN’s global support network and fuel flexibility, or must meet IMO Tier III NOx with after‑treatment. Avoid if the ship’s power requirement is modest, budget constraints are tight, or engine room space is limited.
Use Cases: The S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega‑container ships and large bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can drive the propeller directly. It also appears in LNG carriers configured for oil firing and in cruise liners requiring high thrust at low rpm.
14S70ME-C10.5 unverified
· 46060.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
46060
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – >45 MW in a compact low‑speed package
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service life
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO / MDO) with low specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh)
  • Modular construction simplifies installation, alignment and maintenance
  • Advanced electronic control (ME‑C) for optimized performance and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand significant hull space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and a rigorous maintenance regime
  • Emissions compliance often needs additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) increasing system complexity
  • Fixed low rpm; not suitable where higher shaft speeds are required without reduction gearing
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierHeavy‑lift / RoRo vessels requiring high thrust
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >45 MW of low‑speed power with proven fuel efficiency and can accommodate the engine’s size and cost. Avoid if vessel space is limited, a higher shaft speed is required without reduction gear, or you prefer an integrated dual‑fuel gas system.
Use Cases: The 14S70ME-C10.5 is typically installed on new‑build VLCCs, ultra‑large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships for long‑haul routes where fuel economy and reliability are paramount. It also appears in some heavy‑lift vessels that demand maximum thrust at low rpm.
5S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 13150.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
13150
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (13.15 MW) at very low rpm, enabling efficient direct‑drive or simple reduction gearing.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Proven MAN reliability record with modular cylinder design that simplifies overhaul and parts replacement.
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with higher‑speed engines, contributing to lower operating costs.
  • Compatible with MAN’s Tier III emission solutions (e.g., selective catalytic reduction) for strict NOx limits.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • High upfront capital cost typical of low‑speed, high‑power marine engines.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and rigorous maintenance regimes to avoid wear in the crosshead arrangement.
  • Limited to slow‑speed operation; not suitable for vessels that need higher shaft speeds without a reduction gear.
  • Crew training and spare‑parts logistics are more demanding than for smaller, medium‑speed engines.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carriers (ULCC)Large Container Ships (>8,000 TEU)Panamax and Post‑Panamax Bulk CarriersCruise Liners
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine for large vessels where fuel flexibility, proven reliability and low specific fuel consumption are priorities. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine‑room volume, if you require higher shaft speeds without reduction gearing, or if initial capital outlay must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 5S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships that operate long voyages at economical speeds. It is also used in cruise ships where steady, low‑speed power delivery and compliance with IMO emission tiers are essential.
6S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 15780.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
15780
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at rated load) thanks to advanced fuel injection and turbocharging.
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine‑room footprint compared with V‑type equivalents of similar power.
  • Proven reliability; the S65ME-C family has extensive long‑haul service history worldwide.
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO, MDO, low‑sulphur fuels) compliant with IMO 2020/2023 regulations.
  • Integrated MAN Engine Control System provides optimized load management and condition monitoring.
Weaknesses
  • Large bore and stroke result in high weight and require robust foundations; may be unsuitable for vessels with limited space.
  • Only six cylinders – a single‑cylinder failure has a noticeable impact on total power output.
  • Requires strict maintenance and high‑quality lubricating oil, leading to higher operating costs than some medium‑speed alternatives.
  • High initial capital cost relative to comparable power from slower‑speed (e.g., 4‑stroke) engines.
  • Noise and vibration levels are significant; additional acoustic insulation is often needed.
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierOil TankerContainer ShipLNG Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GLABS
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large cargo or tanker vessels where space efficiency and fuel flexibility are critical, and you value proven long‑term reliability. Avoid if: the vessel has severe weight or space constraints, requires higher redundancy (more cylinders), or budget limits preclude the higher upfront cost of a MAN low‑speed unit.
Use Cases: The 6S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed in newbuild bulk carriers and oil tankers above 150 kt deadweight, as well as retrofits on existing vessels seeking to meet stricter emission standards while maintaining high cruising speeds. It is also used on some large container ships where a compact low‑speed engine layout is advantageous.
7S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 18410.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
18410
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission standards when equipped with exhaust gas cleaning system
  • Modular design simplifies installation and maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with higher‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and routine overhauls
  • Limited suitability for vessels needing high shaft speed or compact installations
  • Not a dual‑fuel (gas) design, so less attractive for LNG‑carrier applications
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankerPanamax & Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>8,000 TEU)Cruise ShipRo‑Ro/Passenger Ferry (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large vessels and value MAN's global service network. Avoid if the vessel is size‑constrained, requires higher shaft speeds, or would benefit more from a dual‑fuel gas capable engine.
Use Cases: The 7S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where direct drive improves efficiency, and on cruise liners where reliability and emission compliance are critical.
8S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 21040.0 kW · electronically controlled low‑speed two‑stroke
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
21040
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency and low specific fuel consumption thanks to slow‑speed operation
  • Electronic ME‑C control provides precise load handling, quick response to speed changes and reduced emissions (IMO Tier III ready)
  • Proven reliability on VLCCs, ULCCs and large container ships with extensive service network
  • Modular construction simplifies major overhauls and spare‑part logistics
  • Compatible with both HFO and low‑sulphur MDO fuels
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and significant weight requiring deep engine rooms
  • Complex electronic control system demands specialised crew training and maintenance support
  • Large physical dimensions limit installation to vessels with ample hull space
  • Not a dual‑fuel (LNG) design, so less attractive for operators targeting strict future CO₂ caps
  • Long lead times for spare parts compared with smaller medium‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm, maximum fuel efficiency on long‑haul routes and have the capital to invest in a proven slow‑speed engine with electronic control. Avoid if vessel size limits deep engine rooms, you require dual‑fuel capability, or budget constraints favour medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 8S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large oil tankers, bulk carriers and mega container ships operating on intercontinental routes, where its low specific fuel consumption and robust design deliver cost‑effective performance over thousands of service hours.
9S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 23670.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
23670
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (23 670 kW) with low specific fuel consumption (~168 g/kWh)
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals across the MAN S65 family
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO/MDO) with optional ME‑GI or SCR for IMO Tier III NOx compliance
  • Modular construction enables easier on‑site assembly and maintenance
  • Wide part commonality with other S65 models reduces spare‑parts inventory
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • High upfront capital cost compared with smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Requires reduction gear due to low rpm, adding complexity and maintenance
  • Tier III compliance needs additional after‑treatment (SCR) increasing operational costs
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; poor HFO can affect injector life
Typical Vessels: ULCV Container ShipPanamax Container ShipAframax TankerVLCCCapesize Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient main engine for vessels >80 000 dwt where space is available and you value proven MAN reliability. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher rpm engines, or has strict weight/space limits.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on large ocean‑going merchant ships such as ultra‑large container vessels, Panamax & Post‑Panamax carriers, VLCCs, Aframax tankers and Capesize bulk carriers; often paired with a reduction gear and optional exhaust gas cleaning system for Tier III compliance.
10S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 26300.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed electronically controlled diesel engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
26300
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (≈50% at rated load) reducing fuel consumption
  • Electronic ME‑C control enables precise fuel metering and lower emissions
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • L‑configuration fits compact engine rooms while delivering high power per cylinder
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul, ultra‑large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Longer response time to rapid load changes; less suited for highly variable service profiles
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and specialized tooling
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict oil analysis programmes
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum fuel efficiency and high continuous power for long‑haul vessels where engine room space can accommodate an L‑type low‑speed engine. Avoid if the ship operates with frequent rapid load changes, has severe space constraints, or if lower capital cost is a primary driver.
Use Cases: The 10S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large container ships and bulk carriers, providing reliable, fuel‑efficient power for transoceanic voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 11S65ME-C8.5
11S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 28930.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
28930
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm design, ideal for direct drive of large propellers
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption and part‑load efficiency
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history on VLCCs and mega‑container ships
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications
  • Compatible with MAN’s integrated control and monitoring systems for predictive maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and robust foundations
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but involve heavy lifting and specialized tooling
  • Emissions compliance beyond IMO Tier II may need additional after‑treatment (SCR) systems
  • Low maximum rpm limits use to vessels equipped with reduction gears
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC tankerLarge container ship (>8,000 TEU)Very large bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Cruise liner (mega‑class)Ro‑Ro/Passenger ferry (high power requirement)
Certifications: IMO Tier II NOx complianceDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for ultra‑large vessels, value fuel flexibility and have the space for a large engine room. Avoid if vessel size is limited, capital budget is tight, or you require a higher‑rpm engine to eliminate reduction gears.
Use Cases: The 11S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships and very large bulk carriers, where its low rpm matches directly driven slow‑turning propellers for optimal fuel efficiency over long voyages.
12S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 31560.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
31560
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 12 cylinders produce >31 MW, suitable for VLCCs and large container ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) reduces operating cost on long voyages
  • Fuel flexibility: can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Integrated electronic control (MAN ME‑Series) provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in the bulk carrier and tanker fleets
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Maintenance intensity – requires skilled crew and strict oil quality control
  • To meet IMO Tier III emissions, an exhaust gas cleaning system (scrubber) is mandatory
  • Low maximum rpm (95 rpm) limits suitability for vessels that need higher shaft speeds
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (Capesize)Very Large Crude Tanker
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier II (with optional Tier III compliance when fitted with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and low SFC. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or you require a higher rpm propulsion system.
Use Cases: The 12S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large container vessels and Capesize bulk carriers, providing reliable thrust for long‑haul routes where fuel efficiency and engine durability are paramount.
14S65ME-C8.5 unverified
· 36820.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
36820
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 36.8 MW from a compact footprint compared with equivalent four‑stroke units.
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes.
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers; extensive global service network from MAN.
  • Low specific fuel consumption at design load, contributing to lower operating costs on slow‑steaming routes.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher NOx emissions than modern four‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment (SCR) kits.
  • Complex crosshead lubrication system increases maintenance workload and spare‑parts inventory.
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed applications or vessels requiring rapid power changes.
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierVery Large Container Ship (VLC) – when low‑speed propulsion is specified
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for a slow‑steaming, long‑range vessel and value fuel flexibility with an established global support network. Avoid if: the ship requires high‑speed propulsion, tight emission limits (Tier III without SCR), or has severe space/weight constraints in the engine room.
Use Cases: The 14S65ME-C8.5 is typically installed on ultra‑large crude carriers, large product tankers and Capesize bulk carriers that operate on long voyages at low service speeds. It is also selected for some of the largest container ships where a single low‑speed engine can meet the required bollard pull while keeping fuel consumption low.
5S60ME-C10.5
· 11900.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
5
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
13400 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) improves operating cost.
  • Flexibility to run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO reduces fuel supply risk.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control optimises combustion and simplifies crew operation.
  • Proven MAN crosshead design offers high reliability and long service intervals.
  • Compact power output for a 5‑cylinder layout compared with larger cylinder counts.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine‑room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost than some competing low‑speed engines.
  • Requires skilled maintenance personnel familiar with MAN crosshead systems.
  • Limited speed range due to low rated rpm; not ideal for high‑speed vessels.
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (SCR/EGR) to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierMedium‑size container ship (≈8–10 k TEU)Cruise ferryOffshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient main engine with flexible fuel options and established MAN after‑sales support for medium to large merchant ships. Avoid if vessel space is severely limited, budget constraints preclude the higher purchase price, or the ship requires a high‑speed (≥150 rpm) propulsion system.
Use Cases: The 5S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on mid‑size tankers, bulk carriers and container vessels operating long voyages where fuel economy and fuel flexibility are paramount. It also serves in cruise ferries and offshore support ships that benefit from its low emissions profile when paired with exhaust gas cleaning systems.
6S60ME-C10.5
· 14280.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
16080 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) offers flexibility with evolving fuel standards
  • Super long stroke provides high torque at low rpm, ideal for slow‑speed vessel propulsion
  • MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and optimized performance
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with comparable four‑stroke medium‑speed engines
  • Crosshead design demands rigorous lubrication and regular overhauls, increasing maintenance workload
  • Fixed low speed (105 rpm) limits suitability for high‑speed vessels
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the latest NOx Tier III limits
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical tankerOffshore supply vesselSmall container shipRo‑Ro / ferry
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine with flexible fuel options and proven MAN service support for vessels such as product tankers or offshore supply ships. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit engine room size, if higher shaft speed is required for fast cargo services, or if capital cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 6S60ME-C10.5 is commonly installed in mid‑size product and chemical tankers (≈30–50 k DWT), offshore support vessels, and small container ships where its high torque at 105 rpm drives a single propeller efficiently while accommodating a range of marine fuels.
7S60ME-C10.5
· 16660.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
18760 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power with low BSFC (~170 g/kWh) improves fuel efficiency on large vessels.
  • Fuel‑type flexibility allows operation on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, supporting compliance with evolving fuel regulations.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system provides precise cylinder management and quick load response.
  • Proven reliability of the S60ME family with extensive service history in ultra‑large tankers and container ships.
  • Super long stroke design yields better thermodynamic efficiency at low engine speeds.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • High upfront capital cost compared with smaller multi‑engine configurations.
  • Requires skilled personnel for operation and maintenance of a two‑stroke crosshead system.
  • Single‑engine layout offers less redundancy than twin‑engine arrangements on some vessel types.
  • Emissions control may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet strict NOx limits.
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerSuezmax TankerUltra‑Large Container Ship (10 000–12 000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>180 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Classification Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a single, high‑power main engine for very large bulk carriers, tankers or container ships and value fuel flexibility and proven MAN efficiency. Avoid if vessel design limits space for a low‑speed engine, requires multiple redundant propulsion units, or operates primarily in emission‑strict zones without ready after‑treatment solutions.
Use Cases: The 7S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers and 12 000‑TEU container vessels, where its high power output, low fuel consumption and robust control system support long‑haul, high‑speed voyages.
8S60ME-C10.5
· 19040.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
21440 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for VLCCs, ULCCs and large container ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Fuel‑flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability of the MAN S60ME family with extensive service history
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises performance and emissions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑speed engines
  • Without after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) the NOx emissions may not meet IMO Tier III limits
  • Maintenance intensity is high; requires skilled personnel and regular overhauls
  • Limited suitability for vessels needing higher shaft speeds or compact installations
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (10k+ TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200 000 DWT)Cruise Ship (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW of low‑speed propulsion power, value fuel flexibility and proven reliability, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid for smaller vessels, high‑speed applications, or when capital budget is tightly constrained.
Use Cases: The 8S60ME-C10.5 powers the main shaft of very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships, providing direct drive propulsion at 105 rpm. It is also installed on some cruise liners and offshore support vessels where high torque at low speed is required.
9S60ME-C10.5 unverified
· 21420.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21420
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed design, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large ships
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven reliability of MAN S60ME‑C family with long service intervals
  • Optional emission control packages (EGR/SCR) enable IMO Tier II/III compliance
  • Crosshead layout reduces cylinder wear and improves durability
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size requires substantial engine‑room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Low maximum rpm limits use to vessels that favour large, slow‑turning propellers
  • Two‑stroke operation demands skilled crew for handling and maintenance
  • Complex after‑treatment systems add weight and operational overhead when Tier III compliance is required
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container ShipRo‑Ro / Passenger Vessel (high power requirement)
Certifications: ABSDNV-GLLloyd's RegisterIMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for large vessels, require fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability, or must meet IMO emission standards with optional after‑treatment. Avoid if engine‑room space is limited, budget constraints preclude the higher capital cost, or the vessel operates at higher speeds where a medium‑speed engine would be more efficient.
Use Cases: The 9S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large container ships and large bulk carriers, where its low‑speed high‑power characteristics drive directly coupled propellers for optimal fuel efficiency over long voyages. It is also selected for vessels that must comply with strict emission regulations while retaining the ability to burn heavy fuel oil.
10S60ME-C10.5 unverified
· 23800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
23800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm enables direct‑drive without a reduction gear, saving weight and cost.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – certified for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO), with optional dual‑fuel conversion kits.
  • MAN’s S60ME family is renowned for long service intervals and robust reliability in ultra‑large vessels.
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑C) provides precise fuel metering, optimal combustion and compliance with IMO Tier II NOx limits.
  • Proven track record on VLCCs, large bulk carriers and mega‑container ships.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high block weight demand substantial engine‑room space and reinforced foundations.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives of similar power.
  • Requires strict oil quality management and disciplined maintenance to avoid wear on the crosshead bearings.
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be challenging for remote ports, especially for the 10‑cylinder configuration.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than slower‑turning low‑speed engines, often necessitating additional acoustic treatment.
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 tankerUltra‑large bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Large container ship (≥12 000 TEU)Cruise liner (high‑speed variants)
Certifications: IMO Tier II NOx complianceDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW propulsion with low‑rpm direct drive, value fuel flexibility and proven MAN support, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if budget constraints prioritize lower initial cost, vessel size limits space for a large low‑speed engine, or you require an all‑LNG solution without conversion.
Use Cases: The 10S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build very large crude carriers, ultra‑large bulk carriers and mega container ships where high shaft power at low speed is essential for efficient direct‑drive operation. It also appears in fast cruise vessels that demand both high speed and flexibility to run on multiple fuel grades.
11S60ME-C10.5 unverified
· 26180.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed electronically controlled diesel
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
26180
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~0.5% lower than previous S‑series) thanks to common‑rail electronic injection
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability in large bulk carriers and tankers with extensive service history
  • Compact inline (L‑configuration) layout reduces engine room length compared with larger cylinder counts
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than older mechanically controlled low‑speed engines
  • Requires sophisticated monitoring and higher‑grade lubricants, increasing operational complexity
  • Large physical size still limits use on vessels with constrained engine‑room space
  • Electronic control system adds dependency on specialized diagnostic tools and trained personnel
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierUltra Large Container Ship (10k+ TEU)Cruise liner (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class notationABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large vessels where fuel efficiency and flexibility are paramount, and you have the crew expertise to manage electronic control systems. Avoid if vessel size is limited, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or you prefer a mechanically controlled engine with simpler maintenance.
Use Cases: The 11S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Capesize bulk carriers, and mega container ships, providing reliable long‑haul power while meeting IMO Tier II/III emission standards when equipped with appropriate after‑treatment.
12S60ME-C10.5 unverified
· 28560.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
28560
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 28.5 MW at only 105 rpm reduces gearbox size and weight
  • Proven fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) with low specific fuel consumption
  • Modular construction and integrated electronic control simplify installation and maintenance
  • Long service intervals and extensive field experience across global fleets
  • Compatibility with major classification societies’ type approvals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance discipline
  • Low‑speed operation may need additional emission after‑treatment to meet IMO Tier III in Emission Control Areas
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (ULCS)Cruise linersLarge crude oil tankersVery large bulk carriersLNG carriers (propulsion only)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels where space for a gearbox is limited and fuel flexibility is required. Avoid if capital cost or emission compliance without after‑treatment are primary concerns, or if the vessel size does not justify a low‑speed main engine.
Use Cases: The S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the sole propulsion engine on ultra‑large container vessels, cruise ships and large tankers, providing reliable thrust for long‑haul voyages while operating at low rpm to maximise propeller efficiency.
14S60ME-C10.5 unverified
· 33320.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
33320
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density enables direct drive without reduction gear
  • Low specific fuel consumption and proven MAN reliability
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO with optional low‑sulphur kits
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts logistics
  • Widely accepted by major classification societies for IMO Type Approval
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes
  • Emissions may need additional after‑treatment to meet Tier III in emission control areas
  • Limited suitability for vessels that need higher shaft speeds or compact installations
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container ShipBulk CarrierProduct Tanker
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for direct‑drive on very large tankers or container ships and value fuel flexibility. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, budget‑constrained, or requires higher shaft speeds that favour medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 14S60ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, 10 000+ TEU container vessels and large bulk carriers, where its low rpm matches a fixed‑pitch propeller for optimal efficiency over long voyages.
9S50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 15120.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~48–50% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs on long voyages.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes.
  • Robust crosshead design provides low vibration and long service intervals, enhancing reliability.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and maintenance in shipyards.
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning systems (SCR) to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Slower transient response; less suited for vessels requiring rapid speed changes.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular monitoring of crosshead bearings.
  • Installation complexity can increase dry‑dock time if retrofitting onto existing ships.
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (10,000+ TEU)Supramax bulk carrier
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalIMO Type Approval (Tier II/III with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large cargo vessels where fuel efficiency and flexibility are paramount, and you have sufficient hull space for the unit. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, rapid speed changes are required, or capital budget constraints favor medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 9S50ME-C9.6 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships, providing reliable continuous power for long‑haul routes while meeting modern emission standards when equipped with aftertreatment.
10S50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 16800.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke electronically controlled crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm reduces need for reduction gearing
  • ME‑C electronic control enables precise fuel metering and lower specific fuel consumption
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO, with optional dual‑fuel conversion kits
  • Proven reliability of MAN S50 family in long‑haul service
  • Modular design simplifies installation and maintenance on large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit applicability to very large ships only
  • Higher capital cost compared with older mechanically controlled engines
  • Requires skilled crew for electronic system diagnostics and software updates
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber) to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas
  • Spare‑parts inventory can be extensive due to 10‑cylinder configuration
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥8 000 TEU)VLCC / Suezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge Ro‑Ro/Car carrier
Certifications: DNV GL type approvalABS classification approvalLloyd's Register class approvalIMO Tier II emission compliance (Tier III optional)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine for very large vessels and want the efficiency and emissions benefits of electronic control. Avoid if vessel size or draft constraints prevent installation of a 10‑cylinder low‑speed engine, or if budget limits preclude the higher upfront cost.
Use Cases: The 10S50ME-C9.6 is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on ultra‑large container ships (8 000–12 000 TEU), VLCCs and Suezmax tankers (~300 k DWT), and large bulk carriers where its low rpm matches directly to a fixed‑pitch propeller for optimal fuel economy.
11S50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 18480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
18480
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (~18.5 MW) suitable for very large ships
  • Low operating speed (117 rpm) allows direct propeller drive and high fuel efficiency
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO/MDO) matches worldwide bunkering infrastructure
  • MAN’s global support network and proven reliability in long‑range shipping
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine‑room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with some competing low‑speed engines
  • Maintenance requires MAN‑specific training, tools and spare parts logistics
  • Not offered as a dual‑fuel (LNG) variant, limiting future emissions compliance without retrofit
  • Typical vibration levels of large 2‑stroke crosshead units may need extra isolation measures
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCVLarge Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (>150 k DWT)Cruise Liner (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power for a large, slow‑speed vessel and value MAN’s proven reliability, direct‑drive efficiency and flexible HFO/MDO fuel use. Avoid if the ship requires dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, has severe space or weight constraints, or if budget limits justify a lower‑cost alternative.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where direct low‑speed propulsion maximises fuel efficiency over long voyages. It also appears in some cruise vessels and offshore support ships that demand high continuous power output.
12S50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 20160.0 kW · electronically controlled low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈20 MW) suitable for very large vessels
  • Electronic common‑rail injection gives superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions compared with older mechanically governed engines
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for electronic control system management and diagnostics
  • Low rpm necessitates a reduction gear, adding to overall plant complexity
  • NOx emissions may still exceed IMO Tier III limits without an after‑treatment system
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10 000 TEU)VLCC / ULCC tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge RoRo/Car carrier (when high power is needed)
Certifications: IMO D-2DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for large, long‑haul vessels and value fuel efficiency, electronic control and MAN’s global service network. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint and cost, or if higher rpm engines are preferred for specific hull forms.
Use Cases: The 12S50ME-C9.6 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large container ships, VLCCs and capesize bulk carriers, where its high output and low fuel consumption meet commercial and regulatory demands.
14S50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 23520.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
23520
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for ultra‑large ships (>20 MW)
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh) leading to lower operating costs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Integrated electronic control (ME‑C) provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability with a long service history in major fleets
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes
  • Longer start‑up time due to low‑speed nature
  • Limited suitability for vessels under 150 kW per propeller shaft
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥25,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierRo‑Ro/Passenger ships with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Tier III (with SCR after‑treatment)DNV Class Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a single engine delivering >20 MW for very large tankers, container vessels or bulk carriers and value fuel efficiency and flexibility. Avoid if: vessel size is moderate to small, space and weight are constrained, or capital budget does not allow a low‑speed main engine.
Use Cases: Primarily installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega‑container ships and large bulk carriers; also used in some high‑power Ro‑Ro/passenger vessels where a single, highly efficient diesel drive is required.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S46ME-B8.5
5S46ME-B8.5
· 6450.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
460 mm
Stroke
1932 mm
Rated Power
6550 kW
Rated Speed
129 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S46ME-B8.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~170 g/kWh) gives excellent propulsion efficiency.
  • Fuel‑flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes.
  • Compact power density for a five‑cylinder layout, suitable for medium‑size vessels.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability in MAN’s long‑standing S46ME family with extensive service history.
Weaknesses
  • Maximum output (~6.5 MW) limits use on larger ships that require >10 MW main power.
  • Physical size and weight are substantial; installation requires ample engine room space.
  • Crosshead design entails more moving parts (e.g., piston rods, crossheads) increasing maintenance complexity.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller four‑stroke alternatives.
  • Optimal performance depends on high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes.
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (15–30 k dwt)Chemical carrierOffshore supply vesselFeeder container shipSmall bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact, high‑efficiency main engine in the 6–7 MW range with flexible fuel options and proven MAN service support. Avoid if vessel power requirements exceed ~10 MW, space is severely limited, or you prefer a four‑stroke design with lower maintenance overhead.
Use Cases: The 5S46ME‑B8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on medium‑size product and chemical tankers, offshore support vessels, and feeder ships where fuel efficiency and flexibility are critical while keeping engine room volume manageable.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S46ME-B8.5
6S46ME-B8.5
· 7740.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
460 mm
Stroke
1932 mm
Rated Power
7860 kW
Rated Speed
129 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S46ME-B8.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a BSFC of ~170 g/kWh and high mean effective pressure (19 bar)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • Compact power density for its class thanks to the six‑cylinder layout
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise fuel metering and diagnostics
  • Proven track record in MAN’s S46ME family with extensive field experience
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Higher maintenance intensity typical of crosshead designs (cylinder liner wear, piston rings)
  • Limited maximum power – not suitable for very large vessels requiring >10 000 kW per engine
  • Initial capital cost is higher than comparable medium‑speed engines
  • Requires low‑speed propeller design; may need reduction gearing for high‑rpm applications
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersProduct tankers (e.g., chemical, oil product)Feeder container ships (up to ~3 000 TEU)Offshore supply vesselsGeneral cargo ships
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency, fuel‑flexible main engine for medium‑size vessels with direct low‑speed propeller drive and can accommodate the size and weight of a two‑stroke crosshead. Avoid if your vessel requires very high power (>10 000 kW per unit), operates primarily on LNG dual‑fuel, or has strict space/weight constraints that favour medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 6S46ME-B8.5 is commonly installed as the sole main propulsion unit on 30–50 kt DWT bulk carriers and product tankers, as well as on feeder container ships where direct drive low‑rpm propellers are preferred for fuel savings and reduced vibration.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S46ME-B8.5
7S46ME-B8.5
· 9030.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
460 mm
Stroke
1932 mm
Rated Power
9170 kW
Rated Speed
129 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S46ME-B8.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC ~170 g/kWh) thanks to the super long‑stroke design
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven track record in the MAN ME‑B series for large cargo vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope requires considerable hull space and structural support
  • Low maximum speed (129 rpm) limits use to slow‑speed propulsion applications
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller, high‑speed engines
  • Requires a dedicated high‑capacity lubrication system and regular maintenance of crosshead bearings
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet Tier III emission limits in Emission Control Areas
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (up to 8 000–10 000 TEU)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalABS ClassificationDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency, fuel‑flexible main engine for slow‑speed cargo vessels where space and weight are available. Avoid if the vessel requires higher shaft speeds, has severe space constraints, or if budget limits justify a smaller high‑speed unit.
Use Cases: The 7S46ME-B8.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on medium‑size tankers (Aframax), bulk carriers and large container ships operating on long voyages where fuel economy and reliability are paramount. It also serves in vessels that must switch between heavy fuel oil and low‑sulphur fuels without extensive retrofits.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S46ME-B8.5
8S46ME-B8.5
· 10320.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
8
Bore
460 mm
Stroke
1932 mm
Rated Power
10480 kW
Rated Speed
129 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S46ME-B8.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output at very low speed enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Super long stroke (1932 mm) provides excellent thermal efficiency; BSFC of ~170 g/kWh for this class
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, easing bunker logistics
  • Robust crosshead design reduces wear on the cylinder liner and crankcase, extending service intervals
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system offers precise fuel metering and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand significant engine room space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost compared with newer ME‑C series or dual‑fuel engines
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) meet IMO Tier II but are higher than the latest low‑emission designs
  • Maintenance complexity – requires skilled personnel for crosshead lubrication and wear monitoring
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (≥150 k DWT)Ultra‑Large Container Ship (≥10 000 TEU)Ro‑Ro / Car Carrier (large displacement variants)
Certifications: ABS Class ApprovalDNV GL Class ApprovalLloyd's Register Class ApprovalIMO Tier II NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with broad fuel flexibility for large tankers or bulk carriers where space and weight are available. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, dual‑fuel gas capability, or very compact installation envelopes are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The 8S46ME‑B8.5 is commonly installed on new‑build VLCCs and LR2 oil tankers, large bulk carriers (>150 k DWT), and mega container ships built from 2020 onward, where direct‑drive propulsion and fuel flexibility are critical for operational economics.
9S46ME-B8.5 unverified
· 11610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
11610
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈12.6 kW per litre) with proven MAN reliability
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of the S46ME family
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO) offers operational flexibility
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III NOx limits in most operating regions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope due to L‑configuration, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality fuel to avoid cylinder liner wear
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than slower‑speed (≤100 rpm) designs
  • Limited suitability for vessels targeting LNG or methanol dual‑fuel strategies
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerHandymax Bulk Carrier12,000‑TEU Container ShipLarge Ro‑Ro / Car Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact yet high‑power engine for mid‑size tankers, bulk carriers or container ships and require proven MAN reliability with dual‑fuel flexibility. Avoid if vessel space is severely constrained, budget is tight, or the ship is being designed for alternative fuels (e.g., LNG) where a dedicated low‑speed gas engine would be more appropriate.
Use Cases: Installed as the primary propulsion unit on newbuild Aframax tankers and Handymax bulk carriers built from 2020 onward; also used in retrofits where an upgrade to ~11 MW power is required while retaining existing propeller arrangements.
10S46ME-B8.5 unverified
· 12900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
12900
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈12.9 MW) in a compact 10‑cylinder layout
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Proven MAN reliability and worldwide support network
  • Integrated electronic control (ME‑CONTROL) for optimized performance and diagnostics
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and vibration
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or LNG engines
  • Emissions higher than modern low‑NOx or LNG solutions unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Requires skilled maintenance crew familiar with 2‑stroke crosshead systems
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerProduct TankerHandymax Bulk CarrierMedium Container Ship (up to ~8,000 TEU)
Certifications: DNV GL classificationIMO Tier II NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven high‑power engine with fuel flexibility and extensive MAN service support for mid‑size bulk or tanker vessels. Avoid if your project prioritises the lowest possible emissions, LNG/dual‑fuel operation, or seeks to minimise upfront capital cost.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newbuild Aframax/product tankers, Handymax bulk carriers, and medium container ships; also used in retrofits where replacing older low‑speed engines with a modern MAN unit provides improved fuel efficiency and reliability while retaining HFO capability.
11S46ME-B8.5 unverified
· 14190.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
14190
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~14 MW) in a compact L‑configuration suitable for tight engine rooms
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) and flexible fuel capability (HFO/MDO)
  • Proven reliability of the MAN S46ME family with long service intervals
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning systems to meet IMO Tier II/III emissions
  • Broad support network and spare‑parts availability worldwide
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller low‑power engines
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful maintenance of the crosshead arrangement
  • Low operating speed (129 rpm) necessitates a large-diameter propeller or reduction gear
  • Emissions exceed Tier II limits without an aftertreatment system
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerLR2 crude oil carrierLarge bulk carrier (>200 kt)Ultra‑large container vessel (ULCV) in the 14–16 MW power range
Certifications: DNV GL type approvalABS classificationIMO Tier II emission compliance (with optional SCR/EGCS for Tier III)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine (~14 MW) for very large tankers or bulk carriers and have space for an L‑configured low‑speed unit. Avoid if the vessel size is below ~30 kt where a smaller, higher‑rpm engine would be more efficient, or if capital cost and hull space are primary constraints.
Use Cases: The 11S46ME-B8.5 is typically installed on newbuild VLCCs and large bulk carriers built from the mid‑2010s onward, as well as in power‑uprate retrofits where additional thrust is required without major redesign of the propulsion system.
12S46ME-B8.5 unverified
· 15480.0 kW · electronically controlled low‑speed two‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
15480
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈15 MW) with very low rpm, ideal for direct drive to propeller shafts
  • Electronic ME control system improves fuel efficiency and enables IMO Tier II/III emissions compliance
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven MAN reliability record and long service intervals on large cargo ships
  • Modular design simplifies installation and maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with older mechanically controlled models
  • Requires skilled crew for electronic control system management and diagnostics
  • High‑pressure lubrication and cooling systems add complexity
  • Vibration levels can be significant; needs robust mounting and isolation
Typical Vessels: Aframax / Suezmax tankersPanamax & Post‑Panamax bulk carriersLarge container ships (8 000–12 000 TEU)LNG carriers (medium‑size)Cruise vessels over 30 000 GT
Decision Guide: Choose this engine when you need high power at low rpm, electronic fuel‑optimisation, and flexibility to burn HFO or MDO on large cargo vessels. Avoid it for small to medium ships where space, weight, or budget constraints make a smaller, mechanically controlled engine more appropriate.
Use Cases: The 12S46ME-B8.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on high‑deadweight tankers, bulk carriers and large container ships that require direct‑drive low‑speed engines to meet efficiency and emission targets on long‑haul routes.
14S46ME-B8.5 unverified
· 18060.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
18060
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈180 kW per cylinder) enabling compact installation on very large ships.
  • Low operating speed (129 rpm) reduces gearbox requirements and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Proven MAN design with extensive global support network and spare‑parts availability.
  • Dual-fuel capability (HFO/MDO) offers operational flexibility and compliance with varying fuel regulations.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with newer dual‑fuel or after‑treated 4‑stroke engines, requiring additional exhaust treatment in emission control areas.
  • Crosshead design adds mechanical complexity (separate crankcase and cylinder lubrication), increasing maintenance workload.
  • Limited suitability for vessels where space is at a premium or where ultra‑low emissions are mandatory without extensive retrofit.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Crude Oil TankerBulk Carrier (>150 kDWT)Large Container Ship (≥12,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm for a large vessel, have ample engine‑room volume, and value MAN's global service network. Avoid if: the ship operates primarily in strict emission control areas without ready access to exhaust after‑treatment, or space/weight constraints dominate the design.
Use Cases: The 14S46ME‑B8.5 is typically installed on ultra‑large crude carriers and bulk carriers where a single engine can drive a large-diameter slow‑turning propeller directly, delivering efficient propulsion over long voyages. It also appears in some of the biggest container ships that still rely on low‑speed two‑stroke engines for optimal fuel consumption.
5S40ME-B9.5
· 5150.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Cylinders
5
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
5675 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a rated BSFC of only 174 g/kWh
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system for optimal load handling and emissions compliance
  • Proven reliability of the S40ME family with long service intervals
  • Compact power output suitable for vessels where space is at a premium
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight compared with high‑speed alternatives
  • Crosshead design requires more extensive lubrication and maintenance procedures
  • Limited redundancy – only five cylinders, so a single cylinder failure has higher impact than on larger multi‑cylinder units
  • Higher upfront capital cost typical of low‑speed MAN engines
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil to protect the crosshead bearing
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (30–40 k DWT)Coastal bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselRo‑Ro / ferryNaval auxiliary ship
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a mid‑range, fuel‑flexible main engine with proven low‑speed efficiency and can accommodate its size; avoid if the vessel requires power above ~10 MW, higher cylinder redundancy, or if a four‑stroke high‑speed solution is preferred for reduced vibration.
Use Cases: The 5S40ME-B9.5 is commonly installed in newbuild product tankers and coastal bulk carriers where a compact yet powerful low‑speed engine meets class requirements, as well as in offshore support vessels that benefit from its fuel flexibility and robust MAN control system.
6S40ME-B9.5
· 6180.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
6
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
6810 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a rated BSFC of only 174 g/kWh
  • Flexible fuel options (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) supporting future emission regulations
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability in the S40ME family with extensive service network worldwide
  • Large torque at low rpm reduces gear‑box stress and improves propeller efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Physical size and weight demand a spacious engine room and strong foundations
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller high‑speed engines
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke maintenance (crosshead bearing, cylinder liner wear)
  • Low rpm necessitates reduction gearing, adding complexity and cost
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerHandymax bulk carrierProduct carrierMedium‑size container ship (up to ~8,000 TEU)Offshore supply vessel
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a mid‑range power plant with excellent fuel flexibility and proven low‑speed efficiency for medium‑size bulk carriers, tankers or offshore vessels. Avoid if space is at a premium, the vessel requires very high speed, or you lack crew experienced with two‑stroke crosshead engines.
Use Cases: The 6S40ME-B9.5 is commonly installed in newbuild Aframax and Handymax ships where operators value fuel‑type versatility and low specific fuel consumption. It is also selected for retrofits on existing vessels aiming to meet stricter emission standards while retaining a familiar MAN service platform.
7S40ME-B9.5
· 7210.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
7945 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (174 g/kWh) gives excellent thermal efficiency for large vessels.
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) supports compliance with evolving fuel regulations.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control system enables precise load management and emissions optimisation.
  • Robust crosshead design provides long service intervals and proven reliability in heavy‑duty applications.
  • Compact power density relative to output reduces shaft line length for low‑speed propulsion.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with some competing 4‑stroke designs.
  • Crosshead architecture demands skilled maintenance personnel and specialised tooling.
  • Low‑speed operation (146 rpm) necessitates reduction gearing, adding to overall plant complexity.
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions may exceed the strictest Tier III limits in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrierContainer ship (large, >8,000 TEU)General cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible engine for large low‑speed vessels where efficiency and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, if higher shaft speed is required, or if capital cost must be minimised.
Use Cases: The 7S40ME-B9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers, often in dual‑fuel configurations to meet IMO 2020 sulfur limits while maintaining low operating costs. It also appears on large container ships where a single low‑speed engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller through reduction gearing.
8S40ME-B9.5
· 8240.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
8
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
9080 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈174 g/kWh) reduces fuel costs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Robust crosshead design provides long service life and low wear
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control system for precise operation and diagnostics
  • Proven worldwide track record in VLCCs, bulk carriers and large container ships
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular maintenance of the crosshead bearing system
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (SCR or EGR) to meet Tier III NOx limits in emission control areas
  • Limited suitability for small vessels or high‑speed applications
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax tankersAframax and Panamax oil carriersPanamax and Capesize bulk carriersLarge container ships (≥8,000 TEU)Cruise liners and ferries with high power demand
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Classification Society approvalIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance (low‑speed engine)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible main engine delivering high power at low rpm for large vessels where efficiency and reliability are paramount. Avoid if the vessel size is small, space in the engine room is limited, or a higher‑speed compact engine is required.
Use Cases: The 8S40ME‑B9.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, bulk carriers, and large container ships, providing steady low‑speed thrust for long voyages while allowing operators to switch between heavy fuel oil and low‑sulphur alternatives depending on market and regulatory conditions.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S40ME-B9.5
9S40ME-B9.5 unverified
· 9270.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
9270
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm, providing excellent propulsive efficiency for slow‑speed ships.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for both heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil, supporting bunker cost optimisation.
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with V‑type layouts of similar power.
  • Proven MAN ME series reliability with integrated exhaust gas after‑treatment (SCR) for low NOx emissions.
  • Broad class society acceptance and extensive global support network.
Weaknesses
  • Large overall dimensions and weight despite L layout, requiring substantial structural accommodation.
  • Higher upfront capital cost than comparable medium‑speed diesel or dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but more complex; requires skilled personnel for crosshead cylinder servicing.
  • Limited to low‑speed applications – not suitable for vessels needing higher shaft speeds.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict water‑in‑oil monitoring to avoid wear.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge containership (12 000–14 000 TEU)LNG carrier (large class)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large bulk or tanker vessels, value fuel flexibility and have space constraints that benefit from an L‑configuration. Avoid if the vessel operates at higher shaft speeds, budget constraints limit capital expenditure, or maintenance facilities lack crosshead expertise.
Use Cases: The 9S40ME‑B9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, Aframax tankers and Capesize bulk carriers, as well as on large containerships where low‑speed efficiency and fuel flexibility are paramount. It also serves in LNG carrier propulsion when paired with appropriate cryogenic cargo systems.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S40ME-B9.5
10S40ME-B9.5 unverified
· 10300.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
10300
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct drive of large propellers without reduction gear.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Integrated ME‑B electronic engine management provides precise fuel metering and helps meet IMO Tier III emission limits.
  • Proven S40ME family with extensive global service network and long‑time reliability record.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly, extending overhaul intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope; requires substantial engine room space.
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires skilled personnel for routine maintenance and overhauls of a 2‑stroke crosshead unit.
  • Low rpm limits use to vessels that can accommodate large-diameter, slow‑turning propellers.
Typical Vessels: Aframax / VLCC tankersPanamax & Post‑Panamax bulk carriersLarge container ships (10 000+ TEU)Cruise linersLNG carriers with dual‑fuel configuration
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (D‑2)USCG Type ApprovalDNV Classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine with proven reliability and fuel flexibility for large vessels that can accommodate its size. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit engine room volume, if budget is extremely tight, or if higher shaft speeds are required for smaller fast ships.
Use Cases: The 10S40ME‑B9.5 is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on long‑range tankers, bulk carriers and large container vessels, often paired with a controllable‑pitch propeller to optimise fuel consumption across varying service speeds. It also appears in cruise ships where low vibration and noise are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 11S40ME-B9.5
11S40ME-B9.5 unverified
· 11330.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
11330
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel efficiency (~185 g/kWh) reducing operating costs
  • Electronic ME‑B9.5 control system enables precise fuel metering and better load handling
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers with extensive service history
  • Compact L‑configuration saves engine room space compared with wider layouts
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull accommodation
  • Higher upfront capital cost than medium‑speed alternatives
  • Crosshead design demands regular lubrication and wear‑part replacement (e.g., crosshead bearings)
  • To meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas an SCR system is required, adding complexity
  • Limited suitability for vessels needing high rpm or rapid start/stop cycles
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large container ship (>10 000 TEU)LNG carrier (low‑speed propulsion variant)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine for large vessels where space efficiency and proven long‑haul reliability are critical, especially when operating in emission control areas with SCR installed. Avoid if the vessel is small to medium size, budget‑constrained, or requires higher rpm engines for fast manoeuvring or dynamic positioning.
Use Cases: The 11S40ME-B9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, and large bulk carriers, providing continuous power for long voyages. It is also used on some ultra‑large container ships where low‑speed engines are preferred for fuel economy, and on LNG carriers that adopt low‑speed diesel propulsion.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S40ME-B9.5
12S40ME-B9.5 unverified
· 12360.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
12360
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈12 MW) suitable for very large ships
  • Fuel flexible – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from MAN’s S40ME family
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑Series) optimises fuel consumption and emissions
  • Meets IMO Tier II NOx limits without additional after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller low‑power units
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful maintenance to avoid wear in the crosshead design
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than medium‑speed alternatives, needing robust isolation
  • Not compliant with IMO Tier III without retrofit or exhaust after‑treatment
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Capesize Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (8–12 k TEU)Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier II (MARPOL Annex VI)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power main engine for vessels above ~150 000 dwt, require fuel flexibility and compliance with IMO Tier II emissions. Avoid if the ship is smaller where a lower‑power or medium‑speed engine would be more economical, or if operation in strict Tier III Emission Control Areas without after‑treatment is required.
Use Cases: The 12S40ME-B9.5 is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on new‑build VLCCs, Capesize bulk carriers and large container ships, providing reliable high‑speed service for long voyages while meeting international emission standards.
MAN Energy Solutions 14S40ME-B9.5
14S40ME-B9.5 unverified
· 14420.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
14420
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 14 420 kW from a compact L‑configuration fits tight engine rooms.
  • Proven fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) with MAN’s ME electronic control for optimal combustion.
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of modern low‑speed 2‑stroke designs (~176 g/kWh).
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates reduction gear losses, improving overall efficiency.
  • Broad class society approvals and extensive service network worldwide.
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller or 4‑stroke alternatives.
  • Requires crew experienced with low‑speed crosshead operation and maintenance.
  • Large bearing loads demand rigorous lubrication monitoring and periodic overhauls.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than many medium‑speed engines, needing robust isolation.
  • Limited to HFO/MDO – not suitable for vessels requiring dual‑fuel (LNG) capability.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Very Large Crude Tanker
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on large tankers or bulk carriers, value MAN’s global support and proven fuel flexibility, and have crew trained on 2‑stroke crosshead engines. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires dual‑fuel (LNG) operation, has strict budget constraints, or you prefer lower vibration solutions.
Use Cases: The 14S40ME‑B9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine in new‑build VLCCs and capesize bulk carriers for long‑haul routes, and it is also selected for retrofits where a power boost is required while retaining existing propeller arrangements.
5S35ME-B9
· 3950.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
350 mm
Stroke
1550 mm
Rated Power
3700 kW
Rated Speed
167 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S35ME-B9
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a BSFC of only 174 g/kWh.
  • Fuel‑flexible – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as low‑sulphur and marine diesel oils.
  • Compact inline layout reduces engine room footprint compared with larger multi‑cylinder units.
  • Proven MAN reliability and integrated SaCoSone control system for remote monitoring and diagnostics.
  • Super long stroke provides strong torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers.
Weaknesses
  • Relatively high capital cost versus medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives of similar power.
  • Large physical size and weight still demand substantial engine‑room space on small vessels.
  • Higher vibration and noise levels typical of two‑stroke crosshead designs, requiring robust isolation measures.
  • Limited maximum output (≈3.7 MW) makes it unsuitable for larger bulk carriers or tankers needing >10 MW main power.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but tasks (e.g., cylinder liner inspection) can be more specialised.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerFeeder container shipHandy‑size bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselCruise ferry
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL ClassificationABS Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact, fuel‑flexible main engine in the 3–4 MW range with proven low‑speed efficiency and direct‑drive capability. Avoid if vessel power requirements exceed ~5 MW, space is extremely limited, or you prefer four‑stroke medium‑speed engines for lower vibration and simpler maintenance.
Use Cases: The 5S35ME-B9 is typically installed on midsize product carriers (≈15–30 k DWT), feeder container vessels (≈2,000–3,500 TEU), small bulk carriers, and offshore support ships where a compact low‑speed engine provides direct drive to the propeller while allowing operation on a wide range of fuels.
6S35ME-B9
· 4740.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead medium-speed engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
350 mm
Stroke
1550 mm
Rated Power
4440 kW
Rated Speed
167 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S35ME-B9
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power for a six‑cylinder layout – compact for its output class.
  • Fuel flexibility across heavy and low‑sulphur oils reduces bunker cost risk.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈174 g/kWh) meets IMO Tier II emission limits.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise monitoring and diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability in MAN’s long‑standing S35ME family with extensive service network.
Weaknesses
  • Initial capital cost higher than comparable low‑speed, larger‑cylinder engines.
  • Requires skilled maintenance staff familiar with crosshead two‑stroke systems.
  • Physical length and weight are significant for a six‑cylinder unit – may limit installation space.
  • Emissions still higher than newer dual‑fuel or LNG‑optimized designs when running on high‑sulphur fuel.
  • Limited to medium‑speed applications; not optimal for ultra‑large vessels seeking maximum efficiency.
Typical Vessels: Medium‑size Crude Oil TankerProduct/Chemical TankerBulk Carrier (handymax / supramax)Container Ship (up to ~8 000 TEU)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact, high‑power engine with fuel flexibility and proven MAN service support for medium‑size cargo vessels. Avoid if the project demands ultra‑low emissions (e.g., LNG or dual‑fuel) or if space constraints preclude a crosshead layout.
Use Cases: The 6S35ME-B9 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on mid‑range tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where a balance of power density, fuel flexibility and reliability is required. It is also used in vessels operating on mixed fuel regimes to comply with varying bunker specifications while staying within IMO Tier II limits.
7S35ME-B9
· 5530.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
350 mm
Stroke
1550 mm
Rated Power
5180 kW
Rated Speed
167 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S35ME-B9
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency with a low BSFC of ~174 g/kWh.
  • Fuel‑type flexibility allows operation on heavy fuel oil as well as low‑sulphur and marine diesel oils.
  • Robust crosshead construction provides long service intervals and proven reliability in harsh sea conditions.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring, diagnostics and optimized performance.
  • Compact power density for its class, suitable for large vessels where space is at a premium.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room volume and structural support.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller high‑speed diesel alternatives.
  • Requires skilled personnel for maintenance of the crosshead and long‑stroke components.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than those of modern dual‑fuel or electric propulsion systems.
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for vessels needing high shaft speeds.
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerPanamax/Handymax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (12 000+ TEU)Cruise Ship
Certifications: DNV ClassificationIMO NOx Tier II compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with excellent fuel flexibility and proven reliability for large cargo or passenger vessels that run on heavy fuel oil. Avoid if the vessel requires high shaft speeds, dual‑fuel capability, limited engine‑room space, or if lower noise/vibration is a primary concern.
Use Cases: The 7S35ME-B9 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuilds and retrofits of large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where low‑speed diesel power is standard. It also serves in cruise ship propulsion plants where fuel flexibility and long service intervals are valued.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S35ME-B9
8S35ME-B9
· 6320.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
350 mm
Stroke
1550 mm
Rated Power
5920 kW
Rated Speed
167 rpm
BSFC (rated)
174 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
19.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S35ME-B9
Engine Series
ME-B
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power (5920 kW from only eight cylinders) with a low rated speed of 167 rpm, giving excellent torque characteristics for direct‑drive propellers.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO – allowing operators to optimise bunker costs under varying market conditions.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (174 g/kWh) compared with older two‑stroke designs, contributing to reduced operating expenses and CO₂ emissions.
  • Advanced electronic control system (MAN SaCoSone) provides precise fuel metering, load optimisation and diagnostic capabilities.
  • Proven track record in the MAN S35ME family, with extensive class approvals and a large global service network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high dry weight make installation feasible only on vessels of considerable size.
  • Higher capital cost than smaller low‑speed engines or newer dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Requires specialised maintenance skills for crosshead and long‑stroke components, increasing crew training needs.
  • NOx emissions can exceed IMO Tier III limits without additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR), limiting use in emission‑control areas unless equipped accordingly.
  • Limited suitability for vessels that demand very low vibration levels or compact engine rooms.
Typical Vessels: Capesize bulk carrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Large container ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise liner (mid‑size)Heavy‑lift cargo vessel
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approvalIMO Type Approval for marine diesel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability and fuel flexibility for large vessels where space and weight are available. Avoid if the vessel is small to medium size, if ultra‑low NOx emissions are mandatory without planned after‑treatment, or if capital cost must be minimised.
Use Cases: The 8S35ME-B9 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on Capesize bulk carriers and VLCC tankers, where its high torque at low rpm drives a fixed‑pitch propeller directly. It is also used in large container ships and cruise vessels that benefit from its fuel‑type versatility and efficient operation over long voyages.
9S35ME-B9 unverified
· 7110.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35ME-B9
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1550
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
7110
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) reduces fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Compact power‑to‑size ratio for the 7 MW class, fitting into limited engine room spaces.
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in MAN’s S35ME family.
  • Modular construction simplifies overhauls and spare‑parts logistics.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand robust foundations and hull space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller four‑stroke units.
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels requiring rapid load changes (e.g., LNG carriers).
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular maintenance of crosshead bearings.
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (SCR/DPF) for IMO Tier III.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerHandymax bulk carrierMedium container ship (8–10 k TEU)General cargo vessel
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS classificationIMO Tier II compliance (with optional Tier III after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible main engine delivering ~7 MW in a compact layout for mid‑size tankers or bulk carriers and are prepared to invest in the initial cost and space. Avoid if budget is tight, vessel size limits preclude the engine’s dimensions, or rapid load response (e.g., LNG dual‑fuel ships) is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 9S35ME-B9 is commonly installed on Aframax‑class oil tankers, Handymax bulk carriers and medium‑size container vessels operating worldwide. It provides the main thrust for ships in the 30 000–45 000 dwt range where fuel efficiency and reliability are paramount.
10S35ME-B9 unverified
· 7900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel with electronic fuel injection
Model Family
S35ME-B9
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1550
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
7900
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50%) thanks to MAN’s ME‑C electronic fuel management
  • Flexibility to run on HFO or MDO, supporting dual‑fuel strategies
  • Compact L‑configuration optimises hull space for mid‑size vessels
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of crosshead designs
  • Ready for IMO Tier II compliance; can be equipped with SCR for Tier III
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight due to 350 mm bore/1550 mm stroke, limiting installation in very space‑constrained ships
  • Low maximum rpm (167) requires reduction gearing for high‑speed propellers, adding cost and maintenance
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Electronic control system adds diagnostic complexity and requires specialised training
  • Tier III emissions compliance needs additional after‑treatment equipment
Typical Vessels: Product TankerBulk Carrier (30–45 k DWT)Container Ship (up to ~5 000 TEU)General Cargo VesselLNG/LPG carrier (mid‑size)
Certifications: IMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑efficiency low‑speed engine with flexible fuel options and can accommodate its size and gearing requirements. Avoid if vessel design limits space for a large crosshead engine or if lower capital cost and higher rpm are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 10S35ME-B9 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on mid‑size bulk carriers, product tankers and container ships where fuel efficiency and compliance with IMO Tier II emissions standards are critical. It is also used in new builds that favour a compact L‑layout to maximise cargo space.
11S35ME-B9 unverified
· 8690.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35ME-B9
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1550
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
8690
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of MAN S35ME‑B series (≈48% at ISO conditions)
  • Electronic engine control (ME‑C) enables precise fuel metering and lower emissions
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability on a wide range of commercial vessels worldwide
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with older inline designs
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew familiar with crosshead two‑stroke engines
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels that need >200 rpm operation
  • After‑treatment (SCR/Selective Catalytic Reduction) may be required to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas
Typical Vessels: Bulk Carrier (30–45 k dwt)Product Tanker (15–30 k dwt)Container Ship (2,000–3,500 TEU)General Cargo VesselOffshore Supply Vessel (large class)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven low‑speed engine delivering ~8.7 MW with good fuel flexibility for medium‑size cargo vessels and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if: vessel requires higher shaft speed, very tight space constraints, or you aim to minimise initial capital outlay.
Use Cases: The 11S35ME-B9 is typically installed in newbuilds of mid‑range bulk carriers, product tankers and small containerships where the combination of high power at low rpm, fuel flexibility and strong after‑sales support are valued. It also appears as a repower option for existing vessels seeking improved efficiency and compliance with IMO emission tiers.
12S35ME-B9 unverified
· 9480.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35ME-B9
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1550
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
9480
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈57 kW per cylinder) enabling compact installation on very large ships
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh), reducing operating costs
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO, with optional LNG conversion) for market flexibility
  • Proven MAN reliability record and long service intervals thanks to robust crosshead design
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME) for precise monitoring and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires crew trained in low‑speed two‑stroke operation and maintenance
  • NOx emissions may exceed IMO Tier III limits without after‑treatment systems
  • Limited suitability for vessels needing high shaft speed or compact power plants
Typical Vessels: Bulk Carrier (≥150 k DWT)VLCC / ULCC TankerUltra‑Large Container ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: DNV Class approvalABS Class approvalIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels and value fuel flexibility and proven efficiency. Avoid if the ship is size‑constrained, requires higher shaft speeds, or budget constraints make a medium‑speed solution more attractive.
Use Cases: The 12S35ME‑B9 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild bulk carriers of 150 k+ DWT, VLCC tankers, and ultra‑large container ships, where its high power output at low rpm matches large propeller designs and delivers fuel savings over long voyages.
14S35ME-B9 unverified
· 11060.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S35ME-B9
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1550
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
11060
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈11 MW) at very low rpm enables direct drive of large propellers without reduction gear.
  • Robust MAN engineering with a long service record and extensive global support network.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO / MDO) provides operational flexibility on different fuel markets.
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear, suited for continuous heavy‑load operation.
  • Well‑established type approval and classification society documentation simplifies certification.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to very large hulls.
  • Higher NOx/SOx emissions compared with newer low‑speed dual‑fuel engines unless equipped with after‑treatment systems.
  • Crosshead arrangement adds complexity and maintenance workload (more moving parts, oil consumption).
  • Specific fuel consumption is modestly higher than the latest ME‑B series models that incorporate advanced combustion optimisation.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and regular overhauls to maintain reliability.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Bulk Carrier (>200 kt)Large Container Ship (≥12,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large ships with flexible fuel options and direct‑drive capability. Avoid if space is at a premium, ultra‑low emissions are mandatory, or you prefer the latest low‑speed dual‑fuel designs with higher efficiency.
Use Cases: The 14S35ME-B9 is typically installed on VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and mega‑container ships where continuous high thrust at low rpm is required for efficient propulsion over long voyages. It is also used in some large Ro‑Ro or passenger vessels that demand robust, low‑speed diesel power.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G50ME-C9.6
9G50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 16020.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed electronically controlled crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
16020
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers
  • Electronic ME‑C control enables optimal fuel consumption and emission performance (IMO Tier II/III)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • L‑configuration reduces shaft line length and improves installation layout in tight engine rooms
  • Proven reliability of MAN G‑type family with extensive service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost compared with older mechanically controlled engines
  • Complex electronic control system increases maintenance skill requirements and diagnostic costs
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict monitoring to avoid wear in the crosshead arrangement
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for vessels needing higher shaft speeds
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC tankerLarge bulk carrier (≥180 kt)Container ship (>10,000 TEU)LNG carrier (large class)Cruise ship (mega‑class)
Certifications: DNV GL Class approvalABS classificationLR (Lloyd’s Register) approvalIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with proven fuel flexibility and modern emission control for ultra‑large vessels. Avoid if the vessel design limits space for a large crosshead engine, requires higher shaft speeds, or if budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost of electronic control systems.
Use Cases: The 9G50ME-C9.6 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and mega container ships, where its low rpm matches directly coupled fixed‑pitch or controllable‑pitch propellers and its emission‑friendly ME‑C system satisfies current environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G50ME-C9.6
10G50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 17800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed electronic injection
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
17800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈1.78 MW per cylinder) enabling compact engine rooms
  • Electronic common‑rail fuel injection gives low specific fuel consumption and better NOx performance
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Proven MAN reliability record with long service intervals and extensive global support network
  • Modular L‑configuration simplifies installation and maintenance
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑power engines
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and robust foundations
  • Low rpm necessitates a reduction gear, adding to overall plant complexity and cost
  • Requires skilled crew for electronic control system management and maintenance
  • To meet IMO Tier III NOx limits in emission control areas, an after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) is often needed
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (Capesize)Product Tanker
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Type Certificate for Main Engine
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm, want proven fuel‑flexibility and low specific fuel consumption, and have the hull volume to accommodate a large low‑speed engine. Avoid if budget constraints dominate, space is limited, or a dual‑fuel (LNG) capability without additional after‑treatment is required.
Use Cases: The 10G50ME-C9.6 is typically installed on new‑build VLCCs and ULCCs as the primary propulsion unit, as well as on large container vessels where high speed and fuel efficiency are critical. It is also selected for retrofits of existing tankers seeking to improve fuel consumption and meet stricter emission standards.
11G50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 19580.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed ME engine
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
19580
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Electronic fuel injection provides up to 5% better specific fuel consumption versus mechanically controlled versions.
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III emissions when operated with low‑sulphur fuel or exhaust gas cleaning systems.
  • Proven reliability on large bulk carriers and container ships; extensive global support network.
  • Flexible load handling – rapid response to speed changes without loss of efficiency.
  • Modular design simplifies installation and future upgrades.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable mechanically controlled engines.
  • Complex ME control system requires specialised training for operators and maintenance staff.
  • Large physical footprint; may limit installation in vessels with tight engine‑room constraints.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality – HFO must meet strict specifications to avoid injector wear.
  • Maintenance intervals can be shorter when operating at high loads continuously.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerHandymax / Supramax bulk carrierPost‑Panamax container ship (8 000–10 000 TEU)Large cruise vessel (mid‑size)Ro‑Ro/Lo‑Lo vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Type Approval for marine propulsionDNV GL Classification (approved type)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient engine with electronic control to meet current emission regulations and have access to trained crew or service support. Avoid if budget constraints prioritize lower upfront cost, the vessel has severe space limitations, or the operator prefers a mechanically controlled engine for simplicity.
Use Cases: The 11G50ME-C9.6 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build Aframax tankers and post‑Panamax container ships targeting IMO Tier II/III compliance in Emission Control Areas. It is also selected for retrofits where a compact, high‑output engine with flexible speed control can replace older mechanically controlled units.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G50ME-C9.6
12G50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 21360.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
21360
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈48% thermal efficiency) for a 12‑cylinder unit
  • Fuel flexible – can run on HFO or MDO, supporting bunker cost optimisation
  • Electronic fuel injection and engine control reduces crew workload and improves trim optimisation
  • Proven MAN reliability record in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Compact ‘L’ configuration shortens overall engine room length
Weaknesses
  • 2‑stroke crosshead design requires more intensive lubrication and bearing maintenance than 4‑stroke engines
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with SCR or exhaust gas cleaning, adding system complexity
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on smaller vessels or those with tight hull constraints
  • Initial capital cost higher than comparable 4‑stroke units of similar power
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (VLBC)Ultra‑large Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Large Ro‑Ro / Car Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class CertificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >21 MW of low‑speed propulsion power on a large vessel, value fuel flexibility between HFO and MDO, and want the proven reliability of MAN’s G‑series. Avoid if space or weight constraints are critical, if ultra‑low NOx emissions are required without additional after‑treatment, or if a dual‑fuel gas engine is preferred for LNG carriers.
Use Cases: The 12G50ME-C9.6 powers the main shaft of VLCCs and Suezmax tankers on long-haul crude routes, drives very large bulk carriers on iron ore trades, and serves as the primary propulsion unit on mega‑container ships where high power at low rpm is essential for efficient propeller operation.
14G50ME-C9.6 unverified
· 24920.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
24920
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific fuel consumption efficiency typical of low‑speed MAN engines
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history on ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
  • Compatible with IMO Tier II/III emission control strategies when equipped with after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for operation, monitoring and maintenance of a 2‑stroke crosshead design
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for vessels needing higher shaft speeds without reduction gearing
  • Without SCR or other after‑treatment, NOx emissions can be higher than modern dual‑fuel engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large container ships (>15 000 TEU)Bulk carriers >200 k DWTCruise liners and Ro‑Ro vessels requiring high shaft power
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for ultra‑large tankers or bulk carriers and have the space and crew expertise to support a large 2‑stroke crosshead unit. Avoid if vessel size constraints, dual‑fuel capability, or lower upfront cost are primary concerns, or if higher shaft speeds are required without reduction gearing.
Use Cases: The 14G50ME-C9.6 is typically installed in the propulsion line of VLCCs and ULCCs transporting crude oil, as well as in very large container ships and bulk carriers where a single high‑power engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller through a reduction gear. It also appears on some cruise vessels that favor low‑speed diesel for fuel economy over long voyages.
5S70ME-C10.5-GI
· 16450.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Cylinders
5
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
18200 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact installation on vessels with limited engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) reduces fuel cost and CO₂/NOₓ emissions when gas is available.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise load response and optimized fuel consumption.
  • Proven S70ME family reliability with extensive service network worldwide.
  • Super long stroke design yields excellent mean effective pressure and thermal efficiency (BSFC ~167 g/kWh).
Weaknesses
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, requiring additional maintenance for gas injectors and safety systems.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines of similar power.
  • Requires on‑board natural‑gas storage or bunkering infrastructure, limiting applicability on routes without NG supply.
  • Physical length due to 2.8 m stroke can be a constraint for retrofits in existing hulls.
  • Specific fuel consumption still higher than the newest ultra‑low‑speed four‑stroke designs with advanced after‑treatment.
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierProduct tankerLNG carrier (dual‑fuel operation)Offshore supply vessel
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III compliance (via gas injection/after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, space‑efficient main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility and lower emissions on routes that can supply natural gas. Avoid if the vessel lacks gas bunkering capability, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or simplicity of a single‑fuel system is preferred.
Use Cases: The 5S70ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild medium‑size container ships, bulk carriers and product tankers that aim to meet Tier III emission limits while exploiting cheaper natural‑gas fuel where available. It is also used on LNG carriers for boil‑off gas utilization and on offshore supply vessels requiring high reliability and compact engine rooms.
6S70ME-C10.5-GI
· 19740.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke
Cylinders
6
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
21840 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (21 840 kW) in a compact 6‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO and high‑pressure natural gas) provides fuel flexibility and emissions advantage
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) thanks to the super long stroke design
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces wear on pistons and connecting rods
  • MAN SaCoSone control system enables optimized load handling and quick fuel switching
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require ample engine room space
  • Higher upfront cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Gas injection system adds complexity and requires high‑pressure gas bunkering infrastructure
  • Maintenance of dual‑fuel injectors is more demanding than conventional fuel systems
  • Long stroke may limit suitability for vessels with tight hull form constraints
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierOil Tanker (including LNG‑powered product tankers)Container ShipBulk CarrierCruise Ship (dual‑fuel propulsion)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility, low NOx emissions (Tier III) and are able to provide natural‑gas bunkering. Avoid if the vessel has severe space or weight limits, the operator cannot support high‑pressure gas infrastructure, or budget constraints preclude the higher capital cost.
Use Cases: Primarily installed as the main propulsion engine on newbuilds that require IMO Tier III compliance and want to exploit LNG or boil‑off gas for reduced emissions—e.g., modern LNG carriers, dual‑fuel oil tankers, large container ships and cruise vessels with access to gas bunkering ports.
7S70ME-C10.5-GI
· 23030.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
25480 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) gives excellent thermal efficiency.
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows use of LNG or other gases to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduce SOx emissions.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and easy integration with ship automation.
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global service network for spare parts and technical support.
  • High mean effective pressure (21 bar) enables compact power density for large vessels.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine‑room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel low‑speed diesel of comparable power.
  • Complex high‑pressure gas handling system increases installation, commissioning and maintenance effort.
  • Crew training requirements are higher due to dual‑fuel operation and advanced control electronics.
  • LNG storage infrastructure on board adds weight and reduces cargo space.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierChemical/TankerContainer ShipBulk CarrierCruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operating on gas)DNV GL Class Approval for dual‑fuel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high power with low fuel consumption, must meet strict emission limits, and have the ability to install LNG storage and handling systems. Avoid if: vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint, gas infrastructure is unavailable, or crew expertise in dual‑fuel operation is lacking.
Use Cases: The 7S70ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed on large ocean‑going vessels that require both high propulsion power and flexibility to switch between conventional heavy fuel oil and cleaner gaseous fuels—e.g., new LNG carriers, eco‑focused tankers, or cruise ships operating in emission‑controlled areas.
8S70ME-C10.5-GI
· 26320.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
8
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
29120 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 29 MW from an 8‑cylinder unit
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) provides fuel flexibility and can use boil‑off gas on LNG carriers
  • IMO Tier III compliant with low NOx emissions thanks to advanced combustion control
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Proven MAN S70ME-C family reliability and extensive global support network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents due to dual‑fuel hardware and controls
  • Complexity of high‑pressure natural‑gas injection system requires specialised crew training and safety procedures
  • Physical size and weight are larger than smaller low‑power engines, affecting hull integration
  • Maintenance intervals can be shorter for the gas injection components compared with pure oil‑fired units
  • Requires on‑board NG storage or LNG boil‑off handling infrastructure
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerULCV Container ShipLarge Bulk Carrier (300 kDWT+)LNG Carrier (using boil‑off gas)Cruise Ship (high power, low emissions requirement)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalIMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility and must meet strict emission limits (Tier III). Ideal for new builds where LNG boil‑off or shore‑supplied natural gas can be used. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, if the vessel lacks space or infrastructure for NG storage, or if operating in regions where dual‑fuel support is limited.
Use Cases: The 8S70ME-C10.5-GI is commonly installed on new‑build ultra‑large crude carriers, container ships of 15 000–20 000 TEU, and LNG carriers that can utilise boil‑off gas as a secondary fuel. It also fits large cruise vessels seeking to lower NOx emissions while retaining the option to run on conventional marine fuels.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S70ME-C10.5-GI
9S70ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 29610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29610
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈30 MW) from a relatively compact footprint for a low‑speed engine
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when LNG is used
  • MAN’s proven S70ME-C family reputation for reliability and long service intervals
  • Modular construction simplifies installation, commissioning and on‑board maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel HFO engine because of the LNG fuel system and controls
  • Requires dedicated LNG bunkering infrastructure and onboard cryogenic storage
  • Complex fuel handling increases crew training requirements and operational procedures
Typical Vessels: Large Container ShipPanamax / Post‑Panamax Bulk CarrierVLCC / Aframax TankerCruise VesselLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with the ability to switch between LNG and HFO for emission compliance or fuel‑price optimisation; you have access to LNG bunkering and can absorb higher upfront costs. Avoid if: the vessel operates on routes without reliable LNG supply, budget constraints preclude dual‑fuel system investment, or space/weight limits are tighter than a conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engine allows.
Use Cases: The 9S70ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed in newbuilds of large ocean-going vessels where operators seek to meet IMO Tier III emission standards on nitrogen oxides while retaining the option to run on conventional heavy fuel oil when LNG is unavailable. It is also favoured for ships targeting lower CO₂ footprints through LNG utilisation.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S70ME-C10.5-GI
10S70ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 32900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency (≈170 g/kWh) especially on LNG, reducing CO₂ emissions
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides operational flexibility and compliance with IMO Tier III when using LNG
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network
  • Integrated electronic control system enables precise load management and quick start‑up
  • Compact power density for a 33 MW engine, suitable for very large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires cryogenic LNG storage and handling infrastructure on board
  • Crosshead design adds mechanical complexity and maintenance workload
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be challenging in remote ports due to size of components
  • Limited suitability for vessels with strict space constraints or lower power requirements
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) / Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk Carrier (>180 k DWT)Cruise ship (high‑power propulsion requirement)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operated on LNG)DNV GL ApprovedABS Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >30 MW of main‑propulsion power, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet future emission regulations, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if: the vessel’s budget cannot accommodate higher upfront costs, space for LNG tanks is limited, or the operating profile does not justify the efficiency gains of LNG.
Use Cases: The 10S70ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels and very large crude carriers where fuel flexibility and low emissions are strategic priorities. It is also selected for high‑speed bulk carriers and cruise ships that benefit from the engine’s power density and MAN’s global service network.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S70ME-C10.5-GI
12S70ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 39480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39480
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (~39 MW) suitable for ultra‑large ships
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduces CO₂ emissions when LNG is used
  • MAN’s extensive global service network ensures rapid spare‑part supply and technical support
  • Proven reliability of the S70ME family in long‑haul applications
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication system reduces wear and extends overhaul intervals
Weaknesses
  • High capital expenditure compared with conventional HFO‑only engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited on certain routes
  • Crosshead design occupies a larger engine‑room footprint than some alternatives
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system increases training and maintenance demands
  • Longer lead times for spare parts specific to the GI (gas‑injection) variant
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container vesselsLarge bulk carriersVery large crude carriers (VLCC)Liquefied natural gas carriers (dual‑fuel retrofits)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >39 MW power, want LNG flexibility to meet strict emission regulations, and have access to LNG bunkering on your trade routes. Avoid if budget constraints are tight, the vessel size does not justify a low‑speed crosshead engine, or LNG supply is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 12S70ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed on ultra‑large container ships (20 000+ TEU), large bulk carriers (>200 k dwt) and VLCCs undergoing retrofits to lower their carbon footprint while maintaining high propulsion efficiency.
5S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 13150.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
13150
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact installation for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides significant NOx and CO₂ emission reductions
  • Proven MAN reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead design
  • Meets IMO Tier III requirements, facilitating operation in Emission Control Areas
  • Flexibility to switch fuels depending on bunkering availability
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront cost due to LNG handling equipment and cryogenic storage
  • Increased system complexity compared with single‑fuel HFO engines
  • Spare parts inventory may be less widespread than for older MAN 6‑cylinder models
  • Requires crew training on dual‑fuel operation and safety procedures
  • Physical footprint larger than comparable medium‑speed diesel alternatives
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierContainer ShipBulk CarrierProduct TankerRo-Ro/Passenger Vessel (large)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine that can meet strict emission limits and have access to LNG bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable LNG supply, budget constraints prohibit the additional fuel system cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel solution.
Use Cases: The 5S65ME-C8.5-GI is typically installed on newbuilds targeting low‑emission routes such as Europe‑North America trades, on LNG carriers that can use their own cargo as fuel, and on retrofits of large bulk or container vessels where compliance with IMO Tier III is required.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S65ME-C8.5-GI
6S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 15780.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
15780
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈15.8 MW) in a compact six‑cylinder layout suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation (LNG/HFO) enables IMO Tier III compliance and fuel flexibility
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of low‑speed two‑stroke designs, improving operating economics
  • Proven MAN Energy Solutions reliability record with extensive service network
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies load management and emissions monitoring
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel equivalents
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board gas handling equipment
  • Larger physical footprint than comparable high‑speed diesel units, affecting hull design
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to maintenance and spare‑parts inventory
  • Limited availability of qualified technicians for LNG dual‑fuel engines in some regions
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Product TankerBulk Carrier (>80,000 dwt)LNG Carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with LNG flexibility to meet Tier III emission limits on large bulk or container ships, and you have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the vessel operates on routes without reliable LNG supply, budget constraints preclude higher capital cost, or space constraints favor a more compact high‑speed diesel solution.
Use Cases: The S65ME-C8.5-GI is typically installed in newbuilds of large container ships, VLCCs and product tankers where operators seek to future‑proof against tightening emission regulations while retaining fuel flexibility for cost optimisation. It also appears on LNG carriers equipped for dual‑fuel operation, allowing seamless switch between gas and oil fuels during voyages.
7S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 18410.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel marine diesel
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
18410
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (≈48% LHV) reduces fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions.
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexible operation with LNG for Tier III compliance or HFO when LNG is unavailable.
  • Proven MAN reliability record and extensive global service network.
  • Compact power density for a low‑speed engine, suitable for large vessels requiring high shaft power.
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication system reduces wear and extends overhaul intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost, especially when LNG storage and handling infrastructure are required.
  • Larger physical footprint compared with medium‑speed engines of similar output.
  • Cryogenic LNG systems add complexity to installation and maintenance.
  • Requires skilled crew training for dual‑fuel operation and safety procedures.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large crude carriers (ULCC)Very large crude carriers (VLCC)Large container ships (>10 000 TEU)Bulk carriers (>200 k DWT)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel configuration)
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III (when operated on LNG)DNV GL Type Approval for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power with low specific fuel consumption and want to meet future NOx limits using LNG; the engine’s proven reliability and MAN global support are added benefits. Avoid if the vessel lacks space or budget for LNG storage, or if operating primarily in regions where LNG bunkering is scarce.
Use Cases: The S65ME-C8.5-GI is typically installed on new‑build large tankers, ultra‑large container vessels and bulk carriers that target IMO Tier III compliance and aim to lower operational CO₂ costs by using LNG as a primary fuel while retaining the option to switch to HFO when necessary.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S65ME-C8.5-GI
8S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 21040.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
21040
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~210 kW per cylinder) for its size class
  • Fuel flexibility – can switch between LNG and HFO, supporting IMO emission targets
  • Low NOx and CO₂ emissions when operated on LNG, aiding Tier III compliance
  • Proven MAN reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead design
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑Control) for optimized performance
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and high‑pressure LNG system
  • Requires access to reliable LNG bunkering infrastructure
  • Increased mechanical complexity compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Larger footprint and weight typical of 2‑stroke crosshead units, affecting hull design flexibility
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; LNG purity must be tightly controlled
Typical Vessels: Large crude or product tankers (including LNG carriers)Container ships >15 000 TEUBulk carriers (>80 000 dwt)Cruise liners and ferries seeking low‑emission operationOffshore support vessels
Certifications: IMO Type Approval – Dual FuelDNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel will operate on routes with established LNG bunkering or must meet strict emission regulations (IMO Tier III, EU MRV). The dual‑fuel capability also offers operational flexibility when fuel prices fluctuate. Avoid if LNG supply is uncertain, budget constraints preclude higher upfront costs, or a simpler single‑fuel engine meets the ship’s regulatory profile.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuilds targeting low‑emission compliance, such as LNG‑powered tankers on long trans‑Atlantic runs, dual‑fuel container ships on Asia–Europe routes, and cruise vessels operating in emission‑controlled ports. The engine is also selected for retrofits where a shift to LNG is part of a green‑shipping strategy.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S65ME-C8.5-GI
9S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 23670.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
23670
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output suitable for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III emission limits
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME) for optimized fuel consumption
  • Compact bore‑stroke ratio provides good specific fuel consumption
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents
  • Requires LNG cryogenic storage and handling infrastructure on board
  • Larger engine room footprint compared to smaller low‑speed engines
  • Complexity of dual‑fuel system can increase maintenance training needs
  • Availability of spare parts may be limited in remote ports
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)LNG carrierCruise shipLarge bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power, must meet strict NOx emission limits and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if budget constraints prevent the higher upfront cost or if the vessel lacks space for LNG tanks and associated safety systems.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ocean‑going vessels that require both high thrust and low emissions, such as 12 000‑TEU container ships, VLCCs operating in emission control areas, modern cruise liners, and LNG carriers with dual‑fuel flexibility.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S65ME-C8.5-GI
10S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 26300.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
26300
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific output (≈26 MW) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows LNG use for IMO Tier III compliance while retaining HFO fallback
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises fuel consumption and emissions
  • Compact length‑to‑power ratio compared with older single‑fuel designs
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional fuel handling equipment
  • More complex dual‑fuel system increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Larger overall height due to crosshead arrangement, affecting some hull designs
  • Initial commissioning and crew training are more demanding
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC tankerLarge container ship (≥10 000 TEU)Bulk carrier (>150 kt)Cruise liner (high‑power propulsion)Ro‑Ro/ConRO vessels requiring high speed
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (dual‑fuel, Tier III capability)DNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >25 MW main power with the flexibility to run LNG for strict emission limits and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost or if the vessel will operate on routes without reliable LNG supply.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in new‑build large tankers, ultra‑large container ships and high‑capacity bulk carriers where owners target IMO Tier III compliance and want fuel‑cost flexibility. It is also used in retrofits of existing vessels to replace older HFO‑only engines when upgrading to dual‑fuel capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S65ME-C8.5-GI
12S65ME-C8.5-GI unverified
· 31560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S65ME-C8.5-GI
Bore (mm)
650
Stroke (mm)
2730
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
31560
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈31.5 MW) suitable for large vessels while maintaining compact size per kW
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can switch between LNG and HFO, enabling compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits when using LNG
  • MAN’s proven reliability and long service intervals for low‑speed crosshead designs
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises fuel consumption and emissions in real time
  • Designed for easy retrofit on existing hulls thanks to standard MAN mounting interfaces
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost due to LNG gas‑injection hardware and required cryogenic storage infrastructure
  • Complexity of dual‑fuel operation demands specialised crew training and more rigorous maintenance of gas injection components
  • Physical envelope is large; installation may be constrained on vessels with limited engine room space
  • Availability of LNG bunkering still limited on many trade routes, affecting operational flexibility
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥15 000 TEU)Large bulk carriers (capesize)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) where dual‑fuel is being introducedCruise liners requiring low emissions on emission control areas
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with the ability to meet strict NOx limits using LNG and have access to reliable LNG bunkering or plan to invest in on‑board storage. Avoid if your operating routes lack LNG infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit the higher capital outlay, or engine room space is severely limited.
Use Cases: The 12S65ME-C8.5-GI is typically installed on newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance on high‑speed trades (e.g., Europe–North America container routes) and on retrofits of existing large carriers where owners wish to future‑proof against tightening emission regulations while retaining the option to run conventional fuel.
5S60ME-C10.5-GI
· 11900.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
13400 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel operation provides flexibility to switch between HFO/MDO and natural gas for emissions compliance.
  • Super long stroke design yields high thermal efficiency (BSFC ~168 g/kWh) and low specific fuel consumption.
  • Low operating speed allows direct drive of large slow‑turning propellers, reducing gearbox losses.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system offers advanced monitoring, diagnostics and optimized load handling.
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global service network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight due to five‑cylinder inline arrangement limits installation in space‑constrained vessels.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives.
  • Complex dual‑fuel gas injection system requires additional safety measures and specialized maintenance.
  • Long stroke engines have slower transient response, less suited for vessels needing rapid speed changes.
  • Requires high‑pressure natural‑gas infrastructure on board for optimal operation.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerBulk Carrier (Handymax to Capesize)Container Ship (30–40 k TEU)Product/Chemical Tanker
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for large propeller drives and have the space and budget for a five‑cylinder layout. Avoid if vessel size or cost constraints favor more compact medium‑speed four‑stroke engines, or if gas infrastructure cannot be accommodated.
Use Cases: Commonly installed as the primary propulsion unit on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers where fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption are critical; also selected for new builds targeting IMO Tier III compliance by using natural gas in emission‑controlled areas.
6S60ME-C10.5-GI
· 14280.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
6
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
16080 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output (16 080 kW) from a compact six‑cylinder layout thanks to super long stroke design.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO and high‑pressure natural gas) enables significant CO₂ and NOₓ emission reductions and fuel‑cost flexibility.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides advanced load management, diagnostics and remote monitoring.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 168 g/kWh for a machine of this size improves operational efficiency.
  • Robust crosshead construction from the proven S60ME family ensures high reliability on long voyages.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight restrict installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity: requires gas storage, handling infrastructure and specialised crew training.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Spare‑parts logistics for the GI (gas injection) variant can be more demanding in remote ports.
  • Maximum speed limited to 105 rpm, making it unsuitable for high‑speed vessel designs.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerAframax TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container Ship (>8000 TEU)LNG Carrier (dual‑fuel) or Gas‑fired Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for emission reduction and fuel‑cost optimisation on large ocean‑going vessels. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if operational simplicity and lower upfront cost are higher priorities than gas capability.
Use Cases: Typically installed in very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships that benefit from dual‑fuel operation to meet IMO Tier III NOₓ limits, as well as LNG carriers and cruise vessels using shore‑side gas bunkering for cleaner propulsion.
7S60ME-C10.5-GI
· 16660.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Cylinders
7
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
18760 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power: 18 760 kW from only seven cylinders, enabling compact installation on large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure natural gas) provides fuel cost flexibility and helps meet IMO Tier III NOx limits when running on gas.
  • Super long stroke (2.4 m) yields excellent thermal efficiency; BSFC of 168 g/kWh is competitive for low‑speed engines.
  • MAN SaCoSone advanced control system optimises combustion, fuel mix and emissions in real time.
  • Proven MAN Energy Solutions platform with extensive global support and spare‑parts network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit retrofitting into existing hulls not designed for low‑speed engines.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity: requires high‑pressure gas handling, additional safety equipment and specialised maintenance skills.
  • Dependence on reliable natural‑gas bunkering infrastructure, which is still limited in many trade routes.
  • Crosshead design entails more moving parts (e.g., piston rod bearings) that demand rigorous inspection regimes.
Typical Vessels: LNG carriersVery large crude carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLarge bulk carriers
Certifications: IMO Type Approval for main propulsion enginesDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible main engine that can run on natural gas to meet strict emission regulations and you have access to reliable gas bunkering. Avoid if the vessel’s design cannot accommodate the size/weight of a low‑speed crosshead engine or if operating primarily in regions without adequate LNG infrastructure.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new‑build LNG carriers where boil‑off gas can be used as fuel, on large tankers converting to low‑sulphur or dual‑fuel operation, and on cruise ships seeking to lower NOx emissions while maintaining long range. The engine’s power rating suits vessels above 150 000 dwt or >20 000 TEU.
8S60ME-C10.5-GI
· 19040.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
21440 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power density – 8 cylinders produce over 21 MW at low rpm.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) provides fuel flexibility and significant emissions reduction.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 168 g/kWh and lean‑burn gas operation meet IMO Tier III NOx limits.
  • MAN SaCoSone integrated control system offers optimized load handling, diagnostics and remote monitoring.
  • Proven reliability of the MAN S60ME family with a super long stroke delivering high torque.
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system raises initial cost and requires specialised maintenance skills.
  • On‑board high‑pressure natural gas storage/compression infrastructure is mandatory for NG operation.
  • Physical footprint and weight are larger than comparable diesel‑only engines of similar output.
  • HFO must meet stricter quality specifications to avoid combustion issues in the crosshead design.
  • Spare‑parts inventory is broader due to additional gas‑related components.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierChemical TankerOffshore Supply VesselCruise ShipLarge Container Ship
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict NOx emission limits and have the infrastructure for on‑board natural gas storage. Avoid if budget constraints, limited space, or lack of gas supply infrastructure make the added complexity unattractive.
Use Cases: Primarily installed as the main propulsion unit on LNG carriers and other gas‑fired vessels where emissions compliance is critical; also used in large cruise ships and offshore supply vessels that benefit from fuel flexibility between HFO/MDO and natural gas for both economic and environmental reasons.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S60ME-C10.5-GI
9S60ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 21420.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21420
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈21420 kW) with a compact footprint for a 9‑cylinder design
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions when LNG is used
  • MAN’s proven S60ME family offers excellent reliability and long service intervals
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits, facilitating operation in emission control areas
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑Control) enables precise fuel management and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board gas handling equipment
  • Complexity of dual‑fuel system can increase maintenance training requirements
  • Large bore (600 mm) and long stroke may limit installation in vessels with constrained engine rooms
Typical Vessels: Bulk carrier (≥150 kt)Container ship (≈10 000–14 000 TEU)General cargo vesselLNG‑carrying vessel (small to medium size)
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV class approval (DNV GL – D-2) for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility, operate in emission control areas, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if: the vessel has severe space constraints, the operator prefers a single‑fuel solution to minimise upfront cost, or the route lacks reliable LNG supply.
Use Cases: The 9S60ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed on newbuild bulk carriers of 150 000 dwt and larger container ships where operators seek to reduce emissions while retaining high propulsion power. It is also selected for retrofit projects converting existing HFO‑only vessels to dual‑fuel capability.
10S60ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 23800.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
23800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when LNG is used
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits, suitable for operation in Emission Control Areas
  • High power output at very low rpm gives excellent propulsive efficiency and reduced vibration
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global service network
  • Compact crosshead design reduces overall engine room footprint
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional on‑board gas handling equipment
  • More complex control system increases training and maintenance demands
  • Spare‑parts inventory for dual‑fuel specific components can be limited in remote ports
  • When operated on HFO, may still need exhaust gas cleaning to meet strict emission rules
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipLNG carrierCruise shipLarge bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with LNG flexibility, must comply with IMO Tier III/ECAs, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the operating route lacks reliable LNG supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a low‑speed 10‑cylinder unit.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the primary propulsion source on ultra‑large container vessels (10 000+ TEU), LNG carriers and modern cruise ships where low emissions and fuel flexibility are critical. It also appears in large bulk carriers operating in regions with strict NOx regulations.
12S60ME-C10.5-GI unverified
· 28560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
28560
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈28 MW) from a relatively compact footprint for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on LNG for lower emissions and on HFO for flexibility where LNG bunkering is unavailable
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits without aftertreatment, aiding compliance in emission control areas
  • MAN Energy’s ME electronic control system provides precise fuel management and diagnostic support
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul service with extensive field experience on bulk carriers and tankers
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines, especially when LNG infrastructure is required
  • Requires cryogenic LNG storage and handling systems, adding space and weight penalties
  • Complex dual‑fuel control logic can increase maintenance training requirements
  • Limited availability of LNG bunkering in some trade routes may restrict full LNG operation
  • Physical size remains large compared with medium‑speed alternatives for the same power
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Aframax TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (Handymax and above)Ultra Large Container Ship (10,000+ TEU)LNG Carrier (propulsion only)Cruise ship (mid‑size)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >25 MW of propulsion power on a large vessel, require fuel flexibility to meet future LNG mandates, and operate in IMO Tier III emission control areas. Avoid if: the intended service lacks reliable LNG bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or space for cryogenic tanks is limited.
Use Cases: The 12S60ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large tankers and bulk carriers that demand high continuous power while seeking to reduce CO₂ and NOx emissions through LNG operation. It also appears in some new‑build container ships and LNG carriers where dual‑fuel flexibility supports both regulatory compliance and fuel cost optimisation.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S50ME-C9.6-GI
5S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 8400.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
8400
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III emissions while retaining fuel flexibility.
  • High specific power for a 5‑cylinder layout, reducing engine room space compared with larger cylinder counts.
  • Crosshead design provides low vibration and long service intervals on the crankshaft.
  • MAN’s ME series electronic control system offers precise fuel metering and quick load response.
  • Proven track record in product tankers and offshore support vessels.
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront cost due to LNG handling equipment and SCR after‑treatment (if Tier III required).
  • Requires access to LNG bunkering infrastructure, limiting operability on routes without it.
  • Maintenance of dual‑fuel injection systems is more complex than single‑fuel engines.
  • Maximum continuous power limited to ~8.4 MW; not suitable for very large vessels needing >15 MW per shaft.
  • Physical dimensions and weight are larger than comparable medium‑speed diesel units for the same power.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerChemical/LPG CarrierOffshore Supply VesselSmall Cruise ShipContainer Feeder
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ApprovedLR (Lloyd's Register) ApprovedIMO Tier III (with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a compact, high‑power main engine with LNG flexibility for emission‑controlled routes and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if: the vessel requires power >10 MW per shaft, operates on routes without LNG infrastructure, or budget constraints prohibit dual‑fuel system costs.
Use Cases: The 5S50ME-C9.6-GI is commonly installed in mid‑size product and chemical tankers (15–30 k dwt) operating between Europe and the Middle East where LNG bunkering is available, as well as offshore support vessels that benefit from low emissions during port stays.
6S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 10080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
10080
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (10 080 kW) from a compact six‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on LNG for lower emissions or HFO when LNG is unavailable
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (~50% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs
  • Man’s proven reliability and extensive global service network
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel HFO engine of comparable power
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board gas handling systems
  • Larger physical footprint and weight compared with newer medium‑speed alternatives
  • More complex control and fuel‑system electronics increase training requirements
  • Maintenance of high‑pressure common‑rail injection system adds to spare‑parts inventory
Typical Vessels: Large container shipsLNG carriers (as main propulsion)Cruise linersVery large crude carriers (VLCC) undergoing LNG retrofitsOffshore supply vessels
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility for LNG and want to meet strict NOx emissions without SCR. Avoid if: the vessel operates on routes lacking reliable LNG bunkering or budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost of dual‑fuel hardware.
Use Cases: The 6S50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed in newbuilds targeting decarbonisation pathways, such as next‑generation container ships and cruise vessels that can access LNG terminals, as well as retrofits where existing HFO engines are replaced to gain emissions credits.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S50ME-C9.6-GI
7S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 11760.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed crosshead
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
11760
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact L‑configuration suitable for space‑constrained engine rooms
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and future‑proofing against emission regulations
  • Low NOx emissions when running on LNG, meeting IMO Tier III requirements
  • Thermal efficiency around 50 % reduces specific fuel consumption
  • Proven MAN reliability record with extensive service network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and associated LNG handling equipment
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and dedicated storage tanks on board
  • Increased complexity of control and injection systems can raise training and maintenance demands
  • Gas‑injection components may have shorter overhaul intervals compared with pure diesel versions
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerLNG carrierBulk carrierProduct tankerOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Approved EngineABS Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high shaft power with low‑emission capability, have access to LNG bunkering or plan to retrofit for future regulations, and value MAN's global support. Avoid if LNG supply is uncertain, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a 7‑cylinder low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 7S50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large ocean‐going vessels such as 10 000+ TEU container ships, cruise ships exceeding 100 000 GT, and LNG carriers where dual‑fuel operation enables compliance with stringent emission control areas while maintaining high cruising speeds.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S50ME-C9.6-GI
8S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 13440.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
13440
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output with excellent specific fuel consumption at low rpm
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits, facilitating operation in emission control areas
  • Proven MAN reliability record for long‑haul vessels
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost, especially when LNG fuel handling infrastructure is needed
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Dependence on LNG bunkering limits operability in regions with scarce supply
  • Longer start‑up time compared with high‑speed diesel alternatives
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLarge bulk carriersVery large tankers (VLCC, LR2)Offshore support vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose this engine if you need very high propulsion power with low‑emission dual‑fuel flexibility and operate in regions where LNG bunkering is available or mandated. Avoid it for smaller vessels, projects with tight budget constraints, or routes lacking reliable LNG supply.
Use Cases: The 8S50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large container ships, cruise ships and large bulk carriers that must meet strict emission regulations while delivering high efficiency over long voyages. It is also selected for retrofits where a shift to LNG fuel is part of an emissions reduction strategy.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S50ME-C9.6-GI
9S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 15120.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈15120 kW) with excellent fuel efficiency for a low‑speed engine
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions when LNG is used
  • Integrated electronic control (ME‑C) provides precise load management and quick response to demand changes
  • Proven track record on large LNG carriers and cruise ships, with robust crosshead design for long service intervals
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable medium‑speed diesel engines due to dual‑fuel hardware and low‑speed construction
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional crew training for fuel handling
  • Larger physical footprint and weight compared with medium‑speed alternatives of similar power
  • Complex dual‑fuel system can increase maintenance planning and spare‑parts inventory
Typical Vessels: LNG Carrier (Q‑Flex, Q‑Max)Large Cruise ShipUltra‑large Container Vessel (>15 000 TEU)Offshore Support Vessel (high‑power propulsion)
Certifications: IMO Tier III compliance in LNG modeDNV Class – Dual‑Fuel Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power with low emissions, have access to LNG bunkering, and operate in emission control areas or on LNG carriers. Avoid if: the vessel lacks LNG infrastructure, budget constraints dominate, or a more compact medium‑speed engine would meet the power requirement.
Use Cases: The S50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large LNG carriers and cruise ships where fuel flexibility and strict emission limits are mandatory. It is also selected for ultra‑large container vessels that aim to meet Tier III standards while maintaining high propulsive efficiency.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S50ME-C9.6-GI
10S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 16800.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~168 kW per cylinder) with excellent thermal efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables significant NOx, SOx and CO₂ reductions when LNG is used
  • Proven MAN ME series reliability and integrated electronic control system for easy monitoring
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission limits in LNG mode without after‑treatment
  • Flexible installation – can be mounted in both new builds and major retrofits
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel HFO engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board cryogenic storage, increasing space and weight
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to operation and maintenance procedures
  • Longer start‑up time for LNG mode compared with pure diesel
  • Spare parts inventory must cover both fuel systems
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierTanker (product/LNG)Cruise linerOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operated on LNG)DNV GL Class approvalABS classification for dual‑fuel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power with low emissions and have access to LNG bunkering or plan a future fuel switch. Avoid if the vessel will operate primarily in regions without reliable LNG supply, or if budget constraints make the higher upfront cost prohibitive.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new‑build large container ships and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance, as well as on retrofitted tankers seeking fuel flexibility and emission reductions. Also used on cruise vessels where strict environmental standards apply.
12S50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 20160.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows flexibility between LNG (low emissions) and conventional fuel.
  • High power density – ~20 MW from a relatively compact 12‑cylinder layout.
  • IMO Tier III NOx compliance using EGR/SCR, and SOx reduction when running on LNG.
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global service network and spare‑parts support.
  • Common‑rail fuel injection improves specific fuel consumption and reduces engine wear.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to LNG handling equipment and cryogenic storage requirements.
  • Increased system complexity (high‑pressure LNG fuel lines, dual‑fuel control software).
  • Dependence on reliable LNG bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited in some regions.
  • Maintenance of the high‑pressure common‑rail system demands specialised training.
  • Spare‑part logistics can be slower for newer dual‑fuel variants compared with legacy HFO engines.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)LNG carriersLarge bulk carriersCruise ships requiring low emissions
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel (LNG/HFO) flexibility, must meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and want to future‑proof against stricter emissions regulations. Avoid if LNG bunkering is unavailable on your trade routes, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel system.
Use Cases: The 12S50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed in newbuilds of large container ships and tankers that target low‑emission operation on long voyages, as well as LNG carriers where pure gas operation is primary but HFO backup is required for flexibility.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S40ME-B9.5-GI
5S40ME-B9.5-GI
· 5150.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
5675 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC ~172 g/kWh) thanks to super long stroke design
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO or high‑pressure natural gas, providing fuel flexibility and emissions compliance
  • MAN SaCoSone advanced control system enables precise load management and quick start‑up/shutdown
  • Proven reliability of MAN S40ME family with robust crosshead construction
  • Compact power output for a 5‑cylinder inline layout, suitable for medium‑size vessels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires additional gas handling infrastructure (high‑pressure storage, vapourisers) on board
  • Physical length and weight are larger than comparable 4‑cylinder units, limiting installation space
  • Maintenance complexity increases due to dual‑fuel injection system and gas‑related components
  • Limited maximum speed range; not ideal for vessels needing high rpm auxiliary propulsion
Typical Vessels: LNG carrier (dual‑fuel operation with boil‑off gas)Chemical/product tankerOffshore supply vesselMultipurpose cargo shipSmall cruise or ferry operating in Emission Control Areas
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when running on natural gas)DNV GL Class approval for dual‑fuel enginesABS class notation for low‑speed two‑stroke main engines
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need fuel flexibility between conventional oil and natural gas, operate in strict emission control areas, or require high efficiency at low speed on a medium‑size vessel. Avoid if: budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, the ship lacks space for gas storage infrastructure, or the operational profile demands higher shaft speeds.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed on LNG carriers to burn boil‑off gas, on chemical tankers that benefit from low emissions in ECAs, and on offshore support vessels where dual‑fuel capability provides both range and compliance with tightening environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S40ME-B9.5-GI
6S40ME-B9.5-GI
· 6180.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel low-speed engine with high-pressure gas injection
Cylinders
6
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
6810 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency (≈172 g/kWh) at low speed, reducing operating costs.
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexible use of heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil, or natural gas, supporting emission reduction strategies.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise engine management and diagnostics.
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive service network for 2‑stroke crosshead engines.
  • Super long stroke design delivers high torque at low rpm, ideal for large propeller drives.
Weaknesses
  • Complex gas injection system increases initial capital cost and requires specialized maintenance.
  • Installation demands high‑pressure natural‑gas infrastructure on board, limiting applicability to vessels with gas supply.
  • Higher mechanical wear on piston rings compared with some modern 4‑stroke designs due to crosshead layout.
  • Fuel flexibility can be limited by local availability of LNG or high‑pressure gas bunkering facilities.
Typical Vessels: LNG Carrier (Q‑Flex, Q‑Max)LPG CarrierChemical TankerContainer Ship with low‑emission requirementsOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operated on natural gas)DNV GL Dual‑Fuel Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel requires a high‑power, low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet stringent emission limits and has access to LNG or high‑pressure gas bunkering. Avoid if the operator lacks gas infrastructure, budget constraints preclude higher upfront costs, or a simpler 4‑stroke engine is sufficient for the service profile.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new‑build LNG carriers where boil‑off gas can be used as primary fuel, retrofitted to existing tankers aiming for Tier III compliance, and employed in offshore support vessels that benefit from reduced CO₂ and NOₓ emissions while maintaining high propulsion power.
7S40ME-B9.5-GI
· 7210.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Cylinders
7
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
7945 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (ME‑B series BSFC ~172 g/kWh) with flexible dual‑fuel operation
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system for optimized load handling and emissions monitoring
  • Super long stroke design provides excellent mean effective pressure and torque characteristics
  • Proven reliability of the S40ME family in demanding service histories
  • Enables compliance with IMO 2020/2023 sulfur caps and future CO₂ reduction targets
Weaknesses
  • Complex high‑pressure gas injection system raises maintenance skill requirements
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Large physical envelope (7‑cylinder inline) limits installation in space‑constrained hulls
  • Dependence on reliable LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure
  • Sensitive to gas quality; requires additional filtration and conditioning equipment
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierChemical TankerContainer Ship (large‑size)Cruise VesselOffshore Supply Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (dual‑fuel)DNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel needs fuel flexibility, low emissions and can accommodate LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure; ideal for newbuilds targeting IMO 2020/2023 compliance or future CO₂ caps. Avoid if gas supply is uncertain, budget constraints dominate, or hull space cannot fit a 7‑cylinder inline engine.
Use Cases: The 7S40ME-B9.5-GI is typically installed on new LNG carriers and dual‑fuel container ships where operators seek to switch between HFO/MDO and natural gas to meet stringent emission regulations while retaining high power output for long voyages.
8S40ME-B9.5-GI
· 8240.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Cylinders
8
Bore
400 mm
Stroke
1770 mm
Rated Power
9080 kW
Rated Speed
146 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S40ME-B9.5
Engine Series
ME-B-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a low specific fuel consumption of ~172 g/kWh.
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows flexibility between heavy fuel oil, marine diesel and LNG, aiding compliance with IMO Tier III emissions.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise combustion management and easy integration with ship automation.
  • Super long stroke design delivers strong torque at low rpm, suitable for large propeller drives.
  • Proven MAN reliability record and extensive global service network.
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and high‑pressure gas injection system.
  • Large physical envelope and weight typical of crosshead engines require substantial engine room space.
  • Complex maintenance regime, especially for the gas injection components and crosshead seals.
  • Limited speed range; optimal performance is at low rpm, making it less suitable for vessels requiring higher shaft speeds.
  • Dependence on LNG bunkering infrastructure, which may be scarce in certain regions.
Typical Vessels: LNG carriersProduct tankersBulk carriers (large)Container ships (mid‑size)Offshore supply vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the vessel operates primarily in regions without reliable gas supply, budget constraints prohibit higher capital outlay, or space limitations prevent installation of a large crosshead engine.
Use Cases: The 8S40ME-B9.5-GI is commonly installed on newbuild LNG carriers and dual‑fuel tankers operating in Emission Control Areas, as well as on bulk carriers seeking to reduce fuel costs by switching between HFO/MDO and LNG while maintaining low specific fuel consumption.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S40ME-B9.5-GI
9S40ME-B9.5-GI unverified
· 9270.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
9270
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density for large vessels (≈9 300 kW) while operating at low rpm, reducing gear requirements
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduces CO₂ emissions when LNG is used
  • MAN’s proven S40ME family offers long‑term reliability and extensive global support network
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies start‑up, monitoring and crew workload
  • Compact length for its power class compared with older low‑speed HFO‑only engines
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a comparable single‑fuel HFO engine due to LNG handling equipment
  • Requires dedicated LNG storage and bunkering infrastructure on board, increasing space allocation
  • Specific fuel consumption is slightly higher in pure HFO mode versus optimized diesel engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel system adds maintenance tasks and requires specialised training for engineering crew
  • Large overall footprint may limit suitability for smaller vessels or retrofits with tight engine room constraints
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerBulk carrierTanker (LR2/LR3)Offshore supply vessel
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalIMO Tier III emission compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >9 000 kW low‑speed propulsion, operate in Emission Control Areas or plan to meet IMO Tier III limits, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if LNG infrastructure is unavailable, budget constraints dominate capital decisions, or the vessel size cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newbuilds targeting strict emission standards—e.g., large container vessels, cruise ships, and bulk carriers operating in ECAs—and on retrofits where a low‑speed engine replacement is feasible and LNG fuel supply can be secured.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S40ME-B9.5-GI
10S40ME-B9.5-GI unverified
· 10300.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
10300
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) with lower specific fuel consumption than comparable medium‑speed diesels
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can switch between LNG and HFO, enabling compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits when using LNG
  • Compact power density for a 10‑cylinder unit, fitting in engine rooms of mid‑size container or cruise vessels
  • Proven MAN reliability record and extensive global service network
  • Reduced CO₂ emissions (≈20% lower) when operated on LNG
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and need for LNG bunkering infrastructure
  • More complex fuel handling and control systems increase crew training requirements
  • Crosshead bearing wear demands diligent maintenance compared with simpler trunk‑type engines
  • Physical size and weight still larger than medium‑speed alternatives for the same power output
  • Spare‑parts inventory for dual‑fuel specific components can be limited in some regions
Typical Vessels: Container ships (8–12 k TEU)Cruise liners / passenger ferriesRo‑Ro and mixed cargo vesselsOffshore supply & support vesselsSmall LNG carriers (≈30 000 m³)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx) when operating on LNGDNV GL class notation for main engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power with dual‑fuel flexibility, want to meet strict NOx limits using LNG, and operate routes where LNG bunkering is available. Avoid if the vessel will run primarily on HFO in regions lacking LNG infrastructure or if upfront cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in mid‑size container ships and cruise vessels that benefit from lower emissions and fuel‑cost savings on long voyages, as well as offshore support ships where dual‑fuel capability provides operational resilience. It also appears in small LNG carriers that use the same fuel for propulsion and cargo.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S40ME-B9.5-GI
12S40ME-B9.5-GI unverified
· 12360.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S40ME-B9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
12360
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact footprint for a 12‑cylinder design
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions when LNG is used
  • Proven MAN reliability record with advanced electronic control system for precise fuel management
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with older single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Integrated exhaust gas cleaning options compatible with IMO Tier III requirements
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional on‑board cryogenic handling equipment
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to operation and maintenance training
  • Noise and vibration levels are typical of large low‑speed engines, requiring robust isolation measures
  • Spare‑parts inventory is larger due to the dual‑fuel configuration
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10 000 TEU)Cruise linerLarge RoRo/Passenger ferryLNG carrier (as part of a dual‑fuel propulsion set)Offshore supply vessel with high power demand
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, want the flexibility to switch between LNG and HFO for emissions compliance, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if your operation lacks LNG infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a 12‑cylinder low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 12S40ME-B9.5-GI is typically installed on large ocean‑going vessels where high continuous power and fuel flexibility are critical—e.g., ultra‑large container ships, modern cruise ships, and LNG carriers that aim to meet IMO Tier III emission limits while retaining the option to run on conventional fuel when LNG is unavailable.
MAN Energy Solutions 5G50ME-C9.6-GI
5G50ME-C9.6-GI
· 8900.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
5
Bore
500 mm
Stroke
2500 mm
Rated Power
8600 kW
Rated Speed
100 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G50ME-C9.6
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a BSFC of 166 g/kWh thanks to the ultra long stroke design
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows switching between HFO/MDO and natural gas, reducing emissions and fuel cost volatility
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise engine management and easy integration with ship automation
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global service network
  • Compact power output for a 5‑cylinder layout, saving space compared to larger multi‑cylinder units
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system increases maintenance requirements and crew training needs
  • Limited cylinder count reduces redundancy; a failure impacts a higher proportion of total power
  • Higher upfront capital cost relative to single‑fuel engines of similar power
  • Requires high‑pressure natural gas infrastructure on board, adding installation complexity
  • Physical size and weight are still substantial for vessels with tight space constraints
Typical Vessels: LNG carrier (propulsion)Gas‑fired product tankerChemical tankerOffshore supply vesselMedium‑size container ship with low‑emission requirements
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a mid‑range power engine with dual‑fuel flexibility, high efficiency and MAN after‑sales support. Avoid if vessel space is extremely limited, redundancy is critical (prefer more cylinders), or the budget cannot accommodate the higher capital cost of dual‑fuel systems.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on LNG carriers for main propulsion where natural gas can be used as primary fuel, as well as on gas‑fueled product tankers and offshore support vessels that must meet stringent emission regulations while retaining the option to run on conventional heavy fuel oil.
6G50ME-C9.6-GI
· 10680.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel crosshead engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
500 mm
Stroke
2500 mm
Rated Power
10320 kW
Rated Speed
100 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G50ME-C9.6
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) gives excellent thermal efficiency for a medium‑speed engine.
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on HFO/MDO and high‑pressure natural gas, enabling use of boil‑off gas or low‑sulphur fuels to meet emission caps.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics.
  • Proven MAN reliability record with robust crosshead design suited for continuous heavy‑load service.
  • Compact power density for a 10 MW class engine, reducing overall propulsion plant space.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity – requires high‑pressure gas storage and additional maintenance on injectors and control electronics.
  • Large physical envelope of the ultra long‑stroke block may limit installation in vessels with tight engine room constraints.
  • Limited speed range (100 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear for many propeller applications, adding weight and cost.
  • Noise and vibration levels typical of 2‑stroke crosshead engines may require extra acoustic treatment.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerChemical CarrierLNG Carrier (using boil‑off gas)Container Ship (mid‑size)Offshore Supply Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need fuel flexibility to exploit low‑sulphur or boil‑off gas, require high thermal efficiency at medium speed, and have the budget for a dual‑fuel installation. Avoid if vessel space is extremely limited, the operator prefers a single‑fuel low‑speed engine, or upfront cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 6G50ME-C9.6-GI is commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on mid‑size product and chemical tankers where dual‑fuel capability allows compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits using natural gas. It also powers LNG carriers that can burn boil‑off gas directly, reducing reliance on auxiliary boilers. Some operators select it for new builds targeting future low‑carbon fuel strategies.
7G50ME-C9.6-GI
· 12460.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
500 mm
Stroke
2500 mm
Rated Power
12040 kW
Rated Speed
100 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G50ME-C9.6
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (~166 g/kWh) thanks to the ultra long‑stroke design
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows use of HFO/MDO and high‑pressure natural gas, providing flexibility for emission regulations
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and optimized performance
  • Proven reliability of MAN G‑series crosshead engines in large commercial vessels
  • Compact power output per cylinder reduces overall engine length compared with larger‑cylinder variants
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and heavy weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (gas supply, high‑pressure injectors) and higher initial capital cost
  • Crosshead bearing maintenance is more demanding than trunk‑type engines
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for vessels preferring medium‑speed or high‑rpm propulsion
  • Availability of natural gas bunkering may be restricted on some trade routes
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax tankersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel operation)Cruise shipsLarge bulk carriersContainer vessels >10,000 TEU
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet IMO Tier III or ECA requirements and have sufficient hull space for a crosshead layout. Avoid if vessel size constraints, limited gas bunkering infrastructure, or a preference for higher‑rpm medium‑speed engines make the larger footprint and system complexity undesirable.
Use Cases: The 7G50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed in newbuilds where fuel flexibility and low emissions are critical—e.g., LNG carriers that run primarily on natural gas with HFO backup, large tankers operating in emission control areas, or cruise ships seeking to reduce sulfur oxide output while maintaining proven MAN engine reliability.
MAN Energy Solutions 8G50ME-C9.6-GI
8G50ME-C9.6-GI
· 14240.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed two‑stroke engine with high‑pressure gas injection
Cylinders
8
Bore
500 mm
Stroke
2500 mm
Rated Power
13760 kW
Rated Speed
100 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G50ME-C9.6
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh) for a large low‑speed engine
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or high‑pressure natural gas
  • High torque from ultra long stroke design, suitable for very large vessels
  • Advanced MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise combustion management and emission optimisation
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operated on natural gas
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires high‑pressure gas storage and handling infrastructure onboard
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Maintenance of gas injection components adds to crew training and spare‑parts inventory
  • Physical size and weight are substantial, limiting installation on smaller vessels
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierVery large crude carrier (VLCC)Ultra large container shipLarge bulk carrierDual‑fuel cruise liner
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with low specific fuel consumption, want the flexibility to switch between HFO/MDO and natural gas for emission compliance, and have the onboard space and infrastructure for high‑pressure gas storage. Avoid if your vessel lacks gas supply capability, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or the ship size does not justify a low‑speed ultra long‑stroke engine.
Use Cases: The 8G50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed on new‑build LNG carriers and other large ocean‐going vessels where operators seek to meet strict emission regulations while retaining high propulsion power. It is also used in dual‑fuel container ships and bulk carriers operating on routes with access to natural gas bunkering, allowing fuel switching for cost optimisation and regulatory compliance.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G50ME-C9.6-GI
9G50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 16020.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
16020
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density for large vessels (≈16 MW from a compact 9‑cylinder layout)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexible fuel switching between LNG and conventional heavy fuel oil, supporting emissions regulations
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of MAN G50ME series, improving operating cost
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals for MAN crosshead designs
  • Broad after‑sales support network worldwide
Weaknesses
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with single‑fuel equivalents due to LNG handling system integration
  • Requires dedicated LNG storage, vapourisation and fuel gas supply infrastructure on board
  • Limited availability of qualified maintenance personnel for dual‑fuel 2‑stroke engines in some regions
  • Engine control software complexity can increase commissioning time
Typical Vessels: LNG carriersLarge crude oil tankersVLCCs and ULCCsBulk carriers over 150 kt deadweightContainer ships above 12,000 TEU
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx) compliance when operating on LNGDNV Class Approval – Type Approved Marine Main EngineABS Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine for large vessels and want the flexibility of dual‑fuel operation to meet current and future emissions regulations. Avoid if: the vessel lacks LNG storage capacity or operating routes do not justify the added complexity and cost of a dual‑fuel system.
Use Cases: The 9G50ME-C9.6-GI is commonly installed on newbuilds where owners target IMO Tier III compliance, such as LNG carriers and ultra‑large crude carriers that can accommodate LNG tanks for fuel switching, or on retrofits where existing HFO engines are replaced to reduce emissions while retaining fuel flexibility.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G50ME-C9.6-GI
10G50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 17800.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
17800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – >17 MW from a compact low‑speed unit
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables IMO Tier III compliance and lower CO₂/NOₓ emissions when LNG is used
  • Proven MAN G‑type reliability with long service intervals
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption for a 2‑stroke engine (~170 g/kWh in LNG mode)
  • High torque at low rpm, ideal for large propeller drives
Weaknesses
  • Requires LNG storage and handling infrastructure, increasing ship design complexity and cost
  • Higher capital expenditure compared with single‑fuel HFO engines of similar power
  • Crosshead layout adds mechanical complexity and maintenance skill requirements
  • Limited bunkering availability in some trade routes may restrict operational flexibility
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be more demanding for high‑power 2‑stroke units
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV)Cruise ShipsLarge Bulk CarriersVLCC / Suezmax Tankers (dual‑fuel retrofit)LNG Carrier (as a power‑generation engine)
Certifications: DNV GL classificationIMO Tier III (when operated on LNG)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >17 MW propulsion, require dual‑fuel flexibility for emission‑control areas, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if LNG infrastructure is unavailable on your intended routes, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel engine with lower maintenance complexity.
Use Cases: The 10G50ME-C9.6-GI is typically installed in newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance for long‑haul trades, especially on container ships and cruise vessels where fuel flexibility and low emissions are strategic priorities. It is also selected for retrofits of large tankers and bulk carriers when operators want to future‑proof the vessel against tightening emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G50ME-C9.6-GI
12G50ME-C9.6-GI unverified
· 21360.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel low-speed engine
Model Family
G50ME-C9.6-GI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
21360
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈21 MW) in a compact inline L configuration
  • Dual-fuel capability allows operation on LNG for lower emissions and on HFO for flexibility
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits, supporting future regulatory compliance
  • Proven MAN G‑type reliability with extensive service network
  • Good specific fuel consumption compared with comparable high‑speed engines
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual-fuel system and LNG handling equipment
  • Requires dedicated LNG storage and bunkering infrastructure on board
  • Large cylinder dimensions demand significant engine room space
  • Dual-fuel control systems add complexity to operation and maintenance
  • Spare‑part logistics can be more demanding for the 12‑cylinder configuration
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLarge tankers (VLCC, LR2)Bulk carriers (>150 kDWT)LNG carriers (dual-fuel propulsion)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with LNG flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if LNG bunkering is unavailable, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or vessel size limits space for a large low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuild ultra‑large container vessels and cruise ships that target IMO Tier III compliance, as well as on large tankers and bulk carriers where fuel flexibility and high power density are critical. The dual-fuel option is attractive for operators seeking to reduce carbon footprint while retaining the ability to run on conventional heavy fuel oil when LNG is not accessible.
9S70ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 29610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed diesel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29610
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈29 MW) from a compact L‑configuration suitable for large vessels
  • Electronically controlled ME system provides precise fuel metering and improved efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) offers flexibility to meet future emission regulations
  • MAN’s long‑standing reliability record and extensive global service network
  • Crosshead design reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly, extending engine life
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and requires dedicated methanol bunkering infrastructure
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit suitability for retrofit projects on smaller ships
  • Methanol handling demands additional safety measures and crew training
  • Maintenance personnel must be familiar with both diesel and dual‑fuel subsystems
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierOil TankerContainer ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine for new builds above ~150 k DWT and want the option to run methanol to future‑proof emissions compliance. Avoid if: the vessel is size‑constrained, budget‑sensitive, or operates on routes without reliable methanol bunkering infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 9S70ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed in new large bulk carriers and tankers where a powerful low‑speed engine is required and ship owners are planning to transition to lower‑carbon fuels such as methanol while retaining the ability to run conventional HFO when needed.
10S70ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 32900.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and efficiency typical of MAN S70ME family
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility allows operation on methanol (lower CO₂) or HFO for fuel availability
  • L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint, beneficial for space‑constrained vessels
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in large container and cruise ships
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when equipped with standard after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires additional crew training and maintenance expertise
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports
  • Larger cylinder dimensions lead to heavier auxiliary components (e.g., fuel pumps, injectors)
  • Potentially higher lifecycle O&M costs due to dual‑fuel component wear
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerBulk carrierOffshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, space‑efficient main engine with the ability to switch between methanol and HFO to meet future emission regulations or corporate decarbonisation goals. Avoid if: your operation lacks reliable methanol bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or crew training for dual‑fuel systems is not feasible.
Use Cases: The 10S70ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on large container vessels and cruise ships built under the latest IMO Tier III/EEXI requirements, where shipowners seek to future‑proof propulsion against stricter carbon regulations while retaining proven low‑speed engine performance.
12S70ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 39480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine diesel
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39480
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈39 MW) from a compact low‑speed design, reducing need for reduction gears
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on methanol for lower CO₂ and SOx emissions or on conventional HFO when methanol is unavailable
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of S70ME‑C family engines
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits, supporting compliance with future emission regulations
  • Optimised for fuel‑flexibility in ultra‑large vessels, enabling strategic bunkering choices
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight restrict installation to very large hulls
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel counterpart because of methanol injection and control systems
  • Requires crew training and operational procedures specific to methanol handling and dual‑fuel management
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes
  • Maintenance intervals are comparable to conventional low‑speed engines; no significant reduction in downtime
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container ShipVery Large Crude CarrierBulk CarrierLNG Carrier (methanol retrofit)Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOxDNV GL Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm, want future‑proof fuel flexibility with methanol to meet tightening emission caps, and operate a vessel large enough to accommodate the engine size. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot absorb the larger footprint and higher upfront cost, or if reliable methanol bunkering is unavailable on your intended routes.
Use Cases: The 12S70ME‑C10.5‑LGI is typically installed in new‑build ultra‑large container ships and VLCCs where a single engine can drive a large propeller directly, providing efficient low‑speed operation. It is also selected for retrofits of existing LNG carriers or cruise vessels that aim to shift part of their fuel mix to methanol to lower carbon intensity while retaining the ability to run on conventional HFO when needed.
9S60ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 21420.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21420
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density suitable for large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on low‑sulphur HFO or methanol, supporting emissions reduction goals
  • Man’s proven reliability and extensive service network
  • L‑configuration saves valuable engine room space
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without aftertreatment
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents
  • Methanol handling requires dedicated storage, safety systems and bunkering infrastructure
  • Increased system complexity (dual‑fuel control, high‑pressure injectors) leads to more demanding maintenance
  • Limited global methanol supply may restrict operational flexibility
  • Large physical size still demands substantial hull space
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierOil tanker (newbuilds with green‑fuel strategy)Cruise linerOffshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV GL class notation for dual‑fuel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, want to future‑proof the vessel with methanol capability and must meet strict IMO Tier III emissions limits. Avoid if the operating routes lack methanol bunkering, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or simplicity of a single‑fuel engine is preferred.
Use Cases: The 9S60ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on newbuilds targeting low‑emission corridors (e.g., Europe‑Asia), retrofits where dual‑fuel conversion is feasible, and vessels that require both high power and fuel flexibility for long voyages.
10S60ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 23800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
23800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows switching between methanol (low emissions) and HFO for fuel flexibility.
  • Low‑speed crosshead design provides high thermal efficiency (~50% at rated load).
  • MAN’s proven reliability record and extensive global service network.
  • Compact power density for a 10‑cylinder unit, suitable for large vessels requiring >20 MW.
  • Built-in provisions for methanol handling (materials compatible with alcohol fuels).
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many regions.
  • Requires additional safety systems (spill containment, fire suppression) for methanol storage.
  • Engine control software and fuel management are more complex due to dual‑fuel operation.
  • Physical envelope may be larger than a comparable 10‑cylinder HFO engine because of added methanol feed system.
Typical Vessels: Methanol carrierContainer ship (newbuilds targeting low‑carbon IMO targets)Bulk carrierProduct tankerCruise liner (where fuel flexibility is desired)
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel owner needs a high‑power main engine that can run on methanol to meet future emission regulations and wants the operational flexibility of dual‑fuel capability. Avoid if the operating routes lack reliable methanol bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or the ship’s design cannot accommodate the additional safety equipment required for alcohol fuels.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in newbuilds aiming for IMO 2023‑2025 carbon intensity reductions, such as methanol‑fuelled containerships or bulk carriers. It is also selected for retrofits where a ship operator wants to future‑proof the vessel against tightening sulfur and CO₂ limits while retaining the option to run on conventional HFO when necessary.
12S60ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 28560.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
28560
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output suitable for large vessels while operating at very low rpm, reducing vibration and wear
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (methanol/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions when methanol is used
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design offers excellent durability and long service intervals
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with comparable medium‑speed engines
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies optimisation of fuel mix and performance
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and higher initial capital cost
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • When operated on HFO, additional exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber) may be required to meet ECA limits
  • Maintenance personnel need specialised training for methanol handling and dual‑fuel components
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk CarrierOil TankerOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine with the ability to run on methanol for future emission compliance and you have access to methanol bunkering or plan to install it. Avoid if your operation is limited to regions without methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel size cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions.
Use Cases: Installed as the primary propulsion unit on new‑build large bulk carriers, tankers and ultra‑large container ships targeting IMO 2020/2030 emission standards; also used in retrofits where a shift to methanol fuel is part of a green‑shipping strategy, especially for vessels operating frequently in Emission Control Areas.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S50ME-C9.6-LGI
5S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 8400.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
8400
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm gives excellent torque and propeller efficiency.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions when methanol is used.
  • Compact 5‑cylinder layout reduces installation space and weight compared with larger cylinder counts.
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design provides low vibration and long service intervals.
  • Flexibility for retrofits – can be fitted to existing vessels to meet IMO Tier III requirements.
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many regions, restricting operational flexibility.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and higher upfront capital cost versus a single‑fuel engine.
  • Requires additional safety measures for methanol handling (e.g., explosion‑proof equipment).
  • Specific fuel consumption on HFO mode is comparable to conventional 2‑stroke engines – no efficiency gain unless methanol is used.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical carrierOffshore supply vesselShort sea container shipRo‑Ro ferry
Decision Guide: Choose this engine if you need a medium‑power main propulsion unit with the ability to switch to low‑carbon methanol, have access to methanol bunkering or plan for future compliance with stricter emission regulations, and value MAN’s reliability. Avoid it when operating primarily in regions without methanol supply, when capital cost must be minimized, or when higher power density per cylinder is required.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new builds targeting IMO Tier III compliance for short‑sea shipping, as well as retrofits of existing vessels seeking to reduce emissions by adopting methanol while retaining the option to run on conventional HFO where needed.
6S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 10080.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
10080
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (methanol & HFO) enables lower CO₂ and NOx emissions when using methanol.
  • High power output in a compact L‑configuration saves valuable engine‑room space.
  • Proven MAN reliability with advanced electronic control for optimal fuel management.
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operated on methanol.
  • Modular design facilitates installation on new builds and certain retrofits.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed diesel engines.
  • Requires dedicated methanol bunkering, storage, and handling infrastructure.
  • Thermal efficiency is slightly lower on HFO versus a purpose‑built conventional engine.
  • Spare parts specific to the dual‑fuel system may have longer lead times.
  • Additional fuel injection and control hardware increase maintenance complexity.
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierTanker (methanol‑fueled)Cruise ShipRo‑Ro Ferry
Certifications: IMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with methanol dual‑fuel capability and space‑saving L‑layout for newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III emissions. Avoid if your operation lacks methanol bunkering, has tight budget constraints, or prefers the simplicity of a single‑fuel low‑speed diesel.
Use Cases: Typically installed on newbuild container vessels and bulk carriers designed for methanol propulsion, as well as retrofits of existing ships seeking to reduce CO₂ and NOx emissions while retaining the option to run on conventional HFO when methanol is unavailable.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S50ME-C9.6-LGI
7S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 11760.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel low-speed marine engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
11760
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with a compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables compliance with future CO₂ and SOx emission regulations while retaining flexibility to run conventional fuel.
  • Low operating speed (117 rpm) yields excellent propeller efficiency and reduced vibration.
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design offers long service intervals and robust cylinder liner life.
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises combustion for both fuels, improving overall thermal efficiency.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines due to dual‑fuel hardware and controls.
  • Methanol infrastructure is still limited in many ports, potentially restricting fuel availability on certain routes.
  • Complexity of the dual‑fuel injection system can increase maintenance training requirements.
  • Crosshead engines are heavier than equivalent 4‑stroke designs, affecting overall ship weight budgeting.
  • Initial commissioning and type‑approval processes for methanol operation may extend project timelines.
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierProduct Tanker (methanol or refined oil)Cruise VesselOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with future‑proof dual‑fuel (methanol) capability and are willing to invest in the associated infrastructure and training. Avoid if your operation relies exclusively on conventional fuels, has strict weight constraints, or operates primarily in regions lacking methanol bunkering.
Use Cases: The 7S50ME-C9.6-LGI is typically installed in large ocean‑going vessels that aim to meet tightening emission standards while retaining the option to run traditional HFO. It is popular on newbuild container ships and bulk carriers targeting a gradual shift to methanol, as well as on cruise liners seeking lower sulfur emissions without sacrificing range.
8S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 13440.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed marine diesel
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
13440
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density suitable for large vessels while maintaining low rpm for efficient propeller operation
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant NOx, SOx and CO₂ emission reductions and future‑proofing for alternative fuels
  • MAN’s ME‑C electronic control system provides precise fuel management, quick start‑up and diagnostic functions
  • Proven MAN reliability record with extensive global service network
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits and can be certified to MARPOL Annex VI standards
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Larger physical footprint and weight than medium‑speed alternatives, impacting hull design flexibility
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports, restricting operational range
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to fuel handling, storage and safety management on board
  • Crosshead design requires regular liner inspection and can lead to higher maintenance intervals
Typical Vessels: Large container ships (10 000–14 000 TEU)Cruise linersRo‑Pax ferriesOffshore supply vessels with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNVGL Classification (DNV) approvalABS classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine that can run on methanol to meet strict emission regulations and have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel space is at a premium.
Use Cases: The 8S50ME-C9.6-LGI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build container vessels and cruise ships that aim to reduce their carbon footprint by using methanol as a primary fuel, while still retaining the flexibility to burn conventional HFO when required.
9S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 15120.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈15120 kW) with excellent thermal efficiency for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables compliance with IMO 2020 and future carbon regulations
  • L‑configuration reduces footprint, allowing more flexible machinery space layout
  • MAN’s proven reliability record and extensive global service network
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits at low speed
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel HFO engine of comparable power
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires additional training and maintenance expertise
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports
  • Increased auxiliary equipment (methanol tanks, vapour handling) adds weight and space requirements
  • Long lead times for spare parts specific to the LGI variant
Typical Vessels: Methanol carrierLNG carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)Large chemical tankerVery large crude carrier (VLCC) retrofit with low‑carbon fuel optionBulk carrier requiring high power output
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV Class Approval for dual‑fuel operationMAN Type Approval (IMO)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine that can switch between methanol and HFO to meet current and future emission regulations, and you have access to methanol bunkering or plan to develop it. Avoid if: the vessel operates on routes with no methanol infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or operational crew lack dual‑fuel experience.
Use Cases: The 9S50ME-C9.6-LGI is typically installed in newbuild methanol carriers and retrofitted large tankers seeking to reduce sulfur and CO₂ footprints. It also appears in LNG carrier projects where flexibility between LNG and methanol fuel is desired, providing a pathway toward decarbonisation while maintaining the power needed for long‑haul voyages.
10S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 16800.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) typical for low‑speed MAN engines
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on methanol, reducing SOx/PM emissions and enabling future carbon‑neutral fuels
  • Proven MAN reliability with integrated crosshead design that limits vibration and wear
  • Compact power density for a 10‑cylinder unit, suitable for large vessel propulsion
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits and DNV type approval for dual‑fuel operation
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Complex fuel handling system required for methanol (cryogenic or pressurised storage, corrosion‑resistant lines)
  • Larger physical footprint compared with medium‑speed alternatives for the same power output
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility
  • Maintenance personnel need specific training on dual‑fuel injection and safety procedures
Typical Vessels: Large container ships (≥10,000 TEU)Crude oil and product tankers (>80,000 dwt)Bulk carriers (>150,000 dwt)Methanol‑capable LNG or chemical carriersHybrid propulsion retrofits for existing low‑speed vessels
Certifications: DNV GL Type Approval (dual‑fuel)IMO Tier III NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with methanol flexibility to meet future emission regulations and have access to methanol bunkering or plan a fuel‑switch retrofit. Avoid if the vessel operates on routes lacking methanol supply, budget constraints dominate, or a smaller power plant (medium‑speed) would be more space‑efficient.
Use Cases: The 10S50ME-C9.6-LGI is typically installed in newbuilds targeting IMO 2025 carbon intensity limits or in retrofits converting existing HFO‑only ships to methanol dual‑fuel, especially on long‑haul routes where fuel flexibility and NOx reduction are critical.
12S50ME-C9.6-LGI unverified
· 20160.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGI
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈20 MW) from a relatively compact L‑configuration, saving hull space.
  • Fuel flexibility – can switch between methanol and HFO, supporting future decarbonisation strategies.
  • Low NOx and SOx emissions when operated on methanol, helping meet IMO Tier III requirements.
  • Proven MAN Energy Solutions reliability and extensive global service network.
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑Control) for precise fuel management and diagnostics.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engine.
  • Methanol handling requires dedicated storage, safety systems and crew training.
  • Complex dual‑fuel fuel line and injection hardware increases maintenance scope.
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility.
  • Crosshead 2‑stroke design has larger bearing loads, demanding rigorous lubrication monitoring.
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierRo‑Ro ferryCruise linerOffshore support vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high shaft power while targeting low emissions and have access to methanol bunkering or plan a future fuel switch. Avoid if budget constraints dominate, the operating route lacks methanol supply, or crew expertise in dual‑fuel systems is limited.
Use Cases: Often installed on newbuilds aiming for IMO 2025 carbon‑reduction targets, especially vessels that benefit from space‑saving L‑configuration and want to future‑proof against stricter emission regulations. Also selected for retrofits where a compact high‑power engine can replace older units without major hull modifications.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S46ME-B8.5-LGI
5S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 6450.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
6450
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) supports emission‑reduction strategies in ECAs and future decarbonisation plans.
  • Proven MAN crosshead design offers robust cylinder liner protection and long service intervals.
  • Compact L‑configuration fits tighter engine‑room layouts on medium‑size vessels.
  • Broad global support network from MAN Energy Solutions.
Weaknesses
  • Methanol infrastructure is still limited, potentially restricting fuel availability on some routes.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to installation, commissioning and routine maintenance.
  • Initial capital cost higher than a comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engine.
  • Crosshead bearing wear requires regular monitoring and specialised spare parts.
  • Engine size may be excessive for vessels below 10 000 dwt.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical tankerMedium bulk carrier (15–30 kt)Offshore supply vesselRo‑Ro/Passenger ferry with high power needs
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a 6.5 MW low‑speed engine with direct‑drive capability and want the flexibility to run methanol for lower emissions. Avoid if your vessel operates on routes without reliable methanol supply, or if space and budget constraints favour a smaller single‑fuel unit.
Use Cases: Installed on newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance in Emission Control Areas, or on retrofits where engine‑room space is at a premium and operators seek to future‑proof against stricter carbon regulations by adding methanol capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S46ME-B8.5-LGI
6S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 7740.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
7740
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 7.74 MW from a six‑cylinder unit enables compact installation on large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) supports lower CO₂ and SOx emissions while retaining flexibility for conventional bunkering.
  • Proven MAN reliability with integrated electronic control system (ME‑Series) for precise fuel management and diagnostics.
  • L‑configuration reduces overall engine length, freeing valuable hull space.
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of low‑speed crosshead designs.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable medium‑speed engines due to advanced dual‑fuel hardware.
  • Methanol handling requires specialised crew training and additional safety systems (explosion‑proof venting, leak detection).
  • Footprint still larger than some high‑speed alternatives, limiting suitability for smaller vessels.
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure can restrict operational flexibility.
  • Crosshead wear parts may need more frequent inspection in harsh service conditions.
Typical Vessels: Large Container ShipsBulk Carriers (>80 kt)Product Tankers (methanol or refined products)Ro‑Ro/Car Carrier vessels
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL ClassificationABS Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, space‑efficient main engine for a large vessel and want the option to reduce emissions with methanol while retaining HFO fallback. Avoid if: your operation lacks access to reliable methanol bunkering or you are constrained by budget and prefer a simpler single‑fuel system.
Use Cases: The 6S46ME‑B8.5‑LGI is typically installed on newbuilds of large dry bulk carriers, ultra‑large container ships, and product tankers that aim to meet IMO 2020+ emission standards while future‑proofing for methanol as a low‑carbon fuel.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S46ME-B8.5-LGI
7S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 9030.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
9030
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact L‑configuration suitable for space‑constrained engine rooms
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol & HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOx reduction when methanol is used
  • MAN’s proven low‑speed crosshead design offers long service intervals and high reliability
  • Optimised specific fuel consumption at rated speed, comparable to conventional diesel engines
  • Ready‑made for IMO Tier III compliance when operated on methanol
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many regions, affecting operational flexibility
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and higher upfront capital cost compared with a single‑fuel engine
  • Maintenance personnel require additional training for methanol handling and dual‑fuel control systems
  • Potential slight efficiency penalty when running on HFO versus pure diesel operation
  • Large low‑speed engine requires reinforced foundations and vibration isolation measures
Typical Vessels: Bulk Carrier (handymax & supramax)Product / Chemical TankerContainer Ship (mid‑size, ~8 000–10 000 TEU)Cruise FerryOffshore Support Vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power low‑speed engine with the flexibility to run on methanol for emissions reduction and have access to methanol bunkering or plan future retrofits. Avoid if: your operation is limited to regions without methanol supply, budget constraints preclude higher capital cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel system.
Use Cases: The 7S46ME‑B8.5‑LGI is typically installed in new builds targeting IMO 2025/2030 emission limits and in retrofits of existing vessels seeking to lower carbon footprints by switching part of the fuel mix to methanol. It fits well on ships where engine‑room space is at a premium but high power is required, such as bulk carriers and product tankers operating on long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S46ME-B8.5-LGI
8S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 10320.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
10320
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact L‑configuration, saving engine room volume
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOx emission reductions
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design offers long service intervals and robust durability
  • Optimised for low specific fuel consumption at slow rpm, improving overall efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront cost due to methanol handling equipment and dual‑fuel control systems
  • Methanol infrastructure is still limited in many ports, restricting operational flexibility
  • Maintenance of the crosshead arrangement can be more complex than a simple trunk piston engine
  • Large cylinder dimensions may limit suitability for retrofits on smaller hulls
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10 000 TEU)Bulk carrier (≥150 k dwt)Crude oil tanker (≥200 k dwt)Liquefied gas carrier (where methanol bunkering is planned)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine for large vessels, want to meet IMO Tier III or future low‑carbon mandates with methanol capability, and have space constraints that benefit from the L‑configuration. Avoid if: budget is tight, methanol bunkering is unavailable on your trade routes, or the vessel size cannot accommodate the engine’s physical dimensions.
Use Cases: The 8S46ME-B8.5-LGI is typically installed in newbuilds of ultra‑large container ships and bulk carriers that target low‑emission performance under IMO Tier III regulations, as well as in retrofits where a compact L‑engine layout frees valuable cargo space while providing dual‑fuel flexibility for greener operations.
9S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 11610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
11610
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output with low rpm enables direct propeller drive, eliminating reduction gears.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) provides flexibility and future‑proofing for emission regulations.
  • MAN’s crosshead design offers robust durability and long service intervals.
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared to medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global support network.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol handling requires specialized storage, safety systems, and limited bunkering infrastructure.
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable medium‑speed units, affecting hull design.
  • Complex fuel management system increases installation and training requirements.
  • Potentially higher maintenance complexity due to dual‑fuel injection hardware.
Typical Vessels: Methanol carrierLNG/methanol dual‑fuel tankerChemical tankerBulk carrier (retrofit for low‑sulphur or methanol operation)Container ship (newbuild with alternative fuel strategy)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a low‑speed direct‑drive engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet upcoming IMO emission limits and have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if your operating profile cannot justify the higher upfront cost, you lack methanol infrastructure, or space constraints favor a more compact medium‑speed solution.
Use Cases: The 9S46ME-B8.5-LGI is typically installed on newbuild methanol carriers and retrofitted tankers seeking to switch from HFO to methanol for compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and the 2020 sulphur cap. It also appears in LNG‑methanol dual‑fuel vessels where operators want fuel flexibility across different trade routes.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S46ME-B8.5-LGI
10S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 12900.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
12900
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 12.9 MW from a compact low‑speed design
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions when methanol is used
  • Low operating speed (129 rpm) reduces gearbox requirements and improves propeller efficiency
  • Proven MAN reliability record for long‑haul vessels
  • Designed for easy integration with modern exhaust gas cleaning systems
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure still limited on many trade routes
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and higher upfront cost compared to single‑fuel engines
  • Maintenance crew need specific training for methanol handling and safety procedures
  • Large physical size may require redesign of engine room layout in retrofit projects
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerBulk carrierRo‑Ro ferry
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier III (NOx) compliance when operated on low‑sulphur fuel or methanol
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine and want to future‑proof the vessel with methanol dual‑fuel capability for stricter emission regulations. Avoid if your operating routes lack reliable methanol supply, budget constraints preclude the higher capital cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel power plant.
Use Cases: The 10S46ME‑B8.5‑LGI is typically installed on newbuild large container vessels and cruise ships targeting IMO Tier III compliance, as well as on retrofits where operators aim to shift part of the fuel mix to methanol for greener operations while retaining the flexibility to run HFO when needed.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S46ME-B8.5-LGI
12S46ME-B8.5-LGI unverified
· 15480.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
15480
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm, ideal for large propeller drives
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant NOx and CO₂ emission reductions when methanol is used
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals for crosshead designs
  • Optimised for IMO Tier III compliance in ECAs without additional after‑treatment
  • Modular construction simplifies installation on newbuilds
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a conventional HFO‑only engine due to dual‑fuel hardware
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes
  • Increased system complexity (separate fuel pumps, injection control) raises maintenance expertise requirements
  • Physical envelope larger than comparable 10‑cylinder units, affecting hull space allocation
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipVery large crude carrier (VLCC)Large bulk carrier / VLOCMethanol‑capable product tanker
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with methanol dual‑fuel flexibility to meet IMO Tier III or future carbon‑neutral fuel strategies, and you have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if your operation is limited to conventional fuels, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or vessel size cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions.
Use Cases: Installed on newbuilds targeting emission‑controlled areas (e.g., North Sea, US East Coast) where operators plan a gradual shift to methanol as a low‑carbon marine fuel. Frequently selected for flagship vessels that require both maximum propulsion power and future‑proofing against tightening environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
5S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 16450.0 kW · Low-speed two-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
18200 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a BSFC of 169 g/kWh, reducing fuel costs
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + methanol) supports future emission regulations
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system optimises combustion and load handling
  • Super long stroke design provides excellent low‑speed torque directly to the propeller
  • Proven MAN engineering heritage ensures reliability and worldwide support
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and requires additional fuel handling infrastructure
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many regions
  • Longer start‑up time relative to faster‑running engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with excellent fuel efficiency and the flexibility to switch between conventional oil fuels and methanol for future compliance. Avoid if: vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the large footprint and higher upfront cost, or if methanol bunkering is unavailable on intended routes.
Use Cases: The 5S70ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed on new‑build very large tankers and bulk carriers where direct‑drive low‑speed propulsion is preferred, as well as on dual‑fuel LNG carriers that require the option to run methanol for emission reductions. It is also used in retrofits aiming to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits while preserving existing engine room layouts.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
6S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 19740.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel (HFO/MDO + Methanol)
Cylinders
6
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
21840 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power (21 840 kW) with excellent thermal efficiency (BSFC 169 g/kWh).
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on conventional HFO/MDO and methanol, enabling IMO Tier III compliance.
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system for optimized performance and diagnostics.
  • Super long‑stroke design provides superior fuel economy at low rpm.
  • Robust crosshead construction suited to very large vessels with high duty cycles.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, needing additional pumps, sensors and methanol bunkering infrastructure.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol handling demands strict safety measures and crew training.
  • Maintenance of crosshead seals and cylinder liners can be more demanding than trunk‑type engines.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmaxAframax tankerLarge bulk carrierChemical/product carriers
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility to meet stringent emission limits and have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if vessel size constraints, limited dual‑fuel infrastructure, or budget sensitivity outweigh the benefits of lower emissions.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuild VLCCs and Suezmax tankers targeting IMO Tier III compliance on long-haul routes, as well as retrofits where operators wish to shift part of the fuel mix to methanol for emission reduction.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
7S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 23030.0 kW · Dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
25480 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships
  • Low BSFC (169 g/kWh) delivering excellent fuel efficiency
  • Methanol dual‑fuel option enables compliance with IMO Tier III and future CO₂ reduction targets
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system optimises performance and reduces emissions
  • Proven reliability of the S70ME family with long service intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only engines
  • Methanol handling adds complexity (storage, safety systems, bunkering infrastructure)
  • Crosshead bearing wear demands specialised maintenance expertise
  • Limited global methanol bunkering network may restrict operational flexibility
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ship (>15 000 TEU)Very large bulk carrierNewbuild or major retrofit of high‑deadweight vessels
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS Class ApprovalIMO Tier III (methanol) complianceIMO MARPOL Annex VI
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >25 MW propulsion, want fuel‑flexibility with methanol to meet future emission regulations, and have sufficient engine room volume and budget for a premium low‑speed MAN engine. Avoid if vessel size is limited, methanol bunkering is unavailable on intended routes, or upfront cost must be minimised.
Use Cases: The 7S70ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships and large bulk carriers where fuel efficiency and low emissions are paramount. It is also selected for retrofits aiming to replace older HFO‑only engines with a dual‑fuel solution that can run methanol to achieve IMO Tier III compliance.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
8S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 26320.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed two‑stroke
Cylinders
8
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
29120 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈29 MW) in a compact inline configuration
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on conventional heavy fuel oil, marine diesel or methanol, aiding compliance with future carbon regulations
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈169 g/kWh) thanks to super long stroke and advanced MAN SaCoSone control system
  • Proven reliability of the S70ME family with extensive service network
  • Integrated low‑gas injection module (LGIM) enables methanol operation without major engine redesign
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher capital cost, especially when equipped for methanol dual‑fuel capability
  • Requires dedicated methanol storage, handling and safety systems not always available on existing vessels
  • Limited number of shipyards experienced with the 8‑cylinder variant compared with more common 12‑cylinder S70 models
  • Maintenance intervals can be longer due to large bore and stroke dimensions
Typical Vessels: Panamax bulk carrierHandymax / Supramax container shipProduct tankerCruise ferry (mid‑size)Offshore support vessel with high power demand
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalIMO NOx Tier II compliance (speed‑dependent)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible main engine for newbuilds or retrofits targeting IMO 2020/2030 carbon limits and have access to methanol bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if the vessel lacks space for the engine’s dimensions, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or methanol supply is uncertain on intended routes.
Use Cases: The 8S70ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on medium‑size ocean carriers and specialized vessels that require both high efficiency and the ability to switch to low‑carbon fuels such as methanol, often in fleets pursuing future emission caps or operating in Emission Control Areas.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
9S70ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 29610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29610
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder, suitable for large propulsion requirements
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/Methanol) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduces CO₂ emissions when using renewable methanol
  • Crosshead design separates piston forces from the crankcase, extending bearing life and reducing wear
  • Low operating speed (≈91 rpm) provides excellent propeller efficiency and lower vibration
  • MAN’s proven reliability record and extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel medium‑speed engines due to dual‑fuel hardware
  • Complex fuel handling system requires dedicated storage, vapour recovery and safety infrastructure for LPG/methanol
  • Limited bunkering infrastructure for methanol on many trade routes
  • Large physical footprint (L‑configuration) may restrict installation in vessels with tight engine rooms
  • Maintenance of the crosshead arrangement is more specialised than that of simpler trunk‑type engines
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerRo‑Ro ferryOffshore support vesselLarge bulk carrier
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, want to future‑proof the vessel with low‑emission LPG or methanol capability, and have access to appropriate fuel infrastructure. Avoid if budget constraints are tight, the intended trade lacks reliable methanol/LPG bunkering, or engine‑room space is severely limited.
Use Cases: The 9S70ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed on newbuilds targeting low‑emission routes such as Europe–North America container services, cruise itineraries in emission‑controlled areas, and offshore supply vessels operating under strict environmental regulations. Its dual‑fuel flexibility makes it attractive for operators planning a transition to greener fuels while retaining the ability to run on conventional LPG where available.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
10S70ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 32900.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke designs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on LPG, methanol and marine diesel oil for redundancy
  • Very low NOx and SOx emissions, supporting IMO Tier III compliance
  • Compact power density for a 32.9 MW unit, easing installation in space‑constrained hulls
  • MAN’s proven reliability record and extensive after‑sales support network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional diesel‑only low‑speed engines
  • Requires dual‑fuel bunkering infrastructure and on‑board fuel handling systems
  • Methanol/LPG storage demands additional safety measures and space
  • Complex control and monitoring software increase commissioning time
  • Spare‑parts inventory is broader due to dual‑fuel capability
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierLPG carrierMethanol carrierCruise ship (low‑emission concept)Offshore support vesselContainer ship (green retrofit)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high power with very low emissions and want the flexibility to switch between LPG, methanol and diesel; you have or plan to develop dual‑fuel bunkering facilities; compliance with future IMO emission limits is a priority. Avoid if: bunker infrastructure for LPG/methanol is unavailable on your trade routes, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or operational simplicity of a single‑fuel engine is required.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in new‑build LNG carriers that must meet strict NOx limits while using boil‑off gas as fuel; methanol‑fueled bulk carriers seeking carbon‑reduction pathways; and cruise ships adopting alternative fuels to lower their environmental footprint. It also appears in retrofits where existing diesel engines are replaced with dual‑fuel units to future‑proof vessels against tightening emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
12S70ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 39480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39480
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~50% LHV) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG and methanol) provides flexibility to meet emerging low‑carbon fuel mandates.
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment, supporting strict emission regulations.
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design offers excellent durability and low maintenance intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional diesel‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Limited global bunkering infrastructure for methanol/LPG can constrain operational flexibility.
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable medium‑speed alternatives, affecting hull integration.
  • Requires crew training and engine‑room modifications to handle dual‑fuel systems safely.
Typical Vessels: Methanol CarrierLNG/LPG CarrierChemical TankerCruise ShipOffshore Supply Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx)DNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high power with low NOx emissions, want flexibility to run LPG or methanol, and operate on routes where low‑carbon fuels are supported. Avoid if: the vessel has severe space/weight constraints, the operator cannot secure reliable dual‑fuel bunkering, or budget limits preclude higher upfront engine cost.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in newbuilds targeting future fuel‑flexibility markets—e.g., methanol‑powered bulk carriers, LNG/LPG tankers complying with IMO Tier III, and cruise ships seeking lower emissions while maintaining long‑range capability. It also fits offshore support vessels that benefit from dual‑fuel operation to reduce port emissions.
5S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 11900.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
13400 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption of 170 g/kWh gives excellent efficiency for a large engine.
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on conventional heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or methanol, supporting IMO 2020 and future decarbonisation targets.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise load management and quick start‑up/shutdown.
  • Super long stroke design delivers strong low‑speed torque, reducing gearbox requirements.
  • Proven MAN reliability record with extensive service network worldwide.
Weaknesses
  • Complex fuel handling system for methanol adds installation cost and requires dedicated storage infrastructure.
  • Larger physical footprint due to the super‑long stroke and five‑cylinder layout may limit installation in space‑constrained hulls.
  • Higher upfront capital expenditure compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol use introduces corrosion‑management considerations for fuel lines and seals.
  • Maintenance crew need additional training on dual‑fuel and methanol safety procedures.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerLNG carrier (as auxiliary/main engine)Bulk carrierContainer ship
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalIMO Tier III compliance when operated on methanol or low‑sulphur fuel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power engine with fuel‑type flexibility to meet current sulfur caps and future carbon‑reduction strategies, especially for vessels operating in Emission Control Areas or planning methanol retrofits. Avoid if budget is tight, the ship has limited space for the larger engine package, or there is insufficient methanol supply infrastructure at ports of call.
Use Cases: The 5S60ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed on new‑build tankers and bulk carriers targeting IMO 2020 compliance while future‑proofing for methanol use. It is also selected for retrofits where operators want to add a low‑emission fuel option without sacrificing power, such as converting existing HFO‑only ships to dual‑fuel operation.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
6S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 14280.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Cylinders
6
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
16080 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈170 g/kWh) at low rpm, providing excellent fuel economy.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on conventional heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and methanol, supporting future emission reduction strategies.
  • Super long stroke design delivers strong torque and smooth operation, ideal for large propeller drives.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control optimises combustion for each fuel type, reducing emissions and wear.
  • Proven MAN engineering heritage with extensive global support network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity: extra piping, storage tanks, safety systems and crew training are needed for methanol handling.
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes.
  • Maintenance of the crosshead arrangement demands skilled personnel and can be more time‑consuming than trunk‑type designs.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Container ShipsBulk carriers (>150 kt)Methanol or LNG carrier conversionsCruise ships seeking low‑speed, low‑emission propulsion
Certifications: DNV Class – Dual‑Fuel ApprovalABS – Marine Engine CertificationIMO Tier III (NOx) compliance when operated on methanol
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven fuel flexibility and are planning to future‑proof the vessel against stricter emission regulations. Avoid if bunkering infrastructure for methanol is unavailable on your intended routes, or if budget constraints make the higher upfront cost prohibitive.
Use Cases: The 6S60ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed in new builds or major retrofits of large ocean‑going vessels that require a robust low‑speed propulsion plant while aiming to reduce CO₂ and NOx emissions through methanol dual‑fuel operation. It is especially attractive for carriers operating on long voyages where fuel flexibility and high efficiency translate into significant operational savings.
7S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 16660.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
18760 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a BSFC of ~170 g/kWh, reducing fuel consumption.
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on conventional heavy fuel oil or methanol, supporting future decarbonisation strategies.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system provides precise combustion management and diagnostics.
  • Robust crosshead design offers long service intervals and proven reliability for large vessels.
  • Super long stroke (2400 mm) yields excellent torque characteristics at low rpm.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol handling demands dedicated storage, safety systems, and crew training.
  • Low rated speed (105 rpm) limits suitability for high‑speed vessel types.
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system can increase maintenance expertise requirements.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct carrierChemical tankerBulk carrierLNG/methanol carrier
Certifications: DNV GL Type Approval for dual‑fuel S60ME seriesIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III compliance (via methanol operation)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility and lower NOx emissions, and have the infrastructure to support methanol bunkering. Avoid if: vessel speed requirements are high, space is limited, or the operator cannot accommodate the additional safety and training demands of methanol handling.
Use Cases: The 7S60ME-C10.5-LGIM is typically installed in new‑build large tankers and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance or future carbon‑neutral operation through methanol fuel, as well as retrofits where existing low‑speed engines are replaced to gain dual‑fuel capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
8S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
· 19040.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
21440 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIM
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Methanol
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power with excellent torque due to the 2.4 m super long stroke.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) for both conventional and methanol fuels.
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility allows operation on HFO/MDO or methanol, supporting emission reduction strategies.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides optimized combustion monitoring and diagnostics.
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope requires ample engine‑room space.
  • Higher capital cost, especially for the methanol retrofit package.
  • Methanol handling demands dedicated storage, safety systems, and bunkering infrastructure.
  • Dual‑fuel injection system adds maintenance complexity compared to single‑fuel engines.
  • Limited availability of methanol bunkering on many trade routes.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerVLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Panamax bulk carrierUltra‑large container vessel (ULCV) with emission‑reduction targets
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine that can run on conventional heavy fuel oil and methanol to meet future emission regulations, and you have the space and bunkering support for dual‑fuel operation. Avoid if bunker infrastructure for methanol is unavailable, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or vessel size limits accommodate a smaller engine footprint.
Use Cases: Installed on newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance and future carbon‑neutral operations, especially in trades where methanol bunkering hubs are emerging; also used in retrofits of large tankers and bulk carriers seeking to diversify fuel options while maintaining high propulsion power.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
9S60ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 21420.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21420
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol) enables significant NOx and SOx reductions and compliance with IMO Tier III.
  • High specific power at very low rpm provides excellent propulsive efficiency for large vessels.
  • MAN’s proven S60ME family offers robust reliability and long service intervals.
  • Flexibility to switch between fuels supports future fuel‑mix strategies and regulatory changes.
  • Compact crosshead design reduces overall engine height compared with equivalent inline units.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional heavy‑fuel oil (HFO) only engines.
  • Requires dedicated LPG/methanol bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited in certain ports.
  • Methanol handling demands additional safety systems and crew training.
  • Larger cylinder bore and stroke result in a sizable engine footprint, affecting ship layout.
  • Potentially higher maintenance complexity due to dual‑fuel injection systems.
Typical Vessels: Container shipsBulk carriersCruise linersChemical tankersLNG/LPG carriers (where methanol/LPG is used as auxiliary fuel)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine that can meet strict emission limits, want flexibility to run LPG or methanol, and operate on routes with adequate alternative‑fuel bunkering. Avoid if the vessel’s operating profile lacks access to dual‑fuel supply chains, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or space limitations prevent installation of this large low‑speed unit.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in newbuilds of large container and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance on emission control areas, as well as cruise ships seeking greener propulsion. It also fits chemical tankers that require low emissions for hazardous cargoes and vessels operating on routes where LPG or methanol bunkering is being developed.
10S60ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 23800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel marine diesel
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
23800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output with low rpm enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear
  • Dual‑fuel operation (LPG/methanol) reduces SOx, NOx and CO₂ emissions for compliance in ECAs
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals for 2‑stroke crosshead designs
  • Fuel flexibility allows switching between conventional fuel and low‑carbon alternatives
  • Compact power density compared with equivalent diesel engines
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel injection system and auxiliary equipment
  • Requires access to LPG or methanol bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited on some routes
  • Larger physical envelope than high‑speed alternatives, impacting hull design
  • Additional crew training needed for dual‑fuel handling and safety procedures
  • Potentially higher maintenance complexity of the fuel conversion system
Typical Vessels: Product tankerLPG carrierChemical tankerPanamax container shipHandymax bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a low‑speed, direct‑drive main engine with dual‑fuel capability to meet IMO Tier III/2020 and future carbon targets, and you have reliable LPG or methanol bunkering. Avoid if your operation lacks access to low‑carbon fuels, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel size limits installation of a large low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new builds targeting emission control areas or as retrofits for existing vessels needing to comply with IMO 2020 and upcoming CO₂ reduction mandates. Deployed on product tankers, LPG carriers and other medium‑size cargo ships where fuel flexibility and low‑speed efficiency are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
12S60ME-C10.5-LGIM unverified
· 28560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIM
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
28560
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a relatively compact 12‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol + MDO) enables significant NOx and SOx reductions
  • MAN’s proven reliability and extensive global service network
  • Optimised for low specific fuel consumption at cruise speeds
  • Flexibility to meet IMO Tier III emission standards when running on clean fuels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional diesel‑only engines
  • Limited bunkering infrastructure for LPG/methanol on many trade routes
  • 2‑stroke crosshead design requires specialised maintenance and training
  • Potentially larger auxiliary systems (fuel pretreatment, gas handling) increasing installation complexity
  • Fuel price volatility for LPG/methanol can affect operating economics
Typical Vessels: Large container shipsCruise linersFerriesOffshore supply vesselsBulk carriers (high‑capacity)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high shaft power while meeting strict emission limits, have access to LPG or methanol bunkering, and value MAN’s global support. Avoid if the intended trade route lacks clean‑fuel infrastructure, budget constraints dominate, or crew expertise in dual‑fuel 2‑stroke engines is unavailable.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new builds targeting green corridors (e.g., North Sea, Baltic) or as a retrofit to replace older diesel units on vessels that must comply with IMO 2020 and Tier III regulations. It is also favored for cruise ships and ferries operating in emission‑controlled ports where low‑sulphur or zero‑sulphur fuels are mandated.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
5S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 8400.0 kW · 5‑cylinder low‑speed dual‑fuel (LPG/methanol) 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
8400
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at rated load) reduces fuel consumption
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on LPG, methanol or marine diesel for flexibility
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment, supporting low‑emission mandates
  • Compact 5‑cylinder layout gives a smaller footprint compared with larger multi‑cylinder engines
  • MAN’s proven reliability and extensive service network
Weaknesses
  • Maximum output of 8.4 MW may be insufficient for large deep‑sea vessels
  • LPG/methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports
  • Higher upfront capital cost than conventional diesel engines of similar power
  • Dual‑fuel injection system adds complexity to operation and maintenance
  • Specific fuel handling equipment (cryogenic or pressurised tanks) required on board
Typical Vessels: Coastal container shipRo‑Ro ferryShort‑sea bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselMethanol‑demonstration vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a medium‑power main engine with low NOx emissions and have access to LPG or methanol bunkering; ideal for short‑sea, coastal or retrofit projects targeting IMO Tier III compliance. Avoid if the vessel requires power well above 10 MW, operates on routes without reliable alternative fuel supply, or when budget constraints prohibit higher capital expenditure.
Use Cases: Often installed in new builds of short‑sea container and Ro‑Ro vessels aiming for zero‑carbon transition, as well as retrofits of existing ships to demonstrate methanol propulsion. Also used in offshore support vessels where compact size and low emissions are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
6S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 10080.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
10080
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke designs
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol) enables compliance with IMO Tier III in ECAs
  • Compact power output for a six‑cylinder unit, reducing weight and space compared to larger engines
  • Crosshead construction provides lower vibration and longer bearing life
  • Proven MAN Energy Solutions reliability and global support network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable diesel‑only low‑speed engines
  • Requires dedicated gas handling and storage infrastructure on board
  • Methanol/LPG bunkering availability is still limited on many trade routes
  • Maintenance complexity increases due to dual‑fuel injection system
  • Physical size remains larger than medium‑speed alternatives for the same power
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical tankerCoastal container shipCruise ferryOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalIMO Tier III compliance (when operated on LPG/methanol)
Decision Guide: Choose if the operator needs high efficiency low‑speed propulsion with flexible low‑emission fuel options and operates in regions where LPG or methanol bunkering is available. Avoid if upfront cost, limited gas fuel infrastructure, or a preference for simpler diesel‑only systems outweighs emission benefits.
Use Cases: The S50ME-C9.6-LGIM is typically installed on short‑sea product carriers and chemical tankers that must meet strict emission limits in ECAs, as well as on methanol‑fueled cruise ferries and offshore supply vessels where low vibration and high reliability are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
7S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 11760.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
11760
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 7 cylinders provide >11 MW in a compact footprint.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on LPG, methanol and has diesel start‑up capability, supporting future low‑carbon bunkering strategies.
  • Low NOx emissions – meets IMO Tier III limits without after‑treatment when operated at design speed.
  • Proven MAN reliability record for long‑haul vessels with extensive service network.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional diesel engines due to dual‑fuel hardware and control systems.
  • Increased complexity of fuel handling and storage, especially for methanol (corrosion protection, safety zones).
  • Limited global methanol/LPG bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility on some routes.
  • Spare parts inventory is larger because of additional injectors, gas‑handling modules, and SCR components.
Typical Vessels: Methanol-fueled LNG carrierLPG carrierChemical tanker (dual‑fuel variant)Offshore supply vessel with low‑emission requirement
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV Class – Dual Fuel Engine notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine that can switch between LPG, methanol and diesel to meet future low‑carbon fuel mandates and operate on IMO Tier III routes. Avoid if the intended service area lacks reliable LPG/methanol bunkering or if upfront budget constraints outweigh long‑term fuel savings.
Use Cases: The 7S50ME-C9.6-LGIM is typically installed in newbuilds targeting methanol‑fuelled LNG carriers or LPG tankers operating on emission‑controlled trade lanes (e.g., Europe–Asia). It also appears in retrofit projects where operators seek to future‑proof existing vessels against tightening carbon regulations while retaining the ability to fall back on diesel when alternative fuels are unavailable.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
8S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 13440.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
13440
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) for reduced fuel consumption
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol) supports IMO 2020 sulfur limits and future carbon targets
  • Crosshead design provides low vibration and noise, advantageous for passenger vessels
  • Compact length‑to‑power ratio saves hull space compared with comparable diesel engines
  • Backed by MAN's global service network and proven reliability
Weaknesses
  • Cannot run on traditional heavy fuel oil without conversion, limiting fuel flexibility
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and specialised components
  • Requires dedicated LPG/methanol storage, handling and safety systems onboard
  • Slightly lower peak power density than some six‑cylinder variants, may need larger engine room
Typical Vessels: Methanol‑fueled container shipLNG/LPG carrierCruise shipRo‑Pax ferry
Certifications: DNVIMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with LPG or methanol dual‑fuel capability to meet strict emission regulations and have the space for larger engine installations. Avoid if your operation relies on heavy fuel oil, has tight budget constraints, or lacks infrastructure for handling LPG/methanol.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuild methanol‑powered containerships (e.g., CMA CGM Methanol), LNG carriers using boil‑off gas as LPG, and cruise liners converting to low‑sulfur dual‑fuel propulsion to reduce emissions while maintaining long‑range performance.
9S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 15120.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke marine engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (15 120 kW) at very low rpm enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol) provides significant NOx and CO₂ emission reductions, supporting IMO Tier III compliance
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals for 2‑stroke crosshead designs
  • Compact L‑configuration saves engine room space on container or cruise vessels
  • Flexibility to switch between diesel and gas fuels depending on bunkering availability
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and specialised fuel handling equipment
  • Increased complexity of high‑pressure gas injection and control systems, requiring specialized training for crew and maintenance staff
  • Methanol/LPG bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many regions, potentially restricting operational flexibility
  • Slightly lower thermal efficiency on gas compared with conventional heavy‑fuel oil operation
  • Spare parts inventory for dual‑fuel components can be larger than for a single‑fuel engine
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerBulk carrierGeneral cargo vesselChemical tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier III (MARPOL Annex VI)DNV Dual‑Fuel Class notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with the ability to run LPG or methanol for emission‑controlled routes and have access to appropriate bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if your operation lacks gas fuel supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel diesel solution.
Use Cases: The 9S50ME-C9.6-LGIM is typically installed on newbuild container vessels operating in North Sea and Asian ECAs, cruise ships seeking to lower their carbon footprint, and bulk carriers targeting greener certifications for European trades. It is also used in retrofit projects where existing diesel engines are replaced with dual‑fuel units to meet upcoming emission regulations.
10S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 16800.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (16.8 MW) in a compact L‑configuration suitable for space‑constrained engine rooms
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/methanol) enables significant NOx, SOx and CO₂ emission reductions
  • MAN’s proven crosshead design offers excellent durability and low specific fuel consumption
  • Optimised for IMO Tier III compliance in Emission Control Areas
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies load management across both fuels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional oil‑fired engines
  • Requires dedicated LPG/methanol storage, handling and safety systems on board
  • Increased complexity of fuel switching and control software
  • Limited global methanol/LPG bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility
  • Maintenance personnel need specialised training for dual‑fuel components
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierGeneral cargo vesselCruise linerRo‑Ro ferry
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Tier III)DNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel must meet IMO Tier III limits, operates in strict Emission Control Areas, or the operator wants fuel flexibility toward low‑carbon LPG/methanol. Avoid if the ship’s routes lack reliable LPG/methanol bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or crew training for dual‑fuel systems is not feasible.
Use Cases: Newbuilds targeting 2027+ emission regulations, retrofits of medium‑size containerships and bulk carriers operating in European ECAs, cruise ships seeking lower‑carbon fuel options, and vessels on routes where methanol/LPG bunkering hubs are emerging (e.g., Europe–Asia corridors).
MAN Energy Solutions 12S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
12S50ME-C9.6-LGIM unverified
· 20160.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed marine engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIM
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/Methanol (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (20 MW) at low rpm enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/Methanol) supports compliance with IMO CO₂, SOx and NOx regulations.
  • Lean‑burn combustion results in very low NOx and particulate emissions.
  • MAN’s proven reliability and long service intervals reduce lifecycle cost.
  • Compact L‑configuration minimizes engine‑room footprint.
Weaknesses
  • Requires dedicated LPG/methanol fuel handling, storage and vapourisation systems.
  • Higher capital expenditure than conventional heavy‑fuel‑oil engines.
  • Limited global bunkering infrastructure for methanol/LPG can restrict operational flexibility.
  • Specialised maintenance knowledge needed for dual‑fuel injection and lubrication systems.
  • Slightly higher specific fuel consumption on LPG compared with optimised HFO at full load.
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierTanker (Product/Crude)Cruise ShipRo-Ro Ferry
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >20 MW power, want dual‑fuel flexibility for LPG or methanol to meet IMO 2020+ emission caps, and have space for the L‑configuration engine room. Avoid if: your routes lack reliable LPG/methanol bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or you prefer a single‑fuel heavy‑fuel‑oil solution.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuilds targeting zero‑carbon or low‑carbon strategies, such as methanol‑powered container ships on Europe–Asia routes, LPG carriers operating in regions with established LPG infrastructure, and cruise vessels seeking lower NOx and SOx emissions.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
5S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 16450.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead with LPG pilot injection
Cylinders
5
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
18200 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power (18 200 kW) suitable for large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and LPG pilot, enabling IMO Tier III compliance
  • Super long stroke delivers excellent thermal efficiency and low specific fuel consumption
  • Robust crosshead design reduces wear on the cylinder liner and piston assembly
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises performance and emissions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight due to five‑cylinder, super long stroke layout
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional low‑speed diesel engines
  • Requires LPG storage and handling infrastructure, adding complexity
  • Limited speed range (low rpm) may not suit vessels needing higher shaft speeds without reduction gear optimisation
  • Additional maintenance for the gas injection pilot system
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerBulk CarrierContainer Ship (large feeder/ultra‑large)Cruise VesselOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high propulsion power with low NOx emissions, have access to LPG pilot fuel and require fuel‑flexibility for IMO Tier III compliance. Avoid if vessel size or budget does not justify the larger engine footprint and added complexity of dual‑fuel handling.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newbuilds targeting emission control areas (ECAs) where IMO Tier III limits apply, retrofits of existing large carriers seeking to reduce NOx without full LNG conversion, and vessels that benefit from fuel flexibility between heavy fuel oil and LPG pilot for operational cost optimisation.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
6S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 19740.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead dual‑fuel engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
21840 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC 169 g/kWh, ME pressure 21 bar)
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and LPG pilot for lower emissions
  • Robust crosshead construction provides long service intervals and reliability
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and optimisation
  • Suitable for large vessels requiring high power while meeting IMO Tier II emission limits
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine‑room space and structural reinforcement
  • Additional LPG storage, handling and injection equipment increase capital cost and complexity
  • Higher upfront investment compared with medium‑speed diesel or gas turbine alternatives
  • Dual‑fuel injection system adds specialised maintenance requirements and spare‑parts inventory
  • Not ideal for smaller vessels or projects with strict weight/space constraints
Typical Vessels: VLCCAframax TankerLarge Container Ship (10,000+ TEU)Bulk Carrier (>150,000 dwt)Cruise Ferry
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine for large carriers and want to lower emissions with LPG pilot operation. Avoid if vessel size, budget or space constraints cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint and the additional LPG system.
Use Cases: Installed primarily in very large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, ultra‑large container vessels and bulk carriers on long voyages where fuel efficiency and flexibility are critical, especially when operating through Emission Control Areas that benefit from LPG pilot combustion.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
7S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 23030.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
25480 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency with a low specific fuel consumption of 169 g/kWh.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/MDO + LPG) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions.
  • Robust crosshead design suited for long service intervals on large vessels.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and optimisation.
  • Super long stroke (2800 mm) enhances torque at low rpm, ideal for propeller‑driven ships.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require significant hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, requiring additional gas handling equipment and crew training.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed diesel engines.
  • Limited speed range (fixed low rpm) makes it unsuitable for vessels needing high shaft speeds.
  • Maintenance of gas injection pilots can be more demanding than conventional fuel systems.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierChemical TankerLarge Bulk Carrier
Certifications: DNVIMO Type Approval (Dual Fuel)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with proven dual‑fuel capability and excellent fuel efficiency for large vessels that can accommodate its size. Avoid if vessel space is limited, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or the operational profile requires higher shaft speeds.
Use Cases: The 7S70ME-C10.5-LGIP is commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build LNG carriers (including Q‑Flex/Q‑Max designs), LPG carriers and large chemical tankers where fuel flexibility and low emissions are critical. It is also selected for retrofits where a ship operator wants to convert from oil‑only to dual‑fuel operation without sacrificing power output.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
8S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 26320.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
29120 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
169 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power with low BSFC (169 g/kWh) for fuel‑efficient operation
  • Dual‑fuel (HFO/MDO + LPG) enables compliance with IMO Tier III limits in ECAs while retaining conventional fuel flexibility
  • Super long stroke design provides excellent durability and reduced wear at low rpm
  • MAN SaCoSone advanced control system optimises combustion, load handling and emissions
  • Proven S70ME family reliability with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to fuel handling, storage and maintenance
  • Limited speed range (fixed low rpm) unsuitable for vessels needing high service speeds
  • When operated on HFO/MDO, additional exhaust gas cleaning may be required to meet Tier III
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container Ship (ULCS) with low‑speed propulsionLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel flexibility)Cruise Ship (low‑speed main engine)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operating on LPG)DNV Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed propulsion unit with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have the space for a large engine room. Avoid if vessel speed requirements exceed low‑rpm capabilities, space is limited, or LPG infrastructure cannot be provided.
Use Cases: The 8S70ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large tankers, bulk carriers and other deep‑sea vessels where fuel efficiency and compliance with Emission Control Areas are critical. Its LPG capability makes it attractive for ships operating in Tier III zones while still allowing conventional heavy fuel oil operation on long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
9S70ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 29610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29610
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – ~29.6 MW from a single engine suitable for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/LNG & HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when gas is used
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of MAN low‑speed crosshead designs
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in VLCCs and LNG carriers
  • Integrated pilot injection system (LGIP) improves combustion stability on gas fuels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Low operating speed (91 rpm) requires large propeller or reduction gearing, unsuitable for high‑speed craft
  • Initial capital cost higher than comparable single‑fuel diesel engines
  • Requires LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure and gas handling systems onboard
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system may increase maintenance training requirements
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)LNG Carrier (Q-Flex, Q-Max)Large Bulk CarrierCruise Ship (mega‑cruise class)Offshore Support Vessel (FPSO/FSRU)
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate for Dual‑Fuel EnginesDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, fuel flexibility between gas and oil, and want to meet stringent emission limits (e.g., IMO Tier III). Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine's large dimensions, or if gas bunkering is unavailable and a single‑fuel solution would be more cost‑effective.
Use Cases: The 9S70ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and LNG carriers where its high output and dual‑fuel capability allow operators to switch between cheaper, lower‑emission gas fuels and traditional heavy fuel oil depending on market conditions and regulatory requirements.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
10S70ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 32900.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed dual‑fuel marine diesel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈33 MW) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when running on LPG
  • Compact L‑configuration saves engine room space
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global service network
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits in gas mode
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and LNG handling equipment
  • Requires access to LPG/LNG bunkering infrastructure
  • Crosshead design entails larger overall dimensions and weight compared with some alternatives
  • Maintenance intervals for fuel injection and exhaust valves are more demanding than simple HFO engines
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersBulk carriers (>150 kDWT)Very large crude carriers (VLCCs)Offshore support vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have access to LPG/LNG bunkering. Avoid if budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost or if LNG infrastructure is unavailable on your intended routes.
Use Cases: The 10S70ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on mega‑size container ships, cruise vessels and large bulk carriers where space efficiency, high output and dual‑fuel operation are critical for compliance with Tier III emission zones and fuel cost optimisation.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
12S70ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 39480.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39480
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈53 000 hp) suitable for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on low‑emission LPG or conventional HFO, improving compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals for the S70ME family
  • Integrated electronic control system (MAN ME‑Control) optimises fuel consumption and emissions
  • Designed for easy retrofitting of exhaust gas cleaning systems if required
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines due to dual‑fuel hardware
  • Requires dedicated LPG storage and handling infrastructure, which may be limited in some ports
  • Larger physical envelope than comparable medium‑speed alternatives, impacting engine room layout
  • Dual‑fuel injection system adds maintenance complexity and requires specialised training
  • Peak fuel consumption still significant; bunker logistics must accommodate both fuels
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (10 000+ TEU)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) / ULCCLarge bulk carriersProduct tankers with low‑emission requirementsOffshore support vessels and cruise ships requiring dual‑fuel flexibility
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceMARPOL Annex VIDNV class approval (e.g., DNV GL Notation for Dual‑Fuel Engines)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power on a low‑speed engine, must meet strict NOx emission limits, and have access to LPG bunkering or plan to future‑proof the vessel. Avoid if: the operating routes lack reliable LPG supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or space in the engine room is severely limited.
Use Cases: The 12S70ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and VLCCs where fuel flexibility and emission compliance are critical, as well as on retrofits of existing large carriers seeking to reduce NOx emissions while retaining the ability to run on conventional HFO when LPG is unavailable.
5S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 11900.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel crosshead engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
13400 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power with low BSFC (≈170 g/kWh) gives excellent fuel economy.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil, plus LPG) provides flexibility for emission control and fuel cost optimisation.
  • Robust crosshead design ensures long service life and reduced cylinder wear.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and quick response to changing operating conditions.
  • Super long stroke (2.4 m) enhances thermodynamic efficiency at low speeds.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and heavy foundations.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel equivalents.
  • LPG handling adds complexity: need for cryogenic storage, safety systems and additional crew training.
  • Low rated speed (105 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding to installation cost and maintenance.
  • Spare parts inventory may be less common than for the more widely used 6‑cylinder S60 variants.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerPanamax product carrierLNG/LPG carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)Chemical tankerCruise ship
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for vessels where fuel cost and emission regulations are critical, and you have sufficient hull space for the engine package. Avoid if capital budget is tight, vessel size limits engine room volume, or operational simplicity (single‑fuel only) is preferred.
Use Cases: The 5S60ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed in medium‑size tankers and cruise ships that benefit from LPG as a low‑emission supplement to conventional heavy fuel oil, allowing compliance with IMO Tier II/III emission standards while maintaining long‑range cruising capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
6S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 14280.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
16080 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) improves operating economics.
  • Electronic MAN SaCoSone control enables precise injection timing, better emissions performance and flexible fuel handling (dual‑fuel HFO/MDO + LPG).
  • Super long stroke design provides high torque at low rpm, ideal for large slow‑speed vessels.
  • Proven MAN reliability record with extensive global service network.
  • Integrated lubrication and cooling systems reduce auxiliary plant footprint.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand significant hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires skilled crew for electronic control diagnostics and maintenance of the crosshead arrangement.
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed vessels or those requiring >200 rpm engines.
  • Emissions compliance (IMO Tier III) may need additional after‑treatment if operating in ECAs with strict NOx limits.
Typical Vessels: VLCC/Aframax crude oil tankersPanamax and Capesize bulk carriersLarge container ships (>10 000 TEU)LNG/LPG carriers (dual‑fuel variant)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels with high power demand
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ApprovedIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance (NOx)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient engine for slow‑speed, large deadweight vessels and value electronic control flexibility or dual‑fuel operation. Avoid if: vessel size limits installation space, budget constraints prohibit high upfront cost, or the ship requires higher rpm engines for speed‑critical service.
Use Cases: The 6S60ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed in newbuild VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers where fuel economy over long voyages is critical, as well as retrofits of existing tankers seeking to add LPG dual‑fuel capability for emission reduction in regulated areas.
7S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 16660.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke marine diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
18760 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) for high thermal efficiency
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and supplemental LPG
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and diagnostics
  • Super long stroke design provides excellent torque at low rpm, ideal for large propellers
  • Robust crosshead construction offers high durability and long service intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Lower operating speed limits compatibility with certain high‑speed propulsion arrangements
  • Initial capital cost is higher than smaller, higher‑rpm engines
  • Fuel handling for LPG adds complexity to the fuel system
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment to meet the strictest NOx/EPA Tier 3 regulations
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Crude Carriers (ULCC)Bulk carriers >150 k DWTContainer ships ≥10 000 TEURo‑Ro / Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power at low rpm, value fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO + LPG) and want the efficiency of a super‑long‑stroke engine for large vessels. Avoid if space is limited, you require fast‑start or high‑speed propulsion, or you must meet the most stringent NOx limits without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 7S60ME-C10.5-LGIP is typically installed on ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine drives a large fixed‑pitch propeller, providing excellent fuel economy on long voyages. Its dual‑fuel capability also makes it attractive for vessels operating in emission control areas that need the option to switch to cleaner LPG.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
8S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
· 19040.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
8
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
21440 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
170 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-LGIP
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + LPG
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm provides excellent propulsion efficiency for large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO + LPG) enables compliance with varying fuel availability and emission regulations.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of ~170 g/kWh for its power class reduces operating costs.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system offers precise engine management, optimizing performance and emissions.
  • Super long stroke delivers high torque, beneficial for heavy‑load applications.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed or single‑fuel engines.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and maintenance requirements (e.g., LPG handling equipment).
  • Limited global LPG bunkering infrastructure may restrict route flexibility.
  • Longer start‑up and warm‑up periods relative to faster‑running medium‑speed engines.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (Capesize)Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx complianceDNV GL classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with fuel flexibility and strict emission compliance for very large vessels. Avoid if vessel size is modest, LPG bunkering is unavailable on intended routes, or budget constraints limit the higher upfront cost.
Use Cases: Predominantly installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, capesize bulk carriers, and mega container ships where long‑range efficiency, high torque, and dual‑fuel capability are essential for meeting both economic and regulatory demands.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
9S60ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 21420.0 kW · low-speed dual-fuel 2-stroke
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21420
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact low‑speed design suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel (LPG/HFO) allows sulfur‑free operation to meet IMO Tier III limits
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals
  • Flexibility to switch between gas and oil fuels depending on availability and price
  • Optimised fuel consumption at design load, reducing CO₂ per kW·h
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and cryogenic LNG/LPG handling equipment
  • Larger physical footprint compared with medium‑speed engines, impacting engine room layout
  • Requires dedicated gas storage and supply infrastructure on board
  • Complex fuel management and injection systems increase maintenance expertise needs
  • Potentially longer start‑up time when switching from oil to gas mode
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsPanamax and post‑Panamax bulk carriersVery large crude carriers (VLCC) and product tankersCruise linersRo‑Ro/ConRo vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class – Dual‑Fuel Low‑Speed Engine
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for sulfur‑free operation and have access to LNG/LPG bunkering. Avoid if: budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, vessel size limits engine room space, or gas fuel infrastructure is unavailable on intended routes.
Use Cases: Commonly installed in newbuilds targeting compliance with the 2020 sulfur cap and future CO₂ reduction mandates, especially on long‑haul container ships and large bulk carriers where fuel flexibility and high efficiency are critical. Also selected for retrofits where existing oil‑only engines are replaced to gain emission advantages without sacrificing power.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
10S60ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 23800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
23800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed MAN S60ME series (≈176 g/kWh)
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions when running on LPG
  • Proven MAN reliability with electronic engine control for optimized performance
  • Integrated exhaust gas after‑treatment options enable IMO Tier III compliance
  • Large power output per cylinder reduces overall engine footprint for very large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Requires LPG bunkering infrastructure and high‑pressure fuel handling systems
  • Increased system complexity leads to more specialized maintenance training
  • Larger physical size and weight than medium‑speed alternatives for the same power
  • Potentially higher spare‑parts inventory due to dual‑fuel components
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerProduct tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)LPG/LNG carrier (where LPG bunkering is available)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have access to LPG bunkering. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, budget constraints dominate, or LPG infrastructure is unavailable on intended routes.
Use Cases: Deployed in long‑haul crude oil and product tanker voyages where fuel cost optimisation and NOx/CO₂ reduction are critical, as well as in large bulk carriers operating on emission‑controlled trade lanes. Also suitable for LPG carriers that can exploit the engine's gas‑fuel capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
12S60ME-C10.5-LGIP unverified
· 28560.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
28560
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (28.6 MW) suitable for large propulsion requirements
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when gas is used
  • Low rpm allows direct propeller drive, eliminating reduction gears and improving overall efficiency
  • Proven MAN S60ME-C family reliability with extensive service history on ultra‑large vessels
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits in gas mode and supports MARPOL Annex VI CO₂ reduction goals
Weaknesses
  • Requires LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited on certain routes
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system increases training and maintenance requirements
  • Physical size and weight are large; installation demands ample engine room space
  • Maintenance intervals can be shorter due to high‑pressure gas components
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerAframax tankerUltra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Large bulk carrier (>150 kDWT)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power and emission compliance
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (dual‑fuel)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >28 MW propulsion, want dual‑fuel flexibility to cut emissions and fuel cost, operate on routes with reliable LPG/LNG bunkering, and require direct‑drive low‑speed efficiency. Avoid if vessel size is modest, gas infrastructure is unavailable, or budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront investment.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in new‑build ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance, as well as retrofits of existing vessels where a switch to gas fuel is feasible. It is favored on long‑haul routes where gas bunkering ports are established, delivering lower NOx and CO₂ footprints while maintaining high propulsion power.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
5S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 8400.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
8400
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when using LPG.
  • Compact five‑cylinder layout offers high power density for vessels under 10 MW total propulsion.
  • MAN’s proven S50ME family delivers excellent specific fuel consumption and reliability in long‑haul service.
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III emission limits with appropriate after‑treatment, facilitating operation in ECAs.
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies start‑up, monitoring and maintenance.
Weaknesses
  • Maximum output (8.4 MW) may be insufficient for larger bulk carriers or high‑speed container ships.
  • Initial capital cost is higher than a single‑fuel HFO engine due to the dual‑fuel hardware and control system.
  • LPG bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes, potentially restricting fuel choice.
  • Maintenance of LPG injection components adds complexity compared with conventional diesel engines.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical tankerLPG carrier (small to medium size)Offshore supply vesselRo‑Ro/Feeder ship
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the operator needs fuel flexibility, wants to meet strict emission regulations (ECA/Tier III) and operates vessels in the 5–10 MW power range. Avoid if higher propulsion power is required or reliable LPG bunkering cannot be guaranteed on the intended routes.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed on product and chemical tankers that benefit from lower‑emission LPG operation, as well as offshore supply vessels operating in emission‑controlled waters where dual‑fuel flexibility reduces fuel costs and regulatory risk.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
6S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 10080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
10080
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of MAN S50ME series (≈48% at ISO conditions)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexible fuel switching between LNG/LPG and heavy fuel oil, aiding emission compliance
  • Integrated electronic control (ME) provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from extensive fleet experience
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint on large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure and additional fuel handling systems
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Crosshead design adds weight and length relative to simpler trunk‑type engines
  • Electronic control system may need specialized support for troubleshooting
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerLNG carrier (dual‑fuel propulsion)Large bulk carrierUltra‑large container ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >10 MW of main propulsion power with the flexibility to run on LNG/LPG for lower emissions and can accommodate the higher upfront cost and bunkering requirements. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable LPG/NGL supply, has tight budget constraints, or prefers a simpler single‑fuel engine architecture.
Use Cases: The 6S50ME-C9.6-LGIP is typically installed in the propulsion line of large ocean‐going vessels where high power and fuel flexibility are critical—e.g., newbuild crude tankers complying with IMO Tier III NOx limits, LNG carriers using boil‑off gas as a secondary fuel, or mega container ships seeking to reduce carbon intensity through occasional LPG operation.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
7S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 11760.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
11760
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when using LPG.
  • High specific power for a 7‑cylinder design, suitable for large vessels requiring >11 MW.
  • Proven MAN reliability with robust crosshead construction and integrated electronic control system.
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits in gas mode, aiding compliance with strict emission regulations.
  • Low‑pressure gas injection pilot (LGIP) improves start‑up behaviour and reduces wear on fuel injectors.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a comparable single‑fuel HFO engine due to dual‑fuel system complexity.
  • Requires onboard LNG/LPG storage and handling infrastructure, increasing space and weight allocations.
  • Maintenance of gas injection components adds operational complexity and specialist training needs.
  • Physical size of the 7‑cylinder block can limit installation options on smaller hull forms.
  • Limited LPG bunkering availability on some trade routes may restrict optimal operation.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierChemical TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need dual‑fuel flexibility, must meet IMO Tier III or regional low‑sulphur mandates, and operate on routes with reliable LPG/LNG bunkering. Avoid if the vessel lacks space for cryogenic tanks, the operator cannot absorb higher upfront costs, or the intended trade has scarce gas fuel infrastructure.
Use Cases: Commonly installed as the main propulsion engine on newbuild LNG carriers for gas‑only operation, retrofitted on existing tankers to reduce emissions, and selected for large bulk or container ships where high power and fuel flexibility are strategic advantages.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
8S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 13440.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke dual-fuel marine diesel
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
13440
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (13.44 MW) from a compact eight‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/LNG + HFO) provides flexibility and lower emissions
  • Thermal efficiency around 48% with low specific fuel consumption
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operating on gas fuel
  • Advanced electronic control system (MAN ME‑C series) optimises performance and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and gas handling systems
  • Requires LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure, limiting operability in some regions
  • Larger physical dimensions and weight compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • More complex fuel system increases maintenance workload and training needs
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be challenging for remote or older vessels
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierGeneral cargo vesselCruise linerLNG carrier
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high power density with the ability to switch between gas and oil fuels, operate on routes where low NOx emissions are required, or plan for future LNG/LPG bunkering. Avoid if: the vessel will run primarily in ports lacking gas bunkering infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront costs, or space/weight limits prevent installation of a low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 8S50ME‑C9.6‑LGIP is typically installed on newbuild ultra‑large container ships (10 000+ TEU), modern cruise vessels, and large bulk carriers that target IMO Tier III compliance and want fuel flexibility for cost optimisation. It is also selected for LNG carriers where gas‑fuel operation is mandatory.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
9S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 15120.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine diesel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (15.1 MW) from a compact 9‑cylinder layout, suitable for large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (LPG/LNG and HFO) provides fuel flexibility and enables lower emissions when using gas.
  • Low rotational speed (117 rpm) improves propeller efficiency and reduces gearbox size.
  • MAN S50ME platform is proven for reliability with long service intervals and robust construction.
  • LGIP low‑pressure gas injection system delivers smoother combustion and helps meet IMO Tier III NOx limits.
Weaknesses
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, requiring specialised training and maintenance procedures.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Physical size and weight may restrict installation on smaller hulls or retrofits.
  • Dependence on LNG/LPG bunkering infrastructure limits operability in ports without gas supply.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; HFO must meet strict specifications to avoid injector fouling.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierChemical TankerContainer Ship (large)Cruise ShipVery Large Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel capability for gas and oil, operate on routes where LNG/LPG bunkering is available, and value MAN's proven reliability. Avoid if: the vessel has limited space for a large low‑speed engine, the operator cannot support the additional complexity of dual‑fuel systems, or the trade route lacks reliable gas fuel infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 9S50ME-C9.6-LGIP is typically installed on newbuild LNG carriers and chemical tankers that aim to meet stringent emission regulations while retaining high propulsion efficiency. It is also selected for large cruise ships and ultra‑large container vessels where the low rpm aligns with direct‑drive propellers and the dual‑fuel option supports greener operations on gas‑friendly routes.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
10S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 16800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~1 680 kW per cylinder) with a compact footprint for a low‑speed engine.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG & HFO) offers fuel flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions when LPG is used.
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of the S50ME family.
  • Low rpm reduces vibration, allowing direct propeller drive without a reduction gear.
  • Naturally meets IMO Tier II NOx limits; can achieve Tier III with additional exhaust treatment.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines because of the dual‑fuel system.
  • Requires dedicated LPG storage and handling infrastructure, adding space and safety considerations onboard.
  • Complex control software and sensor suite increase maintenance skill requirements.
  • Spare parts for the LGIP (low‑pressure gas injection pump) are less common than standard HFO engine components.
  • Slightly higher specific fuel consumption on HFO compared with optimized single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierContainer ShipCruise ShipBulk CarrierProduct Tanker
Certifications: DNVABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose this engine if you need high power density, fuel flexibility between LPG and HFO, and want to meet strict NOx limits without extensive after‑treatment. Avoid it when the vessel lacks space for LPG storage, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or operational crew lack experience with dual‑fuel systems.
Use Cases: The 10S50ME-C9.6-LGIP is typically installed on large ocean-going vessels that benefit from fuel flexibility—such as LNG carriers using boil‑off gas, long‑haul container ships seeking lower emissions, cruise liners requiring cleaner operation in emission control areas, and bulk or product tankers operating on mixed fuel regimes.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
12S50ME-C9.6-LGIP unverified
· 20160.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S50ME-C9.6-LGIP
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2214
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (20 MW) in a compact footprint for a low‑speed engine
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when using LPG
  • Integrated electronic control system enables precise combustion management and compliance with IMO Tier III limits
  • Proven MAN reliability record and extensive global service network
  • Designed for long‑haul operation with low specific fuel consumption
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires additional LNG/LPG storage, handling infrastructure and crew training
  • Maintenance of high‑pressure injection pumps and crosshead bearings is more demanding
  • Physical size and weight may limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Availability of LPG bunkering can be limited in certain regions
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierLPG carrierChemical tankerLarge bulk carrierContainer ship (large, high‑speed designs)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operated on LPG)DNV GL Class – Dual‑Fuel Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility for LNG/LPG carriers or vessels targeting low emissions and have the bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit dual‑fuel system costs, the vessel size cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or operating routes lack reliable LPG supply.
Use Cases: The 12S50ME-C9.6-LGIP is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on new‑generation LNG carriers (e.g., Q‑Max class) and large LPG carriers, where its dual‑fuel capability allows compliance with stringent emission regulations while offering operational flexibility. It is also used in high‑capacity bulk carriers and some ultra‑large container ships that prioritize fuel efficiency and low emissions.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
5S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 6450.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
6450
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when using LPG.
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact installation on medium‑size vessels.
  • Proven MAN reliability with long service intervals for crosshead bearings.
  • Low specific fuel consumption at design speed, improving operational economics.
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III emission standards when equipped with appropriate after‑treatment.
Weaknesses
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and requires LPG bunkering infrastructure.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Crosshead design demands regular inspection of cylinder liners and bearing wear.
  • Limited to low‑rpm applications; not suitable for high‑speed propulsion needs.
  • Spare parts inventory may be larger due to dual‑fuel components.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical carrierOffshore supply vesselSmall cruise shipRo‑Ro passenger ferry
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a medium‑power main engine with LPG/HFO dual‑fuel flexibility, operate in Emission Control Areas, and have space constraints that benefit from the L‑configuration. Avoid if budget is tight, LNG/LPG bunkering is unavailable, or the vessel requires high‑speed propulsion beyond low‑rpm capabilities.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on newbuild product and chemical tankers targeting IMO Tier II/III compliance, offshore support vessels operating in ECAs, and retrofits where operators want to switch between LPG and HFO without sacrificing power. The engine’s compact layout also suits small cruise ships and ferries that need a reliable low‑speed main propulsion unit.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
6S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 7740.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
7740
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at rated load) reduces fuel consumption
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows switching between LPG and HFO, lowering CO₂ and SOₓ emissions
  • Robust crosshead design provides low vibration and long service intervals
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global support network
  • Can be equipped with exhaust gas recirculation to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires onboard LPG storage and handling infrastructure, increasing space and complexity
  • More sophisticated control and safety systems increase training requirements
  • Limited LPG bunkering availability on some trade routes
  • Dual‑fuel components (injectors, pumps) add maintenance complexity
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierChemical TankerProduct TankerCruise ShipMid‑size Bulk Carrier
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel needs flexible fuel options, high efficiency and compliance with IMO Tier III emissions; especially suitable for routes with reliable LPG bunkering. Avoid if LPG supply is scarce, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or a simpler single‑fuel solution suffices.
Use Cases: Commonly installed in newbuild LNG carriers and dual‑fuel product/chemical tankers to meet strict emission regulations while retaining the ability to run on conventional heavy fuel oil when LPG is unavailable. Also used in cruise ships and mid‑size bulk carriers seeking efficiency gains.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
7S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 9030.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
9030
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke engines
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows significant NOx and SOx reductions when running on LPG
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals
  • Compact power density for a 9 MW engine, suitable for medium‑size vessels
  • Flexibility to switch between HFO and LPG depending on fuel availability
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires dedicated LPG bunkering infrastructure and storage tanks onboard
  • Increased system complexity (pilot injection, gas handling) leads to more specialised maintenance
  • Limited global LPG supply in some remote trade routes
  • Weight and dimensions are larger than medium‑speed alternatives for the same power
Typical Vessels: Product TankerChemical CarrierContainer Ship (up to ~8 000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (handymax/handysize)Offshore Supply Vessel
Certifications: DNV GL ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑efficiency low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel LPG/HFO capability to meet IMO Tier III or ECA emission limits and have access to LPG bunkering. Avoid if your operating area lacks reliable LPG supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel power plant.
Use Cases: The 7S46ME‑B8.5‑LGIP is commonly installed on medium‑size tankers and bulk carriers that operate in emission‑controlled zones, as well as on new builds targeting lower fuel consumption and CO₂ footprints. It is also selected for retrofits where owners want to convert existing HFO engines to dual‑fuel operation without sacrificing power output.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
8S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 10320.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
10320
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions when using gas.
  • High power output from a compact 8‑cylinder layout, suitable for medium‑size vessels.
  • MAN’s extensive global service network reduces downtime and spare‑parts lead time.
  • Integrated LGIP electronic control system improves combustion efficiency and simplifies start‑up procedures.
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operated on LPG.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Requires access to LPG/LNG bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited on certain routes.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, increasing crew training and maintenance requirements.
  • Specific fuel consumption can be less optimal at very low loads when running on HFO.
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable 6‑cylinder models.
Typical Vessels: Handymax bulk carrierProduct tanker (regional)Feeder container shipMedium‑range LPG/LNG carrier (as main engine)General cargo vessel up to ~45,000 DWT
Decision Guide: Choose if you need fuel flexibility for routes with gas availability or strict emission control areas, and value MAN’s after‑sales support. Avoid if the operating area lacks reliable LPG bunkering, budget constraints dominate, or crew expertise in dual‑fuel systems is limited.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on mid‑size bulk carriers and product tankers that operate between Europe and the Middle East where gas bunkering ports exist, allowing them to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits while retaining the option to burn HFO when gas is unavailable. Also used in regional container vessels seeking lower emissions without sacrificing range.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
9S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 11610.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke dual-fuel marine engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
11610
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output suitable for large vessels (>10 MW)
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG & HFO) provides flexibility and lower emissions in ECAs
  • Proven MAN reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead design
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME series) enables precise fuel management
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission standards when operated on LPG
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and control systems
  • Requires dedicated LPG bunkering infrastructure and handling equipment
  • Larger physical footprint compared with smaller low‑speed engines
  • Complex fuel system increases maintenance training requirements
  • Slightly lower thermal efficiency on HFO versus pure diesel operation
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk carrier (>150 kt)Cruise shipLNG carrier with auxiliary LPG bunkering
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >10 MW propulsion power, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet emission control area regulations, and have access to LPG bunkering. Avoid if the operating route lacks reliable LPG supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a low‑speed engine of this scale.
Use Cases: The 9S46ME-B8.5-LGIP is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large tankers, container ships and bulk carriers operating long voyages where fuel flexibility and compliance with strict emission standards are critical. It is also used on cruise vessels and LNG carriers that can supplement boil‑off gas with LPG to optimise emissions and fuel economics.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
10S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 12900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
12900
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of MAN low‑speed two‑stroke designs (≈48% LHV)
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LPG/LNG and HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when using gas
  • Proven MAN reliability with long service intervals and extensive global support network
  • Compact power density for its rating, allowing installation on a wide range of vessel sizes
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires dedicated LPG/LNG bunkering infrastructure and complex fuel handling systems
  • Dual‑fuel control system adds operational complexity and demands specialised crew training
  • Maintenance of the gas injection pilot (LGIP) can be more frequent than for pure diesel versions
Typical Vessels: Container shipsCruise linersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel propulsion)Chemical tankersLarge Ro‑Ro / ferry vessels
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduce CO₂ by using LPG/LNG where bunkering is available. Avoid if the operating route lacks reliable gas fuel supply, budget constraints prohibit higher capital outlay, or crew expertise for dual‑fuel systems is limited.
Use Cases: The 10S46ME‑B8.5‑LGIP is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on newbuilds targeting low emissions and fuel flexibility, such as next‑generation container vessels, cruise ships, and LNG carriers that can switch between gas and oil depending on price or availability.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
12S46ME-B8.5-LGIP unverified
· 15480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S46ME-B8.5-LGIP
Bore (mm)
460
Stroke (mm)
1932
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
15480
Speed (rpm)
129
Fuel Type
LPG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel operation (LPG/HFO) enables lower CO₂ and NOₓ emissions and compliance with IMO Tier III in emission control areas.
  • Electronic ME fuel injection provides superior fuel efficiency, real‑time diagnostics and reduced specific fuel consumption.
  • High power output (≈15.5 MW) at very low rpm gives excellent propeller efficiency and low vibration for large vessels.
  • Proven MAN reliability with a worldwide service network simplifies maintenance planning.
  • Low‑speed design matches well with fixed‑pitch or controllable‑pitch propellers on long‑haul ships.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine‑room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Onboard LPG storage and handling systems add complexity, cost and safety considerations.
  • Initial capital cost is higher than a comparable single‑fuel HFO engine.
  • Dual‑fuel system maintenance requires specialised training and spare parts inventory.
  • Start‑up and warm‑up periods are longer than for medium‑speed diesel engines.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierCrude Oil TankerLarge Container ShipCruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel needs very high power at low rpm, must meet strict emission limits and can accommodate LPG infrastructure – e.g., new LNG/LPG carriers or cruise ships operating in Tier III zones. Avoid if space is limited, the operator prefers a single‑fuel solution, or the fleet lacks experience with dual‑fuel handling.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on newly built ultra‑large tankers and carrier vessels where boil‑off gas from cargo can be used as LPG fuel, delivering both propulsion power and emission benefits. It also appears in cruise liners seeking low vibration and compliance with stringent environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S70ME-C10.5-GA
5S70ME-C10.5-GA
· 15500.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke
Cylinders
5
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
18200 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
171 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈ 171 g/kWh) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO or natural gas, supporting IMO 2020 sulfur limits and future Tier III NOx requirements.
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system optimises combustion and simplifies engine monitoring.
  • Super long stroke design provides excellent torque at low rpm, suitable for large propeller drives.
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global service network.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand significant hull space and structural support.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (gas handling, injection hardware, safety systems).
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Maintenance of crosshead bearings and long stroke components can be more demanding.
  • Fixed low speed (≈91 rpm) requires reduction gearing for many vessel types.
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Bulk carrierContainer shipCruise liner
Certifications: DNV GL Class approvalABS classificationLR (Lloyd's Register) approvalIMO Tier III compliance when operated on natural gas
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power with flexible fuel options, want to meet strict emission regulations (SOx and NOx), and have sufficient space for a low‑speed engine and its dual‑fuel infrastructure. Avoid if vessel size or budget constraints limit the installation of large low‑speed machinery, or if a higher speed diesel is required without reduction gearing.
Use Cases: The 5S70ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large ocean-going vessels that require both high power and fuel flexibility—e.g., LNG carriers using boil‑off gas, tankers seeking compliance with sulfur caps, or cruise ships aiming for lower emissions while retaining diesel backup.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S70ME-C10.5-GA
6S70ME-C10.5-GA
· 18600.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead main engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
21840 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
171 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output with excellent torque due to the super long stroke
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈171 g/kWh) for reduced operating costs
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows flexibility and lower emissions when using natural gas
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and requires additional fuel handling infrastructure
  • Maintenance of the crosshead arrangement is more involved than trunk‑type engines
  • Optimised for low rpm; not suitable for vessels requiring higher shaft speeds
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerLNG carrierCruise shipLarge container vesselBulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for emission reduction and have sufficient space for a large inline crosshead layout. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit engine room volume, budget is highly sensitive to upfront cost, or the ship requires higher shaft speeds.
Use Cases: The 6S70ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed on very large crude carriers, LNG carriers that can run on boil‑off gas, cruise liners and mega‑container ships where fuel efficiency at low rpm and the ability to switch to natural gas for compliance with emission regulations are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S70ME-C10.5-GA
7S70ME-C10.5-GA
· 21700.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel
Cylinders
7
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
25480 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
171 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation enables significant NOx/CO₂ reduction when running on natural gas
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈171 g/kWh) and proven MAN reliability
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system simplifies monitoring and optimisation
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission limits with gas operation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • Higher capital cost, especially for the required high‑pressure gas supply infrastructure
  • Operational complexity of managing two fuel systems (oil and gas)
  • Maintenance intervals can be longer but repairs are more specialised
  • Limited suitability for small or medium vessels where space and budget are constrained
Typical Vessels: Container shipCrude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrierCruise shipOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: DNV class approval for dual‑fuel operationABS classification notation for low‑speed marine diesel enginesIMO Tier III emission compliance (when operated on natural gas)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW of propulsion power, want fuel flexibility and the ability to meet strict emissions limits using natural gas. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, weight, or the additional gas bunkering infrastructure required for dual‑fuel operation.
Use Cases: The 7S70ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild large container ships, tankers and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance, as well as on retrofits where a shift to gas‑lean operation is desired and sufficient gas bunkering infrastructure exists.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S70ME-C10.5-GA
8S70ME-C10.5-GA
· 24800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
700 mm
Stroke
2800 mm
Rated Power
29120 kW
Rated Speed
91 rpm
BSFC (rated)
171 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S70ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (29,120 kW) suitable for direct‑drive of large propellers.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/MDO and natural gas) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when running on gas.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 171 g/kWh for its size class.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system delivers precise monitoring, diagnostics and optimized combustion.
  • Proven long‑stroke design offers high mean effective pressure and durability.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require extensive engine‑room space and robust foundations.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity in fuel handling, gas infrastructure and crew training.
  • Limited maximum speed (91 rpm) necessitates reduction gearing for many propeller types.
  • Maintenance intervals can be longer due to the eight‑cylinder crosshead arrangement.
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 TankerBulk CarrierUltra Large Container VesselLNG Carrier (dual-fuel)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for large vessels and want the reliability of MAN’s long‑stroke design. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room space, budget constraints prohibit higher capital cost, or operational profile prefers higher speed engines without reduction gears.
Use Cases: Installed on ultra‑large crude oil tankers, very large bulk carriers and mega container ships where a single low‑speed engine drives the propeller directly; also selected for dual‑fuel vessels that can switch to natural gas to meet emission regulations in Emission Control Areas.
9S70ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 27900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
27900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈28 MW) in a compact low‑speed package suitable for direct propeller drive
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on emerging ammonia fuel or conventional MDO, providing future‑proofing
  • Proven MAN reliability and worldwide service network
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises combustion and reduces specific fuel consumption
  • Low rotational speed (91 rpm) eliminates the need for a reduction gearbox, lowering mechanical losses
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires additional safety equipment (storage, leak detection, ventilation), increasing installation complexity
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with conventional diesel‑only low‑speed engines
  • Limited global ammonia bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility in the near term
  • Physical envelope larger than medium‑speed alternatives, affecting hull space allocation
  • Regulatory framework for ammonia as a marine fuel is still evolving, creating compliance uncertainty
Typical Vessels: Ammonia tankerBulk carrier (future low‑carbon variants)Large container ship seeking decarbonisationLNG carrier with dual‑fuel retrofit potentialVery large ore or coal carriers requiring >25 MW propulsion
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power (>27 MW) low‑speed engine, want dual‑fuel capability with ammonia for future carbon‑neutral operations, and can accommodate the additional safety systems and higher capital cost. Avoid if: vessel size is modest, ammonia bunkering infrastructure is unavailable on intended routes, or budget constraints preclude the premium price of dual‑fuel technology.
Use Cases: The S70ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed in newbuilds or major retrofits of large carriers that aim to meet upcoming CO₂ reduction targets by using ammonia as a low‑carbon fuel while retaining the option to run on conventional MDO during transition periods. It is especially suited for vessels where direct‑drive propulsion and high power density are critical, such as ammonia bulk carriers, ultra‑large container ships, and LNG carriers being future‑proofed for alternative fuels.
10S70ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 31000.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
31000
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder with proven MAN reliability
  • Very low rpm enables direct propeller drive, eliminating reduction gears and improving overall efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel capability (MDO and ammonia) provides flexibility for future carbon‑neutral operations
  • Advanced electronic control system (ME‑C series) ensures precise fuel injection and optimal emissions performance
  • Robust crosshead design delivers long service intervals and reduced wear
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel system raises initial capital cost and requires specialised crew training
  • Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is still limited, potentially necessitating retrofits on board
  • Large physical dimensions demand significant engine‑room space
  • Higher NOx emissions at full load unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Spare‑parts inventory less common than for standard diesel‑only S70ME variants
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierOil TankerLNG CarrierChemical Tanker
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm, want a future‑proof dual‑fuel solution with ammonia capability, and have sufficient engine‑room space and crew expertise. Avoid if you lack gas‑handling experience, operate in ports without ammonia bunkering, or are constrained by tight hull arrangements.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels and large bulk carriers that aim to transition toward zero‑carbon fuels, as well as on retrofits of existing high‑power ships where direct‑drive efficiency and dual‑fuel flexibility are priorities.
12S70ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 37200.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S70ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
3256
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
37200
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 12 cylinders produce ~37 MW in a compact low‑speed package.
  • Common‑rail fuel injection gives superior fuel efficiency and lower NOx emissions.
  • Modular cylinder block design simplifies installation, maintenance and future upgrades.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (MDO and ammonia) provides flexibility for emerging low‑carbon fuels.
  • Proven MAN reliability record on ultra‑large container ships and VLCCs.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high deadweight – requires substantial engine room space.
  • Higher capital cost than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Ammonia handling needs specialised bunkering infrastructure and crew training, which are not yet widely available.
  • Complex control systems for dual‑fuel operation increase maintenance demands.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than slower‑speed (≤ 10 rpm) designs.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipVery large crude carrier (VLCC)Bulk carrier (>200 kt)Liquefied gas carrier (LNG/LPG)Cruise liner
Certifications: DNV Class notation for low‑speed marine enginesIMO Tier II NOx compliance (with optional SCR to meet Tier III)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine with proven MAN reliability and want flexibility for future ammonia or other alternative fuels. Avoid if your vessel lacks the space for a large low‑speed engine, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or you operate in regions without ammonia bunkering infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 12S70ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels (20 000+ TEU) and VLCCs where >35 MW propulsion is required at low rpm, as well as in retrofits of existing large carriers seeking to add dual‑fuel capability for compliance with tightening emission regulations.
5S60ME-C10.5-GA
· 11200.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Cylinders
5
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
13400 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC ~172 g/kWh) thanks to super long stroke design
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when running on natural gas
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system optimises performance and reduces fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability of the S60ME family in long‑haul applications
  • Compact power output for a low‑speed engine, suitable for large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases installation cost and maintenance requirements
  • Crosshead design demands more auxiliary equipment (e.g., separate lubrication circuits)
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires reliable natural‑gas supply infrastructure on board
Typical Vessels: VLCC/TankerLNG CarrierCruise ShipLarge Container VesselBulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for long‑range voyages and strict emission limits. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if natural‑gas bunkering is unavailable.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on ultra‑large crude carriers, LNG carriers using boil‑off gas, cruise liners operating in Emission Control Areas, and large container ships requiring fuel‑flexibility for cost optimisation.
6S60ME-C10.5-GA
· 13440.0 kW · Two-stroke dual-fuel marine main engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
16080 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power with low BSFC (172 g/kWh) for efficient fuel use
  • Dual‑fuel capability enables switching to natural gas for emissions compliance
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability of the S60ME family in long‑haul applications
  • Super long stroke design offers excellent torque at low rpm, ideal for large vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and control integration
  • Complexity of gas handling systems adds operational and maintenance demands
  • Crosshead design needs dedicated lubrication and cooling circuits, increasing system complexity
  • Limited suitability for smaller vessels or those with strict weight constraints
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVery large crude carriers (VLCC)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel operation)Cruise linersLarge bulk carriers
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet future emission regulations and have sufficient hull space for a super long‑stroke low‑speed unit. Avoid if vessel size, budget or weight limits preclude installing a large crosshead engine, or if the operator prefers a single‑fuel solution.
Use Cases: Installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels and VLCCs where 16 MW propulsion is required, as well as on LNG carriers retrofitted for gas operation to reduce CO₂ and NOₓ emissions under IMO Tier III rules. The engine’s dual‑fuel capability also supports bunker flexibility on long‑haul routes.
7S60ME-C10.5-GA
· 15680.0 kW · dual‑fuel low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
7
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
18760 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈172 g/kWh) – high thermal efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO or natural gas, supporting IMO Tier III compliance in ECAs
  • Robust MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and optimized performance
  • High torque at low rpm suits large propeller‑driven vessels, reducing gearbox requirements
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive service network worldwide
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (LNG handling, gas injection hardware, safety systems)
  • Maintenance of crosshead design requires skilled personnel and can be more time‑consuming
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed auxiliary propulsion
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Bulk CarrierLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel operation)Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type I main engine approvalDNV GL class certificationABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet stringent emission regulations and have the infrastructure for LNG bunkering. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints preclude the higher capital outlay, or operational profile does not justify the complexity of a gas‑capable system.
Use Cases: The 7S60ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed in large ocean‐going vessels where fuel flexibility and emission compliance are critical – e.g., container ships sailing through Emission Control Areas using natural gas to cut NOx, LNG carriers burning boil‑off gas, or VLCCs that want the option to switch to cleaner fuels on long voyages.
8S60ME-C10.5-GA
· 17920.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
600 mm
Stroke
2400 mm
Rated Power
21440 kW
Rated Speed
105 rpm
BSFC (rated)
172 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S60ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GA
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (Otto cycle)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on HFO/MDO or LNG, allowing optimisation of fuel cost and emissions.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈172 g/kWh) gives excellent efficiency for a high‑power main engine.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and quick switching between fuels.
  • Designed for IMO Tier III NOx limits when running on natural gas, supporting operation in Emission Control Areas.
  • Super long stroke (2.4 m) enhances durability and reduces wear at low rpm.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and complexity due to dual‑fuel hardware and gas handling systems.
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board cryogenic storage, limiting suitability for routes without gas supply.
  • Additional maintenance of gas injectors, high‑pressure fuel lines and after‑treatment components.
  • Larger physical footprint compared with a single‑fuel engine of similar power.
  • Potentially slightly lower efficiency when operated solely on HFO versus a dedicated diesel low‑speed engine.
Typical Vessels: Large LNG carriersUltra‑large container shipsCruise linersVery large crude carriers (VLCC)Offshore supply vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with fuel flexibility, want to meet strict NOx limits in ECAs using natural gas, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the vessel operates on routes without reliable gas supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or simplicity of a single‑fuel diesel engine is preferred.
Use Cases: The 8S60ME-C10.5-GA is commonly installed in new‑build LNG carriers where boil‑off gas can be used as primary fuel, in ultra‑large container ships targeting IMO Tier III compliance on trans‑Pacific routes, and in cruise vessels that wish to advertise low‑emission operation while retaining the ability to fall back on conventional marine fuels.
9S60ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 20160.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈20 MW) suitable for large ocean-going vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows ammonia main fuel with MDO as backup, supporting future decarbonisation strategies
  • Proven MAN crosshead design offers excellent durability and low vibration at low rpm
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with comparable medium‑speed engines
  • Integrated control system optimised for ammonia combustion reduces NOx emissions
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is still limited, restricting operational flexibility
  • Higher capital cost and added complexity of dual‑fuel handling equipment
  • Large physical dimensions may limit installation on existing hulls without major modifications
  • Requires specialised crew training for ammonia safety and engine management
  • Limited field experience with long‑term ammonia operation; reliability data still emerging
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (ULCS)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) / Aframax tankersLarge bulk carriers (>200 kt)Future green product tankers designed for ammonia fuel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you are building a new high‑capacity vessel and want to future‑proof it with ammonia as the primary low‑carbon fuel, have access to reliable ammonia bunkering, and can absorb higher upfront costs. Avoid if: your operation lacks ammonia supply chains, you need a retrofit on a space‑constrained hull, or budget constraints make the added complexity unacceptable.
Use Cases: The engine is being specified for newbuilds targeting IMO carbon‑neutral targets, such as next‑generation container ships and tankers that will operate on an ammonia‑MDO blend. It is also considered for green retrofits where a high‑power main engine with backup diesel capability is required.
10S60ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 22400.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel low-speed crosshead
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
22400
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on ammonia for near‑zero CO₂ emissions or MDO for flexibility
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of the S60ME family
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises fuel efficiency across both fuels
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operated on ammonia
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires specialised storage, safety systems and crew training
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Slightly lower thermal efficiency on MDO versus dedicated diesel engines
  • Limited global bunkering infrastructure for ammonia at present
  • Engine dimensions may require redesign of engine room layouts in retrofit projects
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Bulk carriers (>200 kt)Container ships (large feeder and mainline)LNG carriers with dual‑fuel propulsionChemical tankers requiring low emissions
Certifications: DNV GL Class approvalABS Class approvalIMO Tier III NOx compliance (ammonia mode)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need high power for large vessels, want future‑proofing with ammonia capability, and operate on routes where low‑emission requirements are strict. Avoid if: the vessel lacks space for ammonia storage, the operator cannot invest in specialised fuel infrastructure, or capital budget is constrained.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on newbuild ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers targeting IMO 2025 emission reductions, as well as retrofits of existing vessels where owners wish to add ammonia capability while retaining MDO flexibility for bunkering certainty.
12S60ME-C10.5-GA unverified
· 26880.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S60ME-C10.5-GA
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2790
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
26880
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm, enabling efficient large-diameter propellers
  • Dual‑fuel capability (MDO & ammonia) supports current operations and future zero‑carbon transition
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals
  • MAN’s proven reliability record and extensive global support network
  • Compact power‑to‑weight ratio compared with multiple smaller engines
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents, especially for ammonia hardware
  • Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is still limited worldwide
  • Complex fuel management system increases training and maintenance demands
  • When running on MDO, additional exhaust treatment (e.g., SCR) may be needed to meet Tier III limits
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierCrude oil tankerLiquefied gas carrierFuture zero‑carbon cargo vessels
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm main engine with flexibility to run on conventional diesel today and switch to ammonia later for emission reductions. Avoid if your vessel lacks the space for a large low‑speed engine, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or reliable ammonia bunkering is not available on your trade routes.
Use Cases: The 12S60ME-C10.5-GA is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on ultra‑large container ships, very large crude carriers and bulk carriers (>150 k DWT). It is also being positioned for retrofits of existing vessels that aim to meet future IMO carbon reduction targets by adopting ammonia as a low‑carbon fuel.
5G95ME-C10.5
· 34350.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
5
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
34350 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (34.35 MW) suitable for VLCCs and large container ships
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh) and low NOx emissions when equipped with after‑treatment
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability on a fleet of >200 vessels worldwide
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system for optimized performance and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Maintenance intervals are long but involve heavy overhauls and specialized tooling
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed vessels
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful handling of the crosshead arrangement
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥20 000 TEU)LNG CarrierVery Large Bulk Carrier
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for ultra‑large vessels, require fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if the ship is a smaller or high‑speed craft where space, weight or capital cost are critical constraints.
Use Cases: The 5G95ME-C10.5 powers the main shaft of ultra‑large crude carriers, large container ships, LNG carriers and mega bulk carriers, providing efficient low‑speed propulsion for long voyages while meeting IMO Tier II/III emission standards when fitted with SCR systems.
6G95ME-C10.5
· 41220.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead low-speed marine diesel
Cylinders
6
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
41220 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈41 220 kW) at a low crank speed reduces the need for reduction gears.
  • Ultra long stroke design yields excellent specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh).
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO.
  • Robust crosshead construction provides long service intervals and high durability.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system offers advanced monitoring, diagnostics and optimisation.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine‑room space.
  • Low operating speed requires a large-diameter propeller, which can affect maneuverability in confined waters.
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller or higher‑speed engines.
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions may be higher than newer low‑emission concepts.
  • Six‑cylinder configuration adds mechanical complexity for maintenance crews.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Panamax / Post‑Panamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm, excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to use a wide range of marine fuels on large tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid if vessel size constraints prevent installation of a large low‑speed engine, or if stricter NOx emission limits apply without planned after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 6G95ME-C10.5 is typically installed in newbuild VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers where its high output and fuel flexibility meet the vessel's propulsion requirements, as well as in some post‑Panamax container ships that can accommodate its size. It is also selected for retrofits aiming to improve fuel efficiency while retaining multi‑fuel capability.
7G95ME-C10.5
· 48090.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
48090 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈48 MW) at a low shaft speed suitable for direct propeller drive, reducing gear losses.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~166 g/kWh) thanks to the ultra long‑stroke design, giving excellent thermal efficiency.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, facilitating compliance with evolving sulfur regulations.
  • Proven reliability of MAN’s G95ME family with extensive service history on VLCCs and large container ships.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and easy integration with exhaust gas cleaning systems.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • High capital cost and need for specialised maintenance expertise compared with smaller medium‑speed engines.
  • Fixed low operating speed (≈80 rpm) limits suitability for vessels that demand higher shaft speeds or variable RPM ranges.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than those of modern medium‑speed, modular engines, requiring robust mitigation measures.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Large Bulk Carrier (>200 kDWT)LNG carrier (slow‑speed variants)
Certifications: IMO Tier II (MARPOL Annex VI) complianceDNV Type Approval for G95ME-C series
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low shaft speed, fuel flexibility across HFO to low‑sulfur fuels, and proven long‑haul efficiency on VLCC or large container vessels. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room volume, higher shaft speeds are required, or capital/maintenance budgets are tightly constrained.
Use Cases: The 7G95ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large tankers and container ships undertaking long oceanic voyages where fuel efficiency and the ability to meet sulfur emission limits are critical. It is also used in large bulk carriers that benefit from direct drive low‑speed propellers.
8G95ME-C10.5
· 54960.0 kW · ultra long‑stroke two‑stroke main engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
54960 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈166 g/kWh) thanks to the ultra long stroke design
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, supporting future fuel transitions
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder liner wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and emissions optimisation
  • Proven MAN reliability and worldwide support network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and strong foundations
  • Low maximum speed (80 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding to overall plant complexity
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Crosshead design adds maintenance tasks such as piston rod inspection and bearing service
  • Optimised for slow‑speed vessels; not suitable for high‑speed craft requiring >120 rpm
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC crude oil tankersLarge LNG carriers (LNGC)Ultra large container ships (>10,000 TEU)Bulk carriers above 150,000 dwtRo‑Ro/Pax vessels with high power requirements
Certifications: IMO Tier II NOx compliance (standard for engines built after 2011)Optional IMO Tier III compliance when equipped with SCR systemDNV GL class approval for main propulsion machinery
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power at low rpm, excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to use a range of marine fuels; especially suitable for large slow‑speed vessels where engine room volume is available. Avoid if vessel speed requirements exceed typical slow‑speed limits, space or weight constraints are critical, or capital budget is highly restricted.
Use Cases: The 8G95ME-C10.5 is typically installed in the propulsion plant of very large tankers, LNG carriers and mega container ships, where its high output and fuel flexibility provide economic operation on long voyages while meeting stringent emission regulations.
9G95ME-C10.5
· 61830.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
9
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
61830 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (ME‑C series BSFC ~166 g/kWh) reduces fuel costs.
  • Supports a wide range of fuels (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO), aiding compliance with IMO sulfur limits.
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise cylinder management and quick load response.
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul container ships and cruise liners with extensive service history.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives.
  • Requires skilled maintenance crew familiar with crosshead architecture and MAN-specific diagnostics.
  • Optimised for low‑speed operation; not suitable for vessels needing higher shaft speeds or compact power plants.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Large Cruise ShipLNG Carrier (large class)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm, maximum fuel efficiency and flexible fuel options for a large, slow‑speed vessel. Avoid if: engine room space is limited, budget constraints dominate, or the ship requires higher shaft speeds typical of medium‑speed diesel solutions.
Use Cases: The 9G95ME-C10.5 is commonly installed on ultra‑large container ships (20 000+ TEU), VLCCs and large cruise liners where continuous high power output and low fuel consumption are critical for long voyages.
10G95ME-C10.5
· 68700.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
10
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
68700 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh) reduces operating costs
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Proven reliability on ultra‑large vessels with extensive service network
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables remote monitoring and optimized performance
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III NOx limits without mandatory after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Maintenance demands specialised two‑stroke expertise and high‑grade lubricants
  • Low maximum speed (80 rpm) limits propeller design flexibility for some vessel types
  • Long start‑up time relative to higher‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerUltra‑large container ship (ULCS)Large bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)LNG carrier (cryogenic propulsion variants)
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II/IIIDNV GL Class approvalABS Class approvalLR Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power for large vessels, demand low fuel consumption and flexible fuel options, and have the space and budget for a low‑speed engine. Avoid if vessel size is moderate, space is limited, or you prefer higher rpm engines for smaller ships or fast‑service applications.
Use Cases: The 10G95ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, ultra‑large container ships and large bulk carriers, where its high output and efficiency translate into lower voyage costs and compliance with strict emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 11G95ME-C10.5
11G95ME-C10.5
· 75570.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Cylinders
11
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
75570 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh) gives excellent propulsive efficiency.
  • Ultra long stroke provides high torque at low rpm, ideal for large slow‑turning propellers.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes.
  • Proven reliability in VLCCs and ULCCs with extensive service history worldwide.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and diagnostics.
Weaknesses
  • Enormous physical size and weight demand large engine rooms and heavy foundations.
  • High capital cost and longer lead‑time compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires sophisticated on‑board maintenance infrastructure and skilled crew.
  • Baseline configuration meets IMO Tier II NOx; achieving Tier III needs additional after‑treatment (SCR).
  • Limited suitability for vessels below ~150 kDWT where the power rating is excessive.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large LNG carrierFPSOBulk carrier >200 kDWT
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II NOx compliance (80 rpm rating)DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need ultra‑high power at low speed for VLCC/ULCC or large LNG carriers, value fuel flexibility and proven long‑stroke efficiency, and have the space and budget for a low‑speed engine. Avoid if vessel size is moderate, higher speed is required, capital cost is constrained, or you lack the maintenance infrastructure for a two‑stroke crosshead unit.
Use Cases: The 11G95ME-C10.5 is typically installed in the propulsion plant of very large tankers and LNG carriers, often paired with a fixed‑pitch propeller or controllable‑pitch system to drive the ship at service speeds around 13–15 knots while meeting stringent fuel‑efficiency targets.
12G95ME-C10.5
· 82440.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Cylinders
12
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
82440 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈8.6 MW per cylinder) enabling propulsion of VLCC/ULCC sized ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) reduces operating cost on long voyages
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Optional exhaust‑gas after‑treatment (SCR/EGR) allows IMO Tier III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and reinforced foundations
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke crosshead maintenance and periodic cylinder head inspections
  • Fixed low operating speed (≈80 rpm) limits use on vessels needing higher shaft speeds
  • Long start‑up time; not suited for frequent power changes typical of high‑speed services
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge LNG carrierUltra‑large container ship (>20 000 TEU)Very large bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum propulsion power for very large, slow‑speed vessels and value fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption. Avoid if the ship is smaller, requires higher shaft speeds, has tight space constraints, or budget does not allow a high upfront investment.
Use Cases: The G95ME-C10.5 powers VLCCs on long‑haul crude routes, large LNG carriers with dual‑fuel capability, and ultra‑large container ships where fuel efficiency at low speed is critical. It is also installed in mega bulk carriers where the combination of power density and emissions compliance is decisive.
14G95ME-C10.5 unverified
· 96180.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
96180
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (~96 MW) suitable for VLCC/ULCC and other mega‑ships
  • Low operating speed (80 rpm) enables direct propeller drive, eliminating reduction gear losses
  • Advanced electronic engine management (ME‑C) provides precise fuel metering and on‑board diagnostics
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Proven reliability with long intervals between overhauls in the MAN G95 family
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires highly trained crew for operation and maintenance of crosshead bearings
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions may exceed Tier III limits in emission control areas
  • Spare‑parts inventory can be costly due to size and specificity
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (12k+ TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >90 MW of low‑speed power for direct‑drive propulsion on very large tankers, bulk carriers or mega‑container ships and value fuel flexibility and proven MAN reliability. Avoid if the vessel is smaller than ~30 k DWT, budget constraints are critical, or a higher shaft‑speed engine is required for high‑speed craft.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on VLCCs/ULCCs crossing oceans, large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal, 12 000+ TEU container ships on main trade routes, and cruise liners where smooth low‑rpm operation is desired.
5G90ME-C10.5
· 31150.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
30800 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (30.8 MW) suitable for large vessels
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) thanks to ultra long stroke
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control system for optimized performance and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul applications
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑speed engines
  • Complex maintenance procedures, especially for the crosshead bearing arrangement
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and fuel handling infrastructure
  • Best suited to very large ships; over‑sized for vessels under ~15 000 dwt
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge LNG carrierBulk carrier (>80 k dwt)Very large container ship (≥15 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx emission standardDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >30 MW of main propulsion power, demand fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption for long‑distance voyages, and have sufficient hull space for a large low‑speed engine. Avoid if the vessel is smaller than ~15 000 dwt, budget constraints limit capital expenditure, or operational profile does not justify the ultra long stroke efficiency.
Use Cases: The 5G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed on new‑build very large crude carriers, ULCCs and LNG carriers where high power and fuel flexibility are critical. It is also used in retrofits of existing tankers seeking to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits while improving fuel efficiency.
MAN Energy Solutions 6G90ME-C10.5
6G90ME-C10.5
· 37380.0 kW · ultra long‑stroke 2‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
6
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
36960 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈37 MW) suitable for VLCCs and large bulk carriers
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) thanks to ultra long stroke design
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major modifications
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone electronic control system for precise load management and diagnostics
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Low maximum rpm limits use to slow‑speed vessels; not ideal for high‑speed container ships
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes to avoid wear on the crosshead bearings
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be slower in remote ports where MAN dealer network is limited
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Crude Oil TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (≥200 kDWT)Heavy Lift / Project Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels where fuel efficiency and fuel flexibility are critical. Avoid if the vessel requires higher speed, limited engine room volume, or a lower upfront budget.
Use Cases: The 6G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed in the propulsion line of VLCCs, ULCCs and mega‑bulk carriers, providing reliable thrust for long voyages with heavy fuel oil or compliant low‑sulphur fuels. It is also used on some heavy‑lift project ships where maximum bollard pull and durability are paramount.
7G90ME-C10.5
· 43610.0 kW · ultra long‑stroke low‑speed two‑stroke diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
43120 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder enables propulsion of ultra‑large ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) reduces operating costs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system for optimal performance and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for maintenance of crosshead design
  • Low‑speed operation limits use to vessels that can accommodate slow‑turning propellers
  • Tier III emission compliance may need additional after‑treatment (SCR) in Emission Control Areas
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥20 000 TEU)Aframax TankerBulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ApprovedLR Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for ultra‑large tankers, container ships or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility plus MAN's global support. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room space, higher shaft speed is required, or budget constraints preclude the upfront cost of a low‑speed crosshead engine.
Use Cases: The 7G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large container vessels and high‑capacity bulk carriers, where its massive torque at 84 rpm drives a single or twin screw arrangement for efficient long‑haul voyages.
8G90ME-C10.5
· 49840.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
8
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
49280 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ~166 g/kWh) resulting in low fuel consumption
  • Flexibility to run on a wide range of fuels (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO)
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals typical of MAN G‑type engines
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system for optimized performance and emissions compliance
  • Compact power output per cylinder thanks to ultra long stroke design
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller high‑speed engines
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods, limiting rapid power changes
  • Requires skilled crew for routine maintenance of crosshead and valve gear
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large bulk carrier (>200,000 dwt)Container ship (10,000+ TEU)Cruise liner
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II complianceDNV Class Approval for MAN G90ME‑C seriesABS Class Approval for MAN G90ME‑C series
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient main engine for large low‑speed vessels and want flexibility to use multiple fuel grades while meeting IMO NOx Tier II limits. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if rapid speed changes/high‑speed operation are required.
Use Cases: The 8G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on newbuild VLCCs, Aframax tankers, large bulk carriers and mega container ships, providing reliable low‑speed thrust for long voyages while delivering fuel savings and emissions compliance.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G90ME-C10.5
9G90ME-C10.5
· 56070.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
9
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
55440 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power with low rpm, ideal for large propulsion shafts
  • Excellent fuel efficiency (BSFC ~166 g/kWh) and flexible fuel options
  • Proven reliability on VLCCs and mega‑container ships, backed by MAN’s global service network
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III emission standards when equipped with after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Low maximum speed limits suitability for high‑speed vessels
  • Complex lubrication and cooling systems increase maintenance workload
  • Requires SCR/EGR or equivalent after‑treatment to achieve Tier III compliance
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥15,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200,000 dwt)Cruise Liners (high‑power propulsion)
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS ClassificationLR (Lloyd’s Register) Type ApprovalIMO Tier II/III Emission Compliance (when equipped with after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for ultra‑large tankers, container ships or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability. Avoid if vessel size is moderate, speed requirements are high, budget constraints limit capital expenditure, or space in the engine room is limited.
Use Cases: The 9G90ME-C10.5 powers VLCCs on long‑haul crude routes, mega‑container vessels on inter‑continental trades, and large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal. It is also installed as a prime mover for offshore platform power generation where high output and fuel flexibility are critical.
10G90ME-C10.5
· 62300.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
10
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
61600 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (61.6 MW) suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large vessels
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Ultra long stroke design enhances thermal efficiency and emissions performance
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) provides operational flexibility
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system enables precise monitoring and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to ships with ample engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for crosshead maintenance and periodic overhauls
  • Low rated speed (84 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding complexity and loss
  • Long start‑up time and warm‑up period relative to fast‑response diesel‑electric systems
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15k TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for large tankers, bulk carriers or mega‑container ships and value fuel flexibility and proven efficiency. Avoid if vessel size constraints, budget limits, or a fast‑response diesel‑electric solution is preferred.
Use Cases: The 10G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs and ULCCs transporting crude oil, on large bulk carriers moving ore or coal, and on ultra‑large container vessels where maximum efficiency at low speed is critical. It is also selected for new builds requiring compliance with IMO Tier III emissions when operated on low‑sulfur fuels.
11G90ME-C10.5
· 68530.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Cylinders
11
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
67760 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high rated power (67.8 MW) suitable for the largest bulk carriers and container ships.
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) thanks to the ultra long‑stroke design.
  • Fuel flexibility across heavy fuel oil, very low sulphur fuel oil and marine diesel oil, aiding compliance with evolving emission regulations.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides optimized combustion, emissions monitoring and remote diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability in a wide fleet of VLCCs and ULCVs with extensive service history.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand deep engine rooms and reinforced foundations.
  • High capital expenditure compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives.
  • Maintenance complexity inherent to crosshead engines (separate crankcase, cylinder liners and piston rods).
  • Longer start‑up time due to low operating speed; not ideal for vessels requiring rapid power changes.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes to protect the long stroke components.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV, >20 000 TEU)Large Bulk CarrierLNG carrier (diesel‑driven propulsion variant)Large Ro‑Ro/Passenger ships with diesel‑direct drive
Certifications: DNV class approval for G90ME seriesABS classification approvalIMO NOx Tier III compliance (when equipped with appropriate after‑treatment or optimized combustion)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >65 MW of shaft power for a very large vessel, value fuel flexibility and the lowest possible specific fuel consumption, and have the space/structural capacity for a low‑speed crosshead engine. Avoid if the ship is smaller than 150 m LOA, budget constraints limit capital cost, or rapid start‑up and high manoeuvrability are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The 11G90ME-C10.5 powers many of today’s VLCCs and the newest generation of ultra‑large container ships (e.g., Maersk Triple‑E class), providing reliable main propulsion on routes where fuel efficiency and compliance with strict NOx limits are critical.
12G90ME-C10.5
· 74760.0 kW · Two-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Cylinders
12
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
73920 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈73 MW) suitable for VLCCs, ULCCs and large container ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) reduces operating costs
  • Electronic MAN SaCoSone control enables precise fuel metering, fast load response and compliance with IMO Tier II emissions
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) offers operational flexibility
  • Proven reliability of the G‑type family with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Long warm‑up period; not ideal for vessels needing rapid start‑stop cycles
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes to protect the crosshead design
  • Best suited only for very large tonnage ships; over‑sized for smaller vessels
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large container ship (>15,000 TEU)Bulk carrier (>200 kDWT)Cruise liner
Certifications: IMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum propulsion power for ultra‑large vessels, demand low fuel consumption and flexible fuel options, and can accommodate the engine’s size and upfront cost. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, budget‑constrained, or requires fast start‑stop capability typical of diesel‑electric or medium‑speed solutions.
Use Cases: The 12G90ME-C10.5 is commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs and mega container ships, providing the thrust needed for long voyages at economical fuel burn rates. It also appears in large bulk carriers and cruise liners where high power and emission compliance are critical.
14G90ME-C10.5 unverified
· 87220.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
G90ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3260
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
87220
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈87 MW) suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large bulk carriers
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency (~50% thermal efficiency at design point)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with traditional straight layouts
  • Integrated ME‑C electronic control system enables precise monitoring and optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost and longer lead times for procurement
  • Requires a skilled maintenance crew familiar with crosshead two‑stroke engines
  • Limited to low‑rpm direct‑drive applications; not suitable for high‑speed auxiliary drives
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) can be higher than modern dual‑fuel or after‑treatment equipped units unless fitted with additional scrubbers
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerUltra‑large Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (15k+ TEU)Cruise Ship (propulsion only)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approved Machinery
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for large, low‑speed vessels and value fuel flexibility with proven reliability. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room space, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or if a dual‑fuel or higher‑rpm solution is required for emissions compliance.
Use Cases: The 14G90ME-C10.5 is typically installed on VLCCs and large bulk carriers where direct‑drive low‑speed propulsion maximises fuel economy over long voyages. It also appears in mega‑container ships and some cruise liners that run on conventional HFO/MDO fuels, providing the thrust needed for sustained high speeds across oceanic routes.
MAN Energy Solutions 5G80ME-C9.5
5G80ME-C9.5
· 26100.0 kW · ultra long‑stroke 2‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
5
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
23550 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈168 g/kWh) gives excellent fuel efficiency on long voyages.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, easing bunker logistics.
  • Advanced MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability in VLCCs and large bulk carriers with a long service history.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and future upgrades.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope requires significant engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives.
  • Low rated speed (78 rpm) limits suitability for high‑speed container vessels.
  • Maintenance demands skilled personnel and extensive spare‑parts inventory.
  • After‑treatment systems may be needed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits, adding complexity.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersCapesize bulk carriersHeavy‑lift and offshore support vessels
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalIMO Tier II NOx compliance (Tier III with optional after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum fuel efficiency for a slow‑speed, high‑power propulsion plant on large tankers or bulk carriers and value proven MAN reliability and flexible fuel options. Avoid if vessel speed requirements exceed the low rpm range, space is limited, or upfront budget constraints outweigh long‑term operating cost savings.
Use Cases: The 5G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed in the main propulsion line of very large oil tankers and bulk carriers, where its ultra long stroke delivers high thermal efficiency on long hauls. It is also selected for new builds that target low fuel consumption and need to accommodate a range of bunker fuels under evolving emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 6G80ME-C9.5
6G80ME-C9.5
· 31320.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Cylinders
6
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
28260 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (28 MW) suitable for VLCCs and large container ships
  • Ultra long‑stroke design gives excellent specific fuel consumption (~168 g/kWh)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system optimises performance and simplifies monitoring
  • Proven reliability with a global service network and extensive field experience
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Requires highly skilled crew for crosshead maintenance and overhauls
  • NOx emissions may need additional after‑treatment (SCR) to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas
  • Cannot operate on LNG or other dual‑fuel options, limiting future fuel‑switch flexibility
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15 000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalABSDNV GLLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >25 MW propulsion power, operate a large tanker or container vessel, require fuel flexibility between HFO and low‑sulphur oils, and value MAN’s global support. Avoid if: the ship size is limited, budget constraints prohibit high upfront cost, crew expertise for crosshead engines is lacking, or you need LNG dual‑fuel capability.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large tankers and mega container ships, providing reliable thrust for long voyages. It is also used in some bulk carriers where high power and fuel efficiency are critical, often coupled with a reduction gear to drive a single or twin screw propeller.
MAN Energy Solutions 8G80ME-C9.5
8G80ME-C9.5
· 41760.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead low-speed
Cylinders
8
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
37680 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈38 MW) in a relatively compact footprint for ultra‑large ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 168 g/kWh, improving operating economics
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Ultra long stroke reduces cylinder wear and enhances thermal efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to very large hulls
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller low‑speed engines
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke operation and maintenance
  • Maximum speed limited to 78 rpm, necessitating reduction gearing for higher shaft speeds
  • NOx emissions may need after‑treatment (SCR) to meet Tier III in emission control areas
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>20k TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power for a VLCC, ULCC or mega‑container/bulk carrier and value fuel flexibility and proven MAN reliability. Avoid on smaller vessels where the engine size, cost and lower shaft speed are not justified, or when strict Tier III NOx compliance is required without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: Installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build VLCCs, ULCCs and ultra‑large container ships; also used in retrofits of existing mega‑carriers seeking improved fuel efficiency and lower specific fuel consumption.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G80ME-C9.5
9G80ME-C9.5
· 46980.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke marine diesel
Cylinders
9
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
42390 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈42 MW) in a compact 9‑cylinder layout
  • Low specific fuel consumption (168 g/kWh) thanks to the ultra long stroke
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) for future fuel flexibility
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability on large tankers and bulk carriers with extensive service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Relatively low rated speed (78 rpm) requires a slow‑turning propeller or reduction gear, unsuitable for high‑speed ships
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with smaller, higher‑rpm engines
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but more complex due to the crosshead design
  • May require additional NOx after‑treatment (SCR) to meet IMO Tier III in Emission Control Areas
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersBulk carriers >200 k dwtLarge container ships (≥15,000 TEU) where low‑speed engines are preferred
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm for a large vessel, require fuel flexibility across HFO to low‑sulphur fuels, and value the proven MAN service network. Avoid if: engine room space is limited, ship design calls for higher shaft speed, or capital budget cannot accommodate the higher upfront cost.
Use Cases: The 9G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed on ultra‑large crude carriers, product tankers and large bulk carriers where its 42 MW output drives a slow‑turning, high‑efficiency propeller. It is also used on some of the biggest container ships that favour low‑speed engines for fuel efficiency over long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G80ME-C9.5
10G80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 52200.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
52200
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power suitable for ultra‑large ships (VLCCs, mega container vessels)
  • Fuel flexible – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from extensive MAN fleet experience
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Compatible with after‑treatment systems (SCR, EGR) to meet IMO Tier II/III NOx limits
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost and longer lead times for procurement
  • Slower transient response; less suited for vessels with frequent rapid load changes
  • Requires highly skilled crew for operation, maintenance and troubleshooting
  • Emissions control (SCR/EGR) adds complexity if strict Tier III compliance is needed
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankerLarge Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (150‑300 k dwt)
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum propulsion power for very large vessels, value fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability, and have the engine room volume to accommodate a low‑speed crosshead. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints are tight, or rapid load cycling performance is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 10G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships and large bulk carriers where its high output and fuel flexibility provide operational efficiency over long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 11G80ME-C9.5
11G80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 57420.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
57420
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a single unit, suitable for VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead design
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) resulting in operational cost savings
  • Can be equipped with IMO Tier III SCR after‑treatment to meet strict NOx limits
  • Integrated ME‑C electronic control system provides comprehensive monitoring and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Only HFO/MDO capable – no dual‑fuel (gas) option for LNG or methanol carriers
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Longer start‑up time due to low‑speed design and need for extensive cooling water flow
  • Crosshead bearing wear demands regular inspection and specialised maintenance
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (≥10 000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger ships requiring high power output
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a single, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large carriers that can run on heavy fuel oil and meet IMO Tier III NOx limits. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room volume, if dual‑fuel capability is required, or if higher rpm (medium‑speed) engines are preferred for faster start‑up.
Use Cases: The 11G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships where maximum propulsion power and fuel efficiency are paramount. It is also used on some large Ro‑Ro/passenger vessels that demand sustained high speed over long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G80ME-C9.5
12G80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 62640.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
62640
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – >60 MW from a single unit
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) for the power class
  • Proven reliability and long service life in ultra‑large tankers and containerships
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Integrated electronic control system (MAN ME‑C series) for optimized performance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require a spacious engine room
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑power alternatives
  • Maintenance intervals are long but involve extensive overhauls and skilled personnel
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) for IMO Tier III operation
  • Limited suitability for vessels with strict space or weight constraints
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥15,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierRo‑Ro/Passenger Ferry (high‑speed variants)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >60 MW of propulsion power, have sufficient engine‑room volume, value low fuel consumption and proven long‑term reliability, and can accommodate the initial investment. Avoid if vessel size is limited, budget constraints preclude a high‑cost main engine, or you require IMO Tier III emissions compliance without planning for additional after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 12G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the sole main engine on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large container vessels and bulk carriers where a single high‑output unit simplifies propulsion layout and maximises fuel efficiency. It is also used in some Ro‑Ro ships that demand high power for fast transits.
MAN Energy Solutions 14G80ME-C9.5
14G80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 73080.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
73080
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈73 MW) suitable for VLCCs, ULCCs and mega‑container ships
  • Low operating speed (78 rpm) eliminates the need for reduction gearing, improving overall efficiency
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive service network and spare‑parts availability
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) and be equipped for IMO Tier III emissions compliance
  • Integrated electronic control system (ME‑ECU) enables precise monitoring, diagnostics and optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel alternatives
  • Requires highly skilled crew for operation and maintenance of the crosshead design
  • Long start‑up time and slower response to rapid load changes than faster‑speed engines
  • Limited suitability for vessels under ~50 000 dwt where such power is unnecessary
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large containerships (>15 000 TEU)Bulk carriers >200 k dwtLNG carriers and other high‑power offshore support vessels
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >70 MW of low‑speed propulsion for ultra‑large tankers or mega‑container ships, value proven MAN reliability and fuel flexibility, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if the vessel is smaller than ~50 000 dwt, budget constraints dominate, or rapid load response is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 14G80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large containerships and high‑capacity bulk carriers, where its high power and low rpm provide efficient long‑haul performance while meeting stringent emission standards when fitted with after‑treatment.
5S90ME-C10.5
· 28600.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
5
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
31200 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) improves operating economics.
  • Fuel‑type flexibility allows use of HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO, aiding compliance with emission regulations.
  • Super long stroke design provides high thermal efficiency at low engine speeds.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise monitoring and easy diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability in ultra‑large vessels with long service intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance regimes to avoid wear on the crosshead bearings.
  • Limited suitability for vessels that need high‑speed propulsion or compact engine rooms.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Container Ship (>15,000 TEU)Bulk CarrierCruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power output, excellent fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption for large, slow‑speed vessels where engine room space is ample. Avoid if vessel size constraints, budget limits, or a preference for higher‑speed diesel or electric propulsion exist.
Use Cases: The 5S90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large tankers, large container ships and bulk carriers, where its high power and efficiency drive single‑screw configurations. It is also used in some cruise vessels and offshore support ships that benefit from its fuel‑type versatility and robust design.
6S90ME-C10.5
· 34320.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
6
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
37440 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed design, ideal for large propulsion requirements.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as low‑sulphur and marine diesel oils, supporting future fuel transitions.
  • Advanced MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides optimal combustion, lower specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) and reduced emissions.
  • Proven reliability of the S90ME family with extensive service history on mega‑vessels.
  • Integrated exhaust gas treatment options (SCR/EGR) enable IMO Tier II/III compliance.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • High capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Maintenance complexity – requires skilled personnel, high‑quality lubricants and regular overhauls.
  • Limited speed range; not suited for vessels needing higher rpm or rapid manoeuvring without reduction gearing.
  • Initial installation may need extensive auxiliary systems (fuel treatment, cooling, exhaust gas cleaning).
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipVery large crude carrier (VLCC)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)Cruise linerLarge bulk carrierOffshore support vessel (FPSO/FSRU)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with optional SCR/EGR)DNV Class – D-2ABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for mega‑vessels, require fuel flexibility to meet upcoming sulphur and carbon regulations, and value MAN's proven reliability and integrated control system. Avoid if the vessel is small to medium size, budget constraints dominate, or a higher speed range without reduction gearing is essential.
Use Cases: The 6S90ME-C10.5 powers the main shafts of ultra‑large container ships (20 000+ TEU), VLCCs and large LNG carriers where its high torque at low rpm drives single‑screw propulsion efficiently. It is also installed on cruise ships and large offshore vessels that benefit from its fuel flexibility and emissions compliance capabilities.
8S90ME-C10.5
· 45760.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
49920 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈50 MW) suitable for large ocean‑going vessels
  • Low specific fuel consumption (167 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability of the S90ME‑C family with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand spacious engine rooms and robust foundations
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled personnel for routine overhauls and troubleshooting
  • Limited to low‑speed propulsion; not suitable for high‑speed craft or vessels needing compact power packs
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) for IMO Tier III in emission control areas
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)Ultra large container ship (>12 000 TEU)LNG carrier (diesel‑oil fired variant)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large carriers and value fuel flexibility with MAN’s global support. Avoid if vessel size limits engine‑room space, you require higher shaft speed, or prefer diesel‑electric or gas‑turbine solutions for compactness or lower emissions without extra after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 8S90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and mega container ships, providing reliable thrust for long voyages while allowing operators to switch between heavy fuel oil and low‑sulphur alternatives.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S90ME-C10.5
9S90ME-C10.5
· 51480.0 kW · two-stroke low-speed crosshead
Cylinders
9
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
56160 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈56 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Fuel flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) and proven emissions compliance with IMO Tier III options
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and automated optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and heavy installation requirements limit use to very large ships
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller or four‑stroke alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew familiar with two‑stroke crosshead operation and maintenance
  • Crosshead bearing wear demands rigorous lubrication management
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥20 000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx) with SCR optionDNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for ultra‑large tankers or container ships, require fuel flexibility and low NOx emissions, and can accommodate the engine’s size and crew expertise. Avoid if vessel size is moderate to small, budget constraints are tight, or a four‑stroke engine with lower installation complexity is preferred.
Use Cases: The 9S90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs/ULCCs transporting crude oil, on mega container vessels exceeding 20 000 TEU, and on very large bulk carriers where its power density and fuel‑flexibility deliver operational efficiency and compliance with stringent emission regulations.
10S90ME-C10.5
· 57200.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Cylinders
10
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
62400 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency with a BSFC of ~167 g/kWh, reducing fuel costs.
  • Fuel‑flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major hardware changes.
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul vessels; MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load following and emissions management.
  • Super long stroke design lowers specific wear and extends maintenance intervals.
  • Modular construction simplifies on‑site installation and major overhauls.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Limited speed range (fixed low rpm) requires a reduction gear, adding weight and complexity to the propulsion line.
  • Long start‑up time; not suited for vessels needing rapid power changes or frequent stop‑start cycles.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and careful water‑in‑oil management due to crosshead design.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerCapesize bulk carrierUltra‑large container ship (>15 k TEU)Cruise liner
Certifications: DNVABSIMO MARPOL Annex VI NOx Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for large, slow‑speed vessels and want the lowest possible specific fuel consumption with flexible fuel options. Avoid if: vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint and cost, or if a higher operating speed without reduction gearing is required.
Use Cases: The 10S90ME-C10.5 powers long‑haul tankers, bulk carriers and mega container ships as their main propulsion unit, often coupled with a fixed‑pitch propeller via a reduction gear. It is also employed in cruise ships and offshore power plants where continuous high output and fuel flexibility are critical.
11S90ME-C10.5
· 62920.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Cylinders
11
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
68640 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈68 MW) suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) delivering strong operational efficiency
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) provides flexibility with evolving bunker markets
  • Proven reliability of the S90ME-C family with extensive service history on large vessels
  • Modular design and MAN SaCoSone control system simplify maintenance and enable advanced diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand significant hull space and robust auxiliary systems
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed engines of lower power rating
  • Long start‑up time; not ideal for vessels requiring rapid engine cycling
  • Complex control and after‑treatment integration may need specialised crew training
  • Limited applicability to ships below ~30 000 kW propulsion requirement
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCVery Large Container Ship (20k+ TEU)Large LNG CarrierBulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS ClassificationLloyd's Register ApprovalIMO Tier III (with appropriate after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >65 MW propulsion for very large tankers, container ships or LNG carriers and value fuel flexibility and high efficiency. Avoid if vessel size/power requirement is modest, budget constraints are tight, or rapid start‑up cycles are essential.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, mega‑container vessels (20 000+ TEU) and large LNG carriers, where its high output, low specific fuel consumption and ability to run on a range of bunker fuels meet both economic and regulatory demands.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S90ME-C10.5
12S90ME-C10.5
· 68640.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
12
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
74880 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
167 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) improves operating cost
  • Fuel flexible – can run on HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO or MDO without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability of MAN S90ME‑C family with extensive service history on VLCCs and LNG carriers
  • Advanced electronic control (MAN SaCoSone) enables precise load management and emission optimisation
  • High power output in a relatively compact footprint for its class, suitable for very large propulsion shafts
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Crosshead design adds complexity to maintenance (separate cylinder liner and piston rod assemblies)
  • Long start‑up time relative to faster‑running medium‑speed engines
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes to avoid wear
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge LNG carrierVery large bulk carrierUltra‑large container ship (≥20 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance (with optional SCR/EGR for Tier III)DNV GL class approval – S90ME‑C seriesABS class notation – S90ME‑C
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high propulsion power (>70 MW) for ultra‑large tankers or carriers, demand fuel flexibility and low operating cost, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if: vessel size is moderate to small, capital budget is constrained, or rapid start‑up and minimal maintenance complexity are higher priorities.
Use Cases: The 12S90ME-C10.5 powers the main shafts of VLCCs and ULCCs on long-haul crude oil routes, large LNG carriers where fuel flexibility and efficiency are critical, and very large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal across oceans. Operators value its low fuel burn and ability to meet stringent emission regulations while delivering the thrust required for ships exceeding 300 m in length.
MAN Energy Solutions 14S90ME-C10.5
14S90ME-C10.5 unverified
· 80080.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S90ME-C10.5
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3260
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
80080
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm package, enabling direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈170 g/kWh) for excellent long‑range efficiency
  • Flexibility to run on HFO or MDO with MAN’s ME‑C electronic control system for optimized performance and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability in the world’s largest tankers and bulk carriers, backed by extensive service network
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication and exhaust gas cleaning options for IMO Tier II/III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew familiar with two‑stroke operation, lubrication and cooling regimes
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels that need higher rpm or gear‑driven configurations
  • Maintenance intervals can be longer due to the size of components (e.g., pistons, liners)
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierCruise liner (propulsion only)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (SOLAS)DNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on long‑range, fuel‑sensitive vessels such as VLCCs or large bulk carriers. Avoid if the ship requires higher speed, a smaller engine footprint, or dual‑fuel capability that is better served by medium‑speed or gas‑turbine solutions.
Use Cases: The S90ME-C10.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and mega container ships, where its low specific fuel consumption and direct‑drive capability provide significant operational cost savings over long voyages.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S80ME-C9.5
5S80ME-C9.5
· 22550.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Cylinders
5
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
22550 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power density – 22.5 MW from a relatively compact low‑speed engine.
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) reduces operating cost and allows compliance with varying fuel standards.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 168 g/kWh improves efficiency on long voyages.
  • Robust super‑long stroke design enhances durability and life‑cycle reliability.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise engine management and diagnostics.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial hull space and structural support.
  • Low operating speed (78 rpm) limits suitability for vessels that need higher shaft speeds or direct‑drive propellers.
  • Two‑stroke crosshead design entails more complex maintenance (e.g., piston rings, liner wear) compared with four‑stroke engines.
  • Initial capital cost is high relative to smaller or medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Achieving IMO Tier III NOx limits typically requires after‑treatment (SCR), adding system complexity.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrierContainer ship (large, slow‑speed vessels)Cruise liner
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven high‑power, low‑speed engine with excellent fuel flexibility and efficiency for large, conventional vessels. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit space/weight or if ultra‑low emissions are required without adding SCR after‑treatment.
Use Cases: Commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on 150 k–300 k DWT tankers and bulk carriers, as well as on large cruise ships where low‑speed operation and fuel flexibility are paramount. The engine’s control system integrates with modern ship automation suites for optimal performance monitoring.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S80ME-C9.5
7S80ME-C9.5
· 31570.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Cylinders
7
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
31570 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈ 168 g/kWh) reducing fuel consumption.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil as well as low‑sulphur and marine diesel oils.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control system for optimal load handling and diagnostics.
  • Proven reliability on ultra‑large vessels with long service intervals.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Low maximum speed (78 rpm) limits use to directly‑driven propellers; not suitable for high‑speed applications.
  • Requires sophisticated lubrication, cooling and exhaust treatment systems.
  • Meeting IMO Tier III in Emission Control Areas may need additional after‑treatment equipment.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCUltra‑large container ship (20k+ TEU)Large LNG carrierVery large bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on ultra‑large tankers or container ships, require fuel flexibility and best‑in‑class efficiency, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if: vessel size is moderate to small, higher shaft speed is required, budget constraints are tight, or space for auxiliary emission‑control equipment is limited.
Use Cases: The 7S80ME-C9.5 powers the main shafts of VLCCs, ULCCs and the newest generation of mega container vessels, providing reliable long‑haul performance on routes where fuel economy and low emissions are critical. It is also selected for newbuild LNG carriers that benefit from its torque characteristics and dual‑fuel capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S80ME-C9.5
8S80ME-C9.5
· 36080.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Cylinders
8
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
36080 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈168 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO, MDO) supports compliance with evolving fuel regulations
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone electronic control provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability in ultra‑large crude carriers and mega‑container ships
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact installation relative to total thrust
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room volume and structural support
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Crosshead design requires complex lubrication and oil‑cooling systems, increasing maintenance effort
  • Limited speed range (≈78 rpm) restricts direct drive to high‑pitch propellers; may need reduction gear for certain applications
  • Emissions compliance in Tier III areas often necessitates additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR), adding complexity
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large LNG carrierMega container ship (>15 000 TEU)Large bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approvalIMO Tier II compliance (standard) – Tier III possible with after‑treatment
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power with excellent fuel efficiency for ultra‑large vessels and can accommodate the engine’s size, weight and auxiliary systems. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints dominate, or a higher speed (higher rpm) propulsion solution is required.
Use Cases: The 8S80ME-C9.5 powers the main shaft of VLCCs and ULCCs on long‑haul routes, drives slow‑turning large‑diameter propellers for optimal hull efficiency, and is also installed in mega‑container ships where fuel savings are critical over decades of operation.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S80ME-C9.5
9S80ME-C9.5
· 40590.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Cylinders
9
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
40590 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
168 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C
Fuel Type
HFO/VLSFO/ULSFO/MDO
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (BSFC ~168 g/kWh) reduces fuel costs on long voyages
  • Broad fuel compatibility – can run HFO, VLSFO, ULSFO and MDO without major modifications
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises load sharing and emissions in real time
  • Proven reliability on a wide range of ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies scheduled maintenance and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to very large hulls
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for start‑up, monitoring and routine overhauls
  • Long warm‑up time; not suited to vessels needing rapid power changes
  • May need additional after‑treatment (SCR) to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits in emission control areas
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC crude oil tankersProduct carriersLarge bulk carriers (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large containerships (10 000+ TEU)Heavy lift and ro‑ro vessels
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a single engine delivering >40 MW for an ultra‑large vessel, value fuel flexibility and proven low‑speed diesel reliability, and have the space and budget for a large crosshead unit. Avoid if the ship is smaller than ~80 k DWT, requires fast start‑up or frequent power changes, or if capital cost and crew training are primary constraints.
Use Cases: The 9S80ME-C9.5 is typically installed on very large crude carriers, product tankers and bulk carriers where continuous high power at low rpm is essential for propeller efficiency. It also appears in the main propulsion of some of the world’s biggest container ships, providing a single‑engine solution that can run heavy fuel oil or low‑sulphur alternatives across global trade routes.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S80ME-C9.5
10S80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 45100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine with electronic control
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
45100
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (specific fuel consumption ~170 g/kWh) reduces operating cost.
  • Electronic ME‑C control system optimises combustion and enables flexible load handling.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes.
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul service; long intervals between overhauls.
  • Optional exhaust gas after‑treatment (SCR) allows IMO Tier III NOx compliance.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with older mechanically controlled engines.
  • Requires skilled personnel for electronic system management and advanced diagnostics.
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed or dual‑fuel ships.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality – poor‑grade HFO can increase wear if filtration is inadequate.
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (10,000+ TEU)Cruise Vessel (conventional fuel)
Certifications: DNV GL Main Engine notationABS Marine Classification – Main Propulsion
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for large bulk or tanker ships where fuel efficiency and electronic control are priorities. Avoid if the vessel requires dual‑fuel capability, has severe space constraints in the engine room, or operates at higher shaft speeds.
Use Cases: The 10S80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large ore carriers, and mega container ships, providing reliable long‑haul service with low fuel consumption and compliance options for stringent emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 11S80ME-C9.5
11S80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 49610.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
49610
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – ~49.6 MW from an 11‑cylinder unit suitable for VLCCs and mega‑container ships
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) resulting in reduced operating costs on long voyages
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in the bulk carrier and tanker sectors
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and be converted to dual‑fuel operation
  • Modular construction and integrated electronic control system simplify installation and maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand a spacious engine room and robust foundation structures
  • High capital cost compared with smaller or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance intervals to avoid wear in the crosshead bearings
  • Limited to low rpm operation (≈78 rpm); not suitable for vessels that need higher shaft speeds
  • Compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits often requires an after‑treatment system (EGCS/SCR), adding complexity
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Container Ship (>15,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (>200,000 dwt)LNG carrier (when equipped with dual‑fuel conversion kit)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Tier II NOx)DNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power slow‑speed engine for very large tankers or container ships, value fuel efficiency and can accommodate the required engine‑room space. Avoid if budget constraints limit capital expenditure, vessel size restricts engine room volume, or higher shaft speeds are required for fast ferries or naval applications.
Use Cases: The 11S80ME-C9.5 is typically installed in the propulsion plant of VLCCs and ULCCs transporting crude oil over long distances, as well as in mega‑container vessels where a single low‑speed engine can drive a large fixed‑pitch propeller efficiently. It also appears in high‑capacity bulk carriers that benefit from its fuel flexibility and low operating cost on extended voyages.
12S80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 54120.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed electronically controlled diesel
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
54120
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact L‑configuration, saving hull space
  • Electronic common‑rail injection gives excellent specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh) and flexible fuel use (HFO/MDO)
  • Built‑in compliance with IMO Tier III when equipped with SCR, meeting strict emission regulations
  • Proven reliability of MAN S‑series with long service intervals and extensive global support network
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication and diagnostics reduce maintenance downtime
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with mechanically controlled two‑stroke engines
  • Complex electronic control system requires specialised training and spare parts inventory
  • Large overall dimensions and weight still demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • NOx emissions are high without after‑treatment; SCR installation adds further cost and space
  • Limited to low‑speed operation – not suitable for diesel‑electric or high‑rpm applications
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Large Container Ship (>8,000 TEU)Panamax / Post‑Panamax Bulk CarrierCruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm with proven reliability and electronic fuel‑management to meet Tier III emissions; the compact L‑layout also helps save hull volume. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or if your operation prefers a simpler mechanically controlled engine or requires higher speed diesel‑electric solutions.
Use Cases: The 12S80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the main engine on ultra‑large tankers, large container vessels and bulk carriers where maximum thrust at low rpm is essential. It is also used on cruise ships and some LNG carriers that run on heavy fuel oil with SCR for emission compliance.
MAN Energy Solutions 14S80ME-C9.5
14S80ME-C9.5 unverified
· 63140.0 kW · 2-stroke electronically controlled crosshead
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
63140
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Low specific fuel consumption thanks to ME electronic control
  • Flexibility to run on HFO or MDO with optional IMO Tier III NOx compliance
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals in deep‑sea applications
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces overall engine room length
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Large physical size and weight demand robust hull structures
  • Requires highly trained crew for electronic control system management
  • Limited rpm range restricts direct‑drive options for some propeller designs
  • SOx emissions depend on fuel quality; low‑sulfur fuel may be required
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥15,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200,000 dwt)
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >60 MW propulsion for a very large tanker or container vessel and value fuel efficiency and electronic control flexibility. Avoid if: the vessel size is modest, budget constraints limit capital expenditure, or crew expertise with high‑power 2‑stroke engines is lacking.
Use Cases: The 14S80ME-C9.5 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs/ULCCs transporting crude oil, on mega container ships for long‑haul routes, and on ultra‑large bulk carriers where maximum power and fuel economy are critical.
5G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 34350.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
34350 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈164 g/kWh) gives excellent propulsion efficiency.
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows use of LNG or other natural‑gas blends to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduce CO₂ emissions.
  • Ultra long stroke design provides high torque at low rpm, ideal for large propellers without reduction gears.
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system offers precise fuel management and diagnostics.
  • High power rating (34.35 MW) suits ultra‑large vessels requiring single‑engine propulsion.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity: extra gas handling equipment, high‑pressure injectors, and stricter maintenance regimes.
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional oil‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Dependence on LNG bunkering infrastructure limits operability in regions without reliable gas supply.
  • Longer warm‑up/start‑up periods than medium‑speed diesel alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLarge bulk carriersVLCC tankersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel configuration)Offshore supply vessels
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet Tier III emissions, and have access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if: vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint and cost, or operating routes lack reliable natural‑gas supply.
Use Cases: The 5G95ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on ultra‑large container ships and cruise vessels, or as a dual‑fuel main engine on LNG carriers where emissions compliance and fuel flexibility are critical.
6G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 41220.0 kW · dual-fuel two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
41220 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈164 g/kWh) delivering excellent thermal efficiency.
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexible switching between heavy fuel oil and natural gas, aiding emission compliance.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises load sharing and reduces crew workload.
  • Proven reliability in ultra‑large vessels (>150 k DWT) with long service intervals.
  • High rated power (41 220 kW at 80 rpm) suitable for very large propulsion requirements.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, needing high‑pressure gas handling equipment and additional maintenance.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Dependence on reliable natural‑gas bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited in some regions.
  • More stringent commissioning and certification procedures for gas operation.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCV (Ultra Large Container Vessel)Large Bulk CarrierCruise ShipOffshore Platform Power Unit
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power with the flexibility to run on natural gas for lower emissions and are operating a vessel larger than ~150 k DWT where engine room space is available. Avoid if your routes lack reliable LNG bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher capital outlay, or a smaller, simpler low‑speed diesel engine would meet the power requirement.
Use Cases: The 6G95ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and other ultra‑large carriers, providing both high thrust and the ability to meet stringent NOx limits by running on natural gas in emission control areas. It is also used on large cruise ships and offshore power units where dual‑fuel operation offers operational flexibility.
7G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 48090.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
48090 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈48 MW) from only seven cylinders, giving excellent power density
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides fuel flexibility and can lower emissions when running on natural gas
  • Ultra long stroke design yields a low specific fuel consumption of about 164 g/kWh
  • MAN SaCoSone control system offers precise load management and fast response to demand changes
  • Proven reliability of the G95ME family in large ocean‑going vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation on smaller ships
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system requires specialised maintenance and crew training
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Needs high‑pressure natural‑gas storage and compression infrastructure onboard
  • Spare‑part logistics can be more demanding than for more common 6‑cylinder variants
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Container shipBulk carrierLarge Ro‑Ro / passenger vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power in a compact footprint, want the flexibility of dual‑fuel operation to reduce fuel cost or meet emission targets, and have the infrastructure for natural‑gas handling. Avoid if vessel size is limited, crew lack dual‑fuel expertise, or capital budget does not allow for the higher purchase price.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on ultra‑large tankers and large container or bulk carriers where maximum propulsion power and fuel flexibility are critical. Operators use it to switch between HFO/MDO and LNG/NG during voyages to optimise fuel economics and comply with regional emission regulations.
8G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 54960.0 kW · dual-fuel two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
8
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
54960 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for the largest merchant vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) enables significant NOx and CO₂ reductions in emission control areas
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈164 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Robust crosshead design offers long service intervals for high‑power applications
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • Complex high‑pressure natural gas handling increases installation cost and operational training requirements
  • Higher capital expenditure compared with single‑fuel low‑speed diesel engines of similar power
  • Maintenance of crosshead bearings and piston rings can be more demanding than trunk‑type designs
  • Optimal efficiency is achieved at design speed; off‑design operation may reduce fuel savings
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCS (Ultra Large Container Ship)Large LNG carrier (dual‑fuel propulsion)Cruise shipOffshore support vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power (>50 MW) with the flexibility to switch between oil and natural gas for emission compliance in ECAs or future decarbonisation strategies. Avoid if: vessel size, budget or engine room constraints cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions and dual‑fuel infrastructure, or if lower power ratings are sufficient.
Use Cases: The 8G95ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and ULCSs where maximum thrust is required, as well as on large LNG carriers that benefit from gas boost for Tier III NOx compliance. It also appears in cruise ships and offshore supply vessels operating in strict emission control zones.
9G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 61830.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
9
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
61830 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for VLCC/ULCC sized vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and LNG with high‑pressure injection, enabling compliance with IMO Tier III emission limits
  • Ultra long stroke design yields excellent specific fuel consumption (164 g/kWh) and thermal efficiency
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise engine management and diagnostics
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit retro‑fit applicability on smaller ships
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity – requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional maintenance for high‑pressure gas injectors
  • Long stroke can result in higher vibration levels, requiring robust mounting solutions
  • Spare parts inventory is more extensive due to dual‑fuel components
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Bulk Carrier (≥200 k DWT)Very Large Container Ship (≥20 000 TEU) when designed for ultra‑low emissionsCruise liner (fuel‑flexible newbuilds)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power, want fuel flexibility to meet IMO Tier III/ECA limits, and have access to LNG bunkering on long voyages. Avoid for smaller vessels where engine size and cost outweigh the emission benefits, or when operating in regions with limited natural‑gas infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 9G95ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newly built VLCCs and ULCCs targeting low‑emission operation across global routes, as well as on large bulk carriers and cruise ships that require dual‑fuel capability to comply with stringent emission regulations while maintaining long‑range efficiency.
10G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 68700.0 kW · dual-fuel two-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
10
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
68700 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈164 g/kWh) for a large power plant
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides operational flexibility and emissions advantage in emission control areas
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system offers precise monitoring and optimized performance
  • Ultra long stroke design yields high mean effective pressure (21 bar) and excellent efficiency at low speed
  • Widely supported by global MAN service network, facilitating maintenance on long voyages
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight increase hull space requirements and affect ship design
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel engines of similar power
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system requires dedicated gas handling infrastructure onboard
  • Crosshead bearing wear demands regular inspection and can lead to higher maintenance intervals
  • Spare‑part logistics may be challenging in remote ports due to the engine’s size
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge LNG carrierLarge LPG carrierUltra‑large container ship (≥12,000 TEU)Very large bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with low fuel consumption and the flexibility to switch between HFO/MDO and natural gas, especially for new‑builds targeting IMO emission limits. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or the ship’s operating profile cannot support a dual‑fuel gas supply system.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on newly constructed VLCCs, ULCCs and large LNG carriers where boil‑off gas can be used as fuel, as well as on ultra‑large container ships seeking to meet Tier II/III NOx limits while maintaining high efficiency. It also appears in very large bulk carriers that require robust power for heavy loads and benefit from dual‑fuel flexibility when operating in emission control areas.
12G95ME-C10.5-GI
· 82440.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
12
Bore
950 mm
Stroke
3460 mm
Rated Power
82440 kW
Rated Speed
80 rpm
BSFC (rated)
164 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G95ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈82 440 kW) suitable for the largest merchant vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/MDO + natural gas) provides fuel flexibility and enables IMO Tier III emission compliance.
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 164 g/kWh thanks to the ultra long stroke design.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises load sharing, reduces crew workload and improves reliability.
  • Extensive global service network and proven operational history in large fleets.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require a spacious engine room and robust foundations.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity, needing LNG storage, handling infrastructure and specialised maintenance.
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Longer start‑up time; not ideal for vessels that need rapid power changes.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; high‑pressure gas injectors require careful fuel preparation.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)Container Ship (>20,000 TEU)Cruise Ship
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier III (via gas injection)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power, want fuel flexibility and Tier III emission compliance, have LNG bunkering infrastructure and operate long voyages where dual‑fuel economics pay off. Avoid if vessel size or engine room space is limited, budget constraints preclude higher capital cost, or rapid start‑up/power changes are critical.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on VLCC/ULCC crude carriers, large bulk carriers, mega container ships and cruise liners; also employed in dual‑fuel retrofits of existing low‑speed engine installations to meet stricter emission regulations while retaining high efficiency.
MAN Energy Solutions 5G80ME-C9.5-GI
5G80ME-C9.5-GI
· 26100.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
5
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
23550 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (BSFC 166 g/kWh) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Dual‑fuel capability with natural gas enables significant NOx/CO₂ emission reductions and compliance with IMO Tier III/ECA regulations.
  • MAN SaCoSone advanced control system optimises injection timing and improves reliability.
  • Compact five‑cylinder layout offers lower weight and footprint versus larger 6‑ or 8‑cylinder units for the same power class.
  • Proven MAN engineering heritage ensures robust crosshead design and long service intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and heavy weight still require substantial engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (high‑pressure gas handling, extra safety systems) and higher upfront cost.
  • Crosshead bearing and cylinder liner maintenance can be more demanding than four‑stroke alternatives.
  • Power rating (>20 MW) limits suitability for smaller vessels or those preferring faster‑responding diesel engines.
  • Dependence on natural‑gas bunkering infrastructure may restrict operation in some regions.
Typical Vessels: VLCCLR2 TankerLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel)FPSOChemical/Product TankerOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with dual‑fuel capability for emission‑controlled areas and value MAN’s reliability. Avoid if vessel space is at a premium, the required power is below 20 MW, or the operator prefers a simpler single‑fuel system to minimise capital cost.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on large crude and product tankers, LNG carriers that can burn boil‑off gas, FPSOs using associated gas as fuel, and offshore support vessels where emission reductions are mandated. The engine’s ultra long stroke delivers excellent efficiency for long voyages while the dual‑fuel option supports compliance with strict environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 6G80ME-C9.5-GI
6G80ME-C9.5-GI
· 31320.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke engine
Cylinders
6
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
28260 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh) for its power class
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO or natural gas, supporting IMO Tier III NOx limits and CO₂ reduction strategies
  • High mean effective pressure (20 bar) provides excellent power density per cylinder
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system offers precise fuel metering and fast load changes
  • Designed for ultra long stroke, resulting in reduced wear and longer time between overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to very large vessels
  • Higher capital cost and more complex gas handling infrastructure compared with single‑fuel engines
  • Maintenance of high‑pressure gas injectors adds operational complexity
  • Limited suitability for ships requiring lower power ratings or space‑constrained engine rooms
  • Requires specialized crew training for dual‑fuel operation
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Bulk Carrier (>200 kt)LNG‑bunkered TankerCruise ship with emission‑reduction program
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (when operating on natural gas)DNV GL class notation for dual‑fuel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with flexible fuel options to meet strict NOx/CO₂ targets and have the vessel size to accommodate its dimensions. Avoid if the ship is smaller, budget‑constrained, or lacks access to reliable natural gas bunkering infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 6G80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed on large ocean‐going vessels that aim to lower emissions through LNG or other gaseous fuels while maintaining high propulsion power—e.g., VLCCs, ULCSes, and modern bulk carriers retrofitted for gas‑bunkering.
MAN Energy Solutions 7G80ME-C9.5-GI
7G80ME-C9.5-GI
· 36540.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
7
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
32970 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈33 MW) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure natural gas) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂/NOx emissions
  • Ultra long stroke design yields excellent thermal efficiency (BSFC ≈166 g/kWh)
  • MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and quick response to changing operating conditions
  • Proven MAN crosshead architecture offers robust reliability and long service intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high capital cost compared with lower‑power alternatives
  • Complex gas injection system requires LNG/LBG bunkering infrastructure and specialized maintenance skills
  • Higher initial training requirements for crew on dual‑fuel operation and SaCoSone diagnostics
  • Availability of spare parts for the GI variant can be limited in remote ports
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)LNG carriers and gas-fueled tankersUltra‑large container ships (>20 000 TEU)Large bulk carriers (>150 kt)Cruise liners requiring high power with emission constraints
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑output main engine that can meet stringent NOx/CO₂ targets, have access to LNG/LBG bunkering and value fuel‑flexibility. Avoid if the operating route lacks reliable gas supply, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a 33 MW unit.
Use Cases: The 7G80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed on newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance or owners seeking to future‑proof vessels with dual‑fuel capability. It is common in long‑haul bulk carriers, VLCCs and LNG carriers where fuel cost optimisation and emission reduction are critical.
8G80ME-C9.5-GI
· 41760.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
37680 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) for a large propulsion unit
  • Dual‑fuel capability enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduces CO₂ emissions when gas is available
  • Proven MAN G80ME family reliability and extensive global support network
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and easy integration with ship automation
  • Ultra long stroke design maximises thermal efficiency at low rpm, ideal for large slow‑speed vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation on smaller hulls or retrofits
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel hardware and high‑pressure gas injection system
  • Increased operational complexity; requires crew training for safe handling of high‑pressure natural gas
  • Dependence on reliable LNG/NG bunkering infrastructure, which may be scarce in some regions
  • Spare‑parts inventory can be more extensive than for single‑fuel engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ship (12 000+ TEU)LNG carrierBulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Cruise liner (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV class approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility for strict emission regimes and have access to gas bunkering. Avoid if the vessel size is limited, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or operating routes lack reliable natural‑gas supply.
Use Cases: The 8G80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed as the primary propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large container ships and LNG carriers where its power output and fuel flexibility meet long‑haul efficiency targets while satisfying Tier III NOx limits. It is also used in newbuild cruise vessels seeking lower emissions and in bulk carriers requiring robust low‑speed performance.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G80ME-C9.5-GI
9G80ME-C9.5-GI
· 46980.0 kW · Two-stroke dual-fuel crosshead engine
Cylinders
9
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3720 mm
Rated Power
42390 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
G80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Ultra Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation provides flexibility and lower CO₂/NOₓ emissions when running on natural gas
  • Ultra long stroke design yields excellent specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh)
  • MAN SaCoSone control system enables precise load management and fast response
  • Proven track record in DNV‑ and ABS‑approved installations
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed diesels
  • Complex LNG handling infrastructure required for gas operation
  • Crosshead design increases maintenance tasks (e.g., piston rod wear, cylinder liner inspection)
  • Limited availability of spare parts in remote ports relative to more common 6‑cylinder models
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥12 000 TEU)Cruise linersLarge bulk carriersOffshore support vessels requiring dual‑fuel flexibility
Certifications: DNV GL type approvalABS class approvalIMO Tier III emission compliance when operated on natural gas
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, want the ability to switch between HFO/MDO and LNG for fuel‑cost optimisation or emissions reduction, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if vessel size limits space for a long‑stroke crosshead, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or LNG bunkering infrastructure is unavailable on intended routes.
Use Cases: The 9G80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed in the propulsion plant of mega container vessels and cruise ships where fuel efficiency and emission flexibility are critical. It also appears in large bulk carriers and offshore supply vessels that operate on mixed fuel regimes to meet stringent environmental regulations while maintaining high cruising speeds.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G80ME-C9.5-GI
10G80ME-C9.5-GI unverified
· 52200.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
52200
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed design (≈52 MW @ 78 rpm)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on LNG for reduced emissions or HFO when LNG is unavailable
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III NOx limits and can achieve near‑zero SOx emissions with LNG
  • Proven MAN reliability record and extensive global support network
  • Advanced electronic control system enables optimized fuel consumption and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel HFO engine of comparable size
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and on‑board gas handling equipment
  • Larger physical footprint and weight compared with some newer medium‑speed alternatives
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to operation and maintenance procedures
  • Spare parts inventory is broader due to dual‑fuel components
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10,000 TEU)Cruise linerLarge bulk carrierVLCC tanker (where LNG bunkering is planned)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power with the flexibility to run on LNG for emission‑reduction or on HFO where LNG is not available, and when IMO Tier II/III compliance is required. Avoid if the vessel will operate on routes lacking reliable LNG bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or space/weight limits are critical.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels and cruise ships that target low emissions and future‑proofing for LNG fuel. It is also selected for retrofits of existing high‑power ships where a switch to dual‑fuel operation is desired to meet tightening environmental regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G80ME-C9.5-GI
12G80ME-C9.5-GI unverified
· 62640.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
62640
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for the largest merchant vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and fuel flexibility
  • Proven MAN reliability record with advanced electronic control and diagnostics
  • High thermal efficiency (>50% at design load)
  • Integrated exhaust gas cleaning system compatibility for further emission reduction
Weaknesses
  • Significant capital cost compared with single‑fuel engines
  • Large physical footprint and weight require ample engine room space
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional fuel handling systems
  • Complex dual‑fuel maintenance procedures demand specialised crew training
  • Long lead times for spare parts due to high‑specification components
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCUltra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Large Cruise ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx) compliance when operated on LNGDNV GL Class notation for dual‑fuel low‑speed engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power, want to meet strict NOx emission limits and have access to LNG bunkering; the engine’s flexibility also future‑proofs against tightening fuel regulations. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the larger engine room volume, if LNG supply is uncertain, or if a higher‑speed medium‑speed engine would better suit operational profiles.
Use Cases: The 12G80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed in the propulsion plant of the world’s biggest crude carriers and container ships, as well as large cruise vessels that demand both high thrust and low emissions. It is also selected for new‑build dual‑fuel LNG carriers where compliance with Tier III standards and fuel flexibility are mandatory.
5S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 28600.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
5
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
31200 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (~165 g/kWh) delivering high efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility allows use of HFO, MDO or natural gas, supporting emissions reduction strategies
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and quick start‑up
  • Super long stroke design yields excellent torque at low rpm (84 rpm)
  • Proven MAN reliability with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • High initial capital cost, especially for natural‑gas injection equipment
  • Requires dedicated high‑pressure NG infrastructure on board
  • Only five cylinders – less redundancy compared with larger multi‑cylinder engines
  • Maintenance of dual‑fuel injection system is more complex than single‑fuel units
  • Low operating speed may limit compatibility with some high‑speed propeller designs
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Product TankerCruise ShipOffshore Supply Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power with low specific fuel consumption and the ability to run on natural gas for emission compliance; especially suitable where LNG or boil‑off gas is available. Avoid if the vessel lacks space or budget for NG storage/injection systems, or if higher cylinder redundancy is a priority.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on large tankers and LNG carriers that can utilise boil‑off gas or shore‑supplied natural gas to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduce CO₂ emissions. Also used in cruise ships and offshore support vessels seeking flexible fuel options under strict environmental regulations.
6S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 34320.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
6
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
37440 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (37 440 kW at only 84 rpm) enabling compact installation on large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation allows use of LNG or gas to meet IMO Tier III NOx and CO₂ reduction targets while retaining HFO capability for fuel flexibility
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈165 g/kWh) improves operating economy
  • MAN SaCoSone control system provides advanced monitoring, diagnostics and optimized load management
  • Proven MAN reliability record with long service intervals on ultra‑large ships
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront cost compared with single‑fuel engines due to gas injection system and control electronics
  • Complex gas handling infrastructure (high‑pressure storage, vapourisers) adds installation and operational complexity
  • Maintenance of the high‑pressure gas injectors demands specialised training and spare parts inventory
  • Optimal efficiency is achieved at design load; off‑design operation can raise specific fuel consumption
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierLarge container shipCruise linerVery large crude carrier (VLCC)Offshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations and have the space for gas handling equipment. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the larger footprint, or if gas supply infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 6S90ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on ultra‑large vessels that require both high power and fuel flexibility, such as LNG carriers using boil‑off gas, cruise ships transitioning to LNG, and newbuild container ships targeting IMO Tier III compliance.
7S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 40040.0 kW · Two-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
43680 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact cylinder count (7 cylinders) suitable for ultra‑large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) provides fuel flexibility and helps meet IMO Tier III NOx limits.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~165 g/kWh) improves operating economy.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system enables optimized load handling and quick transition between fuels.
  • Proven long‑stroke design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (gas storage, high‑pressure injectors) and higher capital cost.
  • Maintenance of crosshead bearings and gas injection components demands specialized expertise.
  • Limited suitability for vessels below 30 000 dwt where the power rating is excessive.
  • Availability of LNG or methanol bunkering infrastructure may be a constraint on some routes.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCVLarge Bulk CarrierLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel)Methanol Carrier
Certifications: DNV GL ApprovalABS ClassificationIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power (>40 MW) on a large vessel, want fuel flexibility between oil and natural gas to meet strict emission zones, and have access to gas bunkering. Avoid if: the ship is smaller than 30 000 dwt, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or gas supply infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: Installed as the main propulsion engine on new‑build VLCCs and ultra‑large bulk carriers, as well as on dual‑fuel LNG or methanol carriers where operators aim to reduce NOx emissions and hedge fuel price volatility. Also used in retrofits converting existing diesel engines to gas capability for compliance with emission control areas.
8S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 45760.0 kW · dual-fuel two-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
49920 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈165 g/kWh) delivering excellent thermal efficiency.
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows switching between HFO/MDO and natural gas, supporting IMO Tier III emission targets.
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises combustion and reduces operator workload.
  • Proven reliability of the S90ME family with long service intervals and extensive global support network.
  • High torque at low rpm (84 rpm) suitable for large propeller‑driven vessels.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel counterpart, especially due to the gas injection system.
  • Complex dual‑fuel infrastructure (gas supply, high‑pressure injectors, safety systems) increases installation and maintenance effort.
  • Dependence on reliable LNG/LNG‑equivalent bunkering; limited availability on some trade routes.
  • Specialised training needed for crew and yard personnel to maintain the gas injection components.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsLNG carriers (dual‑fuel)Large cruise linersBulk carriers (>150 kt)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) undergoing emission upgrades
Certifications: IMO Tier III (when operated on natural gas)DNV GL Dual‑Fuel ApprovalABS Type Approval for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with low specific fuel consumption, require flexibility to meet strict emission regulations using natural gas, and have access to reliable LNG bunkering. Avoid if the operating routes lack gas supply infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel size limits can’t accommodate the engine’s dimensions.
Use Cases: The 8S90ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and LNG carriers targeting IMO Tier III compliance for the 2027‑2030 regulatory window, as well as on retrofits of existing large tankers or bulk carriers where owners seek to reduce CO₂ and NOₓ emissions while retaining fuel‑oil flexibility.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S90ME-C10.5-GI
9S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 51480.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Cylinders
9
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
56160 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (56 MW at only 84 rpm) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO and natural gas, reducing emissions where gas is available
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈165 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system optimises combustion and fuel switching
  • Super long stroke design delivers high thermal efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel equivalents
  • Requires dedicated high‑pressure gas bunkering infrastructure
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases maintenance demands
  • Large physical footprint limits installation on smaller hulls
  • Availability of qualified service personnel can be limited in some regions
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCV (Ultra Large Container Vessel)Bulk carrier (>150 kt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel propulsion)Cruise ship (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNVGL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with the flexibility to run on both conventional heavy fuel oil and natural gas, aim for lower CO₂/NOₓ emissions, and operate routes where gas bunkering is feasible. Avoid if your vessel size does not justify the engine’s power rating, gas supply infrastructure is unavailable, or budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost.
Use Cases: The 9S90ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on very large tankers and container ships, providing reliable high‑speed service while allowing operators to switch to natural gas on routes with gas bunkering, thereby meeting stricter emission regulations and reducing fuel costs.
10S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 57200.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Cylinders
10
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
62400 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output (62.4 MW) at a low speed of 84 rpm, giving excellent propulsive efficiency
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + natural gas) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx and Sulphur Emission Control Area regulations while reducing fuel cost when LNG is available
  • Super long stroke design delivers a high mean effective pressure (21 bar) and low specific fuel consumption (165 g/kWh)
  • MAN SaCoSone electronic control system provides precise cylinder management, fast load response and integrated condition monitoring
  • Proven MAN engineering heritage with extensive global support network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost and complex dual‑fuel injection hardware increase initial investment and maintenance training requirements
  • Requires on‑board LNG storage and high‑pressure gas handling infrastructure, limiting suitability for vessels without gas supply
  • Fixed low speed (84 rpm) reduces flexibility for applications that benefit from variable speed operation
  • Piston and liner wear can be higher under continuous dual‑fuel operation due to the high pressures involved
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerLarge Container Ship (10,000+ TEU)Cruise ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel propulsion)Offshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high power output with low specific fuel consumption and have access to LNG or other natural gas on board to meet strict emission regulations. Avoid if the vessel lacks space for LNG tanks, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or operational profiles require variable speed engines.
Use Cases: The S90ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on large ocean‑going vessels where fuel flexibility and emissions compliance are critical—e.g., VLCCs operating in Sulphur Emission Control Areas, ultra‑large container ships seeking Tier III NOx performance, or LNG carriers using gas for primary power while retaining oil backup.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S90ME-C10.5-GI
12S90ME-C10.5-GI
· 68640.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
12
Bore
900 mm
Stroke
3260 mm
Rated Power
74880 kW
Rated Speed
84 rpm
BSFC (rated)
165 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
21.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S90ME-C10.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility allows operation on HFO/MDO or natural gas, improving fuel cost management and emissions compliance
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈165 g/kWh) thanks to super long stroke design
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise monitoring and diagnostics
  • Proven reliability in the MAN S90ME‑C family with extensive global service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost compared with lower‑power alternatives
  • Natural‑gas operation needs high‑pressure gas handling infrastructure on board
  • Complex fuel system increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Optimised for very large vessels; may be over‑spec for ships under 150 000 dwt
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ship (>20 000 TEU)Very large bulk carrierLNG carrier (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier III (when equipped with after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >70 MW propulsion for a very large vessel, require dual‑fuel operation to meet fuel cost or emission targets, and have the space/structural capacity for a low‑speed engine. Avoid if: the ship is smaller than ~150 000 dwt, budget constraints limit high upfront investment, or natural‑gas supply infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 12S90ME-C10.5-GI is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships and large LNG carriers where its massive power output and fuel flexibility provide operational efficiency and compliance with stringent emission regulations.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S80ME-C9.5-GI
5S80ME-C9.5-GI
· 22550.0 kW · dual-fuel low‑speed 2‑stroke
Cylinders
5
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
22550 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High specific power with a super long stroke design, giving excellent power density for limited engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure NG) provides fuel flexibility and enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and sulfur caps in ECAs.
  • Low BSFC of 166 g/kWh reduces operating costs compared with conventional diesel‑only engines of similar size.
  • MAN SaCoSone control system offers advanced monitoring, diagnostics and optimized combustion for both fuel modes.
  • Proven MAN reliability and worldwide service network.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and added complexity due to the high‑pressure natural gas injection system and associated safety equipment.
  • Requires access to LNG or CNG bunkering infrastructure; not ideal for routes lacking reliable gas supply.
  • Five‑cylinder layout provides less redundancy than larger multi‑cylinder configurations on very large vessels.
  • Maintenance of gas injectors and pressure regulators adds to routine service workload.
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierLPG CarrierChemical TankerCruise ShipOffshore Support Vessel
Certifications: IMO D-2IMO Tier III (NOx)DNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power in a compact footprint, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet strict emission regulations, and have reliable access to natural gas bunkering. Avoid if the operating profile lacks gas supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel design prefers greater engine redundancy with more cylinders.
Use Cases: The 5S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed on new‑build LNG carriers that can utilise boil‑off gas and shore‑supplied LNG for propulsion, as well as on cruise ships and offshore supply vessels operating in Emission Control Areas where low NOx and sulfur emissions are mandatory.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S80ME-C9.5-GI
6S80ME-C9.5-GI
· 27060.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Cylinders
6
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
27060 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • High power output (27 MW) in a compact 6‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO + high‑pressure natural gas) for emission reduction and fuel flexibility
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) thanks to super long stroke design
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises performance and fuel mix
  • Proven reliability of the S80ME engine family in large ocean‑going vessels
Weaknesses
  • Complex high‑pressure gas injection system increases initial cost and requires specialised crew training
  • Larger physical footprint compared with equivalent four‑cylinder designs
  • Maintenance of gas‑fuel components adds to operational overhead
  • Dependence on LNG/LNG‑equivalent bunkering infrastructure, which may be limited on some routes
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ships (≥15 000 TEU)Very large bulk carriers (≥200 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with the ability to switch between conventional oil fuels and natural gas to meet stricter CO2/NOx limits, and if LNG bunkering is available on your trade routes. Avoid if bunker infrastructure for gas is scarce, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a 6‑cylinder low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 6S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed in new‑build VLCCs and ultra‑large bulk carriers for long‑haul voyages where fuel flexibility reduces operating costs and emissions, as well as in the largest container vessels seeking to meet IMO Tier III NOx standards while maintaining high propulsive efficiency.
7S80ME-C9.5-GI
· 31570.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
7
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
31570 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈31570 kW) suitable for large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and high‑pressure natural gas, enabling emissions reduction
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system optimises combustion and reduces NOx/CO₂
  • Proven MAN reliability and worldwide service network
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Needs on‑board high‑pressure natural gas storage/infrastructure, limiting retrofits
  • Long lead times for procurement and installation
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ships (≥18 000 TEU)Cruise linersLNG carriers with dual‑fuel capability
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power on a large vessel, want fuel flexibility to meet future low‑emission regulations, and can accommodate the engine's size and gas infrastructure. Avoid if the ship is medium or small, budget constraints are tight, or the operator lacks dual‑fuel handling experience.
Use Cases: The 7S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships, and cruise vessels where its high output and ability to burn natural gas help meet stringent emission limits while maintaining fuel economy. It is also selected for new LNG carriers that require dual‑fuel capability for both boil‑off gas and shore‑supplied gas.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S80ME-C9.5-GI
8S80ME-C9.5-GI
· 36080.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed two-stroke engine
Cylinders
8
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
36080 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high rated power (36 080 kW) in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO or natural gas, supporting IMO Tier III NOx compliance
  • Low specific fuel consumption (166 g/kWh) and high mean effective pressure (20 bar) give excellent efficiency
  • Integrated MAN SaCoSone control system provides advanced monitoring and optimisation
  • Proven MAN reliability record in long‑haul bulk carriers, tankers and container ships
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (high‑pressure gas injection, additional safety systems)
  • Requires access to high‑pressure natural‑gas bunkering infrastructure
  • Maintenance of the gas injection hardware can be more demanding than conventional diesel only units
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Bulk carriers (>150 kt)LNG‑carrying vessels and dual‑fuel tankersCruise ships requiring high power with emissions flexibility
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >35 MW of propulsion power, want the flexibility to switch between HFO/MDO and natural gas for emission compliance, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if vessel size is limited, budget constraints prohibit the higher capital cost, or reliable LNG bunkering is not available on intended routes.
Use Cases: The 8S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed in new‑build mega‑vessels and retrofits where operators aim to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits while retaining the ability to run on conventional fuel. It is common on ULCVs, VLCCs, large bulk carriers and dual‑fuel LNG carriers that operate on routes with established LNG bunkering infrastructure.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S80ME-C9.5-GI
9S80ME-C9.5-GI
· 40590.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Cylinders
9
Bore
800 mm
Stroke
3450 mm
Rated Power
40590 kW
Rated Speed
78 rpm
BSFC (rated)
166 g/kWh
Mean Effective Pressure
20.0 bar
Configuration
2-stroke crosshead inline
Engine Family
S80ME-C9.5
Engine Series
ME-C-GI
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO + Natural Gas (high-pressure injection)
Stroke Class
Super Long Stroke
Engine Type
Two-Stroke
Manufacturer
MAN Energy Solutions
Control System
MAN SaCoSone
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact inline configuration (9 cylinders)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on HFO/MDO and natural gas, enabling IMO Tier III compliance and fuel cost flexibility
  • Low specific fuel consumption of 166 g/kWh for a machine of this size
  • Proven MAN SaCoSone control system provides precise load management and diagnostics
  • Super long stroke design yields high thermal efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Complex high‑pressure gas injection system increases maintenance requirements and spare‑part inventory
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Requires LNG or pipeline natural‑gas infrastructure on board, limiting suitability for vessels without such supply
  • Potential increased piston wear when operating frequently in gas‑only mode
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel propulsion)Large bulk carriersVery large crude carriers (VLCC) targeting emission control areas
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx compliance (dual‑fuel mode)DNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >40 MW of main power with the flexibility to run on both HFO/MDO and natural gas, especially for new builds targeting IMO Tier III or operating in Emission Control Areas. Avoid if the vessel lacks reliable LNG supply infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or space/weight limitations prevent installation of a large low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 9S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels and cruise ships that require high power density while meeting strict emission regulations. It is also selected for LNG carriers and other large tankers undergoing retrofits to gain dual‑fuel capability and reduce NOx emissions in ECAs.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S80ME-C9.5-GI
10S80ME-C9.5-GI unverified
· 45100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine diesel engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
45100
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without aftertreatment, aiding regulatory compliance
  • High specific power for a 10‑cylinder layout reduces overall engine length compared with larger cylinder counts
  • Proven MAN reliability record with integrated electronic control system for optimized performance
  • Efficient fuel consumption at design load, beneficial for long voyages
Weaknesses
  • Higher upfront cost and need for cryogenic LNG storage infrastructure
  • Larger footprint than comparable medium‑speed engines of similar power
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to operation and maintenance
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be more demanding for the specific S80ME family
  • Limited availability of qualified service personnel in some regions
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerLNG carrier (propulsion)Bulk carrierOffshore support vessel
Certifications: DNV GL classificationABS approvalIMO Tier III compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine with LNG dual‑fuel flexibility, must meet strict NOx limits, and have access to LNG bunkering or storage. Avoid if: LNG infrastructure is unavailable, budget constraints prohibit the higher capital cost, or vessel size favours a more compact medium‑speed solution.
Use Cases: The 10S80ME-C9.5-GI is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on large container vessels (12 000+ TEU), cruise ships of 150 m+ length, and LNG carriers where dual‑fuel operation reduces emissions and fuel cost. It also appears in high‑capacity bulk carriers and offshore supply vessels requiring reliable low‑speed power.
MAN Energy Solutions 12S80ME-C9.5-GI
12S80ME-C9.5-GI unverified
· 54120.0 kW · low-speed dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
54120
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed package (≈54 MW)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on LNG for low emissions with HFO as backup
  • Low specific fuel consumption and excellent thermal efficiency
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits and reduces SOx/PM when run on LNG
  • Proven MAN reliability record on ultra‑large container ships and LNG carriers
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost compared with conventional HFO-only engines
  • Requires extensive LNG storage, vapourisation and handling infrastructure onboard
  • Larger footprint and weight than a comparable single‑fuel engine of the same power
  • More complex control and maintenance procedures; needs specialised crew training
  • Sensitivity to LNG fuel quality can affect performance if not tightly controlled
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container vessels (ULCV)LNG carriersCruise shipsLarge bulk carriersOffshore support vessels
Certifications: IMO Type Approval – Dual Fuel EngineDNV Class – Main Propulsion Machinery
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power with the flexibility to run on LNG for stringent emission regulations and have the onboard LNG infrastructure. Avoid if budget constraints, limited LNG bunkering options, or a preference for simpler single‑fuel systems outweigh the emissions benefits.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the primary propulsive unit on ultra‑large container ships that are transitioning to LNG, on LNG carriers where it can burn boil‑off gas and imported LNG, and on cruise liners seeking low‑emission operation while retaining HFO backup for port calls.
MAN Energy Solutions 5G80ME-C9.5-LGI
5G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 26100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
26100
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (26 MW) from a relatively compact five‑cylinder layout
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on methanol, reducing CO₂ and SOx emissions, while retaining HFO fallback
  • Low rotational speed (78 rpm) minimizes gearbox size and improves propeller efficiency
  • MAN’s proven G80ME family offers long service intervals and robust crosshead design
  • L‑configuration eases installation in tight engine rooms
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes
  • Higher upfront cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Dual‑fuel control system adds operational complexity and requires specialised crew training
  • Spare‑parts inventory must cover both methanol and HFO subsystems, increasing logistics burden
  • Maintenance expertise for dual‑fuel high‑pressure injection is less widespread
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierGeneral cargo vesselCruise linerOffshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with flexibility to switch between methanol and HFO, aim for future low‑carbon compliance, and have access to methanol bunkering or plan to develop it. Avoid if your operation is limited to routes without methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher capital cost, or you lack crew familiar with dual‑fuel systems.
Use Cases: The 5G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed in newbuild container and bulk carriers targeting IMO Tier III NOx limits, as well as retrofits of existing vessels that want to transition to methanol while retaining the safety net of HFO. It also appears on cruise ships and offshore supply vessels where low emissions and high reliability are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 6G80ME-C9.5-LGI
6G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 31320.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine diesel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
31320
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 31 MW from a six‑cylinder layout reduces engine room space.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (methanol/HFO) allows significant CO₂ and SOx emission reductions when methanol is used.
  • Low rotational speed (78 rpm) improves propeller efficiency and lowers vibration levels.
  • MAN’s long track record provides proven reliability and extended service intervals.
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission standards in methanol mode, supporting future regulatory compliance.
Weaknesses
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited at many ports, requiring careful voyage planning.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Additional onboard methanol handling system (tanks, pumps, safety equipment) adds complexity and weight.
  • Dual‑fuel control systems increase operational complexity and may require extra crew training.
  • Slightly larger footprint than a comparable 4‑stroke engine of the same power rating.
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierProduct / Chemical TankerCruise VesselRo-Ro/Passenger Ferry
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with the flexibility to run on methanol for lower emissions and future‑proofing against stricter environmental regulations. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable methanol bunkering or if capital cost sensitivity outweighs emission benefits.
Use Cases: The 6G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed in newbuilds targeting Tier III compliance, such as large container vessels on long‑haul routes, bulk carriers serving regions with emerging methanol infrastructure, and cruise ships seeking to market a greener propulsion system. It also fits retrofits where dual‑fuel capability can be added without major hull modifications.
MAN Energy Solutions 7G80ME-C9.5-LGI
7G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 36540.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
36540
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output with excellent specific fuel consumption for a low‑speed engine
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant NOx and SOx emission reductions, aiding IMO Tier III compliance
  • Robust MAN engineering reputation and proven reliability in long‑haul service
  • Flexibility to switch fuels on‑the‑fly, supporting future decarbonisation strategies
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports, affecting operational flexibility
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system increases maintenance skill requirements
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10 000 TEU)Bulk carrier (≥180 kt)Oil tanker (VLCC/Suezmax)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel propulsion)Cruise liner
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine that can meet strict emission regulations and have access to methanol bunkering or plan future fuel switches. Avoid if your vessel operates primarily in regions without methanol supply, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or space limitations prevent installing a large 7‑cylinder unit.
Use Cases: The 7G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on ultra‑large container vessels, bulk carriers and tankers operating in Emission Control Areas, where its dual‑fuel capability allows compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits while offering flexibility to revert to HFO when methanol is unavailable.
MAN Energy Solutions 8G80ME-C9.5-LGI
8G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 41760.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
41760
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for ultra‑large vessels (VLCCs, ULCVs).
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on low‑carbon methanol or conventional HFO, supporting IMO decarbonisation targets.
  • Low specific fuel consumption and inherent NOx reduction due to low engine speed (IMO Tier III compliant by design).
  • Proven MAN reliability record with integrated electronic control for optimized performance.
  • Flexibility to switch fuels on‑board without shutdown.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and complexity compared with single‑fuel engines.
  • Methanol storage requires insulated tanks and additional safety systems, increasing space requirements.
  • Maintenance personnel need specialised training for dual‑fuel handling and methanol corrosion management.
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational routes.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Bulk CarrierProduct Tanker
Certifications: ABS Type ApprovalDNV GL Class ApprovalIMO Tier III NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power for a >150 k DWT vessel, want flexibility to meet future low‑carbon fuel mandates, and have access to methanol bunkering or plan to retrofit. Avoid if: the operating profile is limited to short voyages without methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or shipyard space cannot accommodate additional methanol tanks.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large tankers and container ships targeting IMO 2020/2030 emission reductions, as well as retrofits of existing vessels where operators wish to future‑proof against stricter carbon regulations while retaining the ability to run on conventional HFO when methanol is unavailable.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G80ME-C9.5-LGI
9G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 46980.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
46980
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for large vessels (≈63 000 hp).
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) provides flexibility and enables significant NOx/SOx emission reductions when running on methanol.
  • Proven MAN G‑type reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead design.
  • Integrated electronic control system optimises fuel consumption and facilitates compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits.
  • Designed for easy retrofitting into existing low‑speed engine rooms.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
  • Methanol handling demands specialised storage tanks, safety systems and bunkering infrastructure.
  • Complex dual‑fuel injection system increases maintenance skill requirements.
  • Limited global after‑sales support in regions without established MAN service centres.
Typical Vessels: Cruise shipsLarge container vesselsLNG carriers (dual‑fuel)Methanol‑fueled bulk carriersVery large tankers
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III NOx compliance (when operated on methanol)DNV Class Notation for dual‑fuel operation (DF)ABS approval for low‑speed marine diesel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power, want the flexibility of methanol to meet future emission regulations, and have access to methanol bunkering or plan a retrofit. Avoid if vessel size does not justify the engine’s footprint, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or operating routes lack reliable methanol supply.
Use Cases: The 9G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed on new‑build cruise liners and ultra‑large container ships seeking zero‑sulphur emissions, as well as on LNG carriers that require a dual‑fuel main engine to switch between LNG/methanol and HFO depending on bunkering availability.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G80ME-C9.5-LGI
10G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 52200.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
52200
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output with excellent specific fuel consumption for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables significant CO₂ and NOx emission reductions
  • Compact L‑configuration saves engine room space on new builds or retrofits
  • Proven MAN reliability and extensive global support network
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits and future carbon‑neutral fuel strategies
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system and methanol handling equipment
  • Requires dedicated methanol bunkering infrastructure, which is still limited worldwide
  • Complexity of dual‑fuel injection and control systems can increase maintenance demands
  • Large cylinder dimensions may restrict installation on vessels with tight engine‑room constraints
  • Methanol safety considerations (flammability) add operational procedural requirements
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Aframax tankerUltra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large bulk carrier (>200 kDWT)Cruise shipOffshore support vessel
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's RegisterIMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power with the flexibility to use low‑carbon methanol and operate in strict emission control areas, and you have access to methanol bunkering or plan to produce it onboard. Avoid if your routes lack methanol supply, budget constraints prevent higher upfront costs, or engine‑room space cannot accommodate the L‑configuration.
Use Cases: The 10G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large tankers and container ships targeting IMO 2020+ compliance and future carbon‑neutral operation, as well as retrofits where space savings are critical and operators wish to switch to renewable methanol without sacrificing power.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G80ME-C9.5-LGI
12G80ME-C9.5-LGI unverified
· 62640.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
62640
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density for ultra‑large vessels (≈62 MW)
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows flexibility between methanol and HFO, supporting IMO Tier III emission targets
  • Low operating speed (78 rpm) reduces gearbox requirements and improves propeller efficiency
  • Proven MAN engineering reliability and long service intervals
  • Compatible with major classification societies for type approval
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel system complexity
  • Requires dedicated methanol bunkering infrastructure and on‑board storage safety measures
  • Larger physical footprint compared to medium‑speed alternatives
  • More sophisticated control software increases training requirements for crew
  • Potentially higher maintenance costs for the fuel injection and lubrication systems
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVery large crude carriers (VLCC)Bulk carriers over 200 ktCruise liners seeking low‑emission propulsion
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine that can meet future methanol‑based emission regulations and you have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost or if your operation lacks reliable methanol supply infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 12G80ME-C9.5-LGI is typically installed on new builds of ultra‑large container vessels and large tankers targeting IMO Tier III compliance, as well as retrofits where operators want to convert existing HFO‑only ships to a dual‑fuel methanol solution for greener operation.
5G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 34350.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
34350
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact installation for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) provides flexibility and future‑proofing for emission regulations
  • Low specific fuel consumption at design load, improving operational economics
  • Proven MAN reliability record with advanced electronic control system
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel equivalents
  • Methanol handling requires dedicated storage and safety systems, increasing complexity
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure may restrict route flexibility
  • Maintenance of dual‑fuel injection hardware adds to crew training requirements
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable medium‑speed diesel engines
Typical Vessels: Methanol carrierLNG carrier (dual‑fuel variant)Large cruise shipRoPax ferryHeavy bulk carrier with emission‑control strategy
Certifications: DNVGL Class Approval for dual‑fuel operationABS Classification – Dual Fuel EngineIMO Tier III NOx compliance (low‑speed)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with the ability to switch between methanol and HFO to meet current or future emission caps, and you have access to methanol bunkering or plan to develop it. Avoid if: your operation is limited to regions without methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not justify a low‑speed 5‑cylinder layout.
Use Cases: The 5G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on newbuilds targeting the emerging methanol shipping market—such as dedicated methanol carriers and cruise ships seeking zero‑carbon‑fuel capability—while also being suitable for retrofits of existing vessels that wish to add dual‑fuel flexibility without sacrificing power.
6G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 41220.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
41220
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈41 MW) from a compact six‑cylinder design
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – methanol and HFO, enabling lower CO₂ and NOx emissions
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without aftertreatment in many operating profiles
  • Proven MAN reliability record with long service intervals
  • Suitable for large vessels requiring high shaft power
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint compared with medium‑speed engines of similar rating
  • Higher capital cost and more complex control system
  • Methanol handling requires dedicated storage, safety systems and corrosion‑resistant materials
  • Limited global methanol bunkering infrastructure at present
  • Requires skilled crew for dual‑fuel operation and maintenance
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (10 000+ TEU)Cruise linersLarge LNG carriers (dual‑fuel configuration)Methanol‑fueled bulk carriersVery large tankers
Certifications: DNV GL Class ApprovalABS Type ApprovalIMO Dual‑Fuel Engine Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power with low NOx emissions and want the flexibility to switch between methanol and HFO, especially for newbuilds targeting IMO 2020/2030 compliance. Avoid if budget constraints are tight, vessel size cannot accommodate the engine footprint, or reliable methanol bunkering is unavailable on intended routes.
Use Cases: Installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships, cruise vessels and large LNG carriers that require >40 MW propulsion while meeting stringent emission regulations; also used in demonstration projects for methanol‑fueled bulk carriers where dual‑fuel capability provides operational flexibility.
MAN Energy Solutions 7G95ME-C10.5-LGI
7G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 48090.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
48090
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke engines
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables CO₂ and SOₓ emission reductions
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals for large marine applications
  • Compact L‑configuration eases installation in confined engine rooms
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and vibration
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical dimensions and weight require ample hull space
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Methanol infrastructure still limited at many ports, adding logistical complexity
  • Additional fuel handling and safety systems needed for methanol storage
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system increases maintenance training requirements
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierOil tanker (methanol‑capable)LNG/methanol carrierCruise liner
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with methanol dual‑fuel flexibility for future‑proofing against stricter emission regulations and have sufficient hull space. Avoid if vessel size constraints prevent installation of a large low‑speed unit or if the operator cannot support methanol bunkering and associated safety systems.
Use Cases: The 7G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on ultra‑large container vessels, bulk carriers and tankers that are being retrofitted or newly built for methanol propulsion, as well as on cruise ships seeking lower carbon footprints while retaining the robustness of a low‑speed engine.
MAN Energy Solutions 8G95ME-C10.5-LGI
8G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 54960.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
54960
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈55 MW) at low rpm, suitable for large propulsion requirements
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables lower CO₂ and SOx/NOx emissions when methanol is used
  • Proven MAN G95ME family reliability with long service intervals
  • Compact “L” configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with some alternatives
  • Crosshead design provides excellent cylinder liner life and reduced wear
Weaknesses
  • Dual‑fuel system adds mechanical complexity and higher upfront cost
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited on many trade routes
  • Requires crew training for safe handling of methanol and dual‑fuel operation
  • Maintenance intervals can be longer than some newer low‑speed LNG engines due to additional fuel system components
  • Heavier overall engine mass compared with some modern medium‑speed alternatives
Typical Vessels: Container ship (large, >15 000 TEU)Cruise linerBulk carrier (very large) Ro‑Ro/Passenger ferry (high power requirement)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven high‑power low‑speed engine, want the flexibility to run methanol for future emission regulations, and have access to methanol bunkering or plan a retrofit. Avoid if: your operation lacks reliable methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit higher capital cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel solution.
Use Cases: The 8G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on new builds targeting IMO 2020/2030 carbon reduction pathways and on retrofits of existing large vessels where space for a low‑speed engine is limited but high power is required. It is also selected for ships operating on routes with emerging methanol bunkering facilities.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G95ME-C10.5-LGI
9G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 61830.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke dual-fuel engine
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
61830
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables future‑proofing against CO₂ regulations
  • Low rpm allows direct propeller drive, reducing gear losses
  • IMO Tier III NOx compliance in low‑speed operation
  • Proven MAN reliability and global service network
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system requires specialised crew training
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure still limited on many routes
  • Crosshead design adds length and weight compared with compact medium‑speed units
  • Maintenance intervals can be shorter when operating on methanol due to corrosion concerns
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑Large Container Ship (ULCS)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)LNG carrier (methanol‑dual‑fuel retrofit)Cruise shipLarge Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOxDNV GL Dual‑Fuel Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high‑power, low‑speed main engine with methanol dual‑fuel flexibility for compliance with future emission regulations and have access to methanol bunkering. Avoid if the operating profile is limited to short voyages without methanol supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or vessel size does not require >60 MW propulsion.
Use Cases: The 9G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed as the sole main engine on ultra‑large container ships and very large crude carriers, providing direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller. It is also selected for new builds or retrofits where operators aim to switch part of their fuel mix to methanol to meet IMO 2025/2030 carbon targets while retaining the ability to run on conventional HFO when needed.
10G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 68700.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
68700
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power for a 10‑cylinder layout – enables compact installation on large vessels.
  • Fuel flexibility: can switch between methanol (low‑emission) and HFO, supporting future decarbonisation strategies.
  • MAN’s proven reliability and long service intervals for crosshead designs.
  • Optimised combustion for low NOx emissions, helping meet IMO Tier III requirements when operated on methanol.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only engines due to dual‑fuel hardware.
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports.
  • Complex control and safety systems increase training and maintenance demands.
  • 2‑stroke crosshead engines require more extensive lubrication and have larger auxiliary oil pumps.
Typical Vessels: Container ships (≥10 000 TEU)Bulk carriersProduct tankersMethanol or LNG carrier conversions
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine with methanol flexibility and are targeting lower NOx/CO₂ emissions on new builds or retrofits. Avoid if the operating route lacks reliable methanol bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or you prefer simpler single‑fuel systems.
Use Cases: The 10G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed on large ocean-going vessels where space and weight efficiency are critical, such as ultra‑large container ships, bulk carriers, and tankers that are being designed for future methanol fuel adoption or dual‑fuel operation to meet tightening emission regulations.
12G95ME-C10.5-LGI unverified
· 82440.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
G95ME-C10.5-LGI
Bore (mm)
950
Stroke (mm)
3460
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
82440
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
Methanol/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for the largest merchant vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (methanol/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and future carbon‑reduction strategies
  • Proven MAN G‑series reliability and long service intervals
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with comparable medium‑speed engines
  • Crosshead design isolates cylinder forces, reducing wear on the crankshaft
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost than a conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engine
  • Methanol bunkering infrastructure is still limited in many ports
  • Complex dual‑fuel control system increases training and maintenance requirements
  • Long lead times for spare parts due to the size of the unit
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierCrude Oil TankerProduct TankerCruise Ship
Certifications: DNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >80 MW of low‑speed power and want a future‑proof dual‑fuel solution that can run on methanol to meet tightening emission regulations. Avoid if the vessel’s design cannot accommodate the engine’s size, if methanol bunkering is unavailable on intended routes, or if budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost.
Use Cases: The 12G95ME-C10.5-LGI is typically installed in ultra‑large container vessels (10 000+ TEU), very large crude carriers and bulk carriers where maximum propulsion power and fuel flexibility are critical. Operators targeting IMO Tier III compliance or planning to shift part of their fuel mix to low‑carbon methanol often select this engine for its dual‑fuel capability.
MAN Energy Solutions 5S80ME-C9.5-GA
5S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 21250.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
21250
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~21250 kW) in a compact L‑configuration suitable for large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can switch between conventional MDO and zero‑carbon ammonia
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of the S80ME‑C family
  • Lower CO₂ emissions when operated on ammonia, supporting future regulatory compliance
  • Integrated exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS) compatibility for IMO Tier III
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost due to dual‑fuel (especially ammonia) hardware and storage requirements
  • Ammonia handling demands specialized tanks, safety systems and crew training
  • Limited availability of spare parts and service expertise compared with the more common 6‑cylinder versions
  • Engine size still large; not suitable for small or medium‑size vessels
  • Potential NOx control complexity when operating on ammonia at low load
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (ULCS)Large LNG carriers (future ammonia‑fuelled conversions)Cruise linersOffshore supply vessels (OSV) with high power demandChemical/tanker vessels targeting carbon‑neutral operation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power in a compact layout, want future‑proof fuel flexibility (MDO / ammonia), and have the infrastructure for ammonia storage and handling. Avoid if vessel size is limited, budget constraints preclude the extra dual‑fuel system cost, or your operating routes lack reliable ammonia supply.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and cruise vessels that aim to meet upcoming carbon‑neutral targets, as well as on LNG carriers being retrofitted for ammonia propulsion. It also appears in large offshore support vessels where high power density and fuel flexibility are critical.
MAN Energy Solutions 6S80ME-C9.5-GA
6S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 25500.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel crosshead engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
25500
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈25 MW) at very low rpm, ideal for direct propeller drive
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on ammonia for CO₂‑reduction while retaining MDO fallback
  • MAN’s proven reliability and extensive global after‑sales support network
  • Compact L‑shaped configuration saves engine‑room space compared with straight‑line layouts
  • Low specific fuel consumption when running on conventional marine diesel
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires specialised storage, safety systems and crew training, increasing upfront cost
  • Limited worldwide ammonia bunkering infrastructure restricts operational flexibility at present
  • Dual‑fuel system adds mechanical complexity and maintenance workload compared with single‑fuel engines
  • Higher capital expenditure than comparable conventional low‑speed diesel units
  • Large physical dimensions still demand substantial engine‑room volume
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Bulk CarrierGeneral Cargo ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel operator targets near‑term CO₂ reduction with ammonia as a primary fuel, needs high power at low rpm and values MAN’s global support. Avoid if the ship will operate on routes lacking ammonia bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher capital cost, or crew training for ammonia safety is not feasible.
Use Cases: Installed in newbuilds or major retrofits of large container ships, tankers and bulk carriers that are being designed to meet IMO 2030/2050 decarbonisation goals. Also used on dual‑fuel LNG carriers where flexibility between ammonia and MDO provides operational resilience.
MAN Energy Solutions 7S80ME-C9.5-GA
7S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 29750.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
29750
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for large vessels while operating at low rpm for direct propeller drive
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (MDO + ammonia) enables future carbon‑neutral operation
  • MAN’s proven S80ME-C series offers high thermal efficiency (~50% at design point)
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine‑room footprint compared with traditional inline layouts
  • Designed to meet IMO NOx Tier III limits, supporting strict emission regulations
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia fuel system adds complexity, requiring additional safety and storage infrastructure
  • Higher capital cost than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Limited global ammonia bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility
  • Large physical size demands reinforced foundations and substantial hull space
  • Dual‑fuel components increase maintenance requirements and spare‑part inventory
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Bulk carrierContainer ship (>10 000 TEU)Tankers (oil, chemical)Future zero‑carbon liner or shuttle vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power low‑speed engine with dual‑fuel capability for ammonia to meet future carbon‑neutral targets and strict NOx limits. Avoid if your operation lacks access to ammonia bunkering, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel solution.
Use Cases: The 7S80ME-C9.5-GA is typically installed on newbuild large tankers, bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships that aim to comply with IMO Tier III emissions today while preparing for a transition to ammonia as a low‑carbon fuel in the next decade.
MAN Energy Solutions 8S80ME-C9.5-GA
8S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 34000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
34000
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • 34 MW output at only 78 rpm gives excellent propulsion efficiency for very large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel design allows operation on conventional marine diesel oil and emerging low‑carbon fuels such as LNG or ammonia, supporting future emission regulations.
  • Electronic ME control system optimises fuel injection timing for lower specific fuel consumption and reduced emissions.
  • Proven MAN reliability record with long service intervals and extensive global support network.
  • IMO Tier III NOx compliance when equipped with after‑treatment (SCR) and meets current EEXI/EEDI requirements.
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher capital cost compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines, especially when fitted for ammonia capability.
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases installation and maintenance demands; specialised training is required.
  • Ammonia infrastructure is still limited, so fuel availability may restrict operational flexibility on certain routes.
  • Long lead times for spare parts specific to the dual‑fuel configuration.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container ShipVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Bulk Carrier (>150 k dwt)LNG Carrier (dual‑fuel variant)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOxDNV GL Type ApprovalABS Approved
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high‑power main engine for large newbuilds and want flexibility to switch between conventional diesel and low‑carbon fuels such as LNG or ammonia, while meeting strict emission standards. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints are tight, or the required alternative‑fuel bunkering infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: Installed as the primary propulsion unit on new ultra‑large container ships, VLCCs and large bulk carriers built to comply with IMO 2020+ regulations and future carbon‑neutral targets. Frequently selected for routes where LNG or emerging ammonia bunkering points are planned, providing a pathway to lower CO₂ emissions without sacrificing performance.
MAN Energy Solutions 9S80ME-C9.5-GA
9S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 38250.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
38250
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and efficiency for very large ships
  • Dual‑fuel operation (marine diesel oil or LNG) provides fuel flexibility and emissions reduction
  • Proven reliability of MAN S80ME‑C family with long service intervals
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces overall engine room length compared with comparable 9‑cylinder units
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost than smaller low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel system increases installation and maintenance expertise needs
  • Limited availability of ammonia‑compatible hardware (not certified for ammonia operation)
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container vesselsCruise shipsLarge bulk carriersVery large tankers
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >38 MW of main propulsion power, want dual‑fuel (MDO/LNG) flexibility for future fuel switching, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost or if vessel size cannot accommodate the engine's dimensions.
Use Cases: The 9S80ME-C9.5-GA is typically installed in ultra‑large container ships (20 000+ TEU), mega cruise liners, and large bulk carriers where high power density and fuel flexibility are critical for meeting IMO Tier III emissions targets while retaining operational range.
MAN Energy Solutions 10S80ME-C9.5-GA
10S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 42500.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
42500
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (42.5 MW) suitable for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability with ammonia enables near‑zero CO₂ emissions when using renewable ammonia
  • Proven MAN S80ME family reliability and electronic control system (ME)
  • Low specific fuel consumption on MDO, comparable to conventional diesel engines
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires specialised storage, safety systems and crew training
  • Higher capital cost than a single‑fuel diesel version
  • Limited global ammonia bunkering infrastructure at present
  • Slightly lower thermal efficiency on ammonia compared with MDO
  • Complex after‑treatment (NOx reduction) may be required for full Tier III compliance
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Large Bulk CarrierLNG carrier (newbuilds targeting ammonia fuel)Cruise ship (future low‑carbon propulsion)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalIMO Tier III NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel program requires high power with a future‑proof, low‑carbon fuel option such as ammonia and you have access to or plan to develop ammonia bunkering. Avoid if the operator lacks the infrastructure, budget for the higher upfront cost, or needs maximum thermal efficiency on conventional fuels only.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in newbuilds of ultra‑large carriers that aim to meet IMO 2030/2050 GHG targets, as well as retrofits where a transition to ammonia fuel is part of a green shipping strategy. It is also selected for LNG carriers being designed for dual‑fuel operation with both LNG and ammonia.
12S80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 51000.0 kW · dual-fuel low-speed 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
51000
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈51 MW) in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on ammonia, supporting future zero‑carbon strategies while retaining MDO fallback
  • Proven MAN reliability and long service intervals typical of S‑series engines
  • Low specific fuel consumption when running on MDO; comparable efficiency to conventional low‑speed diesel
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment, aiding compliance in emission control areas
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires dedicated storage, safety systems and crew training, increasing installation complexity
  • Higher capital cost versus a conventional single‑fuel low‑speed diesel engine
  • Limited global ammonia bunkering infrastructure may restrict operational flexibility at present
  • Potential slight power penalty when operating on ammonia compared with MDO
  • Maintenance procedures for the ammonia injection system add to crew workload
Typical Vessels: Container ship (≥10,000 TEU)Bulk carrier (≥150,000 dwt)Crude oil tanker (VLCC)LNG carrier (retrofit scenario)Cruise liner (future green‑fuel conversion)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine for large vessels and want to future‑proof the ship with ammonia capability while retaining MDO as a backup. Avoid if: the vessel will operate on routes lacking ammonia bunkering, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or crew expertise in ammonia safety is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 12S80ME-C9.5-GA is being installed on newbuild ultra‑large container ships and retrofitted on existing bulk carriers that aim to meet upcoming carbon‑neutral targets. Early adopters use it on routes where ammonia supply hubs are planned, allowing a gradual shift from conventional fuel while maintaining operational reliability.
MAN Energy Solutions 5G80ME-C9.5-GA
5G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 24500.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke low-speed
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
24500
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on zero‑carbon ammonia or conventional MDO, supporting future decarbonisation strategies.
  • High specific power (≈24.5 MW) suitable for large container ships and bulk carriers while maintaining MAN’s proven reliability record.
  • Low NOx emissions when running on MDO thanks to low‑speed combustion; meets IMO Tier III limits without additional after‑treatment.
  • Designed for easy integration with existing MAN control systems, facilitating retrofits and new builds alike.
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires dedicated safety, storage, and bunkering infrastructure that is still limited worldwide.
  • Capital cost is higher than a comparable single‑fuel diesel engine due to the dual‑fuel system and associated sensors.
  • Thermal efficiency on ammonia is typically lower than on MDO, leading to slightly higher fuel consumption when operating on ammonia alone.
  • Complexity of fuel management increases crew training requirements and maintenance planning.
Typical Vessels: Container shipBulk carrierGeneral cargo vesselChemical tanker (future low‑carbon variants)Cruise liner (large power plant)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power main engine that can future‑proof the vessel for ammonia fuel, have or plan to develop ammonia bunkering infrastructure, and require compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits. Avoid if your operation lacks access to reliable ammonia supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or crew expertise in dual‑fuel systems is insufficient.
Use Cases: The 5G80ME-C9.5-GA is being installed on newbuild container ships targeting zero‑carbon pathways and on retrofits of existing bulk carriers that aim to demonstrate ammonia propulsion. It also serves as a flagship engine for demonstration projects in ports developing ammonia bunkering facilities.
MAN Energy Solutions 6G80ME-C9.5-GA
6G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 29400.0 kW · dual-fuel 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
29400
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability allows operation on ammonia for near‑zero CO₂ emissions or on conventional MDO for established logistics
  • High specific power (≈29 MW) at very low speed provides excellent propulsive efficiency and reduced gearbox requirements
  • MAN’s proven G80ME family offers long‑term reliability and extensive global support network
  • Designed to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits when running on ammonia, supporting future regulatory compliance
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and maintenance on new builds or retrofits
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is still limited, restricting operational flexibility in many regions
  • Higher capital cost and added complexity of dual‑fuel control systems compared with single‑fuel diesel engines
  • Requires specialized crew training for ammonia handling and safety procedures
  • Potential slight efficiency penalty on MDO relative to a dedicated pure‑diesel engine of the same size
  • Larger physical envelope than high‑speed medium‑power units, impacting hull space allocation
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Bulk CarrierRo‑Ro/Passenger Ferry (high‑capacity)Offshore support vessel (FPSO, FSU)
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power main engine with future‑proof fuel flexibility and want to meet IMO Tier III emissions using ammonia; you have access to or plan to develop ammonia bunkering, and value MAN’s global service network. Avoid if: your operation is limited to regions without ammonia supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or crew expertise for ammonia safety is unavailable.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large tankers and container ships that aim to reduce carbon footprint by switching to ammonia while retaining the ability to run on conventional marine diesel oil during transition periods. It is also selected for retrofits of existing large vessels where future regulatory compliance is a priority.
MAN Energy Solutions 7G80ME-C9.5-GA
7G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 34300.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
34300
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for large ocean‑going vessels (>30 MW)
  • Dual‑fuel capability provides flexibility between marine diesel oil and lower‑emission alternatives
  • Low operating speed (78 rpm) reduces the need for reduction gearing and improves propeller efficiency
  • Proven MAN engineering heritage with long service life and extensive global support network
  • Integrated exhaust gas cleaning systems can meet stringent emission regulations
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives
  • Dual‑fuel (especially ammonia) handling infrastructure is still emerging, adding complexity
  • Crosshead design entails more components (e.g., piston rods, crossheads) increasing maintenance tasks
  • Limited suitability for vessels that prioritize ultra‑low emissions without access to alternative fuel supply
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Container Ships (ULCS)Capesize Bulk CarriersLNG carriers (when equipped for LNG dual‑fuel)Cruise liners requiring high power and fuel flexibility
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Marine Main Propulsion Engine)DNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with the option to run on marine diesel oil and alternative fuels, and have sufficient hull space for a large crosshead unit. Avoid if vessel size constraints, budget limits, or a requirement for fully zero‑carbon propulsion without established ammonia infrastructure exist.
Use Cases: The 7G80ME-C9.5-GA is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on mega‑size carriers and liners where high shaft power at low rpm maximises propulsive efficiency. It is also selected by operators seeking fuel flexibility to hedge against volatile oil prices or to comply with upcoming IMO carbon regulations using alternative fuels.
MAN Energy Solutions 8G80ME-C9.5-GA
8G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 39200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel (ammonia/MDO) engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
39200
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for large vessels while maintaining low rpm for direct shaft drive
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals
  • Dual‑fuel capability enables ammonia use, supporting future CO₂‑reduction strategies
  • Proven MAN engineering reputation for reliability and long engine life
  • Compact length compared with equivalent multi‑cylinder diesel installations
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is still limited worldwide, affecting operational flexibility
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity and requires specialized crew training and safety procedures
  • Higher capital cost than a conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engine
  • Potential NOx formation from ammonia combustion may require additional after‑treatment
  • Large physical size and weight demand robust hull reinforcement
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk carrier (>200 kt)Ro‑Ro / Passenger ship with high power requirementNewbuilds targeting zero‑carbon pathways
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high‑power, low‑speed engine and want to future‑proof the vessel with ammonia dual‑fuel capability while accepting higher upfront cost and limited bunkering. Avoid if the ship operates on routes without reliable ammonia supply, if budget constraints dominate, or for vessels where a smaller, single‑fuel engine would suffice.
Use Cases: The 8G80ME-C9.5-GA is typically installed in new builds of VLCCs, ULCVs and large bulk carriers that aim to meet upcoming emission regulations by switching to ammonia. It is also used in retrofits where existing diesel engines are replaced with a dual‑fuel unit to enable a gradual transition to zero‑carbon fuels.
MAN Energy Solutions 9G80ME-C9.5-GA
9G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 44100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead main engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
44100
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈44 MW) suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships
  • Proven MAN reliability record with long service intervals
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on marine diesel oil and be converted to LNG/alternative fuels
  • Compact L‑configuration saves hull space compared with inline layouts
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when equipped with after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and significant initial investment
  • Large physical dimensions require deep engine rooms and strong foundations
  • Complex crosshead design increases maintenance skill requirements
  • Ammonia operation is still experimental – infrastructure not widely available
  • Fuel‑oil optimisation needed to stay within emission limits when running on MDO
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Ultra Large Bulk Carrier (ULBC)Cruise liner (propulsion and auxiliary power)
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOxDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >40 MW of low‑speed propulsion, value MAN’s long‑term reliability, and have access to dual‑fuel infrastructure (LNG or future ammonia). Avoid for smaller vessels, tight budgets, or when ammonia fuel supply is unavailable.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main drive on VLCCs, mega‑container ships and large bulk carriers, providing primary propulsion while also serving as a generator set for shipboard electricity in cruise liners.
MAN Energy Solutions 10G80ME-C9.5-GA
10G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 49000.0 kW · low‑speed dual‑fuel 2‑stroke
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
49000
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability enables transition to carbon‑neutral ammonia while retaining MDO fallback
  • Proven MAN crosshead design offers excellent durability and low wear rates
  • Optimised for slow‑speed operation, yielding high thermal efficiency (~50% LHV) on diesel mode
  • Integrated control system supports seamless fuel switching and emissions monitoring
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires specialised storage, safety systems and crew training
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with conventional diesel‑only engines
  • Potential NOx formation from ammonia combustion may need additional after‑treatment
  • Large engine dimensions demand reinforced hull structures and dedicated engine room space
  • Limited global bunkering infrastructure for ammonia at present
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk carrier (>200 kt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel retrofit)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >45 MW of propulsion power, want to future‑proof the vessel with ammonia capability, and have access to or plan for ammonia bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if: the shipyard cannot accommodate the engine's size, budget constraints preclude higher upfront cost, or operating routes lack reliable ammonia supply.
Use Cases: The 10G80ME-C9.5-GA is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large tankers and container ships that are part of early decarbonisation programmes, allowing operators to run on ammonia for most voyages while retaining diesel backup for ports without ammonia bunkering.
MAN Energy Solutions 12G80ME-C9.5-GA
12G80ME-C9.5-GA unverified
· 58800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
G80ME-C9.5-GA
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3450
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
58800
Speed (rpm)
78
Fuel Type
Ammonia/MDO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for large vessels (>150 000 dwt)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on ammonia, enabling future decarbonisation pathways
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without extensive after‑treatment
  • Compact L‑configuration optimises engine room space
  • MAN’s long track record of reliability and global support
Weaknesses
  • Ammonia handling requires specialised storage, safety systems and crew training
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional MDO‑only engines
  • Limited worldwide ammonia bunkering infrastructure at present
  • Complexity of dual‑fuel control systems may increase maintenance workload
  • Large cylinder count can lead to longer scheduled overhauls
Typical Vessels: Container shipCrude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrierCruise liner
Certifications: IMO Tier III (NOx)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power and want to future‑proof the vessel with ammonia capability while staying within IMO Tier III emissions limits. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable ammonia supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel solution.
Use Cases: Newbuilds of ultra‑large container vessels, very large tankers and cruise ships that aim to meet upcoming decarbonisation regulations; also retrofits where engine‑room volume is at a premium and the operator wants to hedge against future fuel shifts toward ammonia.

B&W (legacy)

110
B&W (legacy) 4S70MC-C
4S70MC-C unverified
· 12200.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
12200
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Proven B&W S70 family reliability with extensive service history worldwide
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good part‑load efficiency, reducing fuel consumption on vessels with variable speed profiles
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with larger multi‑cylinder versions
Weaknesses
  • Physical size and weight remain large for the power output; may limit installation in very space‑constrained ships
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern dual‑fuel or ME‑type engines unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Crosshead design requires more maintenance (piston rod, crosshead bearing) than trunk‑type engines
  • Four‑cylinder layout can generate higher vibration levels that need careful mounting and balancing
  • Initial capital cost is relatively high compared with newer low‑emission engine families
Typical Vessels: Offshore supply vesselProduct tanker (small to medium size)Ro‑Ro ferryCoastal container shipResearch / survey vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (MSC.267)DNVGL Classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with excellent part‑load fuel efficiency and can accommodate its physical size; ideal for vessels where direct drive without reduction gear is desired and fuel flexibility is required. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, dual‑fuel capability, or the smallest possible engine room volume are top priorities.
Use Cases: The 4S70MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on small to medium cargo carriers, offshore support ships, and ferries where a compact low‑speed engine can be directly coupled to the propeller. It also serves as a reliable power source for auxiliary generators on offshore platforms when high torque at low rpm is needed.
5S70MC-C unverified
· 15250.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
15250
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with low rpm reduces gearbox wear and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Proven reliability on large commercial vessels; extensive service network worldwide.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications.
  • Meets IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II emissions out‑of‑the‑box; upgrade path to Tier III with SCR.
  • Modular 5‑cylinder design simplifies on‑site maintenance and parts stocking.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives.
  • Only five cylinders – maximum continuous power lower than larger multi‑cylinder S‑series variants.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful maintenance of crosshead seals.
  • Tier III compliance needs additional after‑treatment (SCR), increasing complexity and cost.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerPanamax & Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier IIDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large vessels where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount, and you have sufficient engine‑room space. Avoid if vessel size is constrained, capital budget is tight, or you prefer higher‑rpm or diesel‑electric solutions.
Use Cases: The 5S70MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, LR2 tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and mega container ships, providing efficient low‑speed drive for single‑screw configurations. It is also used in some cruise liners where long‑range fuel economy and emission compliance are critical.
6S70MC-C unverified
· 18300.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
18300
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm provides excellent torque and propeller efficiency
  • Proven reliability with a long service history in the tanker and bulk carrier market
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with higher‑speed alternatives
  • Extensive global after‑sales support from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than medium‑speed or diesel‑electric options
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) may need additional treatment to meet the latest IMO Tier III standards
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels that demand higher rpm
  • Complex lubrication and cooling systems increase maintenance planning
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrierLarge container ship (10,000+ TEU)LNG carrier (certain designs)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval D‑2DNV GL Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque for long‑range, fuel‑flexible vessels and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if vessel size is constrained, you require higher shaft speeds, or you must meet the strictest emissions limits without installing after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 6S70MC-C powers large crude oil tankers (≈300 kDWT), bulk carriers (≈200 kDWT) and ultra‑large container ships, providing reliable propulsion on long voyages where fuel economy and engine durability are paramount.
7S70MC-C unverified
· 21350.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
21350
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) reduces fuel consumption
  • Proven B&W reliability with extensive service history
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO and MDO)
  • Compact “L” configuration shortens shaft line layout
  • Crosshead design minimizes cylinder wear and vibration
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Long warm‑up time; slower start‑up than higher‑rpm engines
  • Requires highly skilled crew for routine overhauls
  • Limited to slow‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed vessels
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Aframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel version not standard for this model)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power at very low rpm for large slow‑speed vessels, value B&W’s long‑track record and fuel flexibility, and have the hull volume to accommodate a big engine. Avoid if the ship is smaller, requires higher shaft speed, has strict capital budget constraints, or needs dual‑fuel (LNG) capability out of the box.
Use Cases: The 7S70MC‑C is typically installed on VLCCs and large tankers for long‑haul crude transport, on Panamax and larger bulk carriers for iron ore or coal shipments, and on high‑capacity container ships where low‑speed propulsion offers fuel savings over long voyages.
8S70MC-C unverified
· 24400.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead main engine
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
24400
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power suitable for VLCCs and ultra‑large bulk carriers
  • Low operating speed (≈91 rpm) reduces vibration and propeller cavitation
  • Proven B&W reliability with decades of service history
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Crosshead design separates cylinder lubrication from crankcase, extending engine life
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher upfront cost compared with newer medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality maintenance programmes; wear parts are expensive
  • Emissions compliance (NOx, SOx) may need additional after‑treatment for IMO Tier III zones
  • Part‑load efficiency is lower than some modern MC‑C engines equipped with advanced electronic control
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Bulk Carrier (>180 kt)Container Ship (>150 k TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (ME‑1)DNV GL Class approvalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large cargo carriers and can accommodate the size and capital cost. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit engine room volume, or if strict Tier III NOx limits are required without planning for after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 8S70MC-C is typically installed in VLCCs transporting crude oil, ULCCs, large bulk carriers moving ore or coal, and high‑capacity container ships where a single low‑speed engine drives a large fixed‑pitch propeller. Its fuel flexibility also makes it attractive for operators seeking to optimise bunker costs across different regions.
B&W (legacy) 9S70MC-C
9S70MC-C unverified
· 27450.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
27450
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~48% at rated load) for a mechanically controlled engine
  • Proven reliability and long service life in VLCC/ULCC applications
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies on‑site maintenance and overhauls
  • L‑configuration (inline) reduces overall engine‑room footprint compared with V‑type layouts
  • Can operate on both heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight increase hull space requirements
  • Mechanically controlled fuel system is less flexible than modern electronic control units, limiting fine‑tuning of emissions
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR, scrubbers)
  • Limited RPM range restricts use in vessels requiring variable speed operation
  • Older design lacks integrated digital monitoring found on newer ME‑type engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Crude TankerVery Large Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels and are comfortable with HFO operation and conventional mechanical control. Avoid if you require the latest electronic fuel management, lower emissions without retrofit, or a more compact power plant for smaller hulls.
Use Cases: The 9S70MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers where high thrust at low RPM is essential. It also appears in some of the biggest container ships that favour proven mechanical systems over newer electronic engines.
B&W (legacy) 10S70MC-C
10S70MC-C unverified
· 30500.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
30500
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% ISO) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability from decades of service on bulk carriers and container ships
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO, MDO, low‑sulphur fuels)
  • Electronic MC-C control system improves load response and helps meet IMO NOx limits
  • High power density allows a relatively compact engine room for its output
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed engines
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with highly variable speed profiles
  • Maintenance intensive (crosshead bearings, cylinder liners) demanding skilled crew
  • Older design may need retrofitting or additional after‑treatment to meet strict Tier III NOx limits
Typical Vessels: Container ShipBulk CarrierGeneral Cargo VesselLarge Ro‑Ro
Certifications: DNVABSLRIMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for large vessels where fuel efficiency and reliability are paramount, and hull space can accommodate a low‑speed crosshead layout. Avoid if: the vessel operates with frequent speed changes, has strict weight/space constraints, or must meet Tier III NOx limits without additional exhaust treatment.
Use Cases: The 10S70MC-C is commonly installed on 8,000–12,000 TEU container ships and 150‑200 kDWT bulk carriers, providing the main propulsion for long‑haul routes where fuel consumption savings outweigh the larger engine footprint.
B&W (legacy) 11S70MC-C
11S70MC-C unverified
· 33550.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
33550
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output suitable for VLCC/ULCC sized vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker fleet
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with higher‑speed engines
  • Designed to integrate with exhaust gas cleaning systems (scrubbers)
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight increase hull space requirements
  • Higher capital cost than medium‑speed alternatives
  • Complex crosshead maintenance requiring skilled personnel
  • Limited rpm range restricts use on vessels needing higher shaft speeds
  • Emissions control still needed to meet modern IMO Tier III limits
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCSuezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)Very large container ship (rare, but possible)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for ultra‑large deadweight vessels and value fuel flexibility. Avoid if: vessel size is modest, budget constraints are tight, or you require higher shaft speeds and lighter machinery.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on ultra‑large crude carriers, large product tankers, and bulk carriers where maximum power and reliability outweigh the penalty of larger engine dimensions; often paired with scrubbers to meet IMO emission standards.
B&W (legacy) 12S70MC-C
12S70MC-C unverified
· 36600.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
36600
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power allowing direct shaft drive without reduction gearing
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from B&W’s legacy design
  • Broad fuel flexibility (HFO, MDO) with good part‑load efficiency
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication system reduces wear on crosshead bearings
  • Widely supported by major classification societies for class approvals
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled engines
  • Fuel consumption at low loads is higher than modern dual‑fuel or electronic‑control units
  • Long warm‑up period before reaching optimal efficiency
  • Requires experienced crew for maintenance of crosshead and cylinder liner systems
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierContainer ShipCrude Oil TankerProduct TankerGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier II (MARPOL Annex VI)DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 12S70MC-C when you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large vessels that can run on conventional heavy fuel oil and benefit from direct drive without reduction gears. Avoid it if space is at a premium, you require best‑in‑class fuel efficiency at part load, or you want a dual‑fuel capability for stricter emission regimes.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in the main propulsion line of deep‑sea bulk carriers and tankers above 30 000 dwt, where its robust construction and direct‑drive characteristics provide reliable long‑haul performance on established trade routes.
14S70MC-C unverified
· 42700.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S70MC-C
Bore (mm)
700
Stroke (mm)
2800
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
42700
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a single engine unit, suitable for >150 000 dwt ships.
  • Proven reliability from decades of service on bulk carriers and tankers.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil.
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies major overhauls and parts replacement.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) compared with many medium‑speed alternatives.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • High capital cost and longer lead time for procurement.
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of a low‑speed crosshead design.
  • Slow transient response; not ideal for vessels needing rapid speed changes.
  • NOx emissions may exceed Tier III limits without after‑treatment (SCR) equipment.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (>150 000 dwt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel variants)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a single, high‑power engine for very large deadweight vessels, value fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability, and have the space and budget for a low‑speed crosshead installation. Avoid if: vessel size is moderate, rapid speed changes are required, or you must meet strict NOx Tier III limits without installing SCR systems.
Use Cases: The 14S70MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers where a single engine can provide the necessary propulsion power. It also appears in some ultra‑large container ships and LNG carriers (in dual‑fuel configurations) that benefit from its high efficiency and ability to burn heavy fuel oil.
B&W (legacy) 4S60MC-C
4S60MC-C unverified
· 8800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
8800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high torque at low rpm enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear.
  • Four‑cylinder layout is space‑efficient compared with larger multi‑cylinder engines.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO, supporting diverse bunkering options.
  • Proven B&W reliability and a worldwide service network for maintenance and spares.
  • Compatible with traditional mechanical governors, simplifying integration on older vessels.
Weaknesses
  • Older design may require NOx after‑treatment to meet Tier III emissions standards.
  • Power output limited to ~8.8 MW; not suitable for large high‑speed ships.
  • Mechanical control system is less precise than modern electronic ECUs.
  • Spare parts availability can be a concern as production shifts to newer engine families.
  • Higher vibration levels compared with some newer multi‑cylinder designs.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerCoastal Bulk CarrierOffshore Supply VesselSmall Ro-Ro Ferry
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Marine Diesel Engine)DNV GL Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact, high‑torque engine for vessels up to ~8 MW with flexible fuel options and proven support. Avoid if the ship must meet strict Tier III NOx limits without retrofit, requires higher power density, or prefers modern electronic control systems.
Use Cases: The 4S60MC-C is typically installed on product tankers, short‑sea bulk carriers, offshore supply ships, and small Ro‑Ro ferries where space is limited but reliable low‑speed propulsion is essential. It is favored in fleets that value B&W’s service network and can accommodate its mechanical control architecture.
B&W (legacy) 5S60MC-C
5S60MC-C unverified
· 11000.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
11000
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 11 MW from five cylinders
  • Proven mechanical reliability with decades of service history
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on HFO and MDO
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates the need for reduction gears, improving overall drivetrain efficiency
  • Robust construction suited to harsh marine environments
Weaknesses
  • Large size and weight increase hull space and structural requirements
  • Mechanical control limits fuel‑efficiency optimisation compared with modern electronic engines
  • Higher NOx/SOx emissions relative to newer low‑emission designs
  • More intensive maintenance (crosshead bearing wear, valve gear adjustments)
  • Slower response to rapid load changes
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerAframax TankerLarge Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, proven low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility and direct‑drive simplicity for large tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid if your priority is the lowest possible emissions, compact size, or advanced electronic control for optimal part‑load efficiency.
Use Cases: The 5S60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuilds or retrofits of very large crude carriers, Suezmax and Aframax tankers, and large bulk carriers where direct‑drive low‑speed engines are preferred for their durability and fuel flexibility.
6S60MC-C unverified
· 13200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
13200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power – 13.2 MW from a six‑cylinder unit
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul vessels with extensive service history
  • Fuel flexible (HFO and MDO) with robust fuel handling system
  • Low operating speed (105 rpm) reduces propeller cavitation and allows direct drive
  • Integrated B&W Engine Control System for precise monitoring and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or Tier III engines
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation in smaller hulls
  • Complex crosshead lubrication system increases maintenance effort
  • Limited to heavy fuel oil unless converted to dual‑fuel, which adds cost
  • Longer start‑up time relative to newer fast‑response engine designs
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge bulk carrierVery large container ship (>10 000 TEU)Cruise liner (high power requirement)
Certifications: IMO Tier II NOxDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels and have existing HFO infrastructure; the unit offers proven durability and fuel flexibility. Avoid if emissions compliance beyond IMO Tier II is required, or if space/weight constraints favor more compact dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke designs.
Use Cases: The 6S60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large bulk carriers and mega container ships, where its high output and low rpm match direct‑drive propeller arrangements. It also appears in cruise ships that demand sustained high power over long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 7S60MC-C
7S60MC-C unverified
· 15400.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
15400
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~50% at design point) leading to low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability and long service life in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Flexibility to run on HFO, MDO and, with minor modifications, low‑sulfur fuels
  • Compact power density for a 7‑cylinder configuration compared with larger cylinder counts
  • Good part‑load performance, suitable for long‑duration cruising
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and robust foundations
  • Relatively slow transient response; not ideal for vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Higher initial capital cost versus medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires a sophisticated lubrication and cooling system, increasing maintenance complexity
  • NOx emissions can exceed modern Tier III limits without after‑treatment
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU) where low‑speed propulsion is preferredCruise ships with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need maximum fuel efficiency and proven reliability for a large, slow‑speed vessel operating long voyages. Avoid if the ship has tight space constraints, requires fast speed changes, or if budget limits preclude the higher upfront cost of a low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 7S60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large oil tankers, bulk carriers and some large container vessels, providing continuous high power for long‑haul routes while meeting IMO fuel‑efficiency standards.
8S60MC-C unverified
· 17600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
17600
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power in a compact L‑configuration suitable for large vessels
  • Proven reliability of the S60 family with long service intervals
  • Fuel flexibility – can run HFO, MDO and low‑sulphur fuels without major modifications
  • Direct drive to propeller eliminates need for reduction gearing, improving overall efficiency
  • Extensive global support network from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require robust shaft line and hull accommodations
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed four‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke crosshead maintenance and overhauls
  • Limited RPM range restricts use in vessels needing variable speed operation
  • Initial capital cost is higher than some newer engine families
Typical Vessels: VLCC crude oil tankerProduct tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 kDWT)Ultra‑large container ship (8–10 000 TEU)Heavy lift / offshore support vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large HFO‑fuelled vessels with an established maintenance base and proven track record. Avoid if your vessel requires dual‑fuel capability, strict NOx limits without after‑treatment, or has severe space/weight constraints.
Use Cases: The 8S60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where a single low‑speed engine can directly drive a fixed‑pitch propeller, providing efficient long‑haul performance under heavy fuel oil regimes.
B&W (legacy) 9S60MC-C
9S60MC-C unverified
· 19800.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
19800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and excellent fuel efficiency for long‑haul operations
  • Proven reliability on VLCCs and bulk carriers with decades of service history
  • Flexible fuel options (HFO or MDO) allowing optimisation of bunker strategy
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine‑room footprint compared with wider layouts
  • Robust mechanical construction tolerates harsh marine environments
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial hull space and structural support
  • Mechanical control system (MC‑C) can require more routine maintenance than fully electronic ME versions
  • Base NOx emissions are relatively high; meeting Tier III limits may need after‑treatment upgrades
  • Low maximum rpm (105 rpm) restricts propeller design options and necessitates reduction gearing
  • High capital cost and longer lead times for spare parts compared with newer medium‑speed units
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container Ship (≥10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers where fuel efficiency and durability outweigh size and emissions concerns. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher rpm propulsion, or must meet strict Tier III NOx limits without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on long‑range oil tankers (VLCC/Suezmax), large bulk carriers, and mega container ships where continuous operation at low speed and high thermal efficiency are critical. Frequently selected for new builds and major retrofits that value B&W's extensive service network and spare‑parts availability.
10S60MC-C unverified
· 22000.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
22000
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul vessels with extensive service history
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO, MDO, low‑sulphur fuels) and can be fitted with exhaust gas cleaning for IMO Tier III compliance
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and spare‑part logistics
  • Excellent part‑load performance, ideal for vessels with variable speed profiles
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull reinforcement and foundation space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels needing rapid maneuverability
  • Legacy model may have longer lead times for specific spare parts or upgrades
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)Heavy lift / project cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW of propulsion power for a large, deep‑draft vessel and prioritize fuel efficiency and proven reliability. Avoid if the ship is size‑constrained, requires fast acceleration/deceleration, or budget constraints make a medium‑speed engine more attractive.
Use Cases: The 10S60MC-C powers the main shaft of VLCCs, Suezmax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and large container ships on long ocean voyages, where high power, fuel efficiency and durability are critical. It is also employed in some heavy‑lift vessels that demand robust low‑speed propulsion.
11S60MC-C unverified
· 24200.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
24200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~24 MW) suitable for large ocean‑going vessels
  • Proven reliability and long service life of the S60 family
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on HFO, MDO or low‑sulphur fuels
  • Electronic control (MC‑C) provides better fuel efficiency and emissions management
  • Low RPM allows direct drive to large slow‑turning propellers, improving overall propulsion efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Relatively low maximum speed limits propeller design options
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires skilled personnel for operation and maintenance of the crosshead arrangement
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carriers (ULCC)Panamax and Post‑Panamax bulk carriersLarge container ships (>8,000 TEU)Cruise liners
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability and fuel flexibility for large ocean‑going vessels. Avoid if space is at a premium, higher RPM propulsion systems are required, or the project budget cannot accommodate the initial cost and specialized maintenance crew.
Use Cases: The 11S60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuilds of VLCCs, bulk carriers and large container ships built from the early‑2000s onward, where direct‑drive low‑speed operation and fuel flexibility are paramount.
12S60MC-C unverified
· 26400.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
26400
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • ~173 g/kWh specific fuel consumption (high efficiency)
  • Direct‑drive low rpm eliminates need for reduction gear
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning systems for IMO Tier III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial hull space and foundation
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response, less suited to frequent load changes
  • Elevated NOx emissions without after‑treatment
  • Requires extensive vibration isolation measures
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax TankerLarge Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (≈10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate (ITC)DNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine with proven long‑term reliability and can accommodate its size; avoid if vessel design limits space/weight or the operational profile demands rapid load changes.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers, large bulk carriers (≥150 kt) and 10,000‑TEU container ships operating on long voyages where fuel efficiency and engine durability are paramount.
B&W (legacy) 14S60MC-C
14S60MC-C unverified
· 30800.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
30800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈30 MW) suitable for VLCCs and Capesize bulkers
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the tanker fleet
  • Excellent fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Low specific fuel consumption at design load, reducing operating cost
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies over‑haul and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight impose significant space and structural requirements
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed or newer dual‑fuel engines
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with highly variable power demand
  • May require retrofit (e.g., SCR) to meet current NOx Tier III limits in emission control areas
  • Older legacy control system may need upgrading for modern automation integration
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>20 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO D-2 Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel needs very high shaft power for long‑haul, fuel‑flexible operation and can accommodate the engine’s size and weight. Avoid on smaller or speed‑sensitive ships, in emission‑control areas where a newer low‑NOx design is required without costly after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 14S60MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, ULCCs, Capesize bulk carriers and large container vessels that operate on long oceanic routes, where its high power output, fuel flexibility and proven reliability provide economic advantage over smaller or newer engine types.
B&W (legacy) 4L60MC-C
4L60MC-C unverified
· 8800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
8800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at ISO) resulting in lower fuel consumption per kW·h
  • Proven reliability and long service life from decades of worldwide operation
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications
  • Robust crosshead design tolerates high cylinder pressures and reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly
  • Broad class society approvals (DNV, ABS, LR) simplifying classification
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with tight engine‑room space
  • Lower power density compared with newer four‑stroke or dual‑fuel engines of similar rating
  • Crosshead wear requires periodic inspection and can increase maintenance costs
  • Legacy control systems may need retrofitting for modern automation or emissions monitoring
  • Spare parts availability can be slower for legacy models as production winds down
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerBulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≥8,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger Vessel (high‑power variants)
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine that can run HFO, offers high efficiency and has extensive class approvals – ideal for large carriers where space is not the primary constraint. Avoid if vessel design demands compact power plants, higher power density, or dual‑fuel capability for stricter emission regimes.
Use Cases: The 4L60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers of 30 000–80 000 dwt, as well as on large container vessels where a low‑rpm engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller directly. It is also used in some cruise or Ro‑Ro ships that prioritize fuel flexibility and reliability over footprint.
5L60MC-C unverified
· 11000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
11000
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large ships
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from decades of worldwide operation
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends engine life
  • Good part‑load efficiency, helping to lower fuel consumption on long voyages
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Slower transient response compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric solutions
  • Higher initial capital cost and need for extensive shore‑side maintenance facilities
  • Legacy model – spare parts availability may be limited as newer B&W families replace it
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerBulk CarrierContainer ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Marine Engine)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven global service history and fuel flexibility for large vessels. Avoid if space is at a premium, rapid load changes are required, or you prefer newer ultra‑low emission designs that may need extensive after‑treatment upgrades.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on 100 000–150 000 DWT crude oil tankers, 80 000–120 000 DWT bulk carriers and large container ships (≈8 000 TEU), where direct‑drive low‑speed engines are standard.
B&W (legacy) 6L60MC-C
6L60MC-C unverified
· 13200.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
13200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at design point) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, MDO and compliant low‑sulphur fuels
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies overhauls and reduces engine‑room downtime
  • Integrated electronic control (MECA) provides precise load management and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight demand substantial engine‑room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke operation, maintenance and overhauls
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with frequent speed changes
  • May need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet stringent NOx limits
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerVLCCHandymax Bulk CarrierCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (SOLAS)DNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑efficiency low‑speed engine for large deadweight vessels where fuel flexibility and long‑term reliability outweigh the larger initial cost and space requirements. Avoid if vessel size or operational profile limits engine‑room volume, requires rapid speed changes, or if crew expertise in two‑stroke engines is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 6L60MC-C is typically installed on Aframax/VLCC tankers and Capesize bulk carriers for main propulsion, often paired with controllable‑pitch propellers. It also appears on some large containerships where low‑speed diesel efficiency is prioritized over faster transient response.
B&W (legacy) 7L60MC-C
7L60MC-C unverified
· 15400.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
15400
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power suitable for very large ships (≈15 MW at low rpm)
  • Robust crosshead design gives long service intervals and durability
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Integrated electronic control (MC‑C) improves fuel consumption and load response
  • Widely supported global after‑sales network from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with smaller or newer hybrid solutions
  • Requires skilled crew for routine maintenance of the crosshead and valve gear
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Crude Oil TankerBulk Carrier (Handymax/Supramax and larger)Large Container Ship (>12 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (D‑2)DNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and extensive support. Avoid if vessel size limits engine‑room volume, you target ultra‑low emissions without retrofits, or you prefer newer medium‑speed/electric hybrid propulsion concepts.
Use Cases: The 7L60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs and other large deadweight vessels built from the early 2000s onward, providing reliable thrust for long‑haul routes where fuel economy at low rpm is critical. It also appears in some high‑capacity bulk carriers and mega‑container ships that share the B&W engine family.
8L60MC-C unverified
· 17600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
17600
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm gives excellent fuel efficiency on long voyages.
  • Crosshead design separates piston forces from crankcase, reducing wear and extending liner life.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the global fleet; extensive B&W after‑sales support.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO) provides operational flexibility and cost optimisation.
  • Modular construction allows relatively quick overhauls and component replacement.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Slower transient response compared with medium‑speed or dual‑fuel engines, affecting manoeuvring flexibility.
  • Higher upfront capital cost; legacy model may face longer lead times for spare parts.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes due to crosshead complexity.
  • Emissions performance is lower than newer low‑pressure dual‑fuel designs without after‑treatment.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Aframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierUltra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Cruise Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility for large bulk or tanker vessels and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if vessel size is constrained, rapid load changes are critical, or you require the lowest possible NOx/SOx emissions without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 8L60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships operating on long-haul routes where fuel efficiency and reliability outweigh the need for fast load response. It can also serve as a generator set in cruise liners or offshore support vessels that demand high continuous power.
9L60MC-C unverified
· 19800.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
19800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power allowing direct‑drive of large slow‑turning propellers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals typical of B&W L‑series engines
  • Common‑rail injection (the “C” version) improves fuel efficiency and reduces NOx emissions
  • Broad class society approvals (DNV, ABS) facilitating registration
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with frequent rapid load changes
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and specialized tooling
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance discipline
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (8–12 k TEU)Supertanker / Very large dry cargo vessel
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large bulk or tanker ships and value fuel flexibility and low‑speed efficiency. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, budget‑constrained, or requires very fast load changes such as in ferries or offshore support vessels.
Use Cases: The 9L60MC-C is typically installed as the main engine on ultra‑large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and large container ships, where its low rpm matches a slow‑turning, high‑diameter propeller for optimal fuel consumption over long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 10L60MC-C
10L60MC-C unverified
· 22000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
22000
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~50% LHV) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul VLCC/ULCC service with extensive field experience
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design separates piston forces from the crankcase, simplifying maintenance
  • Low rpm reduces vibration and allows direct coupling to a reduction gear for optimal propeller speed
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels requiring rapid load changes
  • Requires a complex lubrication system and large bearing assemblies
  • Limited to low‑speed operation – not compatible with high‑rpm propeller designs without reduction gearing
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient engine for very large, low‑speed vessels on long voyages and value proven reliability. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher shaft speeds, rapid load response, or if capital expenditure must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 10L60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, capesize ore carriers and large product tankers, providing continuous low‑speed power for transoceanic routes where fuel economy outweighs higher upfront cost.
B&W (legacy) 11L60MC-C
11L60MC-C unverified
· 24200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
24200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke engines
  • Proven reliability and long service life in VLCC and bulk carrier fleets
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low operating rpm (105 rpm) allows direct‑drive to the propeller, reducing gear losses
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel designs
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods, limiting rapid power changes
  • Limited NOx reduction without additional after‑treatment systems
  • Requires highly skilled crew for routine maintenance of crosshead components
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Bulk CarrierMega Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large vessels where low rpm direct drive and fuel flexibility are priorities. Avoid if the project demands dual‑fuel capability, strict NOx limits without after‑treatment, or limited engine‑room space.
Use Cases: The 11L60MC-C is typically installed on newbuild VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and mega container ships, providing the main propulsion power directly coupled to a slow‑turning propeller. It is favored in routes where fuel cost optimisation and engine reliability are critical.
B&W (legacy) 12L60MC-C
12L60MC-C unverified
· 26400.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
26400
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque suitable for very large ships
  • Proven reliability with decades of operational history
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Extensive global support network and spare‑parts availability from B&W
  • Robust construction tolerates harsh operating conditions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in space‑constrained vessels
  • Slower transient response compared with modern electronically controlled engines
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Crosshead wear requires regular inspection and overhauls
  • Lower overall thermal efficiency than the newest 4‑stroke designs
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrierUltra‑large container shipOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: ABSDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability for very large tankers or bulk carriers and you have the space for its size. Avoid if rapid load changes, tight installation envelopes, or strict emission limits without additional after‑treatment are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 12L60MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers, and large bulk carriers, providing continuous high thrust for long voyages. It also appears in ultra‑large container ships where fuel flexibility and robust operation outweigh the need for fast response.
B&W (legacy) 14L60MC-C
14L60MC-C unverified
· 30800.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
L60MC-C
Bore (mm)
600
Stroke (mm)
2400
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
30800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 14 cylinders produce >30 MW in a compact low‑speed package.
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from decades of sea‑going experience.
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modification.
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with many medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Simple mechanical layout (crosshead, no valve gear) eases maintenance and spare‑parts logistics.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed Tier III‑compliant engines; after‑treatment may be required for IMO Tier III zones.
  • Limited to HFO/MDO unless converted to dual‑fuel, reducing flexibility for LNG‑centric routes.
  • Slower transient response compared with newer 4‑stroke or electronic‑control engines.
  • Higher capital and overhaul costs relative to some contemporary low‑speed designs.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Bulk Carriers (>150 k DWT)Large Container Ships (>10 000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Car Carriers of similar deadweight
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (D‑2)ABSDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and can accommodate the space and emission mitigation requirements. Avoid if strict IMO Tier III NOx limits are mandatory without after‑treatment, or if dual‑fuel capability is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 14L60MC-C is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container vessels, where its low rpm matches directly to fixed‑pitch propellers for efficient long‑haul voyages. Operators value its durability on heavy‑fuel routes and its ability to run HFO with occasional MDO blends.
4S50MC-C unverified
· 6200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
6200
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at rated load) resulting in lower fuel consumption
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint for its power class
  • Proven B&W reliability with extensive service history worldwide
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies monitoring and optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight compared with medium‑speed alternatives, requiring ample hull space
  • Low maximum rpm (127 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear for most propeller arrangements
  • Higher capital cost and longer lead time than some competing low‑speed engines
  • Crosshead design demands skilled personnel for routine overhauls and maintenance
  • Compliance with modern NOx/EU MRV limits often requires additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) not supplied factory‑fitted
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (10–30 k DWT)Chemical tanker (5–15 k DWT)Feeder container shipSmall bulk carrier (10–20 k DWT)Offshore supply vessel with moderate power demand
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Resolution MSC.267(84))DNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the ship requires high power at low speed, values fuel flexibility and proven reliability, and has sufficient engine‑room volume for a low‑speed crosshead unit. Avoid if budget constraints demand a lower initial cost, space is limited, or the operator prefers a higher‑rpm medium‑speed engine that can run without a reduction gear.
Use Cases: The 4S50MC-C is typically installed on product and chemical tankers, feeder container vessels and small bulk carriers where its compact L‑layout fits within modest hull dimensions while delivering the power needed for efficient long‑haul voyages. It is also used in offshore supply ships that benefit from its fuel flexibility and robust design.
5S50MC-C unverified
· 7750.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
7750
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with very low rpm enables direct‑drive of large propellers, eliminating reduction gears.
  • Proven reliability and long service life in bulk carrier and tanker fleets.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Crosshead design separates combustion forces from the crankcase, simplifying maintenance and reducing wear on bearings.
  • Modular cylinder construction allows relatively easy over‑hauls and part replacement.
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or four‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment systems.
  • Larger physical footprint and weight than newer compact engine families, limiting installation space on smaller vessels.
  • Vibration levels are higher than in some contemporary low‑speed designs, requiring robust mounting and alignment procedures.
  • No built‑in dual‑fuel capability; conversion to LNG or methanol requires substantial redesign.
  • Higher lube‑oil consumption due to two‑stroke scavenging process.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Suezmax TankerProduct TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (>150 kDWT)Ultra‑large Container Ship (in older builds)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine with high power at very low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion and you value fuel flexibility and straightforward maintenance. Avoid if your vessel must meet IMO Tier III NOx limits or requires dual‑fuel (LNG/methanol) capability without major retrofits, or if space and weight constraints are critical.
Use Cases: The 5S50MC-C is typically installed in large oil tankers and bulk carriers built from the early 2000s onward, where its low rpm matches large-diameter propellers for efficient cruising. It is also selected for life‑extension projects on existing vessels that already operate a B&W two‑stroke fleet.
B&W (legacy) 6S50MC-C
6S50MC-C unverified
· 9300.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
9300
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48%) reduces fuel consumption per kW·h.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in VLCCs and bulk carriers.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Modular construction allows relatively quick overhauls and parts replacement.
  • Extensive global support network from MAN B&W.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with space constraints.
  • Lower specific power compared with medium‑speed engines, requiring larger engine rooms.
  • Higher capital cost and longer lead time for procurement.
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of the crosshead arrangement.
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (SCR/ESOx) to meet current IMO Tier II/III limits.
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerAframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≈20,000 TEU)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) retrofits
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Classification Society Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with a long service record for large bulk or tanker vessels and value fuel flexibility. Avoid if vessel design is constrained by space/weight, you require higher shaft speed, or you must meet the strictest emission standards without installing after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 6S50MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships, where its low rpm matches directly coupled fixed‑pitch propellers and provides excellent fuel economy over long voyages.
7S50MC-C unverified
· 10850.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
10850
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~10.8 MW) suitable for very large vessels
  • Proven reliability from decades of service in B&W legacy fleet
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low rpm (127) enables direct‑drive to the propeller, reducing gear losses
  • Robust crosshead design reduces piston wear and extends overhaul intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in space‑constrained ships
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke designs
  • Maintenance complexity due to side rods, crosshead bearing and large pistons
  • May require additional NOx after‑treatment to meet the latest emission tiers
  • Lower part‑load efficiency relative to modern low‑speed dual‑fuel engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge container ship (>9,000 TEU) where direct drive is preferred
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, proven low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility and can accommodate its size and weight. Avoid if vessel space is limited, ultra‑low NOx emissions are mandatory without after‑treatment, or a dual‑fuel solution offers better part‑load efficiency for your trade.
Use Cases: The 7S50MC-C is typically installed on long‑haul oil tankers (VLCC, Suezmax) and large bulk carriers where direct‑drive propulsion and robust, low‑maintenance operation are critical. It also appears in some high‑capacity container vessels that favour a single low‑speed engine for fuel economy over long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 8S50MC-C
8S50MC-C unverified
· 12400.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
12400
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power output in a compact footprint for its class
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history on bulk carriers and tankers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Advanced electronic control (C‑type) improves fuel efficiency and reduces emissions compared with earlier B&W models
  • Direct integration with common classification society standards for slow‑speed engines
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than some newer dual‑fuel or four‑stroke alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of a crosshead two‑stroke system
  • NOx emissions meet IMO Tier II but may need additional after‑treatment to satisfy stricter Tier III zones
  • Limited suitability for vessels that demand very low vibration or ultra‑quiet operation
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankersProduct and chemical tankersDry bulk carriers (Handymax to Capesize)Large container ships (up to ~10,000 TEU)Cruise liners and passenger vessels of comparable power class
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier IIDNV GL classification approval for low‑speed two‑stroke engines
Decision Guide: Choose the 8S50MC-C if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible slow‑speed engine with a long track record of reliability on large bulk or tanker vessels and your operating profile fits IMO Tier II emissions limits. Avoid it if you require Tier III NOx compliance without additional after‑treatment, dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, or a smaller, lighter propulsion package for high‑speed applications.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ocean‑going bulk carriers and tankers of 30–150 kDWT, providing efficient low‑rpm drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller. It is also used on some large container ships and cruise vessels where slow‑speed diesel propulsion remains the industry standard.
9S50MC-C unverified
· 13950.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
13950
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm reduces vibration and propeller cavitation
  • Electronic MC‑C fuel injection provides fine load control and better fuel efficiency
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers (30+ years service history)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or gas turbine options
  • Requires skilled engineering crew for electronic control tuning and maintenance
  • NOx emissions are higher than modern low‑speed dual‑fuel engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Long start‑up time; not suited to vessels needing rapid power changes
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≥10,000 TEU)Heavy Lift Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate for Marine Diesel Engines (TC‑ME)DNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large deadweight vessels where fuel flexibility and long‑term reliability outweigh space and initial cost concerns. Avoid if the vessel is size‑constrained, requires rapid start‑up, or aims to meet the strictest NOx limits with dual‑fuel gas operation.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on long‑haul crude oil tankers, product carriers, and bulk carriers operating on global routes; also fitted in some large container ships where a single low‑speed engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller for fuel‑efficient cruising.
B&W (legacy) 10S50MC-C
10S50MC-C unverified
· 15500.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
15500
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm reduces vibration and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Proven B&W reliability with a long service history in bulk carriers and tankers.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Compact L‑layout saves engine room space compared with traditional inline arrangements.
Weaknesses
  • 2‑stroke operation generates higher NOx/SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment.
  • Large physical size and weight demand robust foundations and handling equipment.
  • Requires skilled crew for start‑up, monitoring and regular crosshead maintenance.
  • Initial capital cost is higher than many medium‑speed alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerHandymax / Supramax Bulk CarrierProduct TankerMid‑size Container Ship (8–12k TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque, fuel flexibility and a compact footprint for medium‑large vessels. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions are mandatory without additional after‑treatment or if budget constraints favour higher‑speed, lower‑cost engines.
Use Cases: The 10S50MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild Aframax tankers, Handymax bulk carriers and similar vessels where a balance of power (≈15 MW), space efficiency and long‑term reliability is required. It is also used in some product tankers and mid‑size container ships that benefit from low rpm operation.
B&W (legacy) 11S50MC-C
11S50MC-C unverified
· 17050.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
17050
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈17 MW) suitable for VLCCs and capesize bulk carriers
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the global fleet
  • Flexible fuel capability – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil, or low‑sulphur blends
  • Electronic control (MC‑C) provides better fuel metering and lower emissions than older mechanical versions
  • Modular construction simplifies on‑site installation and major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and heavy weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Higher specific fuel consumption compared with newer ME‑GI or X‑engine families
  • Initial capital cost is significant; spare‑parts logistics can be challenging in remote ports
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than some modern low‑speed designs, requiring robust isolation
  • Older design may lack integrated exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS) provisions, needing retrofits for IMO Tier III compliance
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise liner (high‑power variants)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large vessels and value fuel flexibility and established support networks. Avoid if space is at a premium, you require the absolute lowest specific fuel consumption, or you prefer the latest low‑emission designs with integrated EGCS.
Use Cases: The 11S50MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large tankers, capesize bulk carriers and large container ships, where its 17 MW output matches the thrust requirements for speeds around 13–15 knots. It is also used in some cruise vessels that demand high sustained power and benefit from its fuel‑type versatility.
B&W (legacy) 12S50MC-C
12S50MC-C unverified
· 18600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
18600
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density at very low rpm enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul vessels; long service intervals (up to 12 000 hrs)
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or blends
  • Good part‑load efficiency compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint on large ships
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost than medium‑speed engines of similar power
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with frequent rapid load changes
  • Requires highly skilled crew for operation, maintenance and troubleshooting
  • May need additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the latest NOx limits
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerULCC tankerProduct tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Very large container ship (rare, but possible)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on long‑haul tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and proven reliability. Avoid if the vessel operates with frequent rapid load changes, has severe space constraints, or must meet stringent NOx limits without installing after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 12S50MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, product tankers and bulk carriers that run long voyages at constant speeds. Its low rpm allows direct coupling to a large-diameter propeller, maximizing thrust efficiency for heavy cargo transport.
B&W (legacy) 14S50MC-C
14S50MC-C unverified
· 21700.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S50MC-C
Bore (mm)
500
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
21700
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder with excellent specific fuel consumption
  • Robust construction tolerates heavy fuel oil (HFO) and MDO without extensive pretreatment
  • Direct‑drive low rpm eliminates the need for reduction gearing, improving overall efficiency
  • Proven track record of reliability on VLCCs and large bulk carriers
  • Long service intervals and well‑established maintenance procedures
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or Tier III‑compliant engines
  • Slower start‑up and warm‑up times than newer 4‑stroke designs
  • Limited flexibility for low‑sulphur fuel without after‑treatment upgrades
  • Higher capital cost for retrofits when replacing older slower‑speed units
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerULCV Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≥10,000 TEU)Cruise Ship (mid‑size) Heavy‑load Ro‑Ro vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine that can run on heavy fuel oil with low rpm direct drive and you have ample engine‑room space. Avoid if strict Tier III emission limits, dual‑fuel capability, or compact installation footprints are required.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where fuel cost optimisation and reliability outweigh the need for the latest emissions technology; also common in replacement programs for legacy vessels seeking a like‑for‑like engine swap.
B&W (legacy) 4L42MC
4L42MC unverified
· 3920.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
3920
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke designs (~48 % at design load)
  • Proven reliability and long service life in B&W legacy fleet
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil
  • Compact power density for the 4‑cylinder layout, suitable for vessels around 5 000–10 000 dwt
  • Straightforward mechanical maintenance; many spare parts still stocked by B&W
Weaknesses
  • Older control system – may require retrofit for modern emission regulations (e.g., NOx Tier III)
  • Limited maximum power compared with larger B&W families, restricting use to mid‑size ships
  • Four‑cylinder configuration can produce higher vibration levels than multi‑cylinder alternatives
  • Spare‑parts availability gradually decreasing as the legacy line is phased out
  • Specific fuel consumption slightly higher than newer electronically controlled engines (e.g., MAN ME‑GI, Wärtsilä 31)
Typical Vessels: Handymax bulk carrierProduct tanker (10 000 dwt class)Feeder container shipOffshore supply vesselMedium‑size cruise or ferry
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV Classification Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine with good fuel flexibility for vessels in the 3.5–5 MW range and want to leverage existing B&W fleet commonality. Avoid if your vessel requires the latest Tier III NOx compliance without major retrofits, higher power output, or the lowest possible specific fuel consumption offered by newer electronic engines.
Use Cases: The 4L42MC is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑size bulk carriers and product tankers operating regional routes, as well as on offshore support vessels where a compact yet robust engine is required. It also serves in dual‑fuel configurations when retrofitted with emission‑control kits for stricter environmental zones.
5L42MC unverified
· 4900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
4900
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven mechanical reliability with decades of service history
  • Robust construction tolerates heavy‑fuel oil (HFO) and MDO without extensive pretreatment
  • Simple mechanical control system reduces electronic complexity and maintenance training
  • High torque at low rpm provides good propeller efficiency for slow‑speed vessels
  • Wide global support network from MAN B&W and major classification societies
Weaknesses
  • Higher specific fuel consumption compared with modern electronically controlled engines (e.g., ME‑series)
  • Larger footprint and weight per kW, limiting installation space on very small hulls
  • Limited NOx emission performance; Tier III compliance requires after‑treatment retrofits
  • Slower load response due to mechanical governor, less suited for fast‑changing power demands
  • Power range limited to ~5 MW; not appropriate for larger vessels requiring >10 MW
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (up to ~30 k DWT)Offshore supply vesselCoastal container shipSmall cruise ferryGeneral cargo vessel
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLloyd's Register class approvalIMO Type Approval for marine diesel engines (Category 2 NOx)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a rugged, low‑speed engine that can run on heavy fuel oil, have limited budget for electronic control systems, and operate vessels in the 4–6 MW power range where proven reliability outweighs fuel‑efficiency gains. Avoid if you require the highest fuel efficiency, Tier III NOx compliance without retrofit, or power output well above 7 MW.
Use Cases: The 5L42MC is commonly installed on product tankers of 20–30 k DWT, offshore supply vessels, and small coastal container ships where its low‑speed torque matches large‑diameter propellers. It also appears in cruise ferries and general cargo ships that value mechanical simplicity and the ability to burn high‑sulphur HFO.
B&W (legacy) 6L42MC
6L42MC unverified
· 5880.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
5880
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven B&W reliability with long service intervals
  • Low‑speed operation provides high torque and allows direct drive without reduction gear
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO) reduces operating cost
  • Simple crosshead construction eases routine maintenance
  • Good part‑load efficiency for typical bulk carrier routes
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Lower specific power compared with newer medium‑speed engines; may be over‑sized for some applications
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (SCR/EGC)
  • Longer start‑up time due to large cylinder volume
  • Spare‑parts inventory can be costly
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierAframax TankerLR2 Product TankerMid‑size Container Ship
Certifications: DNVABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a robust, low‑speed engine with high torque for direct‑drive propulsion on bulk carriers or tankers and value fuel flexibility. Avoid if vessel size constraints, higher specific power density, or ultra‑low emission requirements without additional after‑treatment are primary concerns.
Use Cases: Widely installed in Handymax to Panamax bulk carriers, Aframax and LR2 product tankers, and mid‑size container vessels where a reliable low‑speed engine with direct drive is preferred for long voyages and heavy cargo loads.
7L42MC unverified
· 6860.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
6860
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with a compact L‑configuration suitable for medium‑size vessels.
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from decades of operational history.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends bearing life.
  • Well‑established spare‑parts network for B&W legacy engines.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight compared with newer dual‑fuel or electronically controlled units.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (scrubbers, selective catalytic reduction).
  • Mechanical complexity leads to more intensive maintenance than modern low‑speed two‑stroke engines.
  • Limited RPM range – not suited for vessels requiring variable speed operation.
  • May not meet the latest IMO Tier III standards without additional exhaust cleaning systems.
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierHandymax Container ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine with strong fuel flexibility and existing fleet commonality; especially suitable for retrofits or new builds where space allows the L‑configuration. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, compact installation envelope, or dual‑fuel capability are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The 7L42MC is commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑size tankers and bulk carriers built from the late 1990s onward, as well as on some container ships where a single engine of ~7 MW meets speed and power demands. It is also favoured for vessels undergoing life‑extension programmes because spare parts and technical support are readily available.
8L42MC unverified
· 7840.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
7840
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~48% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs
  • Fuel flexible – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies maintenance and improves reliability
  • Proven worldwide service record in bulk carriers, tankers and feeder vessels
  • Good part‑load performance, suitable for variable speed profiles
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on space‑constrained ships
  • Low maximum rpm (150 rpm) requires a reduction gear, adding cost and complexity
  • Higher NOx emissions at low load may need SCR or other after‑treatment to meet IMO Tier III
  • Higher initial capital outlay compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance regime
Typical Vessels: Handymax Bulk CarrierProduct TankerFeeder Container ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a reliable ~8 MW low‑speed engine with proven fuel flexibility for medium‑size bulk carriers, product tankers or feeder vessels and have sufficient installation space. Avoid if vessel size constraints, higher speed requirements, or strict Tier III NOx limits without planned after‑treatment make a smaller, faster or newer emission‑controlled engine more appropriate.
Use Cases: The 8L42MC is typically installed in ships of 30–45 kDWT such as Handymax bulk carriers, product tankers and feeder container ships operating on long voyages where fuel efficiency and durability are paramount. It is also used in some offshore supply vessels that benefit from its low‑speed operation and robust design.
B&W (legacy) 9L42MC
9L42MC unverified
· 8820.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
8820
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency and good part‑load fuel consumption thanks to the large bore‑stroke ratio.
  • Proven reliability of B&W’s L‑series family with extensive service history worldwide.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends bearing life.
  • Integrated electronic control system (MEG) simplifies monitoring and optimisation.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Low operating speed (150 rpm) necessitates a large-diameter, slow‑turning propeller or reduction gearing.
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer high‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Maintenance of crosshead bearings can be labour‑intensive at overhaul intervals.
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning systems to meet Tier III emission limits in Emission Control Areas.
Typical Vessels: Aframax / Suezmax tankerHandymax bulk carrierMid‑size container ship (≈5 000–8 000 TEU)General cargo vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine with strong part‑load efficiency and are willing to allocate the required space and capital. Avoid if ship design is constrained by weight/volume, or if ultra‑low emissions are mandatory without installing after‑treatment equipment.
Use Cases: The 9L42MC is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑to‑large commercial vessels where reliability and fuel flexibility outweigh size penalties – e.g., Aframax tankers, Handymax bulk carriers, and mid‑size container ships operating on long voyages with access to HFO.
10L42MC unverified
· 9800.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
9800
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50%) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low operating speed enables direct‑drive to the propeller, eliminating a reduction gear
  • Proven B&W reliability with extensive global support network
  • Compatible with IMO type approval and standard classification societies
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with frequent load changes
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and regular overhauls
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber) or selective catalytic reduction to meet the latest emission limits
Typical Vessels: Product tankerSmall to medium bulk carrierFeeder container shipLPG/LNG carrier (mid‑size)Ro‑Ro vessel (large)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on vessels with long range and fuel‑flexibility requirements. Avoid if the ship has limited engine‑room volume, requires rapid load changes, or must meet the strictest NOx/EURO emission standards without additional after‑treatment equipment.
Use Cases: The 10L42MC is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on product tankers (~30 000–50 000 dwt), midsize bulk carriers and feeder container ships, where its efficiency and direct‑drive capability provide operational cost savings over long transoceanic routes.
11L42MC unverified
· 10780.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
10780
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈10.8 MW) at very low rpm enables efficient direct‑drive to the propeller.
  • Proven B&W legacy reliability with long service intervals and extensive field experience.
  • Crosshead design separates piston motion from crankcase, reducing cylinder wear and allowing use of heavy fuel oil.
  • Good specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) for its power class, contributing to lower operating costs.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO as well as marine diesel oil.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine‑room space.
  • Higher capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled or hybrid propulsion solutions.
  • Maintenance requires skilled personnel; the crosshead lubrication system adds complexity.
  • May need additional NOx after‑treatment to meet strict Tier III emission standards.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Large container ship (≥8,000 TEU)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability and the ability to burn heavy fuel oil on large vessels where space permits. Avoid if vessel size is constrained, emissions limits are stricter than Tier II without planned after‑treatment, or if capital cost and maintenance complexity are primary concerns.
Use Cases: Main propulsion for long‑haul tankers, bulk carriers and large container ships where fuel efficiency, robustness and the ability to use low‑cost heavy fuel oil are paramount. Often selected for new builds requiring direct‑drive low‑speed engines.
12L42MC unverified
· 11760.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
11760
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm, ideal for directly driving large slow‑turning propellers
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker and bulk carrier fleets
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good part‑load efficiency compared with many high‑speed engines
  • Established global support network from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern dual‑fuel or low‑pressure common‑rail designs
  • Complex cylinder lubrication system adds maintenance workload
  • Longer start‑up time and slower response to rapid load changes
  • Less suited to vessels subject to the latest IMO Tier III emission limits without after‑treatment
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>8,000 TEU)Supramax/Handymax bulk carriers
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine that runs on HFO/MDO and can directly drive a large low‑rpm propeller in very large tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid if the vessel must meet strict Tier III NOx limits, has limited engine‑room volume, or if fuel flexibility toward LNG/dual‑fuel is required.
Use Cases: The 12L42MC is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and Suezmax tankers built from the late 1990s onward, as well as on large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships where a low‑speed engine provides optimal propeller efficiency. It is also favoured for retrofits of older vessels that already have B&W support infrastructure.
14L42MC unverified
· 13720.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
L42MC
Bore (mm)
420
Stroke (mm)
1764
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
13720
Speed (rpm)
150
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈13.7 MW) with proven B&W reliability record
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh) reduces operating cost
  • Flexible fuel capability – can run on HFO and MDO without major modifications
  • Robust crosshead construction provides long bearing life and easy maintenance access
  • Integrated electronic control system (MEG) enables precise monitoring and optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and heavy weight limit installation in space‑constrained hulls
  • Fixed low rpm (150 rpm) requires a reduction gear, adding cost and complexity
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular overhauls typical of crosshead engines
  • Longer start‑up time and warm‑up period than faster‑running engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)Ultra‑large container ship (10 000+ TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL ClassificationABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large carriers where fuel efficiency and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if higher rpm flexibility (e.g., for gas‑fuel or hybrid concepts) is required.
Use Cases: The 14L42MC is typically installed on new‑build VLCCs, Aframax tankers and large bulk carriers constructed from the early 2000s onward. It powers ships that operate long voyages with heavy fuel oil availability, where low operating cost and engine durability are critical.
B&W (legacy) 4S35MC-C
4S35MC-C unverified
· 2800.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead medium-speed diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
2800
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – ~2800 kW from a compact four‑cylinder layout
  • Proven reliability and long service life of the B&W S35MC family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low operating speed (170 rpm) reduces vibration and wear on gearboxes
  • Well‑established global support network and spare parts availability
Weaknesses
  • Larger physical footprint compared with modern dual‑fuel engines of similar output
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment, making compliance with the latest Tier III standards more costly
  • Crosshead design requires more routine maintenance (e.g., piston rod and bearing inspections)
  • Limited scalability – four cylinders restrict maximum power per unit
  • Older emission control technology; may need retrofits for stricter environmental regulations
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (5 000–8 000 dwt)Offshore supply vesselCoastal container shipRo‑Ro ferrySmall bulk carrier
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible medium‑speed engine for vessels up to roughly 10 000 dwt with strong after‑sales support. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions dual‑fuel capability or higher power density per cylinder is required.
Use Cases: Commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on product carriers and offshore support ships operating in regional trades, where reliability and fuel flexibility outweigh the need for the latest emission‑reduction technology.
5S35MC-C unverified
· 3500.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
3500
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific torque enables direct drive of a single propeller without reduction gear
  • Fuel flexible – can run on HFO or MDO with good efficiency
  • Proven B&W reliability and long service life in the S35 family
  • Compact inline (L) layout saves engine‑room space compared to V‑type units
  • Low operating speed reduces wear on propeller bearings and improves cavitation performance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull accommodation
  • Crosshead design adds complexity to lubrication and oil‑cooling systems, increasing maintenance effort
  • Maximum output (3 500 kW) may be insufficient for larger vessels that need higher shaft power
  • Without after‑treatment, the engine does not meet IMO Tier III NOx limits in Emission Control Areas
  • Spare‑parts inventory is specific to B&W legacy models, which can be costly
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (10–30 k dwt)Chemical tankerSmall bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselRo‑Ro/Passenger ferry (mid‑size)
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a reliable low‑speed engine around 3.5 MW with high torque, limited hull space and fuel flexibility for HFO/MDO. Avoid if the vessel requires higher power, must meet IMO Tier III NOx limits without SCR, or if maintenance resources for crosshead systems are constrained.
Use Cases: The 5S35MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑size product and chemical tankers, where its low rpm matches large‑diameter slow‑turning propellers. It also appears in offshore supply ships that benefit from its fuel flexibility and robust design for long voyages.
6S35MC-C unverified
· 4200.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
4200
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven B&W legacy design with extensive global support and spare parts network
  • Crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • High torque at low rpm simplifies reduction gearing and improves propeller efficiency
  • Flexibility to run on HFO or MDO without major modifications
  • Modular cylinder arrangement allows relatively straightforward maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or electronically controlled engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Larger physical footprint and weight than newer compact medium‑speed units
  • Mechanical complexity (crosshead, side rods) leads to higher routine maintenance workload
  • Part‑load fuel consumption is less optimal than contemporary electronically controlled designs
  • Limited compliance with IMO Tier III without additional exhaust gas cleaning systems
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersProduct tankers (10–30 k DWT)Feeder container shipsOffshore supply vessels
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a robust, low‑speed engine with proven reliability and existing B&W support infrastructure, especially for vessels that can accommodate HFO operation. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, dual‑fuel capability, or minimal maintenance footprint are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The 6S35MC-C is commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on mid‑size cargo ships such as bulk carriers and product tankers where a low‑speed engine provides efficient direct drive of large propellers. It also appears in offshore supply vessels that benefit from its high torque at low rpm.
B&W (legacy) 7S35MC-C
7S35MC-C unverified
· 4900.0 kW · medium‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
4900
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – ~4.9 MW from a relatively small footprint (L‑config).
  • Proven B&W reliability and global support network.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil.
  • Low operating speed (170 rpm) reduces vibration and propeller cavitation.
  • Straight‑through exhaust flow simplifies integration of after‑treatment systems.
Weaknesses
  • 2‑stroke crosshead design requires more frequent cylinder liner and bearing inspections than slow‑speed four‑stroke engines.
  • Base emission performance may need retrofits (e.g., SCR, scrubber) to meet IMO Tier II/III standards.
  • Maximum output (~5 MW) limits use on larger vessels that require higher shaft power.
  • Higher specific fuel consumption compared with modern low‑speed designs of similar rating.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerChemical tankerSmall bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselResearch vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need ~5 MW of shaft power, have limited engine‑room space and value B&W’s global service support; the vessel operates in regions where IMO Tier II compliance can be achieved with optional after‑treatment. Avoid if: higher power (>8 MW) is required, or the ship must meet strict Tier III NOx limits without major retrofits.
Use Cases: The 7S35MC-C is commonly installed on product and chemical tankers of 15–30 kt deadweight, small bulk carriers around 20 000 dwt, and offshore supply vessels where a compact yet robust engine is needed for moderate speed service.
8S35MC-C unverified
· 5600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
5600
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 5600 kW from a relatively compact eight‑cylinder package.
  • Fuel flexibility – approved for heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil, easing bunkering options.
  • Low operating speed (170 rpm) enables direct‑drive to the propeller without reduction gearing, improving overall efficiency.
  • Proven reliability of the B&W S35 family with decades of service worldwide.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and limits piston‑rod stresses.
Weaknesses
  • Two‑stroke cycle generates higher NOx and particulate emissions than comparable four‑stroke engines; may require additional after‑treatment to meet strict emission caps.
  • Higher routine maintenance (lube oil system, scavenging pumps) compared with modern four‑stroke designs.
  • Limited maximum output (~5.6 MW); not suitable for very large vessels that need >10 MW per shaft.
  • Larger cylinder dimensions result in higher dry weight than an equivalent four‑stroke unit.
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersProduct tankers (up to ~30 k DWT)Container feeder shipsOffshore supply vesselsRo‑Ro ferries and cruise ferries
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible medium‑speed engine with direct‑drive capability for vessels in the 5–10 MW power range and value long‑term reliability. Avoid if your vessel must meet the strictest NOx/PM emission limits without additional after‑treatment, or if you require higher shaft power than the 8S35MC‑C can provide.
Use Cases: The 8S35MC-C is commonly installed on mid‑size bulk carriers and product tankers where a single low‑speed engine drives the propeller directly, as well as on feeder container ships and offshore supply vessels that benefit from its compact length and fuel flexibility. Operators often select it for routes with mixed bunkering infrastructure because it can run on both HFO and MDO.
B&W (legacy) 9S35MC-C
9S35MC-C unverified
· 6300.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
6300
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven reliability and long service life in worldwide fleet operations
  • High thermal efficiency with low specific fuel consumption for HFO/MDO
  • Robust crosshead design minimises cylinder‑liner wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • L‑configuration provides a relatively compact footprint for a 9‑cylinder engine
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or blended fuels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on smaller vessels or tight engine rooms
  • Lower power density compared with newer dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke designs
  • Requires exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber) to meet current NOx/SOx limits in many emission control areas
  • Long warm‑up time before reaching rated speed, affecting maneuverability in short‑notice operations
  • Maintenance of the crosshead and side bearings can be labour intensive
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (8 000+ TEU)Supramax/Handymax bulk carriers
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine with excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to run heavy fuel oil on large cargo vessels where space permits an L‑layout. Avoid if vessel size constraints, stricter emissions without additional after‑treatment, or a requirement for higher power density favor newer dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke platforms.
Use Cases: The 9S35MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build and retrofitted large tankers and bulk carriers built from the late 1990s onward. It is also used in some high‑capacity container ships where operators value its durability and fuel flexibility for long‑haul routes.
10S35MC-C unverified
· 7000.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
7000
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~48–50% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs.
  • Proven reliability with a long service record in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors.
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies on‑board maintenance and overhauls.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications.
  • Good part‑load performance, suitable for variable speed operations.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled engines.
  • Requires skilled crew for optimal tuning and maintenance of the mechanical governor system.
  • Less emissions‑optimised than modern ME‑type electronic engines (e.g., NOx reduction).
  • Longer start‑up time due to low‑speed nature.
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerAframax tankerHandymax bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑efficiency low‑speed engine for large oil or dry cargo vessels and have the space and crew expertise to support it. Avoid if: you prioritize lower capital cost, compact size, or the latest electronic emission control technologies.
Use Cases: The 10S35MC-C is typically installed in the main engine room of very large crude carriers (VLCCs), Aframax tankers, and midsize bulk carriers where its 7 MW output matches propulsion requirements. It is favored on routes where fuel cost savings from high efficiency outweigh the larger initial investment.
11S35MC-C unverified
· 7700.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
7700
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm, ideal for direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Proven reliability with decades of operational history on B&W‑type vessels
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) and good fuel‑oil consumption rates for its size class
  • Extensive global after‑sales support network from MAN Energy Solutions (B&W legacy)
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts logistics
Weaknesses
  • Older two‑stroke architecture produces higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with exhaust treatment
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation in vessels with space constraints
  • Limited rpm range reduces flexibility for variable‑speed applications or hybrid propulsion concepts
  • May require retrofitting of modern electronic control systems to meet current emission regulations
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel low‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierHandymax bulk carrierVLCC (in retro‑fit applications)Large container ship (>8 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed, high‑power engine with broad fuel flexibility and strong OEM support for large bulk carriers or tankers. Avoid if your project prioritises the lowest possible emissions, requires dual‑fuel capability out of the box, or has severe space/weight constraints that favour more compact medium‑speed units.
Use Cases: The 11S35MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on deep‑sea bulk carriers and product tankers where a direct‑drive low‑speed configuration maximises propulsive efficiency. It also appears in some large container vessels that operate at constant service speeds, providing reliable power for long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 12S35MC-C
12S35MC-C unverified
· 8400.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
8400
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct‑drive to a large propeller without reduction gear.
  • Proven B&W legacy reliability; typical overhaul intervals exceed 10 000 operating hours.
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) reduces bunkering constraints on long voyages.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~176 g/kWh) improves operating economics.
  • Crosshead design separates cylinder lubrication from crankcase, simplifying maintenance.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine‑room volume and structural support.
  • Slow‑speed operation limits rapid speed changes; not ideal for vessels requiring high maneuverability.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance discipline to avoid wear.
  • No built‑in dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, limiting use of ultra‑low‑sulfur or gas fuels without conversion.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (UFC class)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (MEPC)DNV Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large bulk or tanker vessels where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if the ship requires fast speed changes, has tight space/weight limits, or must run on dual‑fuel (LNG) without retrofitting.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, capesize bulk carriers and other deep‑sea cargo vessels where direct‑drive low‑speed engines provide optimal efficiency and long service intervals.
B&W (legacy) 14S35MC-C
14S35MC-C unverified
· 9800.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S35MC-C
Bore (mm)
350
Stroke (mm)
1400
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
9800
Speed (rpm)
170
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50% at ISO conditions) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals and extensive field experience.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Strong part‑load performance, suitable for sustained cruising speeds.
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies cylinder liner wear management.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or after‑treated engines.
  • Slower acceleration/start‑up response than medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires highly skilled crew for operation, monitoring and maintenance.
  • High capital cost relative to newer low‑emission engine families.
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerProduct tankerBulk carrier (Handymax and larger)Container ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high power (~10 MW) at low rpm for long‑haul vessels, value fuel flexibility and a proven track record, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if strict NOx/Tier III emission limits apply without retrofit options, space is limited, or rapid maneuverability/start‑up is critical.
Use Cases: The 14S35MC-C is typically installed in large crude oil carriers, product tankers, bulk carriers over 50 000 DWT and high‑capacity container ships where low‑speed propulsion offers fuel savings on long voyages. It is favored by operators seeking a durable engine with extensive support infrastructure.
B&W (legacy) 4S26MC
4S26MC unverified
· 1720.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
1720
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at low rpm provides excellent propulsive efficiency for slow‑stepping vessels.
  • Proven B&W reliability with a long service history in coastal tankers and offshore support ships.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil, reducing bunker cost options.
  • Compact L‑configuration fits tighter engine rooms compared with larger V‑type low‑speed units.
  • Crosshead design separates piston forces from the crankcase, simplifying lubrication and extending bearing life.
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern dual‑fuel or four‑stroke low‑speed engines; may need after‑treatment to meet Tier II/III limits.
  • Physical size and weight are relatively large for the power output, limiting use on very small vessels.
  • Limited maximum rpm (250 rpm) restricts suitability for high‑speed applications.
  • Requires a robust lubrication system and regular crosshead maintenance, increasing operational cost.
  • Older design may lack integrated electronic control systems found on newer engines.
Typical Vessels: Coastal TankerProduct CarrierOffshore Supply VesselFerrySmall Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate (Marine Diesel Engine)DNV Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque, fuel flexibility and compact L‑layout for vessels up to ~5 000 dwt. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, very high speed, or extreme space constraints are primary requirements.
Use Cases: Commonly installed in coastal product tankers (2 000–5 000 dwt), offshore support vessels, ferries and small bulk carriers where a reliable low‑speed engine is preferred and bunker flexibility is valuable.
5S26MC unverified
· 2150.0 kW · low‑speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
2150
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed engines (≈45% LHV)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and allows use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven B&W legacy reliability with extensive global support network
  • Relatively compact power density for a low‑speed engine, fitting mid‑size vessel engine rooms
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high deadweight compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes, limiting suitability for high‑speed service
  • Higher upfront capital cost and longer lead times for spare parts
  • Requires skilled maintenance crew familiar with crosshead mechanics
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (10–30 kt)Chemical tankerSmall bulk carrier (15–35 kt)Offshore supply vesselFeeder container ship
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with good fuel flexibility and high efficiency for vessels in the 2 MW power class where space permits a larger engine room. Avoid if vessel design demands high speed, rapid load changes, or very tight hull‑space constraints.
Use Cases: The 5S26MC is commonly installed on product and chemical tankers of 10–30 kt deadweight, small bulk carriers, offshore support vessels and feeder container ships where a reliable low‑speed propulsion plant is preferred for long voyages and fuel cost optimisation.
B&W (legacy) 6S26MC
6S26MC unverified
· 2580.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
2580
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency and low specific fuel consumption for its power class
  • Proven reliability with a long service history across many operators
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO) provides operational flexibility and fuel cost optimisation
  • Compact L‑configuration fits vessels with limited engine room space
  • Extensive global support network from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Older design lacks integrated electronic control and advanced NOx reduction features
  • Crosshead wear requires regular overhauls, increasing maintenance intervals compared with newer engines
  • Higher emissions (NOx, SOx) unless fitted with after‑treatment systems
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable modern 4‑stroke or electronically controlled units
  • Limited compliance with IMO Tier III without additional exhaust treatment
Typical Vessels: Handymax bulk carrierProduct tankerFeeder container shipOffshore supply vesselGeneral cargo ship
Certifications: DNVIMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible engine for medium‑size vessels and value an established maintenance network. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, highest power density, or the latest electronic control systems are mandatory.
Use Cases: The 6S26MC is commonly installed in handysize bulk carriers, product tankers and feeder container ships where its L‑layout fits the engine room and dual‑fuel operation helps manage fuel costs on regional routes. It also appears in offshore support vessels that require a robust, well‑known power plant.
7S26MC unverified
· 3010.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
3010
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history and extensive spare‑part availability
  • Low operating speed (250 rpm) enables direct drive to the propeller, reducing gearbox weight and losses
  • Crosshead design separates piston thrust from connecting‑rod forces, extending cylinder life and lowering wear
  • Good part‑load efficiency suitable for vessels with variable speed profiles
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
Weaknesses
  • Older mechanical control system compared with modern electronically controlled engines, limiting fine fuel optimisation
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment packages to meet IMO Tier III standards
  • Larger physical footprint and heavier than newer compact designs, affecting hull space allocation
  • Limited cylinder count (7) reduces redundancy compared with 8‑ or 9‑cylinder variants on larger ships
  • May require retrofits (e.g., exhaust gas cleaning systems) to comply with the latest emission regulations
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (10 000–30 000 DWT)Small bulk carrierFeeder container shipOffshore supply vesselMultipurpose cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a rugged, well‑known engine with direct‑drive capability and an established support network for mid‑size vessels. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions (IMO Tier III) or the latest electronic fuel‑control features are mandatory for your operation.
Use Cases: The 7S26MC is typically installed on medium‑sized tankers, bulk carriers and feeder container ships where reliability, direct drive efficiency and proven performance outweigh the need for the smallest possible footprint or the newest emission‑control technology. It also sees use in offshore support vessels that benefit from its robust crosshead construction.
8S26MC unverified
· 3440.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
3440
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct shaft drive without reduction gear
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals typical of legacy B&W designs
  • Robust construction tolerates heavy fuel oil (HFO) with minimal pretreatment
  • Simple mechanical control system – easier to maintain in remote shipyards
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight compared with newer electronically controlled engines
  • Higher specific fuel consumption than modern low‑speed MC‑type engines equipped with electronic fuel injection
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) exceed current Tier II limits unless fitted with after‑treatment (scrubber or selective catalytic reduction)
  • Limited flexibility in speed range – optimal performance only near design rpm
Typical Vessels: Bulk Carrier (30–70 kDWT)Product TankerChemical TankerGeneral Cargo Ship
Certifications: IMO Type Approval for low‑speed marine diesel enginesDNV Class notation (e.g., D-2, D-3) as per standard B&W engine certification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a rugged, proven low‑speed main engine that can run on heavy fuel oil and offers straightforward mechanical maintenance. Avoid if the vessel requires the latest emission standards without additional after‑treatment or if maximum fuel efficiency and flexible speed control are top priorities.
Use Cases: The 8S26MC is commonly installed in newbuild bulk carriers and tankers of 30–70 kDWT, as well as in retrofits of older vessels where a direct‑drive low‑speed engine is preferred for its durability and fuel flexibility. It is also used on some offshore supply vessels that operate at constant cruise speeds.
9S26MC unverified
· 3870.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
3870
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm enables direct drive of large propellers without reduction gear
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption for a 2‑stroke design
  • Extensive global spare‑parts network and support from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes
  • Requires a robust lubrication system and regular maintenance of crosshead bearings
  • Emissions are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) which adds complexity
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerBulk CarrierContainer Ship
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high continuous power at low rpm, proven long‑haul reliability and fuel flexibility for large bulk or tanker vessels. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, rapid load‑change capability is critical, or you require a low‑emission solution without additional after‑treatment equipment.
Use Cases: The 9S26MC is most often installed as the main propulsion unit on long‑range oil tankers and bulk carriers of roughly 10 000–30 000 dwt, providing direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller for efficient cruising over transoceanic routes.
10S26MC unverified
· 4300.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
4300
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at low rpm provides excellent propulsive efficiency for slow‑speed ships.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history and a global spare‑parts network.
  • Compact power‑to‑size ratio for a 10‑cylinder layout, fitting handysize bulk carriers and product tankers.
  • Long overhaul intervals typical of B&W crosshead designs.
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern low‑speed engines equipped with after‑treatment systems.
  • Crosshead arrangement adds mechanical complexity and requires a dedicated lube‑oil system.
  • Noise and vibration levels are greater than newer medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Limited maximum power per cylinder compared with larger‑bore, higher‑rpm designs.
  • Footprint still sizable for vessels where space is at a premium.
Typical Vessels: Handysize bulk carrierProduct tankerChemical tanker (small)Feeder container shipOffshore supply vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a rugged, well‑known engine with fuel flexibility and extensive support infrastructure on medium‑size cargo ships. Avoid if ultra‑low emissions, highest power density, or minimal vibration/noise are top priorities.
Use Cases: The 10S26MC is commonly installed in vessels built from the mid‑1990s to early 2000s for bulk transport, product oil carriage, and feeder container services where a reliable low‑speed engine of ~4 MW is required. It remains popular on retrofits and ships operating under flag states that accept traditional HFO fuel.
11S26MC unverified
· 4730.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
4730
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker and bulk carrier market
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with larger multi‑engine setups
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes
  • Low operating speed (250 rpm) lowers wear on bearings and gearboxes, extending service intervals
  • Modular construction simplifies overhaul and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine‑room space and structural support
  • Higher initial capital cost than some newer electronically controlled engines
  • Without after‑treatment (SCR/DSC) NOx emissions may exceed current Tier II limits in emission‑controlled areas
  • Older control system architecture can be less integrated with modern ship automation platforms
  • Requires significant cooling water flow and robust lubrication system
Typical Vessels: Product Tanker (15–30 k DWT)Chemical Tanker (10–25 k DWT)Bulk Carrier (20–35 k DWT)General Cargo ShipLNG Bunker Vessel (mid‑size)
Certifications: ABSDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, low‑speed engine for vessels in the 15–35 k DWT range with flexibility to burn HFO and you value straightforward maintenance. Avoid if: you operate primarily in NOx‑controlled emission control areas without planned after‑treatment, or you require the smallest possible engine room footprint for ultra‑large ships.
Use Cases: The 11S26MC is typically installed on mid‑size tankers and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed main engine provides efficient propulsion and fuel flexibility. It is also favoured in vessels that prioritize long service intervals and have established support networks for B&W engines.
B&W (legacy) 12S26MC
12S26MC unverified
· 5160.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
5160
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the bulk carrier and tanker fleets
  • Long intervals between overhauls thanks to robust crosshead design
  • Extensive global support network from MAN B&W
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Long warm‑up time compared with modern high‑speed or dual‑fuel engines
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of a two‑stroke crosshead unit
  • Not natively compatible with LNG or other low‑carbon fuels
Typical Vessels: Tanker (VLCC, Suezmax)Bulk Carrier (Capesize, Panamax)Container Ship (up to ~8 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval D‑2DNV Class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque for large cargo carriers, value fuel flexibility and have access to B&W service facilities. Avoid if your vessel requires LNG dual‑fuel capability, ultra‑low emissions without retrofitting, or has severe space constraints in the engine room.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newbuilds of tankers, bulk carriers and mid‑size container ships; also used for repowering projects where a reliable, high‑power low‑speed engine is required to replace older units.
14S26MC unverified
· 6020.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S26MC
Bore (mm)
260
Stroke (mm)
980
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
6020
Speed (rpm)
250
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50% at design point) resulting in low specific fuel consumption.
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or blends without major modifications.
  • Proven reliability on a wide range of long‑haul vessels; extensive global support network.
  • Good part‑load performance, suitable for variable speed operations.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand spacious engine rooms and strong foundations.
  • Long start‑up time compared with medium‑speed or diesel generators.
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR).
  • Initial capital cost higher than newer high‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular monitoring of crosshead wear.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerBulk CarrierContainer Ship (30–50 k DWT)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑efficiency low‑speed engine for large bulk or tanker vessels with flexible fuel options and long service intervals. Avoid if vessel size is limited, you require a compact power plant, or must meet ultra‑low emission limits without additional after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 14S26MC is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on long‑haul tankers (VLCC/Suezmax), bulk carriers and medium‑size container ships, providing reliable thrust for voyages of several thousand nautical miles while allowing operation on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel.
4K98MC-C unverified
· 22880.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
22880
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency and low specific fuel consumption typical of slow‑speed two‑stroke designs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • Proven track record in worldwide service with extensive spare‑parts network
  • Integrated electronic control system simplifies operation and monitoring
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and foundation structure
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives
  • Low maximum rpm (94 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding complexity and maintenance
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR or scrubber) to meet IMO Tier III
  • Crosshead seal maintenance can be labour‑intensive during overhauls
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerHandymax Bulk CarrierPanamax Container ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine with excellent specific fuel consumption for large commercial ships and have the hull space for its size. Avoid if vessel speed requirements favour higher‑rpm engines, weight/space are at a premium, or you prefer newer four‑stroke platforms that meet Tier III emissions without extensive after‑treatment.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on medium‑to‑large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships operating at service speeds of 13–15 knots, often coupled with reduction gears and auxiliary generators in a combined power plant layout.
B&W (legacy) 5K98MC-C
5K98MC-C unverified
· 28600.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
28600
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power suitable for VLCCs, bulk carriers and large container ships
  • Proven reliability of the K98 family with long service intervals
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Low rpm allows direct propeller drive without reduction gear, improving overall efficiency
  • Extensive global support network from MAN Energy Solutions (formerly B&W)
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and foundation
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Maintenance intensity is greater; cylinder liner changes are labour‑heavy
  • Less efficient at part‑load operation, leading to higher specific fuel consumption in variable speed service
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) for IMO Tier III
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerProduct TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Car Carrier (large class)
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for large, slow‑speed cargo vessels and value proven long‑term reliability with fuel flexibility. Avoid if vessel size is limited, fast‑speed operation or high maneuverability is required, or if you must meet the strictest emission limits without installing additional after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 5K98MC-C is typically installed on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, capesize bulk carriers and mega container ships where a single low‑speed engine can drive a large-diameter propeller directly. It is favored in routes with long sea legs where fuel economy at design speed is paramount.
B&W (legacy) 6K98MC-C
6K98MC-C unverified
· 34320.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
34320
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈34 MW) at a low shaft speed, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good specific fuel consumption for its power class, contributing to lower operating cost per mile
  • Long intervals between major overhauls due to robust crosshead design
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine‑room space
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with newer electronically controlled low‑speed engines unless fitted with after‑treatment systems
  • Slower transient response, limiting maneuverability in fast‑changing load conditions
  • Maintenance intensive – regular cylinder liner inspections and crosshead bearing servicing are required
  • Limited compatibility with the latest emission control area (ECA) regulations without additional scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerAframaxLarge Bulk Carrier (>150 k DWT)Very Large Container Ship (rare, only on older builds)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class notation for propulsion machinery
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and have existing infrastructure for HFO handling. Avoid if your priority is minimal emissions, compact engine‑room layout, or the latest electronic control features that enable rapid load changes.
Use Cases: The 6K98MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers, and is also a common choice for retrofitting older vessels seeking to maintain or increase power while retaining familiar maintenance practices.
B&W (legacy) 7K98MC-C
7K98MC-C unverified
· 40040.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
40040
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm package, allowing direct drive without reduction gear
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption and proven long‑term reliability on ultra‑large ships
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO) with robust lubrication system for extended service intervals
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies major overhauls and parts replacement
  • Widely accepted by classification societies, facilitating type approval and insurance
Weaknesses
  • Enormous physical size and weight restrict use to very large vessels
  • High capital cost and longer lead‑time compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Slower start‑up and shutdown cycles, limiting flexibility for frequent speed changes
  • Requires extensive auxiliary systems (lubrication, cooling, exhaust) increasing installation complexity
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment to meet Tier III standards
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15k TEU)Bulk Carrier (200k+ dwt)LNG Carrier (when configured for HFO/MDO)
Certifications: ABS Type ApprovalDNV GL Type ApprovalIMO NOx Tier II compliance (engine rating)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for ultra‑large vessels, value fuel efficiency and a proven track record, and can accommodate the engine’s size and capital cost. Avoid if vessel displacement is moderate, rapid speed changes are required, or budget constraints favour smaller medium‑speed units.
Use Cases: The 7K98MC-C powers the main shaft of VLCCs and ULCCs on long‑haul crude routes, drives large container ships on inter‑continental services, and is installed in high‑capacity bulk carriers and LNG carriers where direct‑drive low‑rpm propulsion maximises efficiency.
8K98MC-C unverified
· 45760.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead with electronic common‑rail fuel injection
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
45760
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output in a compact (low‑speed) footprint – suitable for VLCCs and large container ships
  • Electronic unit‑injector control provides better fuel efficiency and lower NOx/SOx emissions
  • Fuel flexibility – approved for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven B&W K‑series reliability with long service intervals
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication system reduces wear on crosshead bearings
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with older mechanically‑controlled engines
  • Requires skilled personnel for electronic fuel‑system maintenance and diagnostics
  • Limited to low rpm applications – not suitable for high‑speed vessels
  • Sensitivity of common‑rail system to poor‑quality fuel, demanding stricter fuel handling
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large Container Ship (>15,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (>150 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV Classification Society approvalABS classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for large, low‑speed vessels and must meet modern emission limits with electronic fuel control. Avoid if the vessel size is modest, budget constraints are tight, or you lack crew trained in advanced electronic engine systems.
Use Cases: The 8K98MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, ULCCs, large container ships and bulk carriers, where its high power density and fuel‑flexibility support long voyages at economical speeds while complying with IMO Tier III NOx requirements.
B&W (legacy) 9K98MC-C
9K98MC-C unverified
· 51480.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
51480
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific output – ~5.7 MW per cylinder enables compact installation on large vessels.
  • Electronic common‑rail fuel injection (MC‑C) provides better fuel efficiency and lower emissions than older MC models.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil, reducing bunker cost risk.
  • Proven reliability in long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers with extensive service history.
  • Broad class society approvals (DNV, ABS, LR) simplify certification for new builds.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher capital cost compared with smaller low‑power engines or newer dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Maintenance complexity – electronic control system demands skilled technicians and diagnostic tools.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than some modern low‑speed dual‑fuel designs, requiring robust mitigation.
  • Limited suitability for vessels under ~30 000 DWT where the power rating is excessive.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15 k TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (≥200 k DWT)Cruise Liners (large displacement)
Certifications: DNVABSLloyd's RegisterIMO Tier II NOx compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >50 MW propulsion for a very large tanker, bulk carrier or container ship and value proven low‑speed diesel reliability with fuel flexibility. Avoid if: the vessel is smaller than ~30 000 DWT, budget constraints are tight, or you require dual‑fuel (LNG) capability for stricter emission zones.
Use Cases: The 9K98MC-C powers the main shaft of VLCCs and ULCCs on long‑haul crude routes, drives large container vessels on inter‑continental services, and is installed in mega‑bulk carriers transporting ore or coal. Its robustness makes it a common choice for new builds where high power and class society approval are critical.
10K98MC-C unverified
· 57200.0 kW · Low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
57200
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed package (≈57 MW) suitable for VLCC/ULCC propulsion
  • Proven reliability with decades of service on large tankers and container ships
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies over‑haul and parts logistics
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning systems to meet IMO Tier II/III NOx limits
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited for vessels requiring rapid speed changes
  • Requires extensive bunkering infrastructure for HFO handling
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but each overhaul is more involved
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥18 000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS ApprovedIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II compliance (with standard SCR optional for Tier III in ECAs)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for ultra‑large vessels where low rpm and fuel flexibility are critical. Avoid if vessel size is moderate, space is limited, or rapid speed changes are required.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large container ships and bulk carriers; often paired with shaft generators for auxiliary power and equipped with scrubbers to meet emission regulations.
11K98MC-C unverified
· 62920.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
62920
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power – enables propulsion of VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers.
  • Proven reliability from decades of service in the tanker and bulk sectors.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil with minor adjustments.
  • Low rpm operation reduces gearbox complexity and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Extensive global support network from MAN B&W.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with newer low‑speed engines equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR).
  • Long warm‑up period before reaching optimal efficiency.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but each overhaul is costly due to component size.
  • Limited suitability for vessels requiring very tight emission limits without after‑treatment.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersPanamax and Capesize bulk carriersLarge container ships (>10,000 TEU) where space permits
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (SOLAS)DNV Class approvalABS classificationLR (Lloyd’s Register) approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for large, long‑haul vessels and value a proven, globally supported engine with fuel flexibility. Avoid if: the ship must meet strict NOx/EU MR limits without additional after‑treatment or space constraints prevent installation of a low‑speed crosshead unit.
Use Cases: The 11K98MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs and ULCCs transporting crude oil, on large product tankers carrying refined fuels, and on Capesize bulk carriers moving iron ore or coal. It is also found in some of the biggest container ships where designers accept its size for the power advantage.
12K98MC-C unverified
· 68640.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
68640
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific output (~48–50% thermal efficiency) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages.
  • Proven reliability and worldwide support network from MAN B&W after the legacy acquisition.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and blends without major modifications.
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies over‑hauls and parts replacement.
  • Integrated electronic control system (B&W ME‑G4) enables precise load management and emissions monitoring.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes to avoid crosshead wear.
  • Limited suitability for vessels needing very high shaft speeds (e.g., fast ferries).
  • Not a dual‑fuel (LNG) engine, so may be less attractive under tightening sulfur/CO₂ regulations.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ships (>10 000 TEU)Very large bulk carriers (>200 k DWT)Ro‑Ro / car carriers of high deadweight
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (main engine)DNV GL Notation for main propulsion machineryABS Notation for low‑speed diesel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for long‑range, heavy‑load vessels where fuel efficiency and global support are paramount. Avoid if vessel size or shaft‑speed constraints limit engine room volume, or if dual‑fuel (LNG) capability is required to meet future emissions regulations.
Use Cases: The 12K98MC-C powers the main shafts of VLCCs and ULCCs on crude oil routes, large container ships on Asia–Europe trades, and mega bulk carriers transporting ore or coal. It is favoured where continuous high‑power operation and fuel cost optimisation are critical.
14K98MC-C unverified
· 80080.0 kW · Low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
K98MC-C
Bore (mm)
980
Stroke (mm)
2660
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
80080
Speed (rpm)
94
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output (≈80 MW) in a single unit, enabling ultra‑large ship propulsion
  • Proven reliability with decades of service on container and bulk carriers
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies overhauls and reduces docktime
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Advanced MC-C version features common‑rail injection and electronic control for better fuel efficiency and lower emissions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation to new‑builds or major retrofits
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑power engines
  • Requires skilled engineering crew for operation and maintenance of the crosshead system
  • Limited speed range (≈90–100 rpm) may not suit vessels needing higher shaft speeds
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions can be high relative to newer Tier III compliant designs
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ship (ULCS)Very large bulk carrierLarge oil tankerLiquefied gas carrier (LNG/LPG) of >150 k dwt
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a single, high‑power main engine for an ultra‑large vessel and value proven global support. Avoid if the ship’s size or shaft‑speed requirements cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint, or if strict Tier III NOx compliance without SCR is mandatory.
Use Cases: The 14K98MC-C is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large container ships (≈18–20 000 TEU) and on very large bulk carriers (>200 k dwt), where its high specific output and fuel flexibility provide operational efficiency over long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 4S90MC-C
4S90MC-C unverified
· 20880.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke electronically controlled marine diesel
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
20880
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with only four large cylinders, reducing engine length compared to higher‑cylinder designs
  • Electronic common‑rail injection (MC‑C) gives superior fuel consumption and lower NOx emissions
  • Very low rpm (≈76 rpm) often eliminates the need for a reduction gearbox, saving weight and space
  • Proven B&W reliability and extensive global support network
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high dead‑weight make it unsuitable for smaller vessels
  • High capital cost and complex electronic control system require skilled crew and maintenance staff
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Requires substantial auxiliary systems (cooling, lubrication) that add to overall plant layout complexity
  • Even with MC‑C, NOx compliance may still need after‑treatment for Tier III ships
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax tankersAframax and Panamax bulk carriersLarge container vessels (>8,000 TEU)Cruise liners (propulsion only)Heavy‑load Ro‑Ro ships
Certifications: IMO NOx Tier IIDNV Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power in a compact low‑rpm layout, want proven B&W reliability and electronic fuel control for fuel savings and emission limits, and operate large tankers or bulk carriers where the engine size is acceptable. Avoid if vessel size is limited, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or you require higher shaft speeds typical of medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 4S90MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, Aframax tankers and Panamax bulk carriers, providing direct drive to the propeller. It is also found in large container ships where low‑rpm operation reduces gearbox complexity, and occasionally in cruise vessels for its smooth power delivery and fuel flexibility.
B&W (legacy) 5S90MC-C
5S90MC-C unverified
· 26100.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
26100
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder with excellent specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh)
  • Proven B&W reliability and long service intervals on ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces piston‑rod wear and extends engine life
  • Direct‑drive configuration eliminates the need for a reduction gearbox, saving weight and space
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and heavy weight limit installation on smaller or high‑speed vessels
  • Low maximum rpm (≈76 rpm) restricts use where higher shaft speeds are required
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires extensive shore‑based maintenance facilities and skilled personnel
  • Relatively high NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Aframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (8–12 k TEU)Ro‑Ro/Car carrier of high deadweight
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for a large, low‑speed vessel and value proven fuel efficiency and reliability. Avoid if the ship requires higher shaft speeds, has strict space/weight limits, or seeks lower upfront cost with simpler maintenance.
Use Cases: The S90MC-C is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and large container ships where a direct‑drive low‑speed engine provides optimal fuel economy for long voyages. It is favored on routes that allow the use of heavy fuel oil and where shipyards have the infrastructure to support its size and maintenance.
6S90MC-C unverified
· 31320.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
31320
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific output (≈31 MW) in a compact six‑cylinder layout
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Integrated electronic control system for optimized performance and diagnostics
  • Widely approved by major classification societies, facilitating flag state approvals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation in space‑constrained ships
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires skilled crew for routine maintenance of crosshead bearings and pistons
  • Baseline NOx emissions may exceed Tier III limits without after‑treatment
  • Low maximum rpm restricts use to slow‑speed propulsion only
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra‑large Container ShipCruise Ship (propulsion)LNG Carrier (propulsion)
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large vessels where fuel flexibility and long service intervals are critical. Avoid if the vessel requires higher shaft speeds, has severe space or weight constraints, or must meet the strictest NOx emission limits without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 6S90MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, bulk carriers over 150 kt deadweight, and container ships exceeding 10 000 TEU, where its high power output and fuel flexibility support long voyages and economic operation.
B&W (legacy) 7S90MC-C
7S90MC-C unverified
· 36540.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
36540
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact cylinder count (7 cylinders) suitable for VLCCs and large bulk carriers.
  • Proven reliability with extensive global service network from MAN B&W.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil, supporting bunker cost optimisation.
  • Good part‑load efficiency and optional emission‑control packages to meet IMO Tier II/III requirements.
  • Long intervals between overhauls (≈10 000 h) reducing lifecycle maintenance costs.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and robust foundations.
  • Slower transient response compared with medium‑speed engines, limiting suitability for vessels with rapid load changes.
  • Higher initial capital cost than many medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires skilled engineering crew for optimal operation and maintenance of the crosshead design.
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher; additional mitigation measures are often needed.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Product TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (>150 k DWT)Container Ship (10 000+ TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger ships with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class ApprovalABS Classification Society Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power for large, slow‑speed vessels, require fuel flexibility and want a globally supported engine with proven reliability. Avoid if vessel size is limited, rapid load changes are frequent, or budget constraints make the higher upfront cost prohibitive.
Use Cases: The 7S90MC-C is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, large product tankers, and bulk carriers where continuous high power at low rpm is essential. It also appears on some of the biggest container ships that operate long voyages with stable speed profiles, taking advantage of its fuel flexibility and emission‑control options.
B&W (legacy) 8S90MC-C
8S90MC-C unverified
· 41760.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
41760
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power suitable for large vessels (>150 000 dwt)
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the fleet
  • Fuel flexible – can run on heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies maintenance and reduces wear
  • Long intervals between overhauls compared with many newer designs
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in space‑constrained ships
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes
  • Initial capital cost is higher than some modern dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Requires a substantial lubrication and cooling plant
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankerLarge Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (>10 000 TEU)Cruise linerHeavy lift vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels and value fuel flexibility with established maintenance practices. Avoid if space is limited, emissions regulations demand dual‑fuel capability without additional after‑treatment, or rapid load changes are critical.
Use Cases: The 8S90MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships, where its low rpm matches directly to a fixed‑pitch propeller and provides excellent fuel economy over long voyages.
B&W (legacy) 9S90MC-C
9S90MC-C unverified
· 46980.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
46980
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact footprint for its class (≈47 MW at only 76 rpm)
  • Proven reliability and long service life from extensive fleet experience
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies on‑site maintenance and overhaul
  • Compatible with modern emission control packages (SCR, MEGC) for IMO Tier III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance regimes to control crosshead wear
  • Relatively slow transient response; not ideal for vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Limited rpm (76 rpm) may necessitate a reduction gear on ships that prefer direct drive
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierRo‑Ro/Passenger vessels (large ferries)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for large, deep‑draft vessels and value a proven, fuel‑flexible engine with long overhaul intervals. Avoid if: the vessel is small to medium size, budget constraints dominate, or rapid speed changes and minimal engine room volume are critical.
Use Cases: The 9S90MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships, and large bulk carriers built from the early 2000s onward. It powers vessels that operate long voyages at constant speeds where fuel efficiency and engine durability are paramount.
B&W (legacy) 10S90MC-C
10S90MC-C unverified
· 52200.0 kW · Low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
52200
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈52 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Proven reliability from decades of service on tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh) reducing operating costs
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies over‑hauls and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high deadweight, limiting installation on smaller ships
  • High initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Requires extensive lubrication and cooling systems, increasing maintenance workload
  • Longer response time to rapid load changes due to low‑speed nature
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) for Tier III
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk carrier (>200 kt)Cruise ship (large displacement)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel variants)
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS classificationIMO NOx Tier II compliance (when equipped with standard after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power for a large displacement vessel, value proven long‑term reliability and can accommodate the engine’s size and support infrastructure. Avoid if the ship is limited in space/weight, requires fast load response, or has a tight capital budget without scope for additional emission after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 10S90MC-C is typically installed on ultra‑large tankers, mega container ships and large cruise liners where continuous high power at low rpm is required. It is also selected for newbuilds targeting low fuel consumption and flexibility to run both HFO and MDO, often in conjunction with modern exhaust gas cleaning systems.
B&W (legacy) 11S90MC-C
11S90MC-C unverified
· 57420.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
57420
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven mechanical reliability with decades of service history
  • High power density – 57 MW from a single engine unit
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and blends
  • Robust construction tolerates harsh operating conditions on long voyages
  • Simple cam‑shaft control reduces electronic complexity and associated failures
Weaknesses
  • Mechanical cam‑shaft system is less fuel‑efficient than modern electronically controlled ME‑C engines
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with newer low‑emission designs
  • Slower response to rapid load changes, limiting maneuverability in port operations
  • Larger physical footprint and weight versus compact electronic alternatives
  • Limited integration with advanced ship‑wide automation systems
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Product Tanker
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovalABS Type ApprovalIMO Type Approval for Marine Diesel Engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with mechanical control and wide fuel flexibility for long‑haul vessels. Avoid if your priority is maximum fuel efficiency, low emissions, or tight integration with modern digital automation systems.
Use Cases: The 11S90MC-C powers the main shaft of large crude oil carriers, bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships on intercontinental routes, where reliability over thousands of operating hours and the ability to burn heavy fuel oil are critical.
B&W (legacy) 12S90MC-C
12S90MC-C unverified
· 62640.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
62640
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈5.2 MW per cylinder) enables compact installation on very large ships.
  • Proven reliability and worldwide support network from the legacy B&W product line.
  • Low operating speed (76 rpm) reduces vibration and propeller cavitation, improving hull‑propeller efficiency.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes.
  • Integrated electronic control system (ECS) simplifies start‑up, monitoring and diagnostics.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or electronically controlled engines of similar output.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and regular maintenance of crosshead bearings.
  • Part‑load efficiency is lower than that of modern ME‑GI or hybrid propulsion solutions.
  • Emissions control relies on traditional exhaust gas cleaning systems; no built‑in low‑NOx technology.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Bulk carrier (>200 kt)Ro‑Ro/Passenger ships requiring high power
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for a large hull, value proven long‑term reliability and an extensive service network, and can accommodate the engine’s size. Avoid if: you prioritize lowest fuel consumption at part load, require built‑in low‑NOx emissions technology, or have strict weight/space constraints.
Use Cases: The 12S90MC-C is typically installed on ultra‑large tankers and mega container ships where a single high‑output engine drives a large-diameter slow‑turning propeller. It is also used in some large bulk carriers and passenger vessels that demand robust, low‑speed propulsion with flexible fuel options.
B&W (legacy) 14S90MC-C
14S90MC-C unverified
· 73080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
S90MC-C
Bore (mm)
900
Stroke (mm)
3188
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
73080
Speed (rpm)
76
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – up to 73 MW from a single unit, ideal for VLCCs and ultra‑large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the B&W S90 family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes
  • Excellent part‑load efficiency, reducing fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Integrated electronic control system (MEG/MEG+) for precise monitoring and diagnostics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and longer dry‑dock intervals due to the crosshead design
  • Compliance with IMO Tier II/III emissions often needs additional after‑treatment (SCR, EGR) increasing complexity
  • Slower transient response than faster‑revving medium‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (>15 k TEU)Very Large Bulk CarrierLarge Crude Oil Tanker
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for a mega‑size vessel and value the long‑track record of B&W low‑speed engines. Avoid if the ship is smaller, budget‑sensitive, or requires rapid start/stop cycles, or if you prefer an integrated dual‑fuel solution without extra emission‑control equipment.
Use Cases: The 14S90MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, ULCCs, large container ships and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed unit can drive a fixed‑pitch propeller directly, providing maximum efficiency on long, steady‑state voyages.
B&W (legacy) 4L80MC-C
4L80MC-C unverified
· 16800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific fuel consumption (SFC) efficiency for its power class
  • Proven B&W reliability with decades of service history
  • Electronic control system (C‑type) enables precise fuel metering and lower emissions
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Compact power density compared with larger multi‑cylinder designs
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and robust foundations
  • Higher upfront capital cost than comparable four‑stroke units
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke operation and maintenance of crosshead bearings
  • Fixed low rpm (≈79 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding to installation complexity
  • Longer overhaul intervals can lead to extended downtime if unexpected faults occur
Typical Vessels: Product TankerChemical TankerOffshore Supply VesselSmall Cruise ShipBulk Carrier (15‑30 k dwt)Ro‑Ro / Ferry
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV Class ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine with excellent efficiency for vessels in the 10–30 MW range and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if space is at a premium, budget constraints preclude higher capital cost, or you prefer a four‑stroke design that runs at higher rpm without reduction gearing.
Use Cases: The L80MC-C is commonly installed on product and chemical tankers operating long voyages where fuel economy is critical, offshore supply vessels that face variable load profiles, and smaller cruise ships seeking reliable propulsion with flexible fuel options.
5L80MC-C unverified
· 21000.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
21000
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈21 MW) suitable for ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Proven long‑term reliability with extensive global service network
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts logistics
  • Compatible with modern emission control systems (e.g., SCR, exhaust gas recirculation) for IMO Tier II/III compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand significant engine room space
  • Higher capital cost and maintenance expense compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict oil analysis to avoid crosshead wear
  • Low operating speed limits direct drive of auxiliary equipment, often needing gearboxes or separate generators
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions can exceed the most stringent IMO Tier III limits
Typical Vessels: VLCC crude oil tankerProduct tanker (LR2)Large bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large container ship (10–12 k TEU)Heavy lift / RoRo vessel
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large cargo vessels and have the space and budget for its size and maintenance regime. Avoid if vessel size is limited, operating profile favours higher RPM engines, or ultra‑low emissions are required without installing after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 5L80MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, large product tankers, and bulk carriers where continuous high power at low rpm is essential for efficient propulsion. Shipyards also fit it in new‑build ultra‑large container ships that demand maximum shaft power while maintaining fuel flexibility.
B&W (legacy) 6L80MC-C
6L80MC-C unverified
· 25200.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
25200
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – ~25 MW from six cylinders
  • Proven B&W reliability and long service life
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) reduces bunkering constraints
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of low‑speed two‑stroke engines
  • Crosshead design simplifies maintenance and cylinder wear monitoring
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Slow transient response; not ideal for frequent speed changes or DP operations
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil system and regular overhauls, raising operating cost
  • Not dual‑fuel – cannot run on LNG, methanol or other alternative fuels without conversion
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerDry Bulk CarrierUltra Large Container VesselGeneral Cargo Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible engine with proven reliability for large conventional vessels and can accommodate its size. Avoid if the vessel requires rapid load changes, dual‑fuel capability, or has strict space/weight limits.
Use Cases: The 6L80MC-C is typically installed on large oil tankers, bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships where continuous high power at low rpm is required for long voyages with conventional fuel bunkering.
B&W (legacy) 7L80MC-C
7L80MC-C unverified
· 29400.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
29400
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm package, eliminating the need for reduction gearing
  • Proven B&W reliability and long service life on VLCCs and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular 7‑cylinder design simplifies overhauls and cylinder replacement
  • Good specific fuel consumption for its power class
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial hull space and foundation structure
  • High initial capital cost compared with smaller low‑speed engines
  • Less efficient at part‑load operation than newer electronically controlled or dual‑fuel designs
  • Limited suitability for vessels under ~100 000 dwt where the power rating is excessive
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Capesize bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10 000 TEU)Cruise liner (propulsion only)
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need >29 MW of low‑speed propulsion for a very large vessel and value the heritage reliability of B&W engines. Avoid if: the ship is smaller, operates frequently at part load, or requires dual‑fuel capability for stricter emissions compliance.
Use Cases: The L80MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, ULCCs, capesize bulk carriers and large container ships where its high power and low rpm match the vessel’s size and speed profile. It is also used on some cruise liners for primary propulsion when a single massive diesel unit is preferred.
B&W (legacy) 8L80MC-C
8L80MC-C unverified
· 33600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
33600
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder, enabling >30 MW propulsion in a single engine block
  • Proven reliability and long service life from decades of operational history
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good specific fuel consumption for its size class, supporting economical long‑haul operation
  • Robust mechanical design with crosshead arrangement reduces cylinder wear at low speeds
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space
  • Crosshead mechanism requires regular inspection and higher maintenance compared with newer ME‑type engines
  • Older control system (mechanical/electro‑hydraulic) may lack the fine fuel‑metering efficiency of modern electronic controls
  • Spare parts availability can be constrained as the model is considered legacy
  • Overall thermal efficiency is lower than that of the latest electronically controlled low‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: Capesize Bulk CarrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Ro‑Ro / FerryGeneral Cargo Ship over 30,000 DWT
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels and value fuel flexibility and long service intervals. Avoid if: space is at a premium, you require the highest possible thermal efficiency, or you prefer the latest electronic control systems with lower maintenance overhead.
Use Cases: The 8L80MC-C is typically installed in new builds or repowering projects of Capesize bulk carriers, VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships where maximum shaft power and proven reliability are paramount for long‑distance, fuel‑economical voyages. It also appears on large Ro‑Ro vessels that demand robust low‑speed propulsion.
B&W (legacy) 9L80MC-C
9L80MC-C unverified
· 37800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
37800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 9 cylinders produce ~38 MW in a compact footprint.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and blends.
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals typical of B&W low‑speed engines.
  • Integrated exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) version meets IMO Tier III NOx limits without after‑treatment.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Low maximum rpm limits use to slow‑turning propeller arrangements; not suited for high‑speed vessels.
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of the crosshead arrangement.
  • Emissions compliance depends on specific configuration (EGR vs. after‑treatment).
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Crude Oil TankerLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Bulk Carrier (Capesize)LNG Carrier (dual fuel version available)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III NOx compliance (EGR variant)DNV GL ClassABS ClassificationLR (Lloyd's Register) Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high propulsion power for large, slow‑turning vessels and value proven low‑speed engine reliability with fuel flexibility. Avoid if: space is limited, a higher rpm engine is required, or capital budget constraints outweigh the long‑term operational benefits.
Use Cases: The 9L80MC-C is typically installed in very large crude carriers, ultra‑large container ships and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can drive a large-diameter propeller directly. It is also selected for LNG carriers when configured as a dual‑fuel version to meet strict emission regulations on long voyages.
10L80MC-C unverified
· 42000.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
42000
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈4.2 MW per cylinder) enabling very large thrust with a single engine unit
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major hardware changes
  • Proven reliability and long service life in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates reduction gear, reducing mechanical losses and maintenance
  • Robust crosshead design isolates piston forces from the crankcase, lowering wear on bearings
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed engines of similar power
  • Slower transient response; not ideal for vessels that need rapid speed changes
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and strict maintenance regimes to protect the crosshead bearings
  • Limited suitability for ships that use higher shaft speeds or gear‑driven propellers
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (Handymax/Supramax and larger)Ultra‑large ore carriers
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for direct‑drive propulsion on very large tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and proven reliability. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher shaft speeds with gearboxes, or budget constraints make a medium‑speed solution more attractive.
Use Cases: The 10L80MC-C is typically installed as the sole main engine on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers, providing direct propulsion at low rpm. It is favored in routes where fuel cost optimisation and long‑haul reliability outweigh the higher upfront investment.
B&W (legacy) 11L80MC-C
11L80MC-C unverified
· 46200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
46200
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact cylinder count (11 cylinders) suitable for VLCCs and ULCVs.
  • Low operating speed (~79 rpm) yields excellent propeller efficiency and reduced vibration.
  • Crosshead design separates piston thrust from connecting‑rod forces, extending bearing life and simplifying maintenance.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes.
  • Proven B&W reliability record with long service intervals on ultra‑large ships.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives for the same power class.
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes, limiting suitability for vessels requiring frequent speed variations.
  • Emission compliance (IMO Tier II/III) often requires additional after‑treatment equipment, increasing complexity and cost.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)Liquefied Gas Carrier (large LNG/LPG ships)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, low‑speed operation and proven durability for ultra‑large tankers or container ships, especially where fuel flexibility is required. Avoid if the vessel size is moderate, emission limits are strict without willingness to add after‑treatment, or rapid speed changes are a primary operational requirement.
Use Cases: The 11L80MC-C powers VLCCs on long‑haul crude routes, ULCVs on Asia–Europe trades, and large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal. It is favoured where continuous high power at low rpm maximises propeller efficiency and where the engine room can accommodate its dimensions.
12L80MC-C unverified
· 50400.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
50400
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large ships
  • Excellent fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven long‑term reliability with an extensive global spare‑parts network
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with many older designs
  • Simple mechanical layout that eases routine maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Large physical footprint and weight, limiting installation on smaller vessels
  • Longer start‑up time and slower transient response compared with faster‑speed engines
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of a two‑stroke crosshead system
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to newer eco‑engine designs
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Bulk CarrierVery Large Container Ship (>15,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high shaft power
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power at low rpm for large hulls, value a proven engine with worldwide support, and can accommodate the size and emission profile. Avoid if strict emissions limits apply, space is constrained, or you prefer dual‑fuel flexibility and faster transient response.
Use Cases: The 12L80MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and mega container ships operating long‑haul routes where fuel efficiency and reliability outweigh the need for low emissions or compact size.
B&W (legacy) 14L80MC-C
14L80MC-C unverified
· 58800.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
L80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
58800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~50% LHV) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Robust and proven design with long service intervals and high reliability
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates the need for reduction gears, reducing drivetrain losses
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies on‑board maintenance and overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet Tier II/III limits
  • Requires highly skilled crew for optimal operation and monitoring
  • High capital cost and higher initial investment than some newer low‑emission alternatives
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk CarrierContainer Ship (≥10,000 TEU)LNG carrier (dual fuel variants)
Certifications: DNV Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large vessels where direct drive and fuel flexibility are priorities, and you have the space and crew expertise to manage its size. Avoid if vessel size is limited, emissions regulations demand Tier III compliance without after‑treatment, or capital cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 14L80MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and mega container ships as the main propulsion unit, providing reliable low‑speed power for long voyages with heavy fuel oil consumption. It is also selected for new builds where proven performance outweighs the need for ultra‑low emissions.
B&W (legacy) 4K80MC-C
4K80MC-C unverified
· 16800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
4
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque suitable for ships in the 70–120 kt range.
  • Proven reliability from decades of worldwide service on tankers, bulk carriers and container vessels.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications.
  • Good part‑load efficiency compared with comparable 4‑stroke designs.
  • Compatible with modern exhaust gas cleaning systems for IMO Tier II compliance.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Crosshead design entails higher maintenance effort (e.g., piston rod wear, lube oil consumption).
  • Slower transient response than high‑speed 4‑stroke engines, limiting rapid speed changes.
  • Higher NOx emissions without after‑treatment; compliance relies on EGCS installation.
  • Initial capital cost is relatively high compared with newer medium‑speed alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerBulk Carrier (Handymax/Supramax)Container Ship (up to ~8,000 TEU)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ClassificationLloyd's Register Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine delivering >16 MW with fuel flexibility and are prepared for the space and maintenance requirements. Avoid if vessel size constraints, rapid speed changes, or ultra‑low emissions without an EGCS are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 4K80MC-C is typically installed on medium‑sized product tankers, bulk carriers around 70–100 kt deadweight, and mid‑size container ships where a robust, fuel‑flexible main engine is required for long voyages and heavy loading conditions.
B&W (legacy) 5K80MC-C
5K80MC-C unverified
· 21000.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
21000
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven, robust design with decades of service experience
  • Mechanical camshaft control gives very simple maintenance and low spare‑parts cost
  • High torque at low rpm enables direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller without reduction gear
  • Fuel flexible – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Lower capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled engines
Weaknesses
  • Higher specific fuel consumption than modern ME‑type electronic engines
  • Larger footprint and heavier installation due to crosshead layout
  • Mechanical control limits rapid load changes and fine power trimming
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) are higher; may need additional after‑treatment to meet strict IMO Tier III zones
  • Longer start‑up time compared with electronic engines
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierMedium‑size container ship (3–5 k TEU)General cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a highly reliable, mechanically simple main engine for a medium‑size carrier and can accept higher fuel consumption and larger installation space. Avoid if the project demands the lowest possible emissions, best fuel efficiency, or electronic load control for frequent speed changes.
Use Cases: The 5K80MC-C is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on Aframax oil tankers, Panamax dry bulk carriers (30–50 k DWT), and mid‑size container vessels where a direct‑drive low‑speed engine fits the hull form and operational profile.
B&W (legacy) 6K80MC-C
6K80MC-C unverified
· 25200.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
25200
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈25 MW) in a compact 6‑cylinder layout
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, MDO and low‑sulphur fuels
  • Low specific fuel consumption typical of slow‑speed engines
  • Long overhaul intervals (≈10 000 h) reducing lifecycle cost
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels requiring rapid speed changes
  • Requires extensive lubrication and cooling systems
  • Emissions compliance may need after‑treatment (SCR/EGR) for Tier II/III
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tanker / VLCCProduct tankerBulk carrier (>150 kt)Container ship (10–14 k TEU)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel variants available)
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalIMO Tier II NOx compliance (when equipped with optional after‑treatment)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large dead‑weight vessels and value fuel flexibility and long service intervals. Avoid if vessel size or weight constraints limit engine‑room volume, or if rapid speed changes and lower upfront cost are higher priorities.
Use Cases: The K80MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, large product tankers, high‑capacity bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships where direct‑drive propulsion maximises propulsive efficiency. It is also selected for new builds that target IMO Tier II emissions with optional SCR/EGR packages.
7K80MC-C unverified
· 29400.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
29400
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~50%) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Robust and proven design with extensive service history in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies maintenance and over‑haul planning
  • Low rpm allows direct coupling to a large-diameter propeller without reduction gear
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation on smaller hulls
  • Relatively slow transient response; not ideal for vessels requiring frequent speed changes
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular monitoring of crosshead wear
  • Emissions control may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the latest IMO Tier III limits
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (10,000+ TEU)Very large ore carrier
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on long‑range vessels where fuel efficiency and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if rapid speed changes and tight emission limits are critical without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 7K80MC-C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, large bulk carriers, and high‑capacity container ships, providing continuous power for transoceanic voyages with minimal fuel cost per mile.
B&W (legacy) 8K80MC-C
8K80MC-C unverified
· 33600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
33600
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm, ideal for directly driving large slow‑turning propellers
  • Proven reliability and long service life of the crosshead design
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Well supported by a global network of B&W service centres
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than many medium‑speed or dual‑fuel options
  • Slower transient response, less suited to vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Requires a robust lubrication system and regular overhauls
  • Compliance with ultra‑low sulfur fuel may need additional exhaust treatment (scrubber) equipment
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container ShipVery Large Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large vessels where low rpm and fuel flexibility are critical. Avoid if the ship is smaller, requires fast acceleration, or if a dual‑fuel gas engine would better meet emission regulations.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large container ships, and bulk carriers exceeding 150 000 dwt; also employed in auxiliary power generation on mega‑vessels where high continuous output is required.
9K80MC-C unverified
· 37800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
37800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~50% SFC) reduces fuel cost on long voyages
  • Proven reliability on ultra‑large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships
  • Fuel flexible – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) with minor adjustments
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and spare‑part logistics
  • Integrated crosshead arrangement provides excellent lubrication of pistons and bearings
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; not ideal for vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Emissions (NOx) can be high unless equipped with after‑treatment such as SCR or EGR
  • Complex crosshead maintenance demands skilled personnel and longer dry‑dock periods
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (VLOC)Ultra‑Large Container Ship (ULCS)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel variants)
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high shaft power for large, fuel‑intensive vessels and value proven long‑haul efficiency; you have the engine‑room volume and infrastructure to accommodate a low‑speed crosshead. Avoid if: vessel size is limited, rapid speed changes are required, or capital budget is constrained – in those cases a medium‑speed or dual‑fuel engine may be more suitable.
Use Cases: The 9K80MC-C is typically installed on ultra‑large crude carriers, large bulk carriers and mega container ships where continuous high power at low rpm maximises propeller efficiency. It is also selected for LNG carriers when a low‑speed diesel option is preferred over dual‑fuel solutions.
B&W (legacy) 10K80MC-C
10K80MC-C unverified
· 42000.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
42000
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈4.2 MW per cylinder) suitable for VLCCs and bulk carriers
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from decades of worldwide operation
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly
  • Excellent thermal efficiency at low rpm, lowering fuel consumption
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Low maximum rpm limits propeller design options compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Higher initial capital cost than newer high‑efficiency medium‑speed units
  • Emissions control may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the latest IMO Tier III standards
  • Long start‑up time relative to faster‑running diesel alternatives
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk CarrierAframax TankerLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate D‑2
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power at low rpm for large dead‑weight vessels, value proven long‑term reliability and fuel flexibility, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if: vessel size is limited, higher propeller speeds are required, or the project budget cannot accommodate the higher upfront cost of a low‑speed crosshead engine.
Use Cases: The 10K80MC-C is typically installed on VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers where its 42 MW output drives a single slow‑turning propeller for optimal fuel efficiency on long voyages. It also appears in some large container ships that prioritize low fuel consumption over high speed.
B&W (legacy) 11K80MC-C
11K80MC-C unverified
· 46200.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
46200
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – up to ~46 MW from a single unit
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul vessels with decades of service history
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO, MDO) and good specific fuel consumption (~173 g/kWh)
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts replacement
  • Direct‑drive operation eliminates reduction gear losses
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response – less suited to vessels with frequent load changes
  • Baseline NOx emissions are relatively high unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Requires a robust lubrication and cooling system, increasing auxiliary plant complexity
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (150 k dwt+) Ultra‑large Container Ship (10 k+ TEU)Heavy‑lift & RoRo vessels over 30 k dwt
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large bulk carriers or tankers, value fuel flexibility and direct‑drive efficiency, and have sufficient hull space. Avoid if: the vessel is small to medium size, budget constraints dominate, rapid load changes are required (e.g., ferries), or you must meet strict NOx limits without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 11K80MC-C powers the main propulsion of very large oil tankers, bulk carriers and container ships built from the early 2000s onward. It is also used in some offshore support vessels where high continuous power and fuel flexibility are critical.
12K80MC-C unverified
· 50400.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
50400
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈4.2 MW per cylinder) with excellent fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO).
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers; extensive global support network.
  • Low operating speed enables direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller, reducing gearbox complexity.
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies maintenance of the cylinder liner and piston assembly.
  • Well‑documented performance data facilitates accurate fuel consumption forecasting.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation on smaller vessels or those with space constraints.
  • Relatively high NOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or electronically controlled engines; may require after‑treatment to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas.
  • Mechanical camshaft drive (MC) limits fine fuel‑metering flexibility versus fully electronic ME/ME‑C variants.
  • Long start‑up time and lower responsiveness for rapid speed changes.
  • Higher capital cost than medium‑speed alternatives for vessels under 30,000 dwt.
Typical Vessels: VLCC crude oil tankersProduct carriers (MR/LR)Large bulk carriers (>150 k dwt)Ultra‑large container ships (10 k+ TEU)Ro‑Ro and car carriers of high deadweight
Certifications: IMO Type Certificate for main propulsion enginesDNV GL Class approvalABS classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels where fuel flexibility and direct‑drive efficiency are priorities. Avoid if vessel size is limited, emission regulations in ECAs demand Tier III compliance without additional after‑treatment, or rapid speed changes are required.
Use Cases: The 12K80MC-C is typically installed on long‑haul crude oil tankers, large bulk carriers and mega container ships where a single low‑speed engine can drive a fixed‑pitch propeller directly. Its power rating matches the propulsion requirements of vessels above 150 k dwt, providing economical fuel consumption over transoceanic voyages.
B&W (legacy) 14K80MC-C
14K80MC-C unverified
· 58800.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
K80MC-C
Bore (mm)
800
Stroke (mm)
3200
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
58800
Speed (rpm)
79
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (≈ 49–50% LHV) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates reduction gear, reducing overall plant weight and maintenance
  • Proven long‑life design with extensive service history on VLCCs and Capesize vessels
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major hardware changes
  • Robust construction tolerates high cylinder pressures, giving reliable operation in harsh sea conditions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Long warm‑up time; not suited for vessels requiring rapid power changes or frequent start‑stop cycles
  • Emissions compliance (IMO Tier II/III) may require additional after‑treatment systems such as SCR or EGR
  • Requires highly skilled crew for routine overhauls and troubleshooting
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerCapesize bulk carrierVery large ore carriers (VLOC)Large container ships (> 15 000 TEU) where direct drive is preferred
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on large carriers and value proven fuel efficiency and reliability. Avoid if vessel size limits engine‑room volume, rapid start‑stop capability is required, or you must meet strict emissions limits without installing additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 14K80MC-C powers the main shaft of VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and Capesize bulk carriers, providing continuous high thrust for long ocean voyages. It is also installed on some ultra‑large container vessels where a single low‑speed engine drives a large diameter propeller directly.

Sulzer (legacy)

90
5RTA48T unverified
· 5500.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
5500
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 5 cylinders produce 5 500 kW at very low rpm, providing excellent propulsion efficiency.
  • Proven reliability of Sulzer’s legacy RTA family with a long service history in bulk and tanker fleets.
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design offers good bearing life under high cylinder pressures.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight compared with newer compact medium‑speed or dual‑fuel units.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions than modern electronically controlled dual‑fuel engines unless equipped with after‑treatment.
  • Maintenance intensive – crosshead lubrication system adds complexity and periodic overhauls.
  • Limited to HFO/MDO; not a full dual‑fuel (LNG) engine.
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerULCV bulk carrierLarge container ship (>8 000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high shaft power
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine with high torque at very low rpm and an established global support network. Avoid if your project prioritises ultra‑low emissions, compact installation space, or full dual‑fuel (LNG) capability.
Use Cases: The 5RTA48T is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, bulk carriers above 150 000 DWT and high‑capacity container ships, where its low rpm matches directly coupled propellers and its fuel flexibility suits long‑haul routes with variable bunker quality.
6RTA48T unverified
· 6600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
6600
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm – ideal for direct‑drive propellers without reduction gears.
  • Proven reliability and long service life; Sulzer’s RTA family has decades of operational history.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces piston‑rod wear and simplifies cylinder liner maintenance.
  • Compact L‑configuration gives relatively easy access for routine inspections.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed four‑stroke engines.
  • Slower transient response – less suited to vessels that need rapid speed changes.
  • Higher vibration levels typical of two‑stroke designs, requiring careful mounting and isolation.
  • Cylinder liner wear can be significant; periodic over‑haul is required.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerBulk CarrierMid‑size Container ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑torque low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility and are operating in markets where HFO is economical. Avoid if strict emissions limits (e.g., IMO Tier III) or rapid speed changes are critical, or when a dual‑fuel capability is required.
Use Cases: Commonly installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuild product tankers, bulk carriers and mid‑size container ships built before widespread adoption of dual‑fuel technology. Also used in retrofits where existing engine rooms can accommodate its dimensions and where direct‑drive propeller arrangements are preferred.
7RTA48T unverified
· 7700.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
7700
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~45% at design point) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability and long service life from Sulzer’s extensive fleet experience
  • L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with V‑type equivalents
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good part‑load performance, suitable for variable speed profiles
Weaknesses
  • Large bore and stroke give the unit a considerable size and weight, impacting hull design
  • Fixed low rpm (127 rpm) requires a reduction gear, adding to installation complexity
  • Older control architecture may lack the latest digital monitoring features without retrofit
  • Higher NOx emissions at full load unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierOil TankerContainer ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier II (NOx)
Decision Guide: Choose the 7RTA48T if you need a proven, high‑efficiency engine in the 7–8 MW range for bulk carriers or tankers where hull space is at a premium and fuel flexibility is required. Avoid it when vessel design favours higher rpm engines, weight constraints are critical, or the latest digital control systems are mandatory without retrofit.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in newbuild bulk carriers of 30 000–50 000 dwt, product tankers around 20 000 dwt, and medium‑size container ships where a compact low‑speed engine offers fuel savings and reliable operation over long voyages.
8RTA48T unverified
· 8800.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
8800
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm, giving excellent propeller efficiency
  • Proven Sulzer reliability with extensive service network
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO and meet IMO Tier II/III emissions via electronic fuel injection
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces overall engine length compared to V‑type equivalents
  • Robust construction suited for harsh marine environments
Weaknesses
  • Higher oil consumption typical of two‑stroke designs
  • Large bore and stroke result in a heavy engine, limiting installation on smaller vessels
  • Regular overhauls required to maintain performance
  • Initial capital cost higher than some modern four‑stroke or dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and careful maintenance
Typical Vessels: Handymax bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrierProduct tanker (10–30 k DWT)Feeder container ship (up to ~4 000 TEU)General cargo vessel
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine delivering around 8.8 MW for mid‑size bulk carriers or tankers, require fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO) and compliance with IMO Tier II/III emissions, and value Sulzer's global support network. Avoid if vessel space is severely limited, you prefer newer dual‑fuel or four‑stroke designs with lower oil consumption, or the higher upfront cost cannot be justified.
Use Cases: The 8RTA48T is commonly installed in 30–45 k DWT bulk carriers and product tankers operating on medium to long routes, as well as feeder container ships where a reliable low‑speed engine is preferred for fuel efficiency and ease of propeller matching.
9RTA48T unverified
· 9900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
9900
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at design load) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from Sulzer’s legacy design.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, MDO or blends without major modifications.
  • Excellent part‑load performance, suitable for vessels with variable speed profiles.
  • Robust construction compatible with major classification societies.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Slower transient response compared with medium‑speed engines, affecting rapid load changes.
  • Higher upfront capital cost than many competing low‑speed units.
  • Requires extensive on‑shore maintenance facilities for overhauls.
  • Emissions compliance (NOx, SOx) may need additional after‑treatment systems to meet the latest IMO Tier III standards.
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerULCV oil tankerBulk carrier (handymax and larger)Container ship (30–40 kW per propeller shaft)Cruise liner (mid‑size)
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 9RTA48T if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine for large bulk or tanker vessels where efficiency and proven reliability outweigh size and initial cost. Avoid it on smaller ships with limited engine room volume, or when rapid load changes and minimal emissions equipment are top priorities.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in the main propulsion line of long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers, often coupled directly to a fixed‑pitch propeller via a reduction gear. It powers vessels on routes where fuel cost savings and endurance are critical, such as trans‑Atlantic crude oil runs or Asia–Europe dry‑bulk trades.
10RTA48T unverified
· 11000.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
11000
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency (~49% thermal) reduces operating costs on long voyages
  • Robust crosshead design provides excellent durability and low wear on pistons and bearings
  • Fuel flexible – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications
  • Proven track record in VLCCs and large bulk carriers with extensive field service support from Sulzer
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation on vessels with space constraints
  • Mechanical valve gear requires regular manual adjustment, increasing maintenance effort compared with fully electronic engines
  • Older control system may lack the fine‑grained emissions optimisation of newer electronically controlled models
  • Limited compatibility with some modern exhaust gas cleaning systems without additional retrofits
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large container ship (selected units)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Annex VI)DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Classification approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for long‑haul tankers or bulk carriers where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if: vessel design prioritises compactness, or you require the latest electronic control and emissions optimisation found on newer dual‑fuel platforms.
Use Cases: The 10RTA48T is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large oil tankers, Suezmax vessels and ore carriers, providing continuous power for transoceanic voyages while tolerating a wide range of fuel qualities.
11RTA48T unverified
· 12100.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
12100
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – 11 cylinders produce >12 MW, suitable for high‑deadweight ships.
  • Proven Sulzer reliability and long service life with extensive field experience.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Very low operating speed (127 rpm) minimises gear size and wear, improving overall drivetrain efficiency.
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies over‑hauls and parts logistics within the RTA family.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and heavy weight increase ship deadweight allocation for machinery space.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed four‑stroke engines unless fitted with after‑treatment.
  • Limited to oil‑fired operation; not a native dual‑fuel (LNG) design.
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods typical of low‑speed two‑stroke units.
  • Maintenance intensity higher than newer electronically controlled engines.
Typical Vessels: Aframax / Suezmax tankersVLCCs (as part of a twin‑engine arrangement)Panamax and Handymax bulk carriersMid‑size container ships (≈10 000–12 000 TEU)Large cruise vessels requiring high propulsion power
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 11RTA48T when you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility for large tankers or bulk carriers and have sufficient machinery space. Avoid it if ultra‑low emissions, dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, or compact installation are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuilds and retrofits of large oil tankers, bulk carriers and mid‑size container ships where low‑speed diesel operation provides optimal fuel efficiency and reliability over long voyages.
12RTA48T unverified
· 13200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
13200
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with excellent thermal efficiency for slow‑speed operation
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers over decades of service
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • Well‑established support network from Sulzer legacy parts and service centres
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives
  • Requires skilled engineering crew for routine maintenance and overhauls
  • Low rpm necessitates a reduction gear, adding complexity and auxiliary power loss
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction) when burning high‑sulphur HFO
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (≥10,000 TEU)Heavy lift vessel
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels where fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability are critical. Avoid if the ship’s size or budget does not justify the space and cost of a slow‑speed crosshead unit, or if tighter emissions limits make a dual‑fuel or four‑stroke medium‑speed solution more attractive.
Use Cases: The 12RTA48T is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers, providing efficient long‑range service at low revolutions per minute. It also appears in some of the biggest container ships where slow‑speed diesel remains the most fuel‑efficient choice for sustained high power output.
14RTA48T unverified
· 15400.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA48T
Bore (mm)
480
Stroke (mm)
2000
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
15400
Speed (rpm)
127
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Proven reliability from decades of service in Sulzer legacy fleets
  • High specific power (≈15 MW) with excellent fuel flexibility (HFO, MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces wear on the piston‑rod assembly and extends overhaul intervals
  • Good part‑load efficiency for long voyages typical of bulk carriers and tankers
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room volume
  • Slower transient response compared with medium‑speed engines, limiting maneuverability in fast‑changing load conditions
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment or operating under IMO Tier II/III limits
  • Requires highly skilled crew for operation and maintenance of the crosshead system
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to comparable medium‑speed units
Typical Vessels: VLCCAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (≥8,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessel with high power requirement
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power main engine for large vessels that can run on heavy fuel oil and benefit from long overhaul intervals. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room space, rapid load changes are critical (e.g., fast ferries), or you require the lowest possible NOx emissions without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The RTA48T is typically installed as the primary propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships. Its robust design makes it suitable for long‑haul routes where fuel flexibility and reliability outweigh the need for quick speed changes.
5RTA52U unverified
· 6450.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
6450
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large vessels
  • Proven Sulzer reliability with a long service history in ocean‑going ships
  • Crosshead design separates piston and connecting‑rod forces, reducing cylinder wear
  • Flexibility to run both HFO and MDO, supporting fuel availability worldwide
  • Robust mechanical valve gear tolerates harsh operating conditions
Weaknesses
  • Older legacy design lacks modern electronic control, leading to higher specific fuel consumption compared with latest electronically‑controlled engines
  • Larger physical footprint and heavier weight than newer compact units
  • Higher emissions of NOx and SOx unless equipped with additional after‑treatment systems
  • Maintenance intensive due to mechanical valve gear and larger number of moving parts
  • Limited compatibility with ultra‑low sulfur fuel strategies without retrofits
Typical Vessels: VLCC TankerLarge Bulk CarrierUltra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Cruise Vessel (mid‑size)Ro-Ro/Passenger Ferry (high power requirement)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a rugged, low‑speed engine with proven long‑term reliability and the ability to burn heavy fuel oil on large ocean‑going vessels. Avoid if your project prioritises ultra‑low emissions, compact engine room space, or the latest electronic control and fuel‑flexibility features.
Use Cases: The 5RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit in new builds of very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships constructed from the late 1990s onward, and it is also used for repowering projects where existing Sulzer support infrastructure is retained.
6RTA52U unverified
· 7740.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
7740
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50% LHV) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven Sulzer reliability record with extensive global support network
  • Compact power‑to‑size ratio suitable for direct‑drive propeller shafts
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Low‑speed operation gives slower transient response, less suited to frequent load changes
  • Requires skilled crew for routine maintenance of crosshead and valve gear
  • Emissions control may need additional after‑treatment unless the ‘U’ (ultra‑low) version is specified
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (8–10 k TEU)General Cargo VesselRo‑Ro/Passenger Ferry (mid‑size)
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need high continuous power at very low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on large, long‑haul vessels and value fuel flexibility and proven reliability. Avoid if vessel size is limited, rapid load changes are required, or capital budget constraints preclude a low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 6RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on Aframax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers, and large container ships where a single slow‑turning propeller provides optimal hull efficiency. It also appears in some mid‑size Ro‑Ro ferries that benefit from direct drive and fuel‑type versatility.
7RTA52U unverified
· 9030.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
9030
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder enables compact power density for large vessels.
  • Low operating speed (120 rpm) allows direct coupling to the propeller, eliminating reduction gears.
  • Crosshead design provides excellent bearing life and reduces piston wear in long‑term service.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil as well as marine diesel oil.
  • Proven track record in Sulzer’s legacy engine family with extensive field experience.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation space, especially on retrofits.
  • Higher NOx and particulate emissions compared with modern four‑stroke dual‑fuel engines unless equipped with after‑treatment.
  • Crosshead engines require more intensive maintenance (e.g., piston rod bearings) than newer designs.
  • Spare‑parts availability may be constrained as the legacy line is being phased out in favour of newer Sulzer platforms.
  • Limited suitability for vessels that demand very low emissions or ultra‑low fuel consumption.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (Capesize)Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Cruise Ship (mid‑size)Offshore Support Vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a robust, high‑power low‑speed engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large ocean‑going vessels and value proven reliability and fuel flexibility. Avoid if: strict IMO Tier III emission limits, space constraints, or a requirement for the latest dual‑fuel technology are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 7RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where its low rpm matches directly to a fixed‑pitch propeller. It also appears in cruise vessels and offshore support ships that prioritize durability and fuel flexibility over the latest emission‑control technologies.
8RTA52U unverified
· 10320.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
10320
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm simplifies propeller design and reduces gearbox requirements
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Crosshead construction isolates piston forces, reducing wear on the cylinder liner and crankshaft
  • Integrated cylinder lubrication system eases routine maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with space constraints or during retrofits
  • Specific fuel consumption is higher than modern dual‑fuel or electronically controlled four‑stroke engines
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) may exceed current IMO Tier III limits without additional after‑treatment systems
  • Legacy parts inventory can become scarce as the RTA series ages
  • No inherent dual‑fuel capability; conversion to LNG or methanol would require extensive redesign
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerBulk CarrierLarge Container Ship
Certifications: ABSDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a robust, low‑speed engine with high torque for large conventional vessels and have existing Sulzer support infrastructure. Avoid if your project requires dual‑fuel operation, the latest IMO Tier III emission limits without added after‑treatment, or tight hull space constraints.
Use Cases: The 8RTA52U is typically installed in new builds of VLCCs, product tankers and large bulk carriers as the main propulsion engine, and it is also a common choice for major repowering projects where continuity with existing Sulzer systems is desired.
9RTA52U unverified
· 11610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
11610
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct shaft coupling without reduction gear
  • Proven Sulzer reliability and long service intervals for main propulsion
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with V‑type layouts of similar power
  • Good specific fuel consumption typical of modern low‑speed two‑stroke designs
Weaknesses
  • Two‑stroke cycle produces higher NOx and particulate emissions; may require additional after‑treatment to meet strict IMO Tier III limits
  • Larger overall size and weight than comparable four‑stroke engines for the same power rating
  • Complex scavenging and lubrication systems increase maintenance expertise requirements
  • Higher initial capital cost versus some competing low‑speed engine families
  • Less suited to vessels that need rapid speed changes or very tight maneuverability
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankersCapesize Bulk CarriersLarge Container Ships (≥10,000 TEU)Product & Chemical TankersLNG Carrier (propulsion variant)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine with proven Sulzer reliability and fuel flexibility for direct‑drive propulsion on large carriers. Avoid if vessel space is extremely limited, emission limits are very tight without planned after‑treatment, or rapid speed response is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 9RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on newbuilds and major retrofits of VLCCs, Capesize bulk carriers, and large container ships where direct drive and fuel flexibility are priorities. It also appears in some LNG carrier designs that favour low‑speed engines for efficiency.
10RTA52U unverified
· 12900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
12900
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈12.9 MW) at very low rpm, ideal for direct propeller drive
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends liner life
  • Proven track record in VLCCs and large bulk carriers with extensive Sulzer after‑sales support
  • Fuel flexibility between heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Relatively low specific fuel consumption compared to comparable 4‑stroke designs
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher NOx emissions; compliance with IMO Tier III requires additional after‑treatment
  • Limited fuel flexibility – cannot run LNG or other alternative fuels without major modification
  • Maintenance intensity (crosshead bearing inspection, cylinder liner wear) can increase operating costs
  • Long start‑up time compared with newer low‑speed 4‑stroke engines equipped with electronic control
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large bulk carriers (>200 k dwt)Large container ships (≈15 000–18 000 TEU)Cruise liners and offshore support vessels requiring >12 MW propulsion
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large ships with existing Sulzer service infrastructure and can accommodate the space and emission mitigation requirements. Avoid if your project prioritises ultra‑low emissions, LNG or dual‑fuel capability, or if engine room volume is severely constrained.
Use Cases: The 10RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container vessels, where its low‑speed torque directly drives a fixed‑pitch propeller. It also appears in some cruise ships and offshore supply vessels that demand >12 MW continuous power.
11RTA52U unverified
· 14190.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
14190
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm, ideal for direct propeller drive on large ships
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from Sulzer’s legacy RTA family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends bearing life
  • Well‑established global support network for spares and overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher NOx and CO₂ emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke designs unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Limited speed range (fixed ~120 rpm) reduces flexibility for variable‑speed applications
  • Maintenance of crosshead bearings can be more costly than simpler engine types
  • Lower overall thermal efficiency relative to newer low‑emission engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (VLBC)Large Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large bulk or tanker vessels and value fuel flexibility and extensive OEM support. Avoid if the project prioritises ultra‑low emissions, higher thermal efficiency, or compact engine room layouts where modern dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke units are preferable.
Use Cases: The 11RTA52U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, very large bulk carriers and mega container ships built from the early 2000s onward, often in new builds but also in retrofits where space permits a low‑speed direct‑drive arrangement.
12RTA52U unverified
· 15480.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead medium-speed diesel
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
15480
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – delivers >15 MW from a relatively compact footprint for a medium‑speed engine.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family.
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO/MDO) and straightforward conversion to dual‑fuel operation.
  • Crosshead design minimizes cylinder wear and reduces vibration, extending liner life.
  • Global spare‑parts network and long‑term support from Sulzer legacy programmes.
Weaknesses
  • Physical size and weight are larger than newer low‑speed or advanced medium‑speed designs.
  • Specific fuel consumption is higher than the latest Tier III‑compliant engines without after‑treatment.
  • Original control system may require retrofit for modern digital automation and condition monitoring.
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with some competing medium‑speed units.
  • May need additional NOx after‑treatment to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerLR2 Crude Oil TankerProduct/Chemical TankerHandymax Bulk CarrierMid-size Container Ship (6,000–8,000 TEU)
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's RegisterIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose the 12RTA52U if you need a proven, high‑power medium‑speed engine with flexible fuel options and strong after‑sales support for tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid it if vessel design constraints demand the smallest possible envelope, or if you must meet IMO Tier III NOx limits without installing additional exhaust treatment.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on Aframax and LR2 oil tankers, large product/chemical carriers, and Handymax bulk carriers where a balance of power, reliability, and fuel flexibility is critical. It also appears in some mid‑size container vessels that favour medium‑speed engines for better manoeuvrability and quicker start‑up.
14RTA52U unverified
· 18060.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA52U
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1800
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
18060
Speed (rpm)
120
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) giving low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals (>10,000 h between major overhauls)
  • Wide fuel compatibility (HFO, MDO and low‑sulphur alternatives)
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and simplifies maintenance
  • Ready integration with exhaust gas cleaning systems for NOx/SOx compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine‑room space
  • High initial capital cost versus medium‑speed alternatives
  • Low rpm requires a reduction gear, adding complexity and parasitic loss
  • Slower acceleration and response at part load
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance discipline
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCProduct TankerBulk Carrier
Certifications: DNVABSIMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible engine for long‑haul vessels where space is ample and low operating cost is priority. Avoid if the vessel requires high speed, rapid maneuverability, or has tight engine‑room constraints.
Use Cases: Typically installed in very large crude carriers (VLCCs) and ultra‑large crude carriers (ULCCs), as well as large product tankers and bulk carriers of 150 k–300 k DWT for main propulsion on long ocean voyages.
5RTA58T unverified
· 8100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
8100
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power output for a 5‑cylinder design – suitable where engine room space is limited.
  • Proven Sulzer reliability with extensive service network and spare‑parts availability.
  • Fuel flexibility (HFO and MDO) and good specific fuel consumption for its size class.
  • Crosshead construction simplifies cylinder wear monitoring and reduces maintenance intervals.
  • L‑configuration allows installation in vessels with narrow hull forms.
Weaknesses
  • Only five cylinders – a single‑cylinder failure results in a large loss of thrust compared with higher‑cylinder engines.
  • Relatively heavy and bulky for the power rating; may be oversized for very small vessels.
  • Base model does not meet IMO Tier III NOx limits without additional after‑treatment equipment.
  • Maximum speed limited to 105 rpm, restricting direct coupling options for some propeller designs.
  • Higher initial capital cost than comparable medium‑speed engines of similar output.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerChemical CarrierSmall LNG CarrierOffshore Supply VesselMedium‑size Bulk Carrier
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ClassificationLloyd's Register (LR) Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a compact, high‑power engine for a mid‑size vessel with limited engine‑room space and value proven Sulzer service support. Avoid if redundancy is critical (e.g., very long voyages without spare engines) or if the vessel must meet IMO Tier III emissions without installing additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 5RTA58T is typically installed in vessels that require around 8 MW of propulsion power while maintaining a narrow engine room layout, such as product tankers transporting refined fuels, chemical carriers handling specialty cargoes, and offshore supply ships that benefit from the engine's fuel flexibility and robust crosshead design.
6RTA58T unverified
· 9720.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
9720
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency typical of low‑speed two‑stroke designs
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Compact L‑configuration saves engine room space compared to straight layouts
  • Broad global support network from legacy Sulzer and MAN Diesel & Turbo
Weaknesses
  • Limited power output (~9.7 MW) restricts use on larger vessels requiring >15 MW
  • Older mechanical control system – lacks modern electronic fuel‑injection and NOx reduction features
  • Spare‑parts availability may be slower as Sulzer’s two‑stroke line was transferred to MAN Diesel
  • Relatively high specific fuel consumption versus newer electronically controlled engines
  • Large physical size and weight compared with medium‑speed alternatives for the same power
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (≈30 k dwt)Chemical tanker (≤25 k dwt)Small bulk carrier (15–20 k dwt)Offshore supply vesselMedium‑size Ro‑Ro / ferry
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV GL type approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, low‑speed engine around 10 MW with fuel flexibility and space‑saving L‑layout on medium‑size tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid if higher power, the latest emission standards (e.g., Tier III), or fully electronic control systems are required.
Use Cases: The 6RTA58T is typically installed in product and chemical tankers where its robust low‑speed operation matches the vessel’s propulsion requirements while allowing use of cheaper HFO. It also appears on small bulk carriers and offshore support ships that benefit from its compact footprint and long‑term reliability.
7RTA58T unverified
· 11340.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
11340
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 7 cylinders produce >11 MW
  • Low operating speed (≈105 rpm) enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Proven Sulzer reliability and long service intervals
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies on‑site maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope limits use in vessels with space constraints
  • Higher specific fuel consumption than newer electronically controlled low‑speed engines
  • Legacy control system lacks advanced diagnostics and remote monitoring
  • Spare‑parts availability is gradually diminishing as the model ages
  • Emissions are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment (scrubber, SCR)
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerProduct TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierGeneral Cargo Ship
Certifications: ABSDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a robust, high‑power engine for large tankers or bulk carriers where direct drive and fuel flexibility are critical, and you value proven Sulzer service support. Avoid if: the vessel must meet ultra‑low emission targets without additional after‑treatment, or space/weight limits preclude a large low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The 7RTA58T is typically installed on VLCC/Aframax crude carriers, product tankers and Panamax bulk carriers of 150–200 k dwt, providing reliable propulsion for long voyages where fuel flexibility and direct‑drive efficiency are paramount.
8RTA58T unverified
· 12960.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
12960
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear
  • Proven long‑term reliability and robust crosshead construction reduces wear on pistons and bearings
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good part‑load efficiency, suitable for the slow steaming profiles of modern bulk carriers and tankers
  • Established global support network from Sulzer legacy service centres
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes, limiting maneuverability in some operations
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and regular maintenance of crosshead bearings
Typical Vessels: Capesize Bulk CarrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large bulk carriers or tankers and value proven reliability with existing Sulzer support. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room volume, if dual‑fuel capability or the lowest possible emissions are mandatory without additional retrofit investment.
Use Cases: The 8RTA58T is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on newbuilds of 150 kW–200 kW class bulk carriers and tankers, as well as in repowering projects where a direct‑drive low‑speed engine can replace older units to improve fuel efficiency and reduce gear maintenance.
9RTA58T unverified
· 14580.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
14580
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50%) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Robust crosshead design provides excellent durability and low wear on the crankshaft
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Direct‑drive at low rpm eliminates need for reduction gearing, saving weight and space
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high deadweight compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Higher initial capital cost and longer lead time for procurement
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels requiring rapid speed changes
  • Requires skilled crew for routine maintenance and overhauls of the crosshead system
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (Handymax/Supramax)Ultra‑large container ship (>10,000 TEU) where direct drive is specified
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel needs high power at very low rpm for a direct‑drive propeller, operates on long-haul routes where fuel efficiency and durability are paramount, and has sufficient engine room space. Avoid if rapid speed changes, limited installation volume, or lower upfront cost are higher priorities.
Use Cases: The 9RTA58T is typically installed in newbuild VLCCs and Suezmax tankers for main propulsion, as well as in large bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can drive the propeller directly. It is also selected for ultra‑large container ships that adopt direct‑drive configurations to maximise efficiency on intercontinental voyages.
10RTA58T unverified
· 16200.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power and torque at very low rpm – ideal for direct‑drive large slow‑turning propellers.
  • Proven reliability on long‑range tankers and bulk carriers; extensive field experience over decades.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder liner wear and extends overhaul intervals.
  • Legacy parts network – spare components are widely stocked due to the engine’s long production history.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with tight engine‑room constraints.
  • Baseline emissions do not meet IMO Tier III without after‑treatment retrofits (e.g., SCR).
  • Older control architecture (mechanical/electro‑hydraulic) lacks the diagnostic depth of modern electronic ECUs.
  • Higher maintenance cost for crosshead bearing and cylinder liner inspections compared with newer designs.
  • Lower part‑load efficiency; fuel consumption rises noticeably when operating far below design load.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax TankerAframax TankerHandymax / Supramax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (8‑10 k TEU class)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large propeller‑driven tankers or bulk carriers and value an established spare‑parts supply chain. Avoid if the vessel must meet IMO Tier III emissions without major retrofits, has severe space constraints, or if you prefer the latest electronic control and diagnostic systems.
Use Cases: The 10RTA58T is commonly installed on new‑build VLCCs and Suezmax tankers built in the 1990‑2000s, as well as on retrofitted older tankers seeking a reliable power plant replacement. It also appears in large bulk carriers where direct‑drive propulsion is preferred for fuel efficiency at low speeds.
11RTA58T unverified
· 17820.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
17820
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm enables efficient direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear.
  • Crosshead design separates piston and connecting‑rod forces, giving excellent durability and lower wear on the cylinder liner.
  • Proven Sulzer heritage with long service history in large tankers and bulk carriers.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust construction suited to harsh sea‑going conditions.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher specific fuel consumption compared with modern electronically controlled four‑stroke engines.
  • Maintenance intensive – frequent overhauls of pistons, liners and crosshead bearings.
  • May need additional exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber or selective catalytic reduction) to meet the latest IMO Tier III limits.
  • Limited suitability for vessels that demand compact machinery layouts.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge general cargo ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large tankers or bulk carriers where direct‑drive propulsion and durability are priorities. Avoid if vessel size constraints, ultra‑low emission requirements, or a preference for newer electronically controlled four‑stroke engines outweigh the benefits of raw power and heritage reliability.
Use Cases: The 11RTA58T is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers, and Panamax bulk carriers, providing reliable thrust for long‑haul voyages with heavy fuel oil operation.
12RTA58T unverified
· 19440.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
19440
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density – >19 MW from a single engine unit
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker fleet
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder liner wear
  • Low rpm matches large‑diameter propellers for high propulsion efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Mechanical valve gear requires frequent inspection and adjustment
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern electronically controlled engines
  • Large physical size and weight limit suitability for retrofits on smaller vessels
  • Less fuel‑efficient than newer common‑rail or electronic‑control designs
  • Integration of exhaust gas cleaning systems (scrubbers) may need substantial modifications
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmaxAframaxLR2Large Bulk CarrierProduct Tanker
Certifications: IMO D-2DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large oil or bulk carriers and value an established spare‑parts network. Avoid if your priority is the lowest possible emissions, fuel‑efficiency gains from electronic control, or if vessel size limits accommodate a smaller, lighter engine.
Use Cases: The 12RTA58T is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers (VLCCs), Suezmax and Aframax tankers, and large bulk carriers exceeding 150 k dwt, where its low rpm and high torque drive a single large propeller for efficient long‑haul voyages.
14RTA58T unverified
· 22680.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
RTA58T
Bore (mm)
580
Stroke (mm)
2416
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
22680
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends liner life.
  • Extensive global support network and spare‑parts availability.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand significant hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed four‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment.
  • No inherent gas (LNG) capability – cannot meet emerging LNG propulsion trends without conversion.
  • Longer maintenance intervals for cylinder liners and crosshead bearings relative to newer designs.
  • Older control electronics may require retrofitting for advanced monitoring.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Very large container vessel (rare, but possible in older fleets)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven high‑power, low‑speed engine for direct‑drive propulsion on very large tankers or bulk carriers and value global service support. Avoid if your project requires Tier III emissions compliance, dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, or has severe space/weight constraints.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on VLCCs, Suezmax oil tankers, and large bulk carriers; also occasionally installed as a generator set for high‑capacity auxiliary power on mega‑vessels.
5RTA62U unverified
· 9100.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
9100
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm simplifies reduction gearing and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Proven reliability of the Sulzer RTA family with decades of service history.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Compact length for a 5‑cylinder unit relative to its power output, aiding installation in space‑constrained engine rooms.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit suitability to very large vessels only.
  • Older mechanical control system – lower fuel efficiency compared with modern electronically controlled engines (e.g., ME‑GI).
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment, making Tier III compliance more costly.
  • Crosshead design requires more extensive lubrication and maintenance of the piston rod assembly.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrier (Handymax to Capesize)Container ship (30–70 kDWT)
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque, robust fuel flexibility and a long service record for large bulk or tanker ships. Avoid if vessel size is limited, you require the highest possible specific fuel consumption, or must meet strict Tier III NOx limits without installing costly exhaust gas cleaning systems.
Use Cases: The 5RTA62U is typically installed on medium‑to‑large tankers and bulk carriers where a low‑speed engine provides optimal propeller performance and where the vessel’s size can accommodate its dimensions. It is also used on some container vessels in the 30–70 kDWT range that prioritize proven machinery over the latest electronic control technology.
6RTA62U unverified
· 10920.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
10920
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~48% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs.
  • Proven reliability with long service history in Sulzer’s RTA62U family.
  • Modular construction allows relatively easy on‑board maintenance and part replacement.
  • Capable of burning HFO and MDO, providing fuel flexibility for global routes.
  • Integrated electronic control system (Sulzer Power Management) enhances monitoring and optimisation.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • Low operating speed limits suitability for vessels that need higher shaft RPM or rapid manoeuvring.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and water injection systems, increasing auxiliary plant complexity.
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil TankerProduct TankerBulk CarrierContainer ShipGeneral Cargo Vessel
Certifications: DNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large vessels with long‑haul routes and want proven fuel efficiency and reliability. Avoid if vessel size or weight constraints are critical, or if higher shaft speeds and faster start‑stop capability are required.
Use Cases: The 6RTA62U is commonly installed in new builds of VLCCs, product tankers, large bulk carriers (≥150 k dwt) and high‑capacity container ships where low‑speed propulsion aligns with propeller design for optimal fuel consumption on intercontinental voyages.
7RTA62U unverified
· 12740.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
12740
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency and low specific fuel consumption typical of Sulzer RTA series.
  • Robust crosshead design provides long service life and excellent durability under heavy loads.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for both heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil, aiding compliance with emission regulations.
  • Proven track record in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers with extensive global support network.
  • Modular construction simplifies major overhauls and parts replacement.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed or diesel‑electric alternatives.
  • Low operating speed (≈102 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear, adding complexity and maintenance.
  • Long warm‑up period before reaching optimal efficiency; not suited for frequent start‑stop operations.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes to avoid wear on the crosshead bearings.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container vessels (>10,000 TEU) where low‑speed propulsion is preferred
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approvalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for large slow‑speed vessels with flexible fuel options and long service intervals. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or operational profile requires rapid start‑stop capability or higher RPM propulsion systems.
Use Cases: The 7RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large tankers (300 kDWT+) and large bulk carriers (200 kDWT+), providing reliable low‑speed drive for long voyages. It is also used in some high‑capacity container ships where a single slow‑speed engine coupled to a reduction gear offers optimal fuel economy.
8RTA62U unverified
· 14560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
14560
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific output (~48% thermal efficiency) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Electronic common‑rail fuel injection provides precise control and good part‑load performance
  • Proven reliability with a long service history in VLCCs, bulk carriers and large containerships
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO), with optional SCR for IMO Tier III compliance
  • Compact length‑to‑power ratio compared with older low‑speed designs
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost than some competing low‑speed models
  • Requires skilled personnel for maintenance of the electronic injection system and crosshead bearings
  • NOx emissions exceed Tier III limits without after‑treatment (SCR), adding extra equipment and complexity
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels or those needing rapid speed changes
Typical Vessels: VLCCAframax/Suezmax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (10k+ TEU)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier III (when equipped with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑efficiency low‑speed engine for large, long‑haul vessels where fuel flexibility and part‑load economy are critical. Avoid if: vessel size limits engine room volume, budget constraints preclude the higher purchase price, or the ship requires high‑speed operation without extensive after‑treatment for NOx.
Use Cases: The RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Aframax/Suezmax tankers, Panamax bulk carriers and large containerships. It powers ships that operate on long, fuel‑intensive routes where low specific fuel consumption and reliability outweigh the penalties of size and cost.
9RTA62U unverified
· 16380.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
16380
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50% at design load) reduces fuel consumption
  • Robust crosshead construction gives long service intervals and proven reliability
  • Low operating speed (≈102 rpm) allows direct‑drive to the propeller, eliminating a reduction gear
  • Flexible fuel capability – can run on HFO or MDO without major modifications
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and spare‑part logistics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Long start‑up time; not ideal for vessels needing rapid power changes
  • Emissions compliance (IMO Tier III) requires additional after‑treatment equipment
  • Limited suitability for small or mid‑size ships where the power rating is excessive
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (Handymax/Supramax and above)Very large container ship (>10 000 TEU) where direct‑drive is preferred
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible engine for a large vessel with direct‑drive capability and value proven reliability. Avoid if the ship’s size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions and cost, or if ultra‑low emissions are required without installing additional after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 9RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Suezmax/Aframax tankers, and large bulk carriers. Its low rpm makes it ideal for direct‑drive propellers, providing efficient long‑haul operation in conventional fuel vessels.
Sulzer (legacy) 10RTA62U
10RTA62U unverified
· 18200.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
18200
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder with low rpm suitable for direct propeller drive
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals typical of Sulzer crosshead designs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Robust construction reduces wear on pistons and bearings
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than many medium‑speed engines
  • Limited to low‑speed applications; not suitable for high‑speed vessels
  • Long start‑up and warm‑up periods
  • NOx emissions can exceed IMO Tier III limits without after‑treatment
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)Ultra‑large container ship
Certifications: IMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large, long‑haul vessels and value fuel flexibility and proven reliability. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s dimensions, or if higher shaft speed or stricter NOx limits (Tier III) are required without additional exhaust treatment.
Use Cases: The 10RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large oil tankers, bulk carriers and large container ships that operate on long voyages, where its low‑speed, high‑torque characteristics allow direct coupling to a slow‑turning propeller for maximum efficiency.
Sulzer (legacy) 11RTA62U
11RTA62U unverified
· 20020.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
20020
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈20 MW) at very low rpm reduces vibration and propeller cavitation
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker fleet
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies over‑haul and parts replacement
  • Good part‑load efficiency for long‑duration voyages
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer four‑stroke designs
  • Two‑stroke operation typically results in higher NOx emissions without after‑treatment
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict maintenance regimes
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels or those needing rapid speed changes
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersBulk carriers >200 k DWTLarge container ships (>15 000 TEU)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large, fuel‑flexible vessels where space and initial cost are acceptable. Avoid if the vessel requires higher speeds, tighter NOx limits without after‑treatment, or a more compact engine footprint.
Use Cases: The RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large oil tankers, bulk carriers, and some large container ships, providing reliable long‑haul performance on routes where fuel economy and durability are paramount.
Sulzer (legacy) 12RTA62U
12RTA62U unverified
· 21840.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
21840
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder enables propulsion of VLCCs and large bulk carriers without a reduction gear.
  • Low operating speed (≈102 rpm) reduces mechanical losses and improves fuel efficiency (~48% thermal efficiency at ISO conditions).
  • Proven long‑term reliability with extensive service history in the Sulzer RTA62U family.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil, or blends.
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies cylinder liner wear management.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand significant engine room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Longer start‑up time and slower response to rapid load changes.
  • May require additional exhaust after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the latest NOx Tier III limits.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but involve heavy component handling.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels with high power needs
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (MARPOL Annex VI)DNV GL Class ApprovalABS Classification Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels where space and weight are available and fuel flexibility is required. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room volume, if higher RPM propulsion systems are preferred, or if the operator seeks lower initial cost with simpler emissions compliance.
Use Cases: The 12RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs and large bulk carriers, providing direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller. It also appears in some of the world’s largest container ships where a single low‑speed engine can meet the required thrust without a reduction gear.
Sulzer (legacy) 14RTA62U
14RTA62U unverified
· 25480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA62U
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2150
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
25480
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption efficiency (~48% thermal efficiency at ISO conditions)
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Compact L‑configuration reduces engine room footprint compared with inline layouts
  • Crosshead design limits piston‑rod wear and reduces vibration, easing maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require robust foundations and structural support
  • Higher capital cost than many medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives
  • Limited speed range; requires reduction gearing for vessel speeds above ~20 kn
  • Sensitivity to fuel quality – HFO must meet strict specifications to avoid wear
  • Requires crew with specific training on two‑stroke operation and lubrication
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel adaptation)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels where fuel flexibility and long‑run reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size or budget constraints limit the space and investment required for a two‑stroke crosshead engine, or if you prefer higher‑speed four‑stroke solutions with simpler operation.
Use Cases: The RTA62U is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCCs, ULCCs, large bulk carriers and some container ships, often in new builds or major retrofits where its compact L‑layout and fuel flexibility provide operational advantages.
5RTA68T unverified
· 11200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
11200
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈11 MW) from only five cylinders – good power density for medium‑size vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – approved for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~176 g/kWh), reducing operating costs
  • Robust crosshead design minimizes piston wear and extends overhaul intervals
  • Modular construction eases installation, alignment and routine maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand a spacious engine room
  • Five‑cylinder layout can generate higher vibration compared with six‑cylinder variants
  • Requires a sophisticated lubrication system; maintenance is relatively intensive
  • Maximum speed limited to ~95 rpm, unsuitable for vessels needing higher shaft speeds
  • Spare‑parts inventory specific to the RTA68 series may be less ubiquitous than more common engine families
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerProduct CarrierBulk Carrier (Handysize/Handymax)General Cargo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV‑GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine delivering >11 MW in a five‑cylinder package for tankers or bulk carriers and value long overhaul intervals. Avoid if: vessel design constraints limit engine room space, higher shaft speeds are required, or you prefer a more widely supported engine family with broader spare‑parts networks.
Use Cases: The 5RTA68T is typically installed in the main propulsion line of Aframax and product tankers, as well as medium‑size bulk carriers, where its high torque at low rpm matches large propeller designs. It is also used on some general cargo ships that benefit from its fuel flexibility and robust construction for long voyages.
6RTA68T unverified
· 13440.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
13440
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈13 MW) at very low rpm enables efficient direct‑drive propellers without reduction gears.
  • Proven Sulzer reliability and long service intervals, with extensive global support network.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO), allowing cost optimisation.
  • Good specific fuel consumption compared with comparable medium‑speed engines, contributing to lower operating costs.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and simplifies maintenance on long voyages.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Low rpm means slower response to rapid speed changes; not ideal for high‑maneuverability applications.
  • Standard emissions performance may require additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet the strictest IMO Tier III limits.
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to some medium‑speed alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Capesize Bulk CarrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Aframax TankerLarge Container Ship (≈8–10 k TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for direct‑drive propulsion on large bulk carriers or tankers, value proven Sulzer reliability and global support, and can accommodate the engine’s physical dimensions. Avoid if vessel design constraints limit engine room size, rapid speed changes are critical, or you require a turnkey Tier III compliant solution without additional exhaust treatment.
Use Cases: The 6RTA68T is typically installed in large ocean‑going bulk carriers and tankers where direct‑drive low‑speed propulsion maximises fuel efficiency on long hauls. It is also found in some high‑capacity container vessels that favour the simplicity of a single, low‑rpm main engine.
7RTA68T unverified
· 15680.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
15680
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption (~48% thermal efficiency) reduces operating costs on long voyages.
  • Compact L‑configuration saves hull space compared with larger multi‑cylinder layouts.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications.
  • Proven reliability in VLCC and Suezmax service, backed by Sulzer’s long‑standing support network.
  • Optional emission control packages (e.g., SCR) available for IMO Tier III compliance.
Weaknesses
  • Large overall dimensions and weight require substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Maintenance intervals are longer but each overhaul is costly and time‑consuming.
  • Only seven cylinders – limited redundancy compared with higher‑cylinder designs; a single cylinder failure has noticeable power loss.
  • Higher upfront capital cost than some competing low‑speed engines of similar rating.
  • Requires high‑quality lubricants and strict water‑in‑fuel management to avoid wear.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible main engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and have sufficient hull space for its size. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, weight/space constraints are critical, or you require a lower‑cost engine with more cylinders for redundancy.
Use Cases: The RTA68T is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers, providing the thrust needed for long‑haul voyages while offering optional emission‑control upgrades for stricter environmental regimes.
8RTA68T unverified
· 17920.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
17920
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% at design point) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in bulk carriers and tankers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low operating speed (95 rpm) gives excellent torque and lower wear on reduction gear
  • Compact L‑configuration eases installation in engine rooms with limited length
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes, limiting maneuverability in some operations
  • Compliance with future Tier III emission limits may need costly after‑treatment upgrades
  • Maintenance intervals are long but each overhaul is extensive and time‑consuming
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power (≈18 MW) low‑speed engine with proven fuel efficiency and class approvals for large tankers or bulk carriers operating on long routes. Avoid if space is extremely limited, you require immediate load response, or you must meet Tier III emissions without planning major after‑treatment investments.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on very large oil tankers, bulk carriers and ultra‑large container vessels where fuel economy over thousands of nautical miles outweighs the larger engine footprint. Also used in power‑upgrades for existing ships replacing older low‑speed units.
9RTA68T unverified
· 20160.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific output (≈20 MW) suitable for large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Proven long‑life reliability with Sulzer’s crosshead design that isolates piston forces from the crankcase
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications
  • Low engine speed reduces propeller cavitation and improves overall propulsion efficiency at cruise conditions
  • Widely supported by global service network and spare‑parts logistics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high deadweight require substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost and heavy weight increase vessel construction expense
  • Maintenance intensity is greater than that of newer dual‑fuel or electronically controlled engines
  • Baseline emissions meet IMO Tier II only; additional after‑treatment is needed for stricter standards
  • Long overhaul intervals (≈10 000 h) still demand dry‑docking and significant downtime
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerDry bulk carrier (handymax to cape size)Large container ship (above 8 000 TEU)
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS classificationLR (Lloyd’s Register) type approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large, long‑haul vessels where fuel flexibility and robust service support are critical. Avoid if the project demands ultra‑low emissions, compact engine rooms, or the lower lifecycle cost of modern dual‑fuel electronically controlled engines.
Use Cases: The RTA68T is typically installed on very large tankers and bulk carriers operating on long transoceanic routes where steady cruise speed and fuel economy at low RPM are paramount. It is also found in some ultra‑large container ships that prioritize proven mechanical simplicity over newer digital engine concepts.
10RTA68T unverified
· 22400.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead main engine
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
22400
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific output at very low rpm reduces the need for reduction gearing and improves propeller efficiency.
  • Proven reliability on VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers with long service intervals.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies cylinder liner maintenance and reduces wear on the crankcase.
  • Well‑established global support network from Sulzer.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives for similar power.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and careful monitoring of oil cleanliness.
  • Slower transient response; less suited to operations demanding rapid load changes.
  • Limited applicability on ships where space or weight are critical, such as small container vessels.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge ore carriersUltra‑large container ship (rarely)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel requires very high power at low rpm, operates on long-haul routes where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount, and has sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if space or weight constraints dominate, rapid load response is essential, or budget limits preclude a low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The RTA68T is typically installed in VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers for transoceanic voyages, where its efficiency at low rpm maximises fuel economy over long distances. It also appears on large tankers that need the ability to burn HFO while meeting emission regulations through occasional MDO operation.
Sulzer (legacy) 11RTA68T
11RTA68T unverified
· 24640.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
24640
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers on large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and vibration, extending engine life
  • Modular construction allows relatively quick overhauls and component swaps
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO), with Tier II emissions compliance
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight increase installation space and shaft line length requirements
  • Higher specific fuel consumption compared with newer electronically controlled engines (e.g., MAN B&W ME‑C series)
  • Initial capital cost is higher than some competing low‑speed models
  • Maximum rpm limited to 95 rpm, reducing flexibility for vessels that prefer higher speed options
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and strict maintenance regimes to avoid wear in the crosshead bearings
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerSuezmax tankerVLCC (in some retrofits)Large bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Very large container ship (10 000+ TEU) where direct‑drive is specified
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalLR class approvalIMO Tier II emission compliance (upgradeable to Tier III with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large deadweight vessels where direct‑drive efficiency and robust crosshead construction are priorities. Avoid if the project demands the lowest possible fuel consumption, higher maximum rpm, or a lower upfront investment; newer electronically controlled engines may be more suitable in those cases.
Use Cases: The RTA68T is typically installed on long‑haul crude oil tankers (Aframax and Suezmax) and very large bulk carriers, where its high torque at low speed drives a single fixed‑pitch propeller directly. It also appears in some ultra‑large container ships that opt for a direct‑drive configuration to maximize propulsion efficiency.
12RTA68T unverified
· 26880.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
26880
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (~26.9 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Robust, proven long‑run reliability in demanding service
  • Flexible fuel capability (HFO and MDO) with good low‑rpm efficiency
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies overhauls and reduces downtime
  • Supported by an established legacy parts network from Sulzer/Man/Wärtsilä
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space, limiting use on smaller ships
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed alternatives
  • Legacy engine support may rely on third‑party service providers after Sulzer's marine division sale
  • May need additional emission control equipment (scrubbers or SCR) to meet IMO Tier III standards
  • Slower load response than modern medium‑speed engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierCapesize bulk carrier
Certifications: DNVGL classificationIMO MARPOL Annex VI type approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 12RTA68T when you need very high power for large, low‑speed vessels and value proven reliability and fuel flexibility. Avoid it on smaller ships where space and weight are at a premium, or when initial cost and future emissions compliance costs outweigh its benefits.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in ultra‑large crude carriers, product tankers, and very large bulk carriers operating long voyages where low fuel consumption and high durability are critical. It is also favored on vessels that require the ability to run on heavy fuel oil without extensive modification.
14RTA68T unverified
· 31360.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA68T
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2720
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
31360
Speed (rpm)
95
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages.
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals in VLCC and bulk carrier fleets.
  • Fuel flexible – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and be adapted for low‑sulfur fuels.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation, maintenance and parts replacement.
  • Robust design tolerates harsh operating conditions and high cylinder pressures.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand a spacious engine room and heavy foundations.
  • Maximum speed limited to ~95 rpm, requiring reduction gearing for optimal propeller performance.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled medium‑speed engines.
  • Compliance with modern NOx limits often needs additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR).
  • Complex lubrication and cooling systems increase operational maintenance workload.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (MSC.1/Circ.736)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for vessels >80,000 DWT where fuel efficiency and reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size or layout cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint, or if you prefer higher‑rpm medium‑speed or dual‑fuel engines for flexibility in propulsion system design.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on long‑haul oil tankers, bulk carriers and large container ships crossing oceans, where continuous high power output, fuel flexibility and low operating costs are essential. Often paired with a reduction gear and optional emission control systems to meet IMO Tier III NOx limits.
5RTA72U unverified
· 12450.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
12450
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50%) and low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability from decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Long intervals between overhauls thanks to robust crosshead design
  • Extensive global support network for spares and maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight, limiting installation to big hulls
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response – less suited to vessels requiring rapid speed changes
  • Legacy model may need retrofitted emission control (e.g., SCR) to meet Tier II/III limits
  • Potentially reduced after‑sales support as Sulzer’s marine engine business has been integrated into MAN B&W
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge container ship (>8 000 TEU)
Certifications: DNVABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven long‑term reliability and fuel flexibility for large transoceanic vessels. Avoid if vessel size is limited, rapid speed changes are critical, or you require a modern engine that already meets the latest NOx Tier III standards without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The RTA72U is typically installed in VLCCs and Suezmax tankers for long‑haul crude transport, as well as in Capesize bulk carriers hauling iron ore or coal. It also appears on large container ships where a low‑speed engine can drive a single propeller efficiently over intercontinental routes.
6RTA72U unverified
· 14940.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
14940
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈20 000 kW) with excellent thermal efficiency for long voyages
  • Proven reliability on VLCCs and bulk carriers – many units in service for decades
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies major overhauls and reduces dock time
  • Crosshead arrangement minimizes piston‑rod wear, extending component life
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight restrict use to very large vessels
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed diesel alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited for operations requiring rapid speed changes
  • Requires a sophisticated lubrication system and regular oil analysis
  • Without exhaust after‑treatment, emissions may exceed modern IMO Tier III limits
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Ultra‑large container ship (≥10 000 TEU)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine for very large carriers where proven long‑term reliability and long service intervals are critical. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires fast acceleration, or if capital cost and space constraints outweigh the efficiency benefits.
Use Cases: The 6RTA72U is typically installed as the sole propulsion unit on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers, large bulk carriers and mega‑container ships for trans‑ocean voyages, providing continuous high thrust at low rpm while tolerating heavy fuel oil grades.
7RTA72U unverified
· 17430.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
17430
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific output (≈17430 kW) from a relatively compact 7‑cylinder layout
  • Proven long‑term reliability and robust construction typical of Sulzer legacy designs
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Good part‑load efficiency, suitable for vessels with variable speed profiles
  • Widely approved by major classification societies, facilitating class approval
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight compared with newer compact engine families
  • Higher initial capital cost and potentially longer lead times for spare parts due to legacy status
  • May require additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet current IMO Tier III NOx limits in emission control areas
  • Crosshead design entails more auxiliary equipment (e.g., separate crankcase ventilation) increasing installation complexity
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Crude Carriers (ULCC)Bulk carriers (>150 kt)Container ships in the 15 000–20 000 TEU rangeLNG carriers (when configured for dual‑fuel operation)
Certifications: DNV GLABSLR
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, proven low‑speed engine for large tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and class acceptance. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine room volume, if you require the latest emissions‑optimised designs without extensive after‑treatment, or if spare‑parts logistics for legacy Sulzer units are a concern.
Use Cases: The 7RTA72U is typically installed in the main engine rooms of VLCCs and large bulk carriers operating on long-haul routes where fuel economy at low rpm is critical. It also appears in some container vessels that prioritize high power density and in dual‑fuel conversions for LNG carriers.
8RTA72U unverified
· 19920.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
19920
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power density in an eight‑cylinder layout reduces the number of cylinders needed for very large ships.
  • Very low rpm enables direct propeller drive, eliminating reduction gears and improving overall drivetrain efficiency.
  • Sulzer’s long service history provides proven reliability and a worldwide after‑sales support network.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO), with optional dual‑fuel conversion kits available.
  • Competitive specific fuel consumption for its engine class when operated on conventional fuels.
Weaknesses
  • Higher specific fuel consumption than modern dual‑fuel four‑stroke engines, leading to higher operating costs under current fuel price regimes.
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation in vessels with tight engine‑room constraints.
  • Crosshead design requires regular bearing inspections and overhauls, increasing maintenance workload compared to newer designs.
  • Emissions compliance (NOx, SOx) may require additional after‑treatment equipment such as SCR or scrubbers to meet IMO Tier III standards.
  • Higher capital cost relative to some contemporary engine families with integrated exhaust gas cleaning systems.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCPanamax Bulk CarrierCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (8,000+ TEU)Cruise Vessel (propulsion only)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with direct‑drive capability for very large vessels and can accommodate scheduled maintenance; the extensive Sulzer service network adds operational confidence. Avoid if your priority is lowest possible fuel consumption, strict IMO Tier III emissions without added after‑treatment, or limited engine‑room space.
Use Cases: The 8RTA72U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, ultra‑large bulk carriers, and high‑capacity container ships where direct drive at low rpm maximises propulsive efficiency. It also appears in some cruise ship propulsion arrangements where power density and reliability are paramount.
9RTA72U unverified
· 22410.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
22410
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power per cylinder enabling compact installation relative to output
  • Proven reliability and long service life in VLCCs and bulk carriers
  • Low operating speed (≈91 rpm) reduces gearbox size and wear
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Extensive global support network from Sulzer legacy parts and service
Weaknesses
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with modern 4‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Physical size and weight are larger than newer high‑speed alternatives
  • Older control electronics may lack the latest digital monitoring features
  • Initial capital cost is relatively high for a legacy design
  • Longer start‑up time compared with fast‑start 4‑stroke units
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Some ultra‑large container ships requiring high shaft power
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose the 9RTA72U if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with strong fuel flexibility and robust support for large tankers or bulk carriers. Avoid it when ultra‑low emissions, compact space constraints, or the latest digital control systems are top priorities.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on long‑haul crude oil transport vessels (VLCCs, Suezmax) and large dry‑bulk carriers moving iron ore, coal, or grain, where continuous high power at low rpm and fuel flexibility are essential for economic operation over extended voyages.
10RTA72U unverified
· 24900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
24900
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈24.9 MW) in a compact low‑speed design, enabling direct drive of large propellers without reduction gear.
  • Proven reliability from decades of service on VLCCs and bulk carriers; long intervals between overhauls.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) with optional dual‑fuel conversion kits.
  • Modular cylinder construction simplifies maintenance and reduces dry‑dock time.
  • Good part‑load efficiency, beneficial for vessels with variable speed profiles.
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space and structural support.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives.
  • Limited maximum rpm (≈91 rpm) restricts propeller design options for high‑speed vessels.
  • Standard configuration emits higher NOx; meeting Tier III limits requires after‑treatment retrofits.
  • Spare parts availability can be constrained as Sulzer legacy lines are now supported by MAN Energy Solutions.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Product tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k dwt)Container ship (≈10 000 TEU)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large, long‑haul vessels where fuel flexibility and proven reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, higher rpm is required, or the latest emission standards must be met without additional after‑treatment equipment.
Use Cases: The RTA72U is typically installed in newbuild VLCCs and product tankers for long transoceanic voyages, as well as in large bulk carriers and high‑capacity container ships where a direct‑drive low‑speed engine maximises propulsive efficiency and reduces gear losses.
11RTA72U unverified
· 27390.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
27390
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48–50%) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust construction and modular cylinder design simplify major overhauls
  • Excellent torque characteristics ideal for very large displacement vessels
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight limit installation to ships with ample engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or four‑stroke designs
  • Long warm‑up time; slower start‑up and shutdown cycles
  • Emissions compliance may require additional after‑treatment (scrubbers) to meet Tier II/III standards
  • Limited suitability for high‑speed vessels that need faster RPM ranges
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Very large container ship (rare, but possible in slow‑speed configurations)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large displacement vessels where fuel flexibility and proven long‑term reliability are paramount. Avoid if vessel size constraints, rapid start‑up, or the lowest possible emissions without additional exhaust treatment are critical.
Use Cases: The 11RTA72U is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers, providing continuous high torque for long voyages. It is also used in some ultra‑large container ships that employ a slow‑speed propulsion layout.
12RTA72U unverified
· 29880.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
29880
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48% LHV) for a low‑speed engine
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Flexibility to burn HFO or MDO, reducing fuel cost options
  • Long intervals between major overhauls thanks to robust crosshead design
  • Direct drive capability eliminates need for reduction gearing on many vessels
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight limit installation in smaller hulls
  • Slower transient response compared with modern electronically controlled engines
  • Higher NOx/SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Maintenance intensive crosshead bearings require skilled personnel
  • Lower specific power than newer 4‑stroke or electronic‑control designs
Typical Vessels: Crude Oil Tanker (VLCC, Suezmax)Product TankerDry Bulk Carrier (>150 k dwt)Large Ro‑Ro/Car Carrier (where low‑speed propulsion is preferred)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine with proven long‑term reliability for large bulk or tanker vessels and want the flexibility to run heavy fuel oil. Avoid if vessel size constraints, strict emission limits without after‑treatment, or rapid speed changes are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 12RTA72U is typically installed in very large tankers and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can directly drive the propeller shaft, providing efficient propulsion over long voyages. It is also used in some large Ro‑Ro ships that benefit from the direct‑drive arrangement.
14RTA72U unverified
· 34860.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA72U
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
34860
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (~48% at design load) resulting in low specific fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals thanks to the robust crosshead construction
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Excellent part‑load performance, suitable for long ocean passages
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates gearboxes, reducing overall plant weight
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Requires a comprehensive lubrication and cooling system due to high cylinder pressures
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be challenging in remote ports despite Sulzer’s global network
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥15 000 TEU)Capesize Bulk CarrierLNG Carrier
Certifications: IMO D‑2DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, fuel‑efficient main engine for very large vessels where reliability and low operating cost are paramount. Avoid if: the ship is smaller, requires fast speed changes, or budget constraints make a medium‑speed engine more appropriate.
Use Cases: The RTA72U is typically installed as the direct‑drive main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large container ships and capesize bulk carriers, and is also used in FPSO power plants where high continuous output and fuel flexibility are required.
5RTA76 unverified
· 14200.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
14200
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm eliminates the need for reduction gearing in many applications
  • Crosshead design separates piston forces from crankcase, reducing wear and extending service intervals
  • Proven Sulzer reliability with a long service history on ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil without major modifications
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or four‑stroke designs
  • Complex cylinder lubrication and exhaust systems increase maintenance skill requirements
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (scrubber or selective catalytic reduction) for IMO Tier III
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCProduct TankerLarge Bulk CarrierHeavy‑lift / RoRo vessels
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large cargo ships and can accommodate the size and capital cost. Avoid if vessel size is moderate, you prefer newer dual‑fuel or four‑stroke engines with lower initial investment, or you have strict emissions limits without willingness to add after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The RTA76‑5 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers and product tankers, providing direct drive to the propeller. It is also used on some bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can meet the required thrust without reduction gearing.
6RTA76 unverified
· 17040.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
17040
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈2.8 MW per cylinder) with excellent fuel efficiency at design load
  • Proven reliability from decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates the need for a reduction gearbox, reducing mechanical losses
  • Long overhaul intervals and well‑established maintenance procedures
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower start‑up and response to rapid load changes, limiting suitability for fast‑turnaround operations
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) higher than modern LNG‑dual‑fuel engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Limited compatibility with ultra‑low sulphur fuel without additional scrubber installation
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerBulk carrier (≥150 kt)Container ship (≈10 k TEU)LNG carrier (when configured for dual‑fuel conversion)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Type ApprovalLR Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large vessels with direct‑drive propellers and can accommodate the size and weight. Avoid if vessel design limits engine room volume, rapid load response is critical, or you require the lowest possible emissions without retrofitting after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 6RTA76 is typically installed on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers where slow‑speed direct drive maximises propulsive efficiency. It also appears in large container ships that favour a single low‑rpm engine for optimal fuel consumption over transoceanic voyages.
7RTA76 unverified
· 19880.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
19880
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder with excellent specific fuel consumption
  • Low operating speed (87 rpm) reduces gear size and wear
  • Proven Sulzer reliability and long service intervals for main‑propulsion duty
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Robust crosshead design tolerates high cylinder pressures
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Higher NOx emissions compared with modern 4‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes
  • Requires experienced crew for maintenance of crosshead bearings and cylinder liners
  • Capital cost is higher than many competing low‑speed engine families
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container Ship (≥10,000 TEU)Very Large Bulk Carrier (>150,000 DWT)Cruise liner (high power requirement)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven high‑power engine with low rpm for very large vessels and can accommodate its size and weight. Avoid if the vessel has strict NOx limits without planned after‑treatment, or if space and weight budgets are constrained.
Use Cases: The 7RTA76 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, super‑tankers, large container ships and bulk carriers where a single high‑output engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller through a reduction gear. It is also used in some cruise ships requiring >20 MW of shaft power.
8RTA76 unverified
· 22720.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
22720
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output at low rpm enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from Sulzer’s legacy design
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead construction reduces cylinder wear and extends engine life
  • Competitive specific fuel consumption for its power class
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with space constraints
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed or newer dual‑fuel engines
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes, less suited for highly variable operating profiles
  • Requires a high‑capacity lubrication system and regular monitoring of oil quality
  • Older legacy model may have longer lead times for spare parts in remote ports
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)Ultra‑large container ship (10 000+ TEU) where direct drive is preferred
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on long‑haul tankers or bulk carriers, value fuel flexibility and a proven track record, and have sufficient engine room space. Avoid if the vessel requires rapid load changes, has tight installation envelopes, or the operator prioritises the latest dual‑fuel low‑emission technology.
Use Cases: The 8RTA76 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large oil tankers crossing oceans, on large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal, and on some of the biggest container ships where a direct‑drive arrangement maximises efficiency and reduces gear maintenance.
9RTA76 unverified
· 25560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
25560
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm provides excellent propulsive efficiency for large displacement vessels.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the tanker and bulk carrier sectors.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends liner life, resulting in long overhaul intervals.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Broad class society support (IMO type approval, DNV classification).
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Older design may require emission retrofit (e.g., SCR or exhaust gas cleaning) to meet current NOx/EU regulations.
  • Spare‑part logistics can be slower for legacy Sulzer models compared with newer Wärtsilä/MAN engines.
  • Slower transient response than modern electronically controlled medium‑speed diesel sets.
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to some contemporary alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerSuezmax tankerProduct carrierHandy bulk carrierMedium-sized container ship (rare)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑rpm engine with a long track record for large oil or bulk carriers and can accommodate the space and weight. Avoid if vessel size is limited, you require the latest low‑emission technology without retrofit, or you prefer a newer electronically controlled medium‑speed engine for faster load changes.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on Aframax/Suezmax crude tankers, product oil carriers, and large bulk carriers where fuel flexibility and proven durability are paramount. Also used in some retrofits of older vessels seeking to replace worn engines with a reliable low‑speed set.
Sulzer (legacy) 10RTA76
10RTA76 unverified
· 28400.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
28400
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈28 MW) suitable for very large ships
  • Robust crosshead design separates cylinder and crankcase lubrication, reducing wear
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low operating speed allows direct‑drive to a slow‑turning propeller, improving efficiency
  • Proven Sulzer heritage with long service intervals and extensive global support
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight increase hull space requirements
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed or dual‑fuel engines
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels needing rapid load changes
  • Emissions compliance (SOx/NOx) often requires additional after‑treatment such as scrubbers
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and diligent maintenance of the crosshead seals
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 kDWT)Very large container ship (rare, but possible)Cruise liner (in limited installations)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power at low rpm for direct‑drive propulsion on large tankers or bulk carriers, value proven reliability and global support, and can accommodate the engine’s size. Avoid if vessel size limits hull space, rapid load response is critical, or you require a low‑emission dual‑fuel solution without extensive retrofits.
Use Cases: The 10RTA76 powers VLCCs on long‑haul crude oil routes, Suezmax tankers navigating the Mediterranean and Red Sea, and large bulk carriers transporting ore or coal. Operators rely on its fuel flexibility and durability for multi‑year voyages with minimal engine overhauls.
Sulzer (legacy) 11RTA76
11RTA76 unverified
· 31240.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
31240
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 11 cylinders produce >31 MW suitable for VLCCs and ULCCs.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history in the Sulzer RTA family.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO), facilitating compliance strategies.
  • Robust crosshead design simplifies maintenance of pistons, liners and bearings.
  • Compatible with modern exhaust‑gas cleaning systems to meet IMO Tier II/III limits.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require substantial engine room space.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Low‑speed engines have slower transient response, limiting maneuverability in tight ports.
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions are higher than newer dual‑fuel designs.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication and careful monitoring of wear parts.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersCapesize bulk carriersVery large container ships (>15,000 TEU) where high power is needed
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large vessels and can accommodate the size and capital cost; you require fuel flexibility between HFO and MDO and plan to fit exhaust gas cleaning. Avoid if: vessel size is limited, you prioritize rapid speed changes, or you prefer newer dual‑fuel low‑emission solutions that have lower NOx without after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 11RTA76 is typically installed in the engine rooms of VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers, providing main propulsion for ships exceeding 150 kDWT. It is also used on some large product tankers where a single high‑output low‑speed engine simplifies gearing arrangements and offers excellent fuel economy at cruise speed.
12RTA76 unverified
· 34080.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
34080
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (≈45% at design load) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker and bulk carrier fleets.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil or blends.
  • Robust crosshead construction tolerates high cylinder pressures and long service intervals.
  • Directly compatible with existing low‑speed engine auxiliaries (e.g., reduction gears, shaft lines).
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural support.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Slower transient response; less suited to vessels with frequent rapid load changes.
  • Maintenance intervals are long but each overhaul is extensive and costly.
  • Emission compliance often needs additional after‑treatment (e.g., scrubbers) for IMO Tier II/III.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerAframax tankerPanamax bulk carrierLarge container ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible main engine for large, slow‑speed vessels where efficiency and reliability outweigh space and cost concerns. Avoid if: the vessel requires fast load changes, has severe space constraints, or operates primarily in emission‑strict zones without ready after‑treatment solutions.
Use Cases: The 12RTA76 is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on very large crude carriers, Suezmax tankers and Panamax bulk carriers, providing steady thrust for long ocean voyages. It is also used on some ultra‑large container ships where a low‑speed engine aligns with the ship’s reduction gear design.
Sulzer (legacy) 14RTA76
14RTA76 unverified
· 39760.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA76
Bore (mm)
760
Stroke (mm)
2900
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
39760
Speed (rpm)
87
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high rated power (~39.8 MW) suitable for VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers
  • High thermal efficiency (≈48% at design point) reduces fuel consumption
  • Proven reliability from decades of Sulzer legacy service in the tanker fleet
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO, helping meet IMO emission rules
  • Robust crosshead construction minimises piston‑rod wear and extends overhaul intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand extensive engine‑room space
  • Higher capital cost than newer medium‑speed diesel or dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Efficiency drops noticeably at part‑load, limiting flexibility for variable speed operations
  • Complex lubrication and cooling systems increase maintenance workload
  • Noise and vibration levels are higher than some modern low‑emission engines
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerAframax TankerCapesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≥10 k TEU)
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for long‑haul tankers or bulk carriers, value proven reliability and fuel flexibility, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if the vessel operates mainly at low loads, has tight space constraints, or budget prioritises lower upfront cost over ultimate efficiency.
Use Cases: The 14RTA76 is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on very large crude carriers, Suezmax/Aframax tankers and Capesize bulk carriers, and occasionally on ultra‑large container ships where a single high‑power low‑speed engine is preferred for fuel economy on long voyages.
5RTA82C unverified
· 16900.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
16900
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output at very low rpm enables direct drive of large propellers without reduction gearing.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends service intervals.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Proven Sulzer heritage with long‑term reliability in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers.
  • Compact length for a 5‑cylinder unit relative to comparable power ratings.
Weaknesses
  • Two‑stroke operation generates higher NOx and particulate emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems.
  • Large physical footprint and weight limit installation on smaller vessels or those with tight engine rooms.
  • Requires skilled maintenance crew familiar with crosshead lubrication and cylinder wear patterns.
  • Long start‑up time compared with high‑speed diesel generators.
  • Higher initial capital cost than some modern dual‑fuel alternatives.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax/Aframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large container ship (ULCV)Cruise liner (propulsion only)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (MARPOL Annex VI – NOx Tier II/III)ABSDNV GL
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm, proven long‑term reliability and fuel flexibility for large single‑propeller ships. Avoid if vessel size restricts engine room space, emissions limits are extremely tight without ready after‑treatment, or a dual‑fuel system is required for operational economics.
Use Cases: The RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on ultra‑large crude carriers, Suezmax/Aframax tankers and large bulk carriers, where its low rpm matches directly driven slow‑turning propellers. It also appears in some very large container vessels and cruise ships that favour a single, high‑power diesel unit for efficiency and redundancy.
6RTA82C unverified
· 20280.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke diesel
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
20280
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output (≈20 MW) with excellent torque at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers
  • Proven reliability of the Sulzer RTA family with long service intervals
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and extends engine life
  • Extensive global support network from Sulzer legacy service centres
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement
  • Low rpm necessitates a large, slow‑turning propeller or reduction gearing for higher speeds
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with some newer medium‑speed alternatives
  • Without after‑treatment, NOx emissions may exceed the strictest IMO Tier III limits in emission control areas
  • Limited suitability for vessels that demand high speed or rapid maneuverability
Typical Vessels: Aframax tankerHandymax bulk carrierProduct tankerMedium‑size container ship (≈8–10 k TEU)Ro‑Ro vessel
Certifications: DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven low‑speed engine with high torque for medium‑sized tankers or bulk carriers, value Sulzer's global support and fuel flexibility, and can accommodate the engine’s size. Avoid if vessel design limits hull space, requires higher shaft speeds, or must meet the strictest IMO Tier III NOx standards without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: The 6RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑size oil and dry cargo vessels where a slow‑turning, high‑torque engine maximises propulsive efficiency. It is also favoured in ships that operate on mixed fuel regimes and benefit from Sulzer’s long‑standing service infrastructure.
Sulzer (legacy) 7RTA82C
7RTA82C unverified
· 23660.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
23660
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power output suitable for very large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history
  • Good part‑load efficiency and fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO)
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts replacement
  • Widely supported by classification societies and shipyards
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in space‑constrained hulls
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Requires skilled crew for operation and maintenance of a 2‑stroke crosshead engine
  • Initial capital cost higher than many newer dual‑fuel designs
  • Limited compatibility with low‑sulphur or LNG fuel without conversion
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tankersBulk carriers >150 k DWTOlder large container ships
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS ClassificationLloyd's Register Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, proven engine for HFO operation on very large tankers or bulk carriers and have existing Sulzer support infrastructure. Avoid if the vessel requires low emissions dual‑fuel capability, strict space constraints, or a lower upfront investment.
Use Cases: The 7RTA82C is typically installed in VLCCs and ULCCs for long‑haul crude transport, large product tankers on heavy fuel oil routes, and high‑capacity bulk carriers where maximum propulsion power and reliability outweigh the need for ultra‑low emissions.
8RTA82C unverified
· 27040.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
27040
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power – 8 cylinders provide ~3.4 MW each, suitable for very large vessels.
  • Robust crosshead design reduces piston‑rod wear and extends overhaul intervals.
  • Fuel flexibility – approved for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Proven track record in Sulzer’s legacy fleet with long‑term reliability data.
  • Modular construction simplifies on‑site assembly and major overhauls.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space.
  • Older mechanical control system compared with modern electronically controlled four‑stroke engines, leading to higher crew workload.
  • Specific fuel consumption is generally higher than the latest low‑emission four‑stroke designs.
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) may require additional after‑treatment to meet current IMO Tier III limits.
  • Spare‑parts availability can be limited as Sulzer’s marine engine line has been phased out in favour of newer manufacturers.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 kDWT)Ultra‑large ore carriers
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose the 8RTA82C when you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability and fuel flexibility for very large tankers or bulk carriers, especially if existing Sulzer support infrastructure is in place. Avoid it if your priority is maximum fuel efficiency, lowest emissions without retrofits, or you prefer modern electronic control systems found on newer four‑stroke engines.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and Suezmax oil tankers, as well as on large bulk carriers where low‑speed operation matches slow‑turning propellers. It is also used in some offshore support vessels that require high torque at low rpm.
Sulzer (legacy) 9RTA82C
9RTA82C unverified
· 30420.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
30420
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power (≈30 MW at only 84 rpm) suitable for large propellers
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from decades of Sulzer operation
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and improves durability
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with many 4‑stroke alternatives
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require ample engine‑room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost than some newer dual‑fuel designs
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Slower transient response to rapid load changes compared with 4‑stroke engines
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and specialized tooling
Typical Vessels: VLCC / Suezmax crude oil tankerLarge product tankersPanamax & Capesize bulk carriersUltra‑large container ships (≥10 000 TEU)Heavy lift & ro-ro vessels where high shaft power is required
Certifications: IMO Type Approval – 2‑stroke low‑speed marine diesel engineDNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for large hulls, value a long track record of reliability and fuel flexibility, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if space is limited, emissions limits are stringent without ready after‑treatment, or rapid load changes and dual‑fuel capability are primary requirements.
Use Cases: The 9RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on new‑build VLCCs, Suezmax tankers, large bulk carriers and mega container ships. It is also used in major retrofits where a proven low‑speed diesel is preferred over newer dual‑fuel options.
10RTA82C unverified
· 33800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
33800
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder with excellent part‑load efficiency
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals typical of Sulzer RTA series
  • Direct‑drive low rpm reduces gear losses and simplifies propulsion layout
  • Modular cylinder construction eases overhauls and parts replacement
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Long warm‑up time; slower response to rapid load changes
  • Emissions compliance may need additional exhaust gas cleaning systems (scrubbers) for IMO Tier III zones
  • Requires high‑quality lubricating oil and skilled crew for operation
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Suezmax tankerUltra‑Large Container Ship (ULCS)Panamax bulk carrierLarge Ro‑Ro / car carrier
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV ClassABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability for large vessels and have the space and budget to accommodate its size. Avoid if dual‑fuel capability, strict Tier III emission limits without additional after‑treatment, or very tight engine room dimensions are primary concerns.
Use Cases: The 10RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large ocean‑going tankers and container ships, directly coupled to a fixed‑pitch propeller for continuous, efficient service at sea over long voyages.
11RTA82C unverified
· 37180.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
37180
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm enables direct shaft drive without reduction gearing
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals in ultra‑large crude carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Robust crosshead construction simplifies cylinder liner maintenance
  • Modular design allows relatively quick overhauls and part replacement
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation in vessels with space constraints
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or low‑speed four‑stroke engines; Tier III compliance requires after‑treatment
  • Specific fuel consumption is modestly higher than newer common‑rail designs
  • Limited integration with fully electric propulsion concepts
  • Spare parts inventory can be costly for older legacy models
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCSuezmax TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)Very Large Container Ship (≥15 000 TEU)
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large slow‑speed vessels and value fuel flexibility with established maintenance practices. Avoid if: the vessel must meet IMO Tier III NOx limits without SCR, has tight space/weight constraints, or you prefer newer dual‑fuel technology for lower emissions.
Use Cases: The RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on ultra‑large crude carriers, product tankers and ore bulk carriers, providing direct drive to the propeller shaft. It is also used in some large container ships where a single low‑speed diesel unit supplies both propulsion and auxiliary power.
12RTA82C unverified
· 40560.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
40560
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power with excellent fuel efficiency at design load
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul oil tanker routes (decades of service history)
  • Modular construction allows relatively quick overhauls and parts interchangeability
  • Flexibility to run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) without major modifications
  • Broad support network from Sulzer legacy aftermarket
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight, requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer 4‑stroke designs
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Limited speed range – fixed low rpm (84 rpm) limits maneuverability without reduction gearing
  • Crosshead arrangement adds complexity to lubrication and maintenance procedures
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax product tankerLarge bulk carrier (≥180 kt)Ultra‑large container ship (>10,000 TEU) where low‑speed engines are preferred
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large deadweight vessels and value long‑term support; avoid if capital budget is tight, emission limits are stringent without planned after‑treatment, or the vessel requires higher shaft speeds.
Use Cases: The 12RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, Suezmax tankers and large bulk carriers operating long transoceanic routes, where its fuel efficiency at low rpm translates into lower operating costs over thousands of nautical miles.
Sulzer (legacy) 14RTA82C
14RTA82C unverified
· 47320.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA82C
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
2646
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
47320
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (≈48% at rated load) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages.
  • Robust crosshead construction minimizes cylinder wear and extends overhaul intervals.
  • Fuel‑flexible – certified for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Proven Sulzer reliability with a long service history in ultra‑large tankers and bulk carriers.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight limit installation on smaller or retrofit vessels.
  • Relatively slow transient response compared with medium‑speed engines, affecting rapid load changes.
  • Higher upfront capital cost and specialised maintenance expertise required.
  • Requires extensive auxiliary systems (e.g., large cooling water circuit) increasing overall plant complexity.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge Container ShipBulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)Product Tanker
Certifications: IMO D‑2
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large carriers where fuel efficiency and durability outweigh space constraints. Avoid if vessel size or weight limits are critical, or if rapid load response is a primary requirement.
Use Cases: The 14RTA82C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude oil tankers, mega container ships and large bulk carriers, often coupled to a controllable‑pitch propeller in slow‑speed operation for maximum fuel economy over long transoceanic routes.
5RTA84C unverified
· 18600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
18600
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm provides excellent fuel efficiency on long voyages.
  • Proven track record in large tankers and bulk carriers with extensive field experience.
  • Flexible fuel capability – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Large bore and stroke give high torque, reducing gearbox stress.
  • Broad global support network from Sulzer and established spare‑parts logistics.
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight demand substantial engine‑room volume.
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer electronically controlled or dual‑fuel engines.
  • Mechanical valve gear requires regular overhauls; maintenance intensity is higher than modern electronic systems.
  • Emissions performance (NOx, SOx) may need additional after‑treatment to meet current regulations.
  • Noise and vibration levels are greater than those of contemporary four‑stroke or dual‑fuel designs.
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerLarge bulk carrier (≥180 000 dwt)Ultra‑large container ship (≥12 000 TEU) where low‑speed engines are preferred
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑torque low‑speed engine for very large oil or bulk carriers and you have existing Sulzer support infrastructure. Avoid if space is limited, you require the lowest possible emissions without retrofits, or you prefer dual‑fuel flexibility and lower vibration levels.
Use Cases: The 5RTA84C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs and Suezmax tankers, powering long‑haul routes where fuel efficiency and reliability outweigh size penalties. It also appears in large bulk carriers and some ultra‑large container vessels that favour low‑speed engines for direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller.
6RTA84C unverified
· 22320.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
22320
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 6 cylinders provide >30 000 hp in a compact footprint for its class
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals and robust crosshead construction
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~176 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Well‑established support network from Sulzer worldwide
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require a spacious engine room and heavy foundations
  • Fixed low rpm limits gearbox options and may reduce manoeuvrability compared with higher‑speed engines
  • Higher upfront capital cost than medium‑speed alternatives
  • Emissions (NOx, SOx) are relatively high without after‑treatment systems
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew familiar with two‑stroke crosshead engines
Typical Vessels: VLCC tankerSuezmax tankerCapesize bulk carrierVery large ore carriersLarge container ships (selected classes)
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers and value fuel flexibility and low specific fuel consumption. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher rpm propulsion, has strict Tier III emission limits without planned after‑treatment, or budget constraints favour medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The 6RTA84C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on VLCC and Suezmax crude oil tankers, Capesize bulk carriers, and some large container vessels where a single low‑speed unit can drive a controllable‑pitch propeller directly or via reduction gearing.
7RTA84C unverified
· 26040.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
26040
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High specific power suitable for very large ships
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals
  • Can operate on inexpensive HFO, reducing fuel cost
  • Robust crosshead construction tolerates high cylinder pressures
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning (scrubber) systems and can be upgraded for IMO Tier III
Weaknesses
  • Very large footprint and weight limit installation flexibility
  • Higher NOx/SOx emissions without after‑treatment compared to modern dual‑fuel engines
  • Limited RPM range restricts use in high‑speed vessels
  • Requires extensive lubrication system and skilled maintenance crew
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to newer 4‑stroke designs
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Large Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers, want to run on inexpensive HFO and have space for a large engine room. Avoid if: the vessel requires higher speeds, dual‑fuel capability, tight space constraints, or must meet stringent Tier III emissions without additional after‑treatment.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on VLCCs/ULCCs, large bulk carriers (>200 k dwt), and some of the biggest container vessels; often paired with fixed‑pitch or controllable‑pitch propellers where fuel economy at low speed is critical.
8RTA84C unverified
· 29760.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
29760
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (~48%) reduces fuel consumption on long voyages.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the tanker fleet.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO).
  • Low operating speed (80 rpm) eliminates the need for a reduction gearbox, simplifying drivetrain layout.
  • Robust crosshead design facilitates over‑haul and on‑board maintenance.
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Lower specific power compared with newer medium‑speed or dual‑fuel engines; may be oversized for smaller ships.
  • Higher capital cost and longer lead time for procurement.
  • May require additional exhaust gas cleaning (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III emissions in emission control areas.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax TankerVery Large Bulk CarrierPanamax Bulk Carrier
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for very large crude carriers or bulk carriers where low speed and fuel flexibility are critical, and you have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if: the vessel size is limited, you require higher specific power per unit weight, or you must meet strict Tier III emissions without planning retrofits.
Use Cases: The 8RTA84C is typically installed on VLCCs and Suezmax tankers for long‑haul crude transport, as well as on very large bulk carriers moving ore or coal. Its low rpm and high torque make it ideal for ships that run at constant service speeds over extended periods.
9RTA84C unverified
· 33480.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
33480
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power density – 9 cylinders produce ~33 MW at only 80 rpm
  • Fuel‑flexible (HFO and MDO) with good part‑load efficiency
  • Proven reliability on long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers
  • Long service intervals and robust crosshead construction simplifies maintenance
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed alternatives
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight require spacious engine rooms
  • Low rpm necessitates a reduction gear, adding cost and complexity
  • Higher capital cost than many medium‑speed engines
  • Long warm‑up time; not suited for vessels needing rapid speed changes
  • Limited to slow‑speed vessel designs – unsuitable for high‑speed container ships
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)Suezmax tankerAframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>150 k DWT)Ultra‑large ore carriers
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for large tankers or bulk carriers where fuel economy at slow speeds is critical and space for a big engine room is available. Avoid if the vessel requires higher service speed, compact machinery layout, or rapid maneuverability typical of container or cruise ships.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on long‑haul oil tankers (VLCC, Suezmax, Aframax) and large bulk carriers operating on global routes, where the engine’s low specific fuel consumption and durability provide economic advantage over the vessel's service life.
Sulzer (legacy) 10RTA84C
10RTA84C unverified
· 37200.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
37200
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency and fuel consumption advantage in the low‑speed regime
  • Direct‑drive capability eliminates reduction gear, reducing overall plant weight and complexity
  • Proven reliability with decades of service history on VLCCs and bulk carriers
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Extensive aftermarket support from Sulzer legacy parts network
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size limits installation to the biggest vessels
  • Lower specific power compared with newer electronically controlled medium‑speed engines
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment systems
  • Crosshead cylinder wear requires regular overhauls, increasing maintenance cost
  • Long start‑up time and slower response to load changes
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra Large Crude Carrier)Large product tanker200 k–300 k DWT bulk carrierLarge Ro‑Ro/Car carrier (rare)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (Marine Diesel Engine)DNV GL Class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for very large vessels where direct drive and fuel flexibility are priorities. Avoid if vessel size is limited, emissions regulations demand Tier III NOx without costly retrofits, or you prefer the higher specific power and electronic control of modern medium‑speed engines.
Use Cases: The RTA84C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on VLCCs, ULCCs, large product tankers and bulk carriers exceeding 200 k DWT, providing reliable long‑haul service on routes where fuel economy outweighs space constraints. It is also used in some offshore support vessels that require high bollard pull.
11RTA84C unverified
· 40920.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
40920
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • High thermal efficiency (≈48% at rated load) reduces fuel consumption.
  • Proven reliability in VLCC and bulk carrier service histories.
  • Large bore and low rpm provide high torque, often eliminating the need for a reduction gearbox.
  • Fuel flexible – certified for heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil, with optional dual‑fuel conversion kits.
  • L‑configuration packs 11 cylinders into a relatively compact footprint for an engine of this power.
Weaknesses
  • Very large physical size and weight require substantial hull space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost and longer lead times compared with smaller or medium‑speed engines.
  • Crosshead design adds mechanical complexity, increasing maintenance skill requirements.
  • Spare‑part logistics can be challenging in remote ports despite Sulzer’s global support network.
  • Not suitable for high‑speed vessels that require engine speeds above 120 rpm.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power main engine for very large tankers or bulk carriers, value fuel efficiency at low rpm, and have the hull space for a low‑speed crosshead layout. Avoid if: vessel size is limited, budget constraints prohibit high upfront cost, or the ship requires high‑speed propulsion above 120 rpm.
Use Cases: The RTA84C is typically installed in the engine rooms of VLCCs and large bulk carriers where its massive low‑speed torque drives a single propeller directly. It is also found on some ultra‑large container vessels that favor direct‑drive configurations for maximum efficiency over long voyages.
12RTA84C unverified
· 44640.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
44640
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm design, ideal for VLCC/ULCC propulsion
  • Proven long‑term reliability with robust crosshead construction reducing wear
  • Good part‑load efficiency and fuel flexibility (HFO/MDO) for cost‑effective operation
  • Modular cylinder arrangement simplifies maintenance and overhauls
  • Compatible with exhaust gas cleaning systems to meet IMO Tier II/III emissions
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel or 4‑stroke alternatives
  • Limited speed range; not suited for vessels needing high service speeds
  • Requires extensive auxiliary systems (cooling, lubrication, air‑start) increasing complexity
  • Emissions compliance depends on additional after‑treatment equipment
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCSuezmax tankerCapesize bulk carrierLarge LNG carrier (some units)
Certifications: DNV class approvalIMO Type Approval for two‑stroke main engines
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high propulsion power at low rpm for large dead‑weight vessels, value proven reliability and fuel flexibility, and have space for a sizable engine room. Avoid if: vessel size or weight limits preclude a large low‑speed engine, higher service speeds are required, or you prefer a dual‑fuel solution with lower baseline emissions without added scrubbers.
Use Cases: The RTA84C is typically installed as the sole main engine on VLCCs and Capesize bulk carriers for long‑haul routes, providing efficient propulsion over thousands of nautical miles. It is also fitted on some large LNG carriers where high torque at low rpm is advantageous.
14RTA84C unverified
· 52080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA84C
Bore (mm)
840
Stroke (mm)
3150
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
52080
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈52 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in the Sulzer RTA family
  • Crosshead design reduces cylinder wear and allows long overhauls
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel oil
  • Broad class approvals (DNV, ABS, LR) simplify new‑build certification
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and weight demand spacious engine rooms
  • Low rpm limits rapid speed changes; slower manoeuvring response
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with newer dual‑fuel designs
  • Requires skilled crew for two‑stroke maintenance and overhauls
  • Emissions control may need additional scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge bulk carrier (Handymax/Supramax)Very large container ship (>10,000 TEU)
Certifications: DNV GLABSLloyd's Register
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with a long service record for very large tankers or bulk carriers and have the space and crew expertise to support two‑stroke maintenance. Avoid if vessel size is constrained, rapid speed changes are required, or you require dual‑fuel capability and built‑in emissions reduction.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newly built VLCCs/ULCCs and large bulk carriers; also used in retrofits where a proven low‑speed engine is preferred over newer multi‑fuel units.
5RTA96C unverified
· 28600.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
28600
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power and torque at low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Excellent fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) as well as marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies overhauls and parts logistics
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high dry weight, limiting installation in space‑constrained ships
  • Higher upfront capital cost than many medium‑speed or dual‑fuel options
  • Requires extensive maintenance expertise and longer overhaul intervals
  • Emissions compliance for IMO Tier III often needs additional after‑treatment (scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction)
  • Limited speed range; not suited to vessels that need frequent rapid speed changes
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersMid‑size container ships (≈3 000–5 000 TEU)Aframax tankersGeneral cargo vessels requiring high propulsion power
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (marine diesel engine)DNV GL Approved Marine EngineABS Classification Society approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine that can run heavy fuel oil and you have the space for its size. Avoid if your vessel requires dual‑fuel capability, very tight installation envelopes, or must meet Tier III emissions without installing additional after‑treatment systems.
Use Cases: The 5RTA96C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on bulk carriers and medium‑size container ships where direct‑drive low‑speed propellers are preferred. Its robust design makes it a common choice for vessels operating long voyages with heavy fuel oil availability, offering reliable performance and relatively low operational fuel costs.
6RTA96C unverified
· 34320.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
34320
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈34 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Low specific fuel consumption compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Robust crosshead design tolerates heavy HFO and MDO fuels
  • Flexibility to de‑rate cylinders for fuel‑economy or emission targets
Weaknesses
  • Large physical footprint and high capital cost
  • Long warm‑up time; slower response to rapid load changes
  • Requires extensive lubrication and cooling systems, increasing maintenance complexity
  • Higher NOx emissions unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR)
  • Limited suitability for vessels under 15 MW power requirement
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (10 000+ TEU)VLCCs and ULCCsLarge bulk carriers (>200 k DWT)Very large LPG/LNG carriers
Certifications: IMO Type Approval – MARPOL Annex VI (NOx Tier II/III capability when fitted with after‑treatment)DNV GL Class – Marine EngineABS Classification – Marine Propulsion
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power (>30 MW) for long‑haul, fuel‑economy focused vessels and can accommodate the engine’s size and upfront cost. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints dominate, or rapid start/stop cycles are required.
Use Cases: The 6RTA96C powers some of the world’s largest container ships, VLCCs and bulk carriers, where continuous high‑power output and fuel efficiency over long voyages are critical. It is typically installed in new builds targeting low operating costs and compliance with IMO emission regulations.
7RTA96C unverified
· 40040.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
40040
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (≈173 g/kWh) – excellent operating cost for long voyages
  • Proven reliability on a fleet of ULCC and large bulk carriers with decades of service history
  • Modular cylinder design simplifies over‑haul and parts replacement
  • High torque at very low rpm reduces gearbox complexity and improves propeller efficiency
  • Broad fuel flexibility (HFO, MDO) with established fuel‑lubrication management systems
Weaknesses
  • Enormous physical size and weight limit installation to the largest hulls
  • High capital cost and long lead‑time for spare parts compared with newer medium‑speed units
  • Slow transient response – less suited for vessels requiring rapid speed changes or frequent manoeuvring
  • Requires high‑grade lubricating oil and strict maintenance regimes to control cylinder liner wear
  • Limited applicability on ships below ~150 m length due to space constraints
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container vessel (ULCV)Very large bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)Large oil tanker (VLCC) – in some retrofitsHeavy lift / project cargo vessels with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV ClassABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >40 MW of low‑speed power for a vessel over ~300 m LOA where fuel efficiency and proven reliability outweigh size and cost concerns. Avoid if the ship is smaller, has tight space/weight limits, or requires rapid speed changes typical of offshore support or fast container services.
Use Cases: The 7RTA96C powers the main propulsion on many of today’s biggest container ships (18‑20 k TEU) and large bulk carriers, where its high torque at low rpm drives a single slow‑turning propeller for optimal hull efficiency. It is also found in some VLCC retrofits where owners prioritize fuel savings over initial expense.
8RTA96C unverified
· 45760.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
45760
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈61 500 kW) enabling compact installation on very large ships
  • Proven reliability with decades of operational history and extensive spare‑part support
  • Low specific fuel consumption for a two‑stroke engine, contributing to reduced operating costs
  • Robust construction tolerates heavy‑fuel oil (HFO) and marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Wide network of authorized service centers due to Sulzer legacy programme
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight limit installation on smaller vessels
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with modern dual‑fuel or four‑stroke engines unless equipped with after‑treatment
  • Fixed low rpm (≈102 rpm) reduces flexibility for variable‑speed applications
  • Longer start‑up time and higher maintenance intervals typical of two‑stroke crosshead designs
  • Higher initial capital cost relative to newer, more compact engine families
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVery large crude carriers (VLCC)Bulk carriers (>150 kt)Ro‑Ro/Passenger vessels requiring high power output
Certifications: IMO Type Approval (D‑2)ABS ClassificationDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power in a compact footprint for large, deep‑draft vessels and value proven long‑term reliability with an established support network. Avoid if vessel size or draft constraints prevent installation of a large low‑speed engine, or if strict emission limits require newer dual‑fuel or after‑treatment solutions.
Use Cases: The 8RTA96C is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large container ships and VLCCs, where its high power output drives single or twin screw arrangements. It also appears in large bulk carriers and some Ro‑Ro vessels that demand sustained high speed over long voyages.
9RTA96C unverified
· 51480.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
51480
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈5.7 MW per cylinder) enabling compact installation on large vessels
  • Proven reliability with decades of operational history in the container trade
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, marine diesel oil and blends
  • Robust construction suited to harsh sea‑going conditions and long maintenance intervals
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Higher part‑load specific fuel consumption compared with newer electronically controlled engines
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and specialized tooling
  • Limited adaptability for future low‑emission retrofits (e.g., full dual‑fuel conversion) without major redesign
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥10,000 TEU)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) – rare applicationsLarge bulk carriers (when extreme power is required)
Certifications: DNVABSIMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power engine for an ultra‑large container vessel with ample engine‑room space and can support the maintenance regime. Avoid if: the ship is smaller, operates primarily at part load, or the operator prioritises the lowest possible fuel consumption and future dual‑fuel flexibility.
Use Cases: The 9RTA96C powers many of the world’s biggest container ships (e.g., Maersk Triple‑E class) where maximum propulsion power and reliability are paramount. It is also found on a limited number of very large tankers that require comparable shaft power.
10RTA96C unverified
· 57200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
57200
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈57 MW) enabling direct‑drive of large propellers without reduction gear
  • Excellent fuel efficiency – among the lowest specific fuel consumption in its class
  • Proven reliability on ultra‑large container ships and VLCCs with long service intervals
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO)
  • Broad support network from Sulzer/MAN and major classification societies
Weaknesses
  • Enormous physical size and weight – requires substantial engine room volume and structural reinforcement
  • High capital cost and complex maintenance procedures, demanding highly skilled personnel
  • Limited suitability for vessels under ~30 000 dwt due to space and power‑to‑weight considerations
  • Low rpm limits rapid speed changes; not ideal for vessels requiring high maneuverability
  • Emissions control may require additional after‑treatment (e.g., scrubbers) to meet latest IMO Tier III standards
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Suezmax TankerLarge Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power for a mega‑size vessel and prioritize fuel efficiency and proven reliability. Avoid if the ship is smaller, has tight space constraints, or budget limits make the large initial cost and maintenance burden unattractive.
Use Cases: The 10RTA96C powers the main shaft of ships such as 12 000‑TEU container ships, 300 k dwt bulk carriers, and VLCCs, where its low‑speed direct‑drive configuration maximises propulsive efficiency over long voyages.
11RTA96C unverified
· 62920.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
62920
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈62 MW) suitable for the largest container ships
  • Proven reliability with decades of service worldwide
  • Excellent fuel efficiency at design speed when running on HFO/MDO
  • Direct‑drive low‑speed operation eliminates need for reduction gear in many installations
  • Extensive global support network from Sulzer
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space
  • Fixed low rpm limits flexibility for vessels needing variable speed drives
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed or dual‑fuel alternatives
  • Maintenance demands skilled crew and longer planned overhauls
  • Emissions compliance may need additional after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) to meet IMO Tier III
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container vessel (ULCV)Large container ship (10–12 k TEU)Very large bulk carrier (optional)
Certifications: IMO Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power engine for a low‑speed direct‑drive propulsion system on very large container ships and can accommodate the size and capital cost. Avoid if vessel design calls for higher rpm, dual‑fuel flexibility beyond HFO/MDO, or tighter space constraints.
Use Cases: The 11RTA96C is typically installed as the main engine of 10 000–14 000 TEU container ships, providing the thrust needed for speeds around 22–24 knots. It also appears on a few very large bulk carriers where maximum power and fuel efficiency are paramount.
Sulzer (legacy) 12RTA96C
12RTA96C unverified
· 68640.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke crosshead
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
68640
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high specific power suitable for >90 000 HP propulsion needs
  • Proven reliability with decades of service on ULCS container ships
  • Excellent fuel efficiency at low rpm, capable of running heavy fuel oil (HFO) and MDO
  • Long intervals between overhauls due to robust crosshead design
  • High torque output simplifies reduction gearing and propeller sizing
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight demand substantial engine room space
  • Higher upfront capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Slower transient response, less suited for vessels requiring rapid speed changes
  • Maintenance requires specialized facilities and skilled personnel
  • Emissions are higher unless equipped with after‑treatment (e.g., SCR) or low‑sulphur fuel
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipVery large container vesselLarge bulk carrier (rare)
Certifications: IMO D-2DNVABS
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for ultra‑large container vessels, value fuel flexibility and long service intervals, and have the space and support infrastructure for a large crosshead engine. Avoid if: the vessel is smaller than 15 000 TEU, requires fast speed changes, or you prioritize lower emissions without additional retrofits.
Use Cases: The 12RTA96C powers some of the world’s biggest container ships (e.g., Maersk E‑Class 18 000–20 000 TEU vessels) as the main propulsion unit, providing reliable thrust for long ocean voyages while running on heavy fuel oil or marine diesel.
Sulzer (legacy) 14RTA96C
14RTA96C unverified
· 80080.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
RTA96C
Bore (mm)
960
Stroke (mm)
2500
Cylinders
14
Power (kW)
80080
Speed (rpm)
102
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Strengths
  • Very high thermal efficiency (≈48–50%) reduces fuel consumption per mile.
  • Proven reliability with decades of service in ultra‑large vessels.
  • Modular cylinder design allows block‑by‑block maintenance and overhauls.
  • Extensive global support network from Sulzer and classification societies.
  • Can be operated on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) and retrofitted for low‑emission scrubbers.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight restrict installation to very large hulls.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Long start‑up time; not suited for vessels requiring rapid speed changes.
  • Requires a sophisticated lubrication and cooling system, increasing auxiliary plant complexity.
  • Limited flexibility for variable‑speed operation or hybrid propulsion concepts.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Panamax / Post‑Panamax Container ShipCapesize Bulk CarrierVery Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GLABS
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power (>70 MW), long intervals between overhauls, and a proven engine platform for large hulls. Avoid if the vessel size limits space/weight budgets, rapid speed changes are required, or capital cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 14RTA96C is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on ultra‑large container ships (e.g., Maersk E‑class) and large bulk carriers, often coupled with a reduction gear and controllable‑pitch propeller to deliver efficient cruising speeds of 22–24 knots.

WinGD

54
9X72DF
· 27540.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
X72DF
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
27540
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed package, ideal for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG / HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when running on LNG
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈168 g/kWh) improves operating economics
  • Proven WinGD reliability record with reversible operation for maneuvering
  • Meets IMO Tier III emission limits when equipped with after‑treatment
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high dry weight increase installation space and structural requirements
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Complex LNG (or ammonia/methanol) fuel handling system adds operational complexity and requires specialized bunkering infrastructure
  • Injection nozzle wear and fuel‑rail pressure issues require diligent monitoring after ~8 000–10 000 h
  • Scavenge air cooler fouling in dust‑laden trades can reduce thermal efficiency if not regularly cleaned
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Large Bulk CarrierLNG carrier (dual‑fuel configuration)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >27 MW of low‑speed propulsion power, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet current and future emission regulations, and have access to LNG (or alternative gas) bunkering. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s footprint and upfront cost, or if operating in environments where dust fouling of the scavenge air system cannot be reliably managed.
Use Cases: The 9X72DF is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on new‑build ultra‑large container ships, VLCCs and large bulk carriers targeting IMO 2020/2030 compliance. It is also selected for LNG carrier projects that require a high‑power dual‑fuel engine capable of running on both boil‑off gas and heavy fuel oil.
WinGD 10X72DF
10X72DF
· 30600.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X72DF
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
30600
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder (≈3.2 MW/cyl) enabling ultra‑large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – LNG, HFO, and future fuels (methanol, ammonia) on the same platform
  • Meets IMO Tier III NOx limits when operated on LNG, reducing emissions
  • Proven reliability from extensive WinGD service history in ULCVs and tankers
  • Camshaft‑less common‑rail injection provides precise combustion control
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires additional space for LNG tanks, vapour handling and high‑pressure fuel rail infrastructure
  • Maintenance intervals for high‑pressure injectors and fuel rails are shorter (≈8 000–10 000 h) compared with diesel‑only versions
  • Ammonia and methanol variants are still early in commercial deployment; support networks are limited
  • Sensitivity to LNG quality – water/solid contamination can cause fuel rail over‑pressure events
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Bulk Carrier (>200 k dwt)Crude Oil Tanker (VLCC/Panamax)LNG CarrierCruise Ship (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOxDNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power with the ability to switch between LNG and conventional fuel, must meet strict NOx limits, and operate on routes where LNG bunkering is available or planned. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, vessel size does not justify a low‑speed engine of this rating, or the operating area lacks reliable LNG (or future alternative‑fuel) supply infrastructure.
Use Cases: The X72DF powers today’s biggest container ships (>20 000 TEU), large bulk carriers and VLCCs that require >30 MW propulsion while complying with Tier III emissions. It is also selected for new LNG carriers and for vessels being future‑proofed for methanol or ammonia as alternative fuels become commercially viable.
WinGD 11X72DF
11X72DF
· 33660.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
X72DF
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
33660
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power output in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can operate on LNG, HFO or mixed fuels, supporting IMO Tier III emissions limits
  • Electronic common‑rail injection provides precise fuel metering and lower specific fuel consumption
  • Proven WinGD reliability with reversible operation and low‑speed design suited to long‑haul service
  • Modular family (X72) allows common spares and maintenance procedures across variants
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel diesel engines due to dual‑fuel system and cryogenic LNG infrastructure
  • Complex fuel handling requires additional space for LNG tanks, vapourisers and high‑pressure rail safety systems
  • Maintenance of high‑pressure fuel rails and electronic injectors demands specialised training and tooling
  • Ammonia or methanol variants are still emerging and may need extra certification and crew familiarisation
  • Scavenge air cooler fouling can be an issue on dust‑laden routes, requiring more frequent cleaning
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVLCCs and LR2 tankers (with LNG bunker capability)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel flexibility)Large cruise linersOffshore support vessels
Certifications: DNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLR class approvalIMO Tier III compliance when operated on LNG
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with fuel flexibility for LNG/HFO to meet strict emission regulations and have the infrastructure for dual‑fuel handling. Avoid if capital budget is limited, vessel size cannot accommodate LNG storage, or crew lacks training on advanced electronic fuel systems.
Use Cases: The 11X72DF is typically installed in newbuilds of large container ships and tankers that aim to reduce CO₂ and NOx emissions by switching to LNG on emission control areas, as well as in retrofits where dual‑fuel capability extends operational range while complying with IMO Tier III. It also serves as a future‑proof platform for alternative fuels such as ammonia or methanol when those markets mature.
WinGD 12X72DF
12X72DF
· 36720.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X72DF
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
36720
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder enables propulsion of ultra‑large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides significant NOx, SOx and CO₂ emission reductions when LNG is used.
  • Proven WinGD reliability with modular construction for easier on‑site maintenance and overhauls.
  • Reversible operation allows rapid change of rotation direction for manoeuvring without auxiliary gearboxes.
  • Engine control system (common‑rail electronic) offers precise fuel metering and low specific fuel consumption.
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than comparable single‑fuel slow‑speed diesel engines.
  • Complex gas handling and high‑pressure fuel rail systems increase installation and maintenance effort.
  • Physical size and weight require substantial engine room volume, limiting applicability on smaller ships.
  • Fuel‑rail pressure excursions have been reported as a failure mode, requiring strict monitoring.
  • Ammonia variant (X72DF‑A‑1.0) is still in early deployment phase with limited operational data.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVery large crude carriers (VLCC)LNG carriers (type C and B)Large bulk carriers (>180 kDWT)Cruise liners requiring low emissions
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx compliance (when operated on LNG)DNV GL Class approval for dual‑fuel operationABS approved marine main engine
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power with the ability to meet stringent emission limits using LNG and have access to gas bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the larger footprint and higher upfront cost, or if reliable LNG supply is uncertain on intended trade routes.
Use Cases: The X72DF is typically installed in new‑build ultra‑large vessels that must comply with IMO Tier III regulations on NOx and aim for CO₂ reduction through LNG bunkering. It is also selected for retrofits where a power boost and dual‑fuel flexibility are required, especially on long‑haul routes with established LNG terminals.
9X62DF
· 20520.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
X62DF
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
20520
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (~2.3 MW per cylinder) reduces engine room volume for a given output
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III without SCR and future fuel switches
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) lowers methane slip up to 50 % and improves SFOC by up to 5 % in diesel mode
  • Proven service record on large LNG carriers and ultra‑large container ships
  • Variable compression ratio allows optimal combustion across load range, improving fuel efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and high capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Complex gas handling and pressure‑regulation system requires extensive shore infrastructure and crew training
  • Maintenance intensity – piston crown thermal stress and cylinder liner wear demand close monitoring
  • Limited to vessels that can accommodate the required LNG storage volume
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes, especially on DP‑operated ships
Typical Vessels: LNG carrier (Q‑Fit & Q‑Max)Ultra‑large container shipCruise liner (newbuilds with LNG bunkering)Offshore supply vessel / FPSO supportVery large crude carrier (VLCC) retrofit
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)DNV GL Class approved for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW of low‑speed power with LNG flexibility, must meet strict emission limits and have the infrastructure for gas storage/handling. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine footprint, or if operating profile is low‑power where a medium‑speed diesel would be more economical.
Use Cases: The X62DF powers new‑build LNG carriers that burn boil‑off gas, large container ships converting to LNG for emission compliance, cruise ships seeking lower NOx/SOx footprints, and offshore support vessels requiring rapid load changes while staying within Tier III limits.
WinGD 10X62DF
10X62DF
· 22800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X62DF
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
22800
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density (≈2.28 MW per cylinder) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – LNG operation meets IMO Tier III without SCR, HFO as backup
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) reduces methane slip up to 50% and improves SFOC (165–168 g/kWh diesel mode)
  • Variable compression ratio adapts to fuel type and load, enhancing efficiency
  • Proven platform with multiple stroke options (standard, S2.0, S1.0) for speed‑power optimisation
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and complexity compared with single‑fuel engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and additional gas handling equipment
  • Dual‑fuel system maintenance intensive – fuel valve carbon deposits and gas pressure regulation need close monitoring
  • Larger physical footprint and weight than comparable medium‑speed diesel sets
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; poor HFO or contaminated air can accelerate liner/piston wear
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (10 MW+)Very large crude carriers / tankersBulk carriers (>15 kt) requiring high thrustLNG carriers (dual‑fuel flexibility)Cruise ships with Tier III emission requirements
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, want LNG dual‑fuel capability to meet Tier III limits without after‑treatment, and can accommodate the higher upfront cost and space. Avoid if your operation lacks reliable LNG supply, budget constraints dominate, or a simpler single‑fuel engine meets performance needs.
Use Cases: The X62DF is typically installed on new‑build mega‑container vessels, large tankers and bulk carriers where operators demand maximum power, fuel flexibility and compliance with strict emission control areas. It is also selected for LNG carriers that wish to retain diesel backup while operating primarily on gas.
WinGD 11X62DF
11X62DF
· 25080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X62DF
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
25080
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈2.3 MW per cylinder) reduces engine room footprint.
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (LNG/HFO) enables compliance with IMO Tier III without SCR in gas mode.
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) lowers methane slip up to 50 % and improves fuel efficiency by up to 5 % in diesel VCR mode.
  • Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) adapts compression to load and fuel type, optimizing SFOC (165‑168 g/kWh in diesel).
  • Proven track record on large container ships, cruise vessels and LNG carriers.
Weaknesses
  • Complex gas handling and iGPR pressure regulation increase installation and maintenance effort.
  • Higher capital cost compared with conventional HFO‑only low‑speed engines.
  • Requires reliable LNG bunkering infrastructure; limited availability in some trade routes.
  • Fuel valve carbon deposits and piston crown thermal stresses are documented failure points under low‑load multi‑fuel operation.
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes (e.g., DP operations) demands careful monitoring.
Typical Vessels: Container shipCruise linerLNG carrier (boil‑off gas utilization)Offshore support vessel with dynamic positioningLarge bulk carrier or chemical tanker on emission‑controlled routes
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode)DNV GL ApprovedABS ApprovedLR Approved
Decision Guide: Choose the X62DF when you need high power density, dual‑fuel capability and Tier III compliance without SCR, especially for new builds operating in emission control areas or with access to LNG bunkering. Avoid it if your operation lacks reliable LNG supply, budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel engine architecture.
Use Cases: The X62DF is typically installed on modern ultra‑large container vessels and cruise ships targeting low emissions, as well as new LNG carriers that can burn boil‑off gas directly. It also fits offshore DP vessels where rapid load changes are common and fuel flexibility reduces operating cost.
WinGD 12X62DF
12X62DF
· 27360.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel marine engine
Model Family
X62DF
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
27360
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈2.1 MW per cylinder) enables compact installation for very large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – LNG reduces CO₂ and NOₓ, HFO provides fallback where gas bunkering is unavailable
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) lowers methane slip up to 50 % and improves fuel consumption in gas mode
  • IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR, meeting the strictest emission regulations
  • Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) option yields up to 5 % diesel‑mode SFOC reduction
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and more complex control systems compared with single‑fuel engines
  • Requires LNG storage, vapourisation and gas handling plant – not suitable for routes lacking gas infrastructure
  • Fuel‑system sensitivity: carbon deposits on fuel valves and piston crown thermal stress are documented failure points
  • Maintenance intervals (overhaul) remain demanding due to two‑stroke wear mechanisms and turbocharger surge risk in rapid load changes
  • Physical size and weight are larger than comparable medium‑speed diesel sets, impacting hull design
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥18 000 TEU)LNG carriers (Moss type)Cruise ships with LNG propulsionLarge bulk carriers and ore carriers seeking Tier III complianceVery large tankers (VLCC) on routes with established LNG bunkering
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode)DNV GL class approval for dual‑fuel operationABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel requires very high power, wants to future‑proof against tightening emission limits and has reliable access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the operator lacks gas infrastructure, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or the operating profile involves prolonged low‑load periods that increase dual‑fuel wear risks.
Use Cases: The X62DF is installed on new‑build ULCVs and LNG‑fueled cruise ships where space efficiency and emissions performance are critical. It also powers modern dual‑fuel bulk carriers and tankers operating on North‑American or European routes with established LNG supply chains, delivering the flexibility to switch between gas and oil depending on bunker availability.
9X52DF
· 15120.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
X52DF
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
2315
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
15120
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
520
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2315 (standard X52/X52DF), 2045 (X52-S2.0 / X52DF-S2.0)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
79-105 rpm (standard), 85-120 rpm (S2.0 variants), 80-120 rpm (X52-S2.0)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X52), LNG/Gas (X52DF), Ammonia/Diesel (X52DF-A), Methanol capable (future variants)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X52DF-A, X52DF-S2.0, X52-S2.0); Legacy X52DF-1.x removed from portfolio 2024
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Gas Admission Valve (GAV) stroke sensor unreliability at sea causing unplanned diesel mode shutdown
    Check: Visual inspection of GAV sensor wiring, sensor response test at dock and sea trial, check sensor connector corrosion
  • Area: Fuel gas supply pressure fluctuations under heavy sea conditions from ship-side LNG system causing engine speed oscillations
    Check: Pressure relief valve setting verification, fuel supply isolation valve function check, regulator response test under load variation
  • Area: Scavenge air cooler type changes and turbocharger allocation revisions across X-engine platform requiring careful commissioning verification
    Check: Cross-check installed turbocharger serial number against commissioning document, scavenge cooler type plate vs contract specifications
  • Area: Oil starvation risk on turbocharger bearing during engine startup and low-pressure transients common in all two-stroke diesels
    Check: Check lube oil supply pressure before start, inspect turbo bearing condition at overhaul, verify pre-lubrication startup sequence in manual

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density (≈1 510 kW per cylinder) suitable for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility – can run on LNG with a small diesel pilot or switch to HFO when gas is unavailable
  • IMO Tier III emissions compliance with optional iSCR, reducing NOx and SOx penalties
  • Lower specific fuel consumption in gas mode (≈140 g/kWh) compared with conventional diesel engines
  • Platform designed for future alternative fuels (ammonia variant already offered)
Weaknesses
  • Gas admission valve sensor reliability issues can cause unplanned shutdowns in diesel‑only mode
  • Fuel‑gas pressure fluctuations under heavy sea motion may lead to speed oscillations
  • Turbocharger oil‑starvation risk during start‑up requires strict pre‑lubrication procedures
  • Higher initial capital cost and more complex LNG bunkering infrastructure compared with single‑fuel diesels
  • Increased crew training and maintenance documentation for dual‑fuel operation
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersRo‑Ro / passenger vesselsLarge LNG carriers (dual‑fuel configuration)Heavy bulk carriers (where high power is required)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIDNV Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power on a low‑speed engine, want to meet strict NOx limits and have reliable LNG bunkering or plan for future alternative fuels. Avoid if the vessel operates on routes with limited gas supply, crew expertise in dual‑fuel systems is lacking, or capital cost must be minimized.
Use Cases: The 9X52DF is typically installed on newbuilds of 13 000–20 000 TEU container ships and large cruise vessels where fuel flexibility and emissions compliance are critical. It is also selected for LNG carriers that wish to retain diesel capability for port operations or in regions with intermittent gas availability.
WinGD 10X52DF
10X52DF
· 16800.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X52DF
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
2315
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
16800
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
520
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2315 (standard X52/X52DF), 2045 (X52-S2.0 / X52DF-S2.0)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
79-105 rpm (standard), 85-120 rpm (S2.0 variants), 80-120 rpm (X52-S2.0)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X52), LNG/Gas (X52DF), Ammonia/Diesel (X52DF-A), Methanol capable (future variants)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X52DF-A, X52DF-S2.0, X52-S2.0); Legacy X52DF-1.x removed from portfolio 2024
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Gas Admission Valve (GAV) stroke sensor unreliability at sea causing unplanned diesel mode shutdown
    Check: Visual inspection of GAV sensor wiring, sensor response test at dock and sea trial, check sensor connector corrosion
  • Area: Fuel gas supply pressure fluctuations under heavy sea conditions from ship-side LNG system causing engine speed oscillations
    Check: Pressure relief valve setting verification, fuel supply isolation valve function check, regulator response test under load variation
  • Area: Scavenge air cooler type changes and turbocharger allocation revisions across X-engine platform requiring careful commissioning verification
    Check: Cross-check installed turbocharger serial number against commissioning document, scavenge cooler type plate vs contract specifications
  • Area: Oil starvation risk on turbocharger bearing during engine startup and low-pressure transients common in all two-stroke diesels
    Check: Check lube oil supply pressure before start, inspect turbo bearing condition at overhaul, verify pre-lubrication startup sequence in manual

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power density – approx. 1 810 kW per cylinder
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG + diesel/HFO) for fuel flexibility and CO₂ reduction
  • Low specific fuel consumption in gas mode (~140 g/kWh) and optional iSCR for Tier III compliance
  • Proven X‑engine platform with extensive field service data and DNV class approval
  • Future‑fuel variants (ammonia, methanol) available on the same hull
Weaknesses
  • Complex LNG handling system increases installation cost and space requirements
  • Reported reliability issues with gas admission valve stroke sensor and fuel‑gas pressure stability in heavy seas
  • Turbocharger oil‑starvation risk during start‑up requires strict pre‑lubrication procedures
  • Higher capital expenditure compared with single‑fuel diesel engines of similar power
  • Requires careful verification of scavenge air cooler and turbocharger configuration at commissioning
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsLNG carriersLarge bulk carriersCruise/passenger vesselsRo‑Ro / ferry vessels with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with iSCR option in ECAs)DNV class approval for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose the X52DF when you need very high shaft power, want LNG dual‑fuel flexibility to meet current and future emission caps, and have access to LNG bunkering infrastructure. Avoid it if LNG supply is uncertain, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or operational simplicity of a single‑fuel diesel engine is preferred.
Use Cases: The X52DF is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container vessels (20 000+ TEU) and large LNG carriers where megawatt‑class power and low emissions are mandatory. It is also selected for cruise ships and high‑speed ferries that operate in emission‑controlled areas and plan to transition to alternative fuels such as ammonia or methanol.
WinGD 11X52DF
11X52DF
· 18480.0 kW · 2-stroke dual-fuel low-speed marine engine
Model Family
X52DF
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
2315
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
18480
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
520
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2315 (standard X52/X52DF), 2045 (X52-S2.0 / X52DF-S2.0)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
79-105 rpm (standard), 85-120 rpm (S2.0 variants), 80-120 rpm (X52-S2.0)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X52), LNG/Gas (X52DF), Ammonia/Diesel (X52DF-A), Methanol capable (future variants)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X52DF-A, X52DF-S2.0, X52-S2.0); Legacy X52DF-1.x removed from portfolio 2024
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Gas Admission Valve (GAV) stroke sensor unreliability at sea causing unplanned diesel mode shutdown
    Check: Visual inspection of GAV sensor wiring, sensor response test at dock and sea trial, check sensor connector corrosion
  • Area: Fuel gas supply pressure fluctuations under heavy sea conditions from ship-side LNG system causing engine speed oscillations
    Check: Pressure relief valve setting verification, fuel supply isolation valve function check, regulator response test under load variation
  • Area: Scavenge air cooler type changes and turbocharger allocation revisions across X-engine platform requiring careful commissioning verification
    Check: Cross-check installed turbocharger serial number against commissioning document, scavenge cooler type plate vs contract specifications
  • Area: Oil starvation risk on turbocharger bearing during engine startup and low-pressure transients common in all two-stroke diesels
    Check: Check lube oil supply pressure before start, inspect turbo bearing condition at overhaul, verify pre-lubrication startup sequence in manual

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power density – approx. 1 490 kW per cylinder in DF mode
  • Dual‑fuel flexibility (LNG and HFO) reduces fuel cost volatility and enables compliance with IMO Tier II/III emissions
  • Integrated SCR/iSCR option for NOx reduction without separate after‑treatment plant
  • Proven platform – X‑engine family widely installed on LNG carriers and large container ships
  • Future‑proofing options (ammonia, methanol variants) available within the same engine block
Weaknesses
  • Complex low‑pressure gas injection system; GAV sensor reliability issues reported in sea trials
  • Engine speed can oscillate if LNG supply pressure fluctuates under heavy sea conditions
  • Higher capital cost and need for ship‑board LNG storage and handling infrastructure
  • Spare‑parts logistics more demanding than legacy diesel‑only engines
  • Startup procedures are stricter to avoid turbocharger oil starvation during low‑load transients
Typical Vessels: LNG carrier (Q‑Max, Q‑Flex)Large container ship (>15 000 TEU) operating in ECAsCruise liner with strict emission limitsBulk carrier or ore carrier requiring high bollard pull and low NOx
Certifications: IMO Tier II/III (NOx) compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel will operate in Emission Control Areas, has access to LNG bunkering, and requires a high‑power engine with future fuel flexibility. Avoid if LNG infrastructure is unavailable, budget constraints dominate, or operational simplicity of a single‑fuel diesel engine is preferred.
Use Cases: The 11X52DF is typically installed on newbuild LNG carriers for main propulsion, on ultra‑large container ships to meet ECA NOx limits without SCR, and on cruise vessels where dual‑fuel operation supports both environmental compliance and fuel cost optimisation. It is also selected for bulk carriers targeting low‑emission routes.
WinGD 12X52DF
12X52DF
· 20160.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
X52DF
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
2315
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
20160
Speed (rpm)
117
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
520
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2315 (standard X52/X52DF), 2045 (X52-S2.0 / X52DF-S2.0)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
79-105 rpm (standard), 85-120 rpm (S2.0 variants), 80-120 rpm (X52-S2.0)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X52), LNG/Gas (X52DF), Ammonia/Diesel (X52DF-A), Methanol capable (future variants)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X52DF-A, X52DF-S2.0, X52-S2.0); Legacy X52DF-1.x removed from portfolio 2024
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Gas Admission Valve (GAV) stroke sensor unreliability at sea causing unplanned diesel mode shutdown
    Check: Visual inspection of GAV sensor wiring, sensor response test at dock and sea trial, check sensor connector corrosion
  • Area: Fuel gas supply pressure fluctuations under heavy sea conditions from ship-side LNG system causing engine speed oscillations
    Check: Pressure relief valve setting verification, fuel supply isolation valve function check, regulator response test under load variation
  • Area: Scavenge air cooler type changes and turbocharger allocation revisions across X-engine platform requiring careful commissioning verification
    Check: Cross-check installed turbocharger serial number against commissioning document, scavenge cooler type plate vs contract specifications
  • Area: Oil starvation risk on turbocharger bearing during engine startup and low-pressure transients common in all two-stroke diesels
    Check: Check lube oil supply pressure before start, inspect turbo bearing condition at overhaul, verify pre-lubrication startup sequence in manual

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power density – approx. 1 810 kW per cylinder in diesel mode and 1 490 kW per cylinder in gas mode
  • Very low specific fuel consumption in LNG mode (≈140 g/kWh) reducing operating cost on gas‑rich routes
  • IMO Tier II/III compliant with optional integrated SCR/iSCR for NOx control
  • Proven platform – widely installed on large LNG carriers and cruise ships, offering extensive field experience
  • Modular design simplifies overhauls and spare‑parts logistics
Weaknesses
  • Requires a full ship‑board LNG handling system; capital cost is higher than pure diesel engines
  • Gas admission valve sensor reliability issues have been reported, leading to unplanned switches to diesel mode
  • Turbocharger oil‑starvation risk during start‑up and low‑pressure transients demands strict procedures
  • Complex control software for dual‑fuel operation increases training and maintenance workload
  • Ammonia (X52DF‑A) and methanol variants are still early in market adoption, limiting fuel flexibility options
Typical Vessels: LNG Carrier (Q‑Flex/Q‑Max)Cruise ShipLarge RoPax / FerryOffshore Support VesselContainer Ship (dual‑fuel retrofit)
Certifications: IMO Tier II/IIIDNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 12X52DF when you need very high shaft power, want to exploit LNG bunkering for lower fuel cost and emissions, and operate in emission‑control areas where NOx limits apply. Avoid it if your routes lack reliable LNG supply, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront investment, or you prefer a simpler single‑fuel diesel plant.
Use Cases: The engine is most often installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large LNG carriers (≈210 000 dwt) and modern cruise liners that require compliance with strict NOx limits in ECAs. It is also selected for dual‑fuel retrofits of existing high‑power vessels where a shift to gas‑based fuel can deliver operational savings and future‑proofing against carbon regulations.
WinGD 10X40DF
10X40DF
· 10300.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
X40DF
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
10300
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
350 (X35-B); 400 (X40-B)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1550 (X35-B); 1770 (X40-B)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
X35-B: 118–167; X40-B: 104–146
Fuel, V-configuration
Marine Diesel (HFO/MDO) - Diesel Single-Fuel; X40DF-1.0: LNG Dual-Fuel
Status, V-configuration
Legacy – Aus aktiver Produktion genommen, aber WinGD bietet weiterhin technische Unterstützung für bestehende Installationen
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Scuffing: Lokales Verschweißen und Verschleiß zwischen Kolbenring und Linerinnenfläche verursacht durch unzureichende Schmierung oder Ölfilm-Zusam
    Check: Visuelle Inspektion des Liners auf Kratzer, Mikroschweißungen und Verfärbungen; lokale Schliff-Rauheit prüfen; bei Bedarf Liner nachhonen oder austauschen
  • Area: Kolbenkrone- und Ringrillen-Verschleiß: Oberflächentragen, Verschleiß und Risse in Kolbenkrone und Ringrillen erfordern Dickenmessungen
    Check: Dickenmessgerät (z.B. Fischer Dualscope MP0) verwenden; Vergleich mit Richtwerten aus OM; Kolbenkrone auf thermische Verfärbung, Risse und Ablagerungen prüfen
  • Area: Brennstoffdruck-Anomalien und Rillenleckage: Zu hohes/zu niedriges Druck im Common-Rail-System und Brennstoff-Leckage aus Einspritzleitungen
    Check: Brennstoffdruck während Betrieb prüfen (Richtwert bei R1); Brennstoffrücklauf auf Undichtheiten kontrollieren; Inspektionsleitungen an Injektoren auf Lecks überwachen
  • Area: Abgastemperatur-Unregelmäßigkeiten mit erhöhter Gaskonzentration in Kolbenunterseite: Asymmetrische oder unerwartete Abgastemperaturen stromabwärts einzelner Zy
    Check: Kontinuierliche Abgastemperatur-Überwachung pro Zylinder durchführen; bei Temp.-Unterschieden >30°C Zylinderkopf-Inspektionen einleiten; Gaskonzentration im Kolben prüfen
  • Area: Servo-Ölsystem-Leckage und FLV/Brennstoffleitungs-Undichtheiten: Druckverlust im Servo-Hydrauliksystem und Brennstoffleck an Fuel Line Valves
    Check: Servo-Öldrück und -Durchfluss kontrollieren; alle Brennstoffleitungen und Ventilverbindungen visuell und unter Druck prüfen; Inspektionsgläser überwachen

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power output in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower CO₂ emissions when LNG is used
  • Proven reliability from the legacy X40 family with extensive WinGD after‑sales support
  • Specific fuel consumption around 176 g/kWh at full load, competitive for its power class
  • IMO Tier II compliance out‑of‑the‑box and Tier III achievable with SCR retrofit
Weaknesses
  • Engine production has been discontinued; only legacy support is available
  • Requires LNG storage and handling infrastructure, increasing vessel complexity and capital cost
  • Common‑rail injection system is sophisticated and demands rigorous maintenance to avoid fuel‑system failures
  • NOx emissions at Tier II still relatively high without after‑treatment; Tier III needs additional SCR equipment
  • Large physical size may limit installation in vessels with constrained engine rooms
Typical Vessels: LNG CarrierCruise ShipContainer Vessel (retrofit to LNG)Offshore Support VesselRo‑Ro/Passenger Ferry (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR retrofit)DNV Classification Society approval
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel requires high power with LNG flexibility, must meet current or future IMO NOx limits, and has access to LNG bunkering. Avoid if the operator seeks a brand‑new engine line with ongoing production, lacks LNG infrastructure, or is highly cost‑sensitive to initial capital outlay.
Use Cases: The 10X40DF is typically installed on large LNG carriers (e.g., Q‑Max class), modern cruise ships that run primarily on LNG, and container vessels undergoing dual‑fuel conversions to reduce emissions. It also appears in offshore supply vessels where fuel flexibility and compliance with strict emission regulations are critical.
WinGD 11X40DF
11X40DF
· 11330.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
X40DF
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
11330
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
350 (X35-B); 400 (X40-B)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1550 (X35-B); 1770 (X40-B)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
X35-B: 118–167; X40-B: 104–146
Fuel, V-configuration
Marine Diesel (HFO/MDO) - Diesel Single-Fuel; X40DF-1.0: LNG Dual-Fuel
Status, V-configuration
Legacy – Aus aktiver Produktion genommen, aber WinGD bietet weiterhin technische Unterstützung für bestehende Installationen
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Scuffing: Lokales Verschweißen und Verschleiß zwischen Kolbenring und Linerinnenfläche verursacht durch unzureichende Schmierung oder Ölfilm-Zusam
    Check: Visuelle Inspektion des Liners auf Kratzer, Mikroschweißungen und Verfärbungen; lokale Schliff-Rauheit prüfen; bei Bedarf Liner nachhonen oder austauschen
  • Area: Kolbenkrone- und Ringrillen-Verschleiß: Oberflächentragen, Verschleiß und Risse in Kolbenkrone und Ringrillen erfordern Dickenmessungen
    Check: Dickenmessgerät (z.B. Fischer Dualscope MP0) verwenden; Vergleich mit Richtwerten aus OM; Kolbenkrone auf thermische Verfärbung, Risse und Ablagerungen prüfen
  • Area: Brennstoffdruck-Anomalien und Rillenleckage: Zu hohes/zu niedriges Druck im Common-Rail-System und Brennstoff-Leckage aus Einspritzleitungen
    Check: Brennstoffdruck während Betrieb prüfen (Richtwert bei R1); Brennstoffrücklauf auf Undichtheiten kontrollieren; Inspektionsleitungen an Injektoren auf Lecks überwachen
  • Area: Abgastemperatur-Unregelmäßigkeiten mit erhöhter Gaskonzentration in Kolbenunterseite: Asymmetrische oder unerwartete Abgastemperaturen stromabwärts einzelner Zy
    Check: Kontinuierliche Abgastemperatur-Überwachung pro Zylinder durchführen; bei Temp.-Unterschieden >30°C Zylinderkopf-Inspektionen einleiten; Gaskonzentration im Kolben prüfen
  • Area: Servo-Ölsystem-Leckage und FLV/Brennstoffleitungs-Undichtheiten: Druckverlust im Servo-Hydrauliksystem und Brennstoffleck an Fuel Line Valves
    Check: Servo-Öldrück und -Durchfluss kontrollieren; alle Brennstoffleitungen und Ventilverbindungen visuell und unter Druck prüfen; Inspektionsgläser überwachen

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power output per cylinder, suitable for large propulsion requirements
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG/HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when LNG is used
  • Proven design with extensive field experience and ongoing technical support from WinGD
  • Crosshead construction reduces piston‑to‑crank wear and allows higher mean effective pressure
  • Meets IMO Tier II emission standards out of the box, Tier III achievable with SCR retrofit
Weaknesses
  • Production discontinued – spare parts availability relies on legacy support channels
  • Known propensity for cylinder‑liner scuffing if lubrication or oil film control is inadequate
  • Specific fuel consumption (~176 g/kWh) is higher than the latest ultra‑low‑speed models
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity (high‑pressure common rail, LNG handling equipment)
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and crew training for safe dual‑fuel operation
Typical Vessels: Container ships (15 000–20 000 TEU class)Bulk carriers (Capesize, Panamax)Product tankersCruise linersLNG-fueled feeder vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV Class approval (legacy engine series)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with proven dual‑fuel flexibility and existing support infrastructure. Avoid if you require the newest ultra‑low specific fuel consumption technology, guaranteed new‑part supply, or operation on vessels without LNG bunkering capability.
Use Cases: The 11X40DF is typically installed on large ocean-going ships where a single low‑speed engine can drive a fixed‑pitch propeller, especially when operators want to future‑proof the vessel for LNG fuel while retaining HFO fallback. It is common in new builds targeting Tier II compliance and in retrofits converting existing vessels to LNG.
WinGD 12X40DF
12X40DF
· 12360.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead dual-fuel main engine
Model Family
X40DF
Bore (mm)
400
Stroke (mm)
1770
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
12360
Speed (rpm)
146
Fuel Type
LNG/HFO (Dual-Fuel)
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
350 (X35-B); 400 (X40-B)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1550 (X35-B); 1770 (X40-B)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
X35-B: 118–167; X40-B: 104–146
Fuel, V-configuration
Marine Diesel (HFO/MDO) - Diesel Single-Fuel; X40DF-1.0: LNG Dual-Fuel
Status, V-configuration
Legacy – Aus aktiver Produktion genommen, aber WinGD bietet weiterhin technische Unterstützung für bestehende Installationen
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Scuffing: Lokales Verschweißen und Verschleiß zwischen Kolbenring und Linerinnenfläche verursacht durch unzureichende Schmierung oder Ölfilm-Zusam
    Check: Visuelle Inspektion des Liners auf Kratzer, Mikroschweißungen und Verfärbungen; lokale Schliff-Rauheit prüfen; bei Bedarf Liner nachhonen oder austauschen
  • Area: Kolbenkrone- und Ringrillen-Verschleiß: Oberflächentragen, Verschleiß und Risse in Kolbenkrone und Ringrillen erfordern Dickenmessungen
    Check: Dickenmessgerät (z.B. Fischer Dualscope MP0) verwenden; Vergleich mit Richtwerten aus OM; Kolbenkrone auf thermische Verfärbung, Risse und Ablagerungen prüfen
  • Area: Brennstoffdruck-Anomalien und Rillenleckage: Zu hohes/zu niedriges Druck im Common-Rail-System und Brennstoff-Leckage aus Einspritzleitungen
    Check: Brennstoffdruck während Betrieb prüfen (Richtwert bei R1); Brennstoffrücklauf auf Undichtheiten kontrollieren; Inspektionsleitungen an Injektoren auf Lecks überwachen
  • Area: Abgastemperatur-Unregelmäßigkeiten mit erhöhter Gaskonzentration in Kolbenunterseite: Asymmetrische oder unerwartete Abgastemperaturen stromabwärts einzelner Zy
    Check: Kontinuierliche Abgastemperatur-Überwachung pro Zylinder durchführen; bei Temp.-Unterschieden >30°C Zylinderkopf-Inspektionen einleiten; Gaskonzentration im Kolben prüfen
  • Area: Servo-Ölsystem-Leckage und FLV/Brennstoffleitungs-Undichtheiten: Druckverlust im Servo-Hydrauliksystem und Brennstoffleck an Fuel Line Valves
    Check: Servo-Öldrück und -Durchfluss kontrollieren; alle Brennstoffleitungen und Ventilverbindungen visuell und unter Druck prüfen; Inspektionsgläser überwachen

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Dual‑fuel capability (LNG & HFO) provides fuel flexibility and lower emissions when LNG is used
  • High specific power (~12 MW at low rpm) enables direct‑drive propeller without reduction gear
  • Proven legacy design with extensive field experience and ongoing technical support from WinGD
  • Competitive specific fuel consumption (~176.8 g/kWh at full load, Tier II)
  • Meets IMO Tier II emissions; can be upgraded to Tier III with SCR retrofit
Weaknesses
  • Production has been discontinued – new units are not built, reliance on spare‑part stock and support
  • Known wear issues such as cylinder‑liner scuffing and piston‑crown/ring wear require vigilant inspection
  • Dual‑fuel system adds complexity to installation, commissioning and maintenance
  • Without SCR retrofit the engine only satisfies Tier II – may be insufficient for future ECA regulations
  • Older control electronics compared with latest generation engines may lack advanced diagnostics
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierProduct tankerContainer ship (mid‑size)Bulk carrierGeneral cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR retrofit)
Decision Guide: Choose the 12X40DF when you need a proven, high‑power engine with LNG/HFO dual‑fuel flexibility and existing class support for vessels that can accommodate a low‑speed direct‑drive layout. Avoid it if you require brand‑new production units, the latest emission technology without retrofit, or minimal maintenance complexity.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed on medium‑size LNG carriers and product tankers that operate in Emission Control Areas, as well as on container or bulk vessels retrofitted to LNG for fuel cost savings and emissions reduction. Its low rpm suits direct‑drive propellers, making it attractive for new builds and conversions where space for a reduction gear is limited.
WinGD 5W-X72
5W-X72
· 16250.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
16250
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈16250 kW) with low specific fuel consumption (~167 g/kWh at full load)
  • Fuel flexibility – standard diesel/HFO version and dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol, ammonia, enabling future emission compliance
  • Proven reliability on large commercial vessels; common‑rail electronic injection provides precise combustion control
  • Modular design simplifies installation and allows retrofits of alternative‑fuel kits
  • Meets IMO Tier II (and higher) emissions standards out‑of‑the‑box
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight increase hull integration complexity
  • Higher capital cost, especially for dual‑fuel configurations with additional gas handling equipment
  • Complex fuel‑system management for ammonia/methanol requires strict quality control and extra safety systems
  • Common‑rail injection components demand rigorous maintenance intervals (nozzle wear at ~8 000–10 000 h)
  • Availability of spare parts and specialised service may be limited in remote ports
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) / Aframax tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel X72DF versions)Ro‑Ro/Passenger ships requiring >16 MW propulsion
Certifications: IMO Tier II Type ApprovalDNV GL classification notation for low‑speed main enginesABS and LR approvals (standard for WinGD X‑series)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, fuel‑flexible main engine for new‑builds targeting IMO 2020+ and future decarbonisation pathways; the X72’s dual‑fuel kits allow early adoption of LNG, methanol or ammonia. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or operating routes lack reliable supply of alternative fuels.
Use Cases: The 5W‑X72 powers today’s largest container ships and tankers, often installed as the sole propulsion unit on vessels >150 m length. Dual‑fuel variants are being fitted on new LNG carriers and methanol‑ready bulk carriers to meet stricter emission caps while preserving long‑haul efficiency.
WinGD 6W-X72
6W-X72
· 19500.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
19500
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑speed package (≈19 MW) suitable for VLCCs and large container ships.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~167 g/kWh at full load, Tier II) improves operating economics.
  • Multi‑fuel variants (diesel/HFO, LNG, methanol, ammonia) provide future‑proofing for emission regulations.
  • Reversible camshaft‑less design simplifies start‑stop cycles and maneuverability.
  • Proven track record with major shipowners and extensive class approvals.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives.
  • Dual‑fuel control systems add complexity to operation and maintenance, especially for ammonia or methanol blends.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; ammonia combustion can cause instability if pilot injection is not precisely controlled.
  • Requires dedicated after‑treatment (SCR/DPF) to meet IMO Tier III in some jurisdictions.
  • Limited rpm range (66–89 rpm) may constrain propeller design flexibility.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCCLarge container ship (≥12 000 TEU)Bulk carrier (>150 kt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel version)
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalLR (Lloyd's Register) type approvalIMO Tier III emission compliance
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a very high‑power, low‑speed engine for large deadweight vessels and want flexibility to run emerging alternative fuels while meeting strict IMO emissions. Avoid if vessel size is modest, budget constraints preclude the higher upfront cost, or operating routes lack infrastructure for ammonia/methanol dual‑fuel operation.
Use Cases: The 6W‑X72 powers VLCCs on long‑haul crude trades, ultra‑large container ships on Asia–Europe routes, and is installed in LNG carriers using the X72DF‑1.x variant. Recent demonstrations place the X72DF‑A‑1.0 version on ammonia‑fuelled bulk carriers for emissions‑intensive trades.
WinGD 7W-X72
7W-X72
· 22750.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
22750
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈3 225 kW per cylinder) with a compact footprint for its output class.
  • Fuel flexibility – standard diesel/HFO version plus proven dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol and emerging ammonia.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh at full load, Tier II) reduces operating cost.
  • Electronic common‑rail injection provides precise combustion control and reversible operation.
  • Widely accepted by major classification societies, easing class approval for new builds.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and high dry weight limit installation on smaller hull forms.
  • Capital cost is higher than conventional low‑speed diesel engines of similar rating.
  • Alternative‑fuel variants (especially ammonia) require additional subsystems (pilot fuel, safety equipment) that are still maturing.
  • Injection nozzle wear and scavenge‑air cooler fouling demand regular monitoring and scheduled overhauls.
  • Complex fuel handling infrastructure may be unavailable on certain trade routes.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessels (≥15 000 TEU)Very Large Crude Carriers / Aframax tankersLarge bulk carriers (>150 k dwt)LNG carriers and methanol carriersFuture ammonia‑fuelled carriers
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier IIDNV Class approval (main engine type)ABS classification (type approved)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑output, fuel‑flexible main engine that meets IMO Tier II/III emissions with proven reliability and are willing to invest in the larger footprint and advanced fuel handling. Avoid if vessel size or budget constraints preclude the engine’s dimensions, or if operating on routes where alternative fuels (LNG, methanol, ammonia) lack supply infrastructure.
Use Cases: The 7W‑X72 is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and large tankers seeking to meet stringent emission regulations while retaining the option to switch between conventional diesel, LNG, methanol or emerging ammonia fuels. It also appears in demonstration projects for zero‑carbon shipping where dual‑fuel capability is a strategic advantage.
WinGD 8W-X72
8W-X72
· 26000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead main engine
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
26000
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (~3.2 MW per cylinder) reduces the number of engines needed for ultra‑large vessels.
  • Common‑rail electronic injection provides precise fuel metering and lower BSFC (≈167 g/kWh).
  • Multiple fuel variants (diesel/HFO, LNG/Gas, methanol, ammonia) give operators future‑proofing against emission regulations.
  • Reversible operation enables rapid manoeuvring and dynamic positioning when required.
  • Proven DNV‑class approved design with extensive service history on large bulk carriers and tankers.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives.
  • Alternative‑fuel DF versions require complex high‑pressure fuel handling, ammonia safety systems, or LNG cryogenic infrastructure.
  • Fuel‑rail pressure excursions can cause hard starts; regular monitoring of the electronic control system is mandatory.
  • Scavenge‑air cooler fouling in dusty trades reduces thermal efficiency and demands additional filtration.
  • Ammonia combustion still faces flame‑speed and NOx/N₂O emission challenges that may need extra after‑treatment.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥15 000 TEU)VLCC/ULCC crude oil tankersLarge bulk carriers (>200 k dwt)LNG carriers (DF variant)Methanol or ammonia carriers (future‑fuel variants)
Certifications: IMO Tier II emission compliance (diesel version)DNV Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 8W‑X72 when you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with fuel‑flexibility for large vessels and can accommodate its size and upfront cost. Avoid it on smaller ships, routes lacking alternative‑fuel bunkering infrastructure, or projects where capital expenditure must be minimised.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the sole main propulsion unit on ultra‑large container vessels, very large crude carriers, and bulk carriers, providing efficient long‑haul service. DF variants are being fitted to new LNG, methanol and ammonia carrier designs that require compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits and future decarbonisation targets.
9W-X72
· 29250.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29250
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output (~30 MW) suitable for ultra‑large vessels
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh at full load, Tier II)
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO and factory‑certified dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia
  • Proven reliability with extensive service history in the global fleet
  • Camshaft‑less common‑rail injection provides precise combustion control and reversible operation
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and weight require substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Higher capital cost compared with medium‑speed engines of similar power
  • Complex fuel handling for dual‑fuel versions (e.g., LNG or ammonia) increases installation and operational overhead
  • Strict oil cleanliness and scavenge‑air cooler maintenance needed to avoid bearing wear and efficiency loss
  • Limited speed range (66–91 rpm) restricts propeller design options
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC tankerUltra‑large container vessel (ULCV)Large bulk carrier (>200 k dwt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel X72DF variants)Methanol or ammonia carrier (X72DF‑M, X72DF‑A variants)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power main engine with excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to run on conventional heavy fuel oil as well as alternative fuels (LNG, methanol, ammonia). Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the large footprint and higher upfront cost, or if a higher rpm engine is required for smaller ships.
Use Cases: The 9W‑X72 powers the main propulsion of the world’s largest tankers, container ships and bulk carriers, often paired with fixed‑pitch or controllable‑pitch propellers. Its dual‑fuel versions are increasingly installed on new LNG, methanol and ammonia carriers to meet future emission regulations.
10W-X72
· 32500.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32500
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density – >3 200 kW per cylinder at low rpm.
  • Proven reliability on large tankers and container ships with long intervals between overhauls.
  • Multi‑fuel variants (X72DF, X72DF-M, X72DF-A) allow future‑proofing for LNG, methanol or ammonia.
  • Electronic common‑rail injection provides precise fuel metering and lower emissions (IMO Tier II).
  • Reversible operation enables rapid direction change for manoeuvring.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high capital cost compared with medium‑speed engines.
  • Alternative‑fuel versions require additional plant (cryogenic tanks, gas handling, ammonia safety systems).
  • Maintenance intensive – nozzle wear after ~8 000–10 000 h and strict oil cleanliness monitoring.
  • Scavenge‑air cooler fouling in dust‑laden trades can reduce efficiency if not filtered.
  • Ammonia variant still early‑stage (deployment Q3 2025) with documented combustion instability risks.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerUltra‑large Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Large Bulk CarrierLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel X72DF variants)Methanol or Ammonia‑powered Demo Vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier II emission complianceDNV GL Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven service history and the flexibility to switch to alternative fuels as regulations tighten. Avoid if budget constraints prevent the upfront cost of ancillary fuel systems or if vessel size limits can’t accommodate the engine’s footprint.
Use Cases: The 10W-X72 powers long‑haul crude carriers, large container vessels and bulk carriers where steady low‑speed propulsion is essential. Its dual‑fuel versions are being installed on new LNG carriers and on trial ships exploring methanol or ammonia as carbon‑neutral fuels, typically on routes where fuel availability and emission regulations justify the added complexity.
WinGD 11W-X72
11W-X72
· 35750.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
35750
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder (≈3.2 MW/cyl) enabling compact installation on ultra‑large ships.
  • Flexible fuel options – standard HFO/MDO and certified dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol and ammonia.
  • Advanced common‑rail electronic injection provides low specific fuel consumption (~167 g/kWh) and good NOx performance (IMO Tier II).
  • Proven worldwide service record on VLCCs, large container ships and bulk carriers.
  • Reversible operation allows quick direction change for manoeuvring or emergency propulsion.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high dry weight increase hull‑space requirements and initial capital cost.
  • Dual‑fuel versions add complexity to fuel handling, storage and control systems, raising maintenance workload.
  • Known wear items such as injection nozzles require replacement around 8 000–10 000 h; fuel‑rail pressure spikes can cause start‑up issues.
  • Ammonia variant (X72DF‑A‑1.0) still faces combustion stability challenges and stricter emission monitoring.
  • Higher upfront investment compared with conventional low‑speed diesel engines of similar rating.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)Large Bulk Carrier (>180 k dwt)LNG carrier (dual‑fuel version)Methanol/Ammonia‑capable future‑fuel carriers
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier II NOxDNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLR (Lloyd’s Register) class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power density, fuel‑flexibility for future low‑carbon fuels and a proven engine platform on large tonnage vessels. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the engine's footprint and capital cost, or if operational simplicity with a single‑fuel diesel is preferred.
Use Cases: The X72 family powers today’s largest oil tankers, mega‑container ships (14–20 k TEU) and bulk carriers, often as the sole main propulsion unit. Its dual‑fuel variants are being installed on new LNG, methanol or ammonia carriers to meet emerging emission regulations while retaining the same mechanical footprint.
WinGD 12W-X72
12W-X72
· 39000.0 kW · Camshaftless 2‑stroke low‑speed crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X72
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39000
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈3.2 MW per cylinder) enabling compact installation for >38 MW propulsion.
  • Broad fuel flexibility – diesel/HFO, LNG/Gas, methanol, and ammonia variants available on the same platform.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh at full load, Tier II) and reversible operation for maneuvering.
  • Proven reliability with extensive class‑approved service history on VLCCs, ULCCs and large container ships.
  • Built‑in compliance with IMO Tier III NOx limits when equipped with SCR (X72DF variants).
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dry weight; requires substantial engine room space.
  • High capital cost, especially for dual‑fuel or ammonia retrofits and associated fuel handling systems.
  • Complex common‑rail injection and electronic control demand rigorous maintenance and skilled personnel.
  • Limited maximum speed (66–89 rpm) restricts use on vessels requiring higher shaft speeds.
  • Alternative‑fuel versions (e.g., ammonia) still in early commercial deployment, with limited spare‑part networks.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCCLarge container ships (>15 000 TEU)Bulk carriers (>150 kt)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel)Cruise liners (high‑power propulsion)
Certifications: DNV GL ApprovedABS Class ApprovalLR Class ApprovalIMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR for dual‑fuel variants)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >38 MW of reliable low‑speed propulsion, require fuel flexibility or Tier III NOx compliance, and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the high upfront cost, space is limited, or the vessel operates on routes where alternative‑fuel infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: The 12W‑X72 powers long‑haul vessels where fuel efficiency and emissions compliance are critical – e.g., VLCCs crossing the Atlantic, 15 000+ TEU container ships on Asia–Europe trades, LNG carriers using dual‑fuel operation, and emerging ammonia‑powered tankers for zero‑carbon initiatives.
5W-X62
· 12100.0 kW · 2‑stroke low‑speed crosshead dual‑fuel engine with iCER VCR
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
12100
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (~2.1 MW per cylinder) allowing compact installation for >12 MW propulsion
  • Fuel flexibility – runs on HFO/MDO, LNG (dual‑fuel), and upcoming methanol/ammonia variants
  • Variable compression ratio (iCER) reduces SFOC to ~166 g/kWh and cuts emissions without SCR in gas mode
  • IMO Tier III compliant in gas mode, meeting future emission regulations
  • Proven reliability on large tankers and cruise ships with extensive service history
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel and VCR systems increase initial capital cost and require specialised crew training
  • Maintenance of iCER components (gas recirculation, pressure regulators) adds to routine overhaul workload
  • Large engine footprint and weight demand robust hull structures; not suitable for small vessels
  • Sensitive to fuel quality – carbon deposits in fuel valves and piston‑crown thermal stress reported at low load
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes (e.g., DP operations) requires careful monitoring
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierMethanol/ammonia tankerLarge cruise shipUltra‑large container vesselBulk carrier (>80 kt)Offshore support / DP vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)DNV Class Approval (Main Engine)ABS Approved Marine Engine
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >12 MW of propulsion with multi‑fuel flexibility and want to meet IMO Tier III emissions without installing after‑treatment. Ideal for new builds targeting LNG, methanol or future ammonia operation. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, vessel size limits prevent installation, or operating profile is predominantly low load where a simpler single‑fuel engine would be more economical.
Use Cases: The X62DF series is installed on newly built LNG carriers for dual‑fuel operation, retrofitted cruise ships converting part of their power to gas mode, and large DP offshore vessels that benefit from rapid load response and lower emissions. It is also being introduced on methanol‑powered tankers and planned ammonia carriers as the industry transitions to alternative fuels.
6W-X62
· 14520.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
14520
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈2.1 MW per cylinder) at very low rpm, enabling compact installation on large vessels.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (diesel/HFO and LNG) with IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR.
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) reduces methane slip up to 50 % and improves SFOC to 165–168 g/kWh.
  • Variable compression ratio adapts to fuel type and load, delivering up to 5 % fuel‑consumption reduction in diesel mode.
  • Proven DNV class approval and extensive field experience on ultra‑large container ships and tankers.
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and need for LNG storage infrastructure on board.
  • Complex dual‑fuel system requires rigorous maintenance (fuel valve cleaning, gas pressure regulation).
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; carbon deposits in low‑load operation can lead to piston crown cracking.
  • Larger footprint compared with older 6‑cylinder low‑speed diesel families, affecting hull design flexibility.
  • Spare‑parts logistics for the newest variants (M‑1.0, A‑1.0) are still maturing.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsVery large crude carriers (VLCC) and ULCC tankersCruise liners adopting LNG propulsionOffshore support vessels with DP capability
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode)DNV class approved for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose if the vessel requires high power at low rpm, wants future‑proof dual‑fuel flexibility and Tier III emissions without SCR, and has LNG bunkering capability. Avoid if the operator cannot invest in LNG infrastructure, prioritises lowest upfront cost, or operates primarily in low‑speed diesel mode where NOx limits are stricter.
Use Cases: The X62DF-2.1 is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships targeting IMO Tier III compliance, retrofitted VLCCs converting to LNG dual‑fuel, and cruise vessels seeking lower emissions while maintaining long range. It also serves offshore DP vessels that need rapid load changes and benefit from the engine’s variable compression and gas‑mode efficiency.
WinGD 7W-X62
7W-X62
· 16940.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed marine diesel engine
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
16940
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) provides up to 5 % fuel savings in diesel mode and improves efficiency across load ranges
  • iCER (Intelligent Control by Exhaust Recycling) reduces methane slip by up to 50 % and enables Tier III compliance without SCR when running on gas fuels
  • Multi‑fuel capability (diesel/HFO, LNG, methanol, future ammonia) offers operational flexibility for decarbonisation strategies
  • Proven large‑vessel pedigree – installed on VLCCs, ultra‑large container ships and new methanol carriers
  • High specific power (≈2 110 kW per cylinder) reduces engine room space compared with older low‑speed designs
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and more complex control systems than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires extensive fuel‑gas infrastructure, high‑temperature heating and gas pressure regulation (iGPR), increasing installation effort
  • Maintenance intensity – piston crown thermal stresses and turbocharger surge are critical points in dual‑fuel operation
  • Larger footprint and weight than medium‑speed alternatives for vessels under 15 000 dwt
  • Ammonia variant still in early deployment phase (Q3 2026), limiting immediate availability
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Container Ship (ULCS)Methanol carrierLNG carrier (dual‑fuel version)Future ammonia‑powered bulk carrier or tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)DNV GL Classification – approved for dual‑fuel operation
Decision Guide: Choose the 7W‑X62 when you need maximum power at low rpm with built‑in fuel flexibility and emissions compliance for large vessels targeting LNG, methanol or future ammonia propulsion. Avoid it on smaller ships where capital cost, space constraints, or crew expertise make a medium‑speed engine more economical.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in the main propulsion line of mega‑size tankers and container ships that are transitioning to low‑carbon fuels. It powers VLCCs running on HFO/MDO while offering an LNG retrofit path, equips new methanol carriers as a drop‑in replacement for diesel engines, and will serve upcoming ammonia‑fuelled bulk carriers once the A‑1.0 variant is certified.
8W-X62
· 19360.0 kW · 2‑stroke low‑speed crosshead dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
19360
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈2.1 MW per cylinder) enabling >19 MW output in a compact footprint
  • Dual‑fuel capability (HFO/Diesel + LNG) with iCER gas‑recirculation reduces methane slip by up to 50 %
  • Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) and iCER lower SFOC to 165–168 g/kWh, ~5 % better than conventional DF engines
  • IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR, meeting future emission regulations
  • Proven track record on ultra‑large container ships and cruise vessels
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and need for LNG storage & handling infrastructure
  • Increased system complexity (fuel gas regulation, VCR hydraulics) leading to more intensive maintenance
  • Fuel‑valve carbon deposits and piston‑crown thermal stress are known wear points in low‑load multi‑fuel operation
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes typical of DP or dynamic positioning vessels
  • Sensitivity to fuel quality; dust‑contaminated air can accelerate liner scuffing
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥15 k TEU)Cruise linersLarge bulk carriersVLCC tankers requiring Tier III complianceLNG carriers (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: IMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >19 MW per engine, require fuel flexibility between diesel/HFO and LNG, must meet IMO Tier III emissions without SCR, and have space for LNG bunkering infrastructure. Avoid if the vessel operates mainly at low load, has limited budget for dual‑fuel plant, or lacks access to reliable LNG supply.
Use Cases: The X62 is typically installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and cruise vessels where high power and strict emission limits are mandatory; it also powers modern LNG carriers and large bulk carriers that benefit from the fuel‑flexibility and efficiency gains of dual‑fuel operation.
9W-X62
· 21780.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed dual-fuel engine
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
21780
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder (~2.1–2.4 MW) enabling compact installation for ultra‑large vessels
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and a range of gases (LNG, methanol, ammonia) with the iCER system
  • Variable compression ratio (VCR) and iCER reduce specific fuel consumption by up to 5 % in diesel mode and improve gas‑mode efficiency
  • IMO Tier III emissions compliance in gas mode without needing SCR, and methane slip reduction up to 50 %
  • Proven WinGD platform with extensive class approvals and a global service network
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel and VCR systems increase initial capital cost and require specialised crew training
  • Large physical footprint and weight compared with medium‑speed alternatives, affecting hull design flexibility
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; low‑load operation can lead to carbon deposits in fuel valves and piston crown thermal stress
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes (e.g., DP operations) demands careful control strategy
  • Higher maintenance intervals for iGPR pressure regulators and VCR actuators
Typical Vessels: VLCC/ULCC crude oil tankersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel propulsion)Methanol carriersAmmonia carriers (future installations)Ultra‑large container shipsBulk carriers with high power requirement
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier III (gas mode)DNV class approval for X62DF seriesLloyd's Register (LR) approval for dual‑fuel configuration
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high shaft power, fuel flexibility across diesel and low‑carbon gases, and compliance with Tier III emissions without SCR. Ideal for long‑haul vessels where operating cost savings from gas fuels offset higher capital expense. Avoid if the vessel operates predominantly at low load, has limited crew expertise in dual‑fuel systems, or budget constraints preclude the added complexity.
Use Cases: The X62DF is typically installed as the main propulsion engine on ultra‑large crude carriers, LNG and methanol carriers, and emerging ammonia‑fuel vessels. It also appears on very large container ships where a compact high‑power unit reduces shaft line length. Operators value its ability to switch between diesel and gas fuels for route‑specific emissions or cost optimisation.
10W-X62
· 24200.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead diesel with iCER dual‑fuel system
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
24200
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder (≈2.1 MW) enabling single‑engine propulsion for ultra‑large vessels
  • Variable compression ratio and iCER control give low SFOC (≈165 g/kWh) across diesel and gas modes
  • Multi‑fuel flexibility supports current HFO/Diesel as well as LNG, methanol and future ammonia
  • IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR, reducing NOx emissions by up to 50 %
  • Proven track record on new‑build ULCCs, VLCCs and large container ships
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and extensive installation footprint compared with medium‑speed engines
  • Complex dual‑fuel infrastructure (gas handling, iGPR, high‑pressure regulators) increases shipyard integration effort
  • Maintenance intensity – piston crown thermal stress and fuel‑valve deposits require close monitoring at low load
  • Sensitive to fuel quality; dust or water in air intake can accelerate liner wear
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid DP mode changes demands careful control system tuning
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Large LNG carrier (dual‑fuel)Bulk carrier >200 ktCruise ship / RoPax with high power demand
Certifications: DNV class approvalABS class approvalIMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >20 MW single‑engine propulsion, want future‑proof multi‑fuel capability and the vessel will operate on LNG or other low‑carbon gases. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, space is limited, or the ship will remain on oil‑only fuels with no gas bunkering infrastructure.
Use Cases: The X62 series powers new‑build ultra‑large carriers targeting 2027+ emission standards, retrofits where LNG bunkering is available, and vessels that require flexible speed control such as DP‑operated offshore support ships. Its variable compression ratio makes it efficient at both full‑load cruising and low‑load manoeuvring.
WinGD 11W-X62
11W-X62
· 26620.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke dual‑fuel engine
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
26620
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density – 2.1–2.4 MW per cylinder, enabling >26 MW on a single unit
  • Dual‑fuel operation (diesel/HFO and LNG, with upcoming methanol/ammonia variants) provides fuel flexibility and future‑proofing
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈166 g/kWh in diesel mode; up to 5 % reduction with VCR, additional 3 % gas‑mode saving)
  • IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR, aided by iCER technology that cuts methane slip up to 50 %
  • Broad rpm range (80–108 rpm depending on stroke version) supports both slow‑speed and medium‑speed ship designs
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and complexity compared with single‑fuel low‑speed engines
  • Requires LNG bunkering infrastructure and gas handling equipment, increasing installation space and weight
  • Dual‑fuel system adds maintenance tasks (fuel valve cleaning, gas pressure regulator checks) especially at low load
  • Turbocharger surge risk during rapid load changes (e.g., DP operation) demands careful control strategy
  • Sensitivity to fuel quality; carbon deposits in fuel valves and piston crown thermal stress are documented failure points
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑Large Crude Carrier (ULCC)Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)12 000+ TEU Container ShipLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel variant)Methanol/Ammonia Carrier (future variants)
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode)DNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >26 MW of propulsion power with the ability to switch between conventional oil fuels and low‑carbon gases, require IMO Tier III emissions without SCR, and operate on long voyages where fuel flexibility reduces bunker cost risk. Avoid if LNG or alternative gas bunkering is unavailable, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront investment, or vessel operational profile involves predominantly low‑load, steady‑state running where a single‑fuel engine would be simpler.
Use Cases: The X62DF series powers today’s largest container vessels and crude carriers, providing the thrust needed for >30 kn service speed while meeting stringent emission regulations. It is also installed on new LNG carriers and is being qualified for methanol‑ and ammonia‑fueled ships entering service from 2024 onward.
12W-X62
· 29040.0 kW · 2‑stroke low‑speed dual‑fuel engine with VCR
Model Family
W-X62
Bore (mm)
620
Stroke (mm)
2658
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
29040
Speed (rpm)
105
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
620
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
Standard: 2658 | Short-stroke S2.0: 2245 | Short-stroke S1.0: 2045
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
80-103 (Standard L/D 4.29) | 82-108 (S2.0 L/D 3.62) | 85-108 (S1.0 L/D 3.30)
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (all variants) | LNG (DF standard) | Methanol (M-1.0 variant Q2 2024+) | Ammonia (A-1.0 variant Q3 2026 scheduled)
Status, V-configuration
In Production (X62DF-2.1, X62DF-S2.0, X62DF-S1.0 active; X62DF-M-1.0 since 2024; X62DF-A-1.0 announced Q3/2026). Legacy: X62-B (replaced by X62-1.1/1.2)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel valve carbon deposits / fuel system blockages in low-load multi-fuel operation
    Check: Inspect fuel valve nozzle spray pattern during top-overhaul; monitor differential pressure across fuel filter; verify fuel heating system temperature compliance
  • Area: Piston crown thermal cracking and top-land spalling under extreme load or fuel quality variations
    Check: Measure piston crown surface condition using borescope; check for micro-cracks in top land; examine combustion bowl geometry; compare cylinder-to-cylinder pressure readings
  • Area: Cylinder liner scuffing/scoring in dust-contaminated conditions or with inadequate air filtration
    Check: Perform liner diameter measurement service at each overhaul; document wear rate trending; inspect piston rings for abnormal wear patterns; check air inlet filter condition
  • Area: Turbocharger surge and cavitation erosion in unsteady loading (e.g., dynamic positioning vessels)
    Check: Monitor turbocharger bearing temperatures during mode transitions (gas-to-diesel); inspect turbocharger for cavitation pitting on impeller; verify surge line compliance in operational envelope
  • Area: Fuel gas supply system pressure regulation instability (iGPR unit hysteresis) under rapid load changes
    Check: Perform fuel gas system pressure step-response test during commissioning; verify regulator response time <500ms per specification; conduct annual gas line tightness test with ultrasonic detection

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈29 MW) in a compact footprint for large vessels
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/Diesel & LNG) provides fuel flexibility and future‑proofing
  • Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) reduces specific fuel consumption by up to 5% in diesel mode
  • IMO Tier III compliance in gas mode without SCR, meeting the strictest emission limits
  • Proven track record on ultra‑large container ships, cruise liners and tankers
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost than single‑fuel 2‑stroke engines because of LNG handling equipment
  • Increased system complexity (iGPR, VCR, gas metering) leads to more demanding maintenance regimes
  • Requires reliable LNG bunkering infrastructure; not ideal for routes with limited gas supply
  • Fuel‑gas pressure regulation can be sensitive to rapid load changes, requiring careful monitoring
  • Potential for carbon deposits in fuel valves during prolonged low‑load operation
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (10 000–14 000 TEU)Cruise vessels (>150 m)Large product tankers and VLCCsBulk carriers >180 ktDP offshore support vessels requiring high power density
Certifications: IMO Tier III (gas mode, no SCR required)DNV GL Type Approval for X62DF series
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >28 MW of main‑propulsion power, want dual‑fuel flexibility to hedge against fuel price volatility, and must meet IMO Tier III emissions without installing after‑treatment. Avoid if LNG bunkering is unavailable on your trade routes, budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost, or operational profiles involve long periods at very low load where gas system wear becomes a concern.
Use Cases: The X62DF family is installed on new‑build ultra‑large container ships and cruise liners that require high shaft power while complying with Tier III limits. It is also selected for large tankers and bulk carriers operating on mixed fuel strategies, especially when the operator plans to transition to LNG or future low‑carbon fuels such as methanol or ammonia.
9X72-B
· 29250.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
X72-B
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
29250
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power – 29 250 kW from nine cylinders enables propulsion of ultra‑large vessels.
  • Fuel flexibility: baseline HFO/MDO with factory‑available dual‑fuel (LNG, gas, methanol, ammonia) conversions.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~167 g/kWh at full load) meets IMO Tier II emissions without major after‑treatment.
  • Reversible operation and camshaft‑less electronic common‑rail injection provide excellent manoeuvrability and control.
  • Proven track record in the market with extensive service support from WinGD.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dry weight – requires substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • High capital cost compared with medium‑speed alternatives for vessels below ~30 000 dwt.
  • Complex dual‑fuel/ammonia systems increase installation, commissioning and maintenance effort.
  • Sensitive to oil contamination; strict lubrication monitoring and dry‑sump management are mandatory.
  • Emission compliance for ammonia or methanol variants still needs careful pilot‑fuel strategy and may need additional exhaust treatment.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC crude carriersLR2/LR1 tankersLarge LNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Ultra‑large container ships (>18 000 TEU)Cruise liners and offshore support vessels
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Classification
Decision Guide: Choose the 9X72-B when you need >29 MW of low‑speed propulsion, require fuel flexibility (HFO, MDO or dual‑fuel), and value a proven engine with low specific fuel consumption for IMO Tier II compliance. Avoid it on smaller vessels where space, weight and capital cost outweigh its power advantage, or when the operational profile does not justify the complexity of dual‑fuel/ammonia systems.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on ultra‑large crude carriers, large LNG carriers (in dual‑fuel form), mega container ships and cruise vessels where high thrust, reversible operation and fuel flexibility are critical. It also serves as a platform for emerging low‑carbon fuels such as ammonia or methanol in demonstration projects.
WinGD 10X72-B
10X72-B
· 32500.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead main engine
Model Family
X72-B
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
32500
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power per cylinder (≈3.2 MW/cyl) reduces overall engine room volume.
  • Camshaft‑less common‑rail injection provides precise fuel metering and lower emissions (Tier II compliant).
  • Reversible operation enables rapid manoeuvring without auxiliary thrusters.
  • Multiple fuel options – diesel/HFO now, with proven DF variants for LNG, methanol, ammonia – future‑proofs the installation.
  • Widely class‑approved (DNV, ABS) and supported by a global WinGD service network.
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and substantial initial investment compared with smaller low‑power units.
  • Large physical footprint; requires generous engine‑room space and robust foundations.
  • Electronic common‑rail system demands skilled maintenance crew and reliable power supply.
  • Sensitive to fuel quality – especially for ammonia or gas variants – increasing operational monitoring needs.
  • Spare‑parts logistics can be challenging on remote routes if local WinGD support is limited.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Ships (≈15 000–20 000 TEU)Very Large Crude Carriers / Ultra Large Crude CarriersLarge Bulk Carriers (≥300 k DWT)Product Tankers and LNG carriers equipped with DF variants
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the X72‑B when you need very high power density, reversible operation and a platform that can be upgraded to low‑carbon fuels without replacing the whole engine. It is ideal for new‑builds of large carriers where hull space permits a low‑speed engine room and where a global service network is required. Avoid it if budget constraints dominate, if vessel size limits engine‑room volume, or if crew expertise with sophisticated electronic fuel control is lacking.
Use Cases: The X72‑B powers the world’s biggest container ships and VLCCs, delivering sustained high thrust for long voyages while meeting emission regulations. Its DF versions are being trialled on LNG carriers and ammonia‑fuelled tankers as part of the industry’s decarbonisation roadmaps.
WinGD 11X72-B
11X72-B
· 35750.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed marine diesel
Model Family
X72-B
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
35750
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power – ~3 225 kW per cylinder enables compact installation for >35 MW ships.
  • Fuel flexibility: baseline HFO/MDO plus X72DF variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia without major redesign.
  • Proven reliability and worldwide support network from WinGD (30+ years of low‑speed engine experience).
  • Reversible operation simplifies maneuvering and reduces need for separate thrusters on some vessels.
  • Meets IMO Tier II emission limits; DF versions can achieve Tier III with selective catalytic reduction.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dry weight increase hull space requirements and affect stability calculations.
  • Capital cost is higher than smaller low‑speed families (e.g., X57) and dual‑fuel systems add complexity.
  • Maintenance intensive – injection nozzle wear and fuel‑rail pressure control require frequent monitoring, especially on DF variants.
  • Scavenge‑air cooler fouling in dust‑laden trades can reduce thermal efficiency if not regularly cleaned.
  • Alternative‑fuel versions (methanol, ammonia) still need auxiliary pilot diesel systems and have limited commercial track record.
Typical Vessels: Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV)Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) / Ultra Large Crude Carriers (ULCC)Large Bulk Carriers (>200 k dwt)LNG carriers (X72DF‑1.x/2.x variants)Methanol or ammonia demonstration ships
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV Class notation for low‑speed marine enginesABS Type ApprovalLR (Lloyd’s Register) class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >35 MW of main propulsion power, want proven low‑speed technology with the option to run conventional heavy fuel oil or switch to LNG/methanol/ammonia later, and value worldwide after‑sales support. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit high upfront cost, vessel size limits engine room volume, or you require a fully zero‑emission solution without additional after‑treatment equipment.
Use Cases: The X72‑B is typically installed on newbuilds of the world’s largest container ships and crude carriers where maximum shaft power and fuel flexibility are critical. Dual‑fuel variants (X72DF) are increasingly selected for LNG carriers, methanol‑powered bulkers, and pilot projects testing ammonia as a marine fuel, allowing operators to future‑proof their propulsion system while complying with tightening emission regulations.
WinGD 12X72-B
12X72-B
· 39000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
X72-B
Bore (mm)
720
Stroke (mm)
3086
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
39000
Speed (rpm)
91
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
720
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3086
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
66–89 rpm
Fuel, V-configuration
Diesel/HFO (X72); LNG/Gas (X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x with iCER); Methanol/Diesel (X72DF-M-1.0); Ammonia/Diesel (X72DF-A-1.0)
Status, V-configuration
In production (X72, X72DF-1.x, X72DF-2.x); X72DF-M-1.0 active; X72DF-A-1.0 deployment Q3 2025
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Fuel Rail Pressure Too High causing violent firing at start; fuel control failure
    Check: Verify fuel rail pressure within spec; check power supply and wiring to fuel control
  • Area: Injection Nozzle Wear from normal operation causing irregular combustion
    Check: Inspect nozzle tips at ~8,000–10,000 operating hours; replace spare kit per schedule
  • Area: Lubricating Oil Contamination: water and solids reduce bearing protection; dry sump circulation critical
    Check: Verify centrifugal separator bypass operation; monitor oil condition via sampling; check crankcase drain integrity
  • Area: Ammonia Combustion Instability (X72DF-A-1.0): low flame speed, high activation energy, misfiring risk, N2O/NH3 emissions
    Check: Monitor cylinder pressure diagrams; verify pilot fuel injection timing/quantity; track exhaust temps and emission compliance
  • Area: Scavenge Air Cooler Fouling in dust-laden trades; efficiency loss and thermal stress
    Check: Install filtration for dust-prone routes; schedule periodic cooler inspection and cleaning; monitor scavenge air temperature trend

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈39000 kW at only ~90 rpm) enabling direct‑drive propellers without reduction gear
  • Low specific fuel consumption (~167 g/kWh at full load, Tier II) reduces operating cost on long voyages
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for heavy fuel oil and marine diesel oil with optional LNG/gas/ammonia kits
  • Camshaft‑less common‑rail injection provides precise combustion control and meets IMO emission tiers
  • Proven worldwide service network (DNV, ABS, LR) and modular design simplifies scheduled overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dry‑weight demand substantial hull space and strong foundations
  • High capital cost and long lead time for spare‑part kits compared with medium‑speed alternatives
  • Electronic fuel‑control system is sensitive to rail‑pressure excursions; requires rigorous monitoring
  • Reversible operation adds mechanical complexity, increasing maintenance intervals for reversal gear
  • Limited suitability for vessels that need rapid speed changes or high manoeuvrability (e.g., offshore support ships)
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC tankerLarge bulk carrier (>200 k DWT)Container ship (>15,000 TEU)Cruise liner (propulsion only)Heavy‑lift or RoRo vessels requiring high bollard pull
Certifications: IMO Tier II (baseline) – compliant with MARPOL Annex VIDNV GL class approval for X72 seriesABS class approval for low‑speed two‑stroke engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power, low‑speed engine for very large vessels where fuel efficiency and direct‑drive propulsion are critical. Avoid if capital budget is tight, hull space is limited, or the vessel requires frequent speed changes and compact medium‑speed machinery.
Use Cases: The 12X72-B powers the main shaft of VLCCs and ULCCs on long-haul crude oil routes, large bulk carriers on iron ore trades, and flagship container ships where a single low‑speed engine drives a fixed‑pitch propeller. It is also selected for cruise liners that value smooth, low‑vibration operation and for vessels planning future fuel‑flex upgrades (e.g., LNG or ammonia retrofits).
WinGD 10X82-B
10X82-B
· 45100.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
X82-B
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
45100
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) enabling compact installation on very large ships
  • Excellent fuel efficiency – BSFC around 155 g/kWh at part‑load on HFO, lower than many older low‑speed engines
  • Proven reliability with long service intervals and extensive global support network from WinGD
  • Integrated WiCE control system provides real‑time monitoring of emissions, oil pressure and cylinder diagnostics
  • Engine family offers dual‑fuel variants (X82DF) for future LNG/methanol/ammonia conversion
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope (cylinder spacing ~1500 mm) demands a spacious engine room and heavy foundations
  • High capital cost compared with older low‑speed designs; investment justified only on high‑power vessels
  • Piston cooling oil channels are prone to wear at very high loads – requires diligent inspection of piston pins and rod glands
  • Scavenging system can be sensitive to fouling; air‑receiver and exhaust manifolds need regular cleaning to avoid temperature spikes
  • Limited low‑speed range (58–84 rpm) may reduce maneuverability in some operational profiles
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC crude carriersLarge container ships (>15,000 TEU)Very large bulk carriers (200 kDWT+)Ro‑Ro/Pax vessels with high power demandDual‑fuel variants used on LNG carriers and methanol/ammonia carriers
Certifications: DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Marine Engine CertificationLloyd's Register Approved Marine Engine
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with best‑in‑class specific fuel consumption for new‑build VLCCs, ultra‑large container ships or bulk carriers, and you have the space and budget for a large engine room. Avoid if vessel size limits engine‑room volume, capital cost is a primary constraint, or you require extensive low‑speed maneuverability without auxiliary thrusters.
Use Cases: The X82‑B powers today’s largest oil tankers and mega‑container ships, often installed alongside a controllable‑pitch propeller and a high‑efficiency reduction gear. Its dual‑fuel offshoots (X82DF‑1.0/2.0) are being fitted on new LNG carriers and emerging methanol or ammonia vessels to meet future emission regulations.
WinGD 11X82-B
11X82-B
· 49610.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
X82-B
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
49610
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power at low rpm – excellent propeller efficiency and reduced cavitation risk
  • Proven reliability with a long service history on VLCCs, bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships
  • Fuel flexibility: can run heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) and is the basis for later dual‑fuel variants
  • Integrated WiCE monitoring system provides continuous condition based diagnostics and reduces unplanned downtime
  • Standardised dimensions and mounting allow relatively straightforward installation in existing engine rooms
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high deadweight – may limit applicability on vessels with tight aft space constraints
  • Higher NOx and SOx emissions compared with newer X82‑2.0/DF models that incorporate iCER and advanced after‑treatment
  • Original B version is diesel‑only; dual‑fuel capability requires the separate X82DF family, adding parts commonality complexity
  • Piston cooling oil passages are prone to wear under high load – requires close inspection during early overhaul intervals
  • Scavenging system sensitivity: fouling of air receivers or malfunctioning exhaust valves can raise exhaust temperatures quickly
Typical Vessels: VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier)ULCC (Ultra‑Large Crude Carrier)Large container ships (12 000–14 000 TEU)Panamax and post‑Panamax bulk carriersRo‑Ro/ConRO vessels requiring >45 MW propulsion
Certifications: IMO MARPOL Annex VI Tier IIDNV Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 11X82-B when you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine with established fuel flexibility and extensive aftermarket support. Avoid it if your priority is the lowest possible emissions, reduced weight, or built‑in dual‑fuel operation without adopting the newer X82DF family.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large crude carriers, bulk carriers and ultra‑large container ships where shaft power above 45 MW is required. It also appears in retrofits of existing vessels seeking to replace older slower‑speed units while retaining commonality with WinGD’s service network.
WinGD 12X82-B
12X82-B
· 54120.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
X82-B
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
54120
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output in a compact low‑rpm package, ideal for large propulsion requirements.
  • Fuel flexibility – certified for HFO/MDO and dual‑fuel variants (LNG, methanol, ammonia) supporting IMO 2020 and future decarbonisation pathways.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈155 g/kWh on HFO, 141 g/kWh on LNG) improves operating economics.
  • Proven long‑stroke design (4.12 bore/stroke ratio) gives high thermal efficiency and reduced wear at design load.
  • Integrated WiCE monitoring system enables condition‑based maintenance and early detection of piston‑rod or servo‑oil issues.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand substantial engine room space and structural reinforcement.
  • Dual‑fuel variants require additional gas handling, storage, and safety systems, increasing capital cost and crew training needs.
  • Piston cooling oil passages are prone to wear under sustained high load; regular inspection of piston‑rod glands is mandatory.
  • Limited RPM range (58–84 rpm) makes the engine unsuitable for vessels that need higher shaft speeds or rapid maneuverability.
  • Complex turbo‑charging and scavenging system can be sensitive to exhaust fouling, requiring diligent filter and valve maintenance.
Typical Vessels: VLCCULCV (Ultra Large Container Vessel)Large bulk carriers (>150 000 dwt)New LNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Cruise ships with high power demand
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Classification
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >50 MW of low‑speed propulsion, want fuel flexibility for current HFO operation and future LNG/methanol/ammonia decarbonisation, and have sufficient engine room volume. Avoid if the vessel is smaller, requires higher shaft speeds, or cannot accommodate the additional gas infrastructure and maintenance regime required by dual‑fuel variants.
Use Cases: The X82‑B is typically installed on newbuilds of very large tankers, ultra‑large container ships, and bulk carriers where a single low‑speed engine can meet propulsion power needs while offering future‑proofing through dual‑fuel options. It is also selected for LNG carrier projects that demand a proven diesel‑dominant platform with an optional gas mode.
WinGD 5W-X92
5W-X92
· 28400.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
28400
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific output (~6.45 MW per cylinder) reduces overall engine length for a given power.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO/MDO and multiple dual‑fuel variants (LNG, methanol), supporting IMO Tier II/III compliance.
  • Proven operational record: >70 engines in service with ~1 million operating hours across ~200 vessels.
  • Thermal efficiency of 51–53% at part load improves fuel consumption compared with older low‑speed designs.
  • L‑configuration allows better space utilisation on ships with limited engine‑room width.
Weaknesses
  • Complex WECS‑9520 electronic control system; documented servo‑oil and fuel‑line leaks increase maintenance workload.
  • Cylinder‑head and exhaust‑valve wear (thermal fatigue cracks) require frequent inspections during load changes.
  • High‑pressure SCR system for Tier III adds auxiliary plant, consumables and operational cost.
  • Large overall mass and dimensions can limit applicability to retrofit projects with tight weight budgets.
  • Initial capital cost is higher than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines.
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tankerProduct tankerLNG carrier (dual‑fuel version)Large container ship (>10 000 TEU)Bulk carrierCruise liner
Certifications: IMO Tier II (standard fuel mode)IMO Tier III (with SCR, dual‑fuel mode)DNV Class approvalABS Class approvalLR Class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 5W‑X92 when you need very high power density, want future‑proof fuel flexibility (LNG or methanol) and must meet IMO Tier III emissions with SCR. It is ideal for newbuilds where engine room layout can accommodate its L‑configuration and where operating cost savings from higher efficiency offset the higher upfront price. Avoid if the vessel has strict weight limits, limited space for auxiliary SCR plant, or if budget constraints favour a simpler single‑fuel low‑speed engine.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed on new large tankers and LNG carriers built to meet stringent emission regulations, as well as on ultra‑large container ships where two high‑output units are required. Operators also select it for retrofits of existing vessels that need to upgrade from older low‑speed diesels to dual‑fuel capability while maintaining or improving fuel efficiency.
WinGD 6W-X92
6W-X92
· 34080.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
34080
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power per cylinder (≈6 450 kW/cyl) enabling compact installation for >30 MW ships.
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO plus optional LNG, dual‑fuel and methanol variants for emission compliance.
  • Thermal efficiency of 51–53 % at mid‑load, reducing fuel consumption compared with older low‑speed designs.
  • Proven field base: >200 vessels ordered, ~70 engines in service with ~1 million operating hours, ensuring strong spare‑parts and support network.
  • IMO Tier II standard compliance; Tier III achievable with SCR, meeting current and near‑future emission regulations.
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel and SCR systems increase installation cost and maintenance workload.
  • Documented failure hotspots: WECS‑9520 control unit oil/fuel leaks, cooling‑water leaks in cylinders, turbocharger oil leakage, and thermomechanical cracking of cylinder‑head bridges.
  • Large physical envelope limits retrofitting into existing hulls not designed for low‑speed engines.
  • Higher capital expenditure than simpler 2‑stroke models without dual‑fuel capability.
  • Requires high‑quality fuel handling infrastructure (LNG storage, methanol tanks) to exploit the dual‑fuel options.
Typical Vessels: VLCC/Aframax crude oil tankersLarge LNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Ultra‑large container ships (>10 000 TEU)Panamax and larger bulk carriers
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)DNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 6W‑X92 when you need >30 MW low‑speed propulsion with fuel‑flexibility for HFO, LNG or methanol and want a proven engine family backed by extensive service experience. Avoid it on smaller vessels where space, weight, or budget constraints make a simpler medium‑speed diesel more appropriate, or when the ship lacks infrastructure for dual‑fuel handling.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit of large ocean‑going tankers and container ships that must meet IMO emission standards while retaining the ability to switch fuels for cost optimisation. Dual‑fuel variants are favoured on new LNG carriers and vessels operating in Emission Control Areas where Tier III compliance is required.
WinGD 7W-X92
7W-X92
· 39760.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
39760
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific output (~6 450 kW per cylinder) reduces engine room volume.
  • Dual‑fuel operation (HFO/MDO and LNG) provides fuel flexibility for emission compliance.
  • Proven fleet – >70 engines in service with ~1 million operating hours, giving a strong reliability record.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈160–167 g/kWh) improves voyage economics.
  • Meets IMO Tier II by default and Tier III when equipped with SCR.
Weaknesses
  • Complex electronic control system (WECS‑9520) prone to oil/fuel leaks requiring rigorous monitoring.
  • High‑pressure LNG supply and handling infrastructure increase installation cost and crew training needs.
  • Cooling‑water and turbocharger wear zones demand frequent inspection (coolant leaks, turbine oil leaks).
  • Thermal stress on cylinder heads/valve bridges can lead to fatigue cracks under rapid load changes.
  • Maintenance intensity is higher than for comparable 4‑stroke engines due to scavenging and common‑rail systems.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 crude oil tankersProduct tankers (MR, LR1)Large bulk carriers (Handymax, Panamax, Capesize)Ultra‑large container ships (10 000+ TEU)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel variant)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 7W‑X92 when you need very high power at low rpm, want dual‑fuel flexibility to meet current and future emission regulations, and have space for an L‑configuration engine room. Avoid it if your crew lacks experience with LNG handling or sophisticated electronic control systems, or if you prefer a simpler 4‑stroke design with lower maintenance overhead.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on long‑haul bulk carriers, VLCCs and large container vessels where fuel flexibility and high power density are critical. It is also selected for newbuilds targeting IMO Tier III compliance via SCR, as well as retrofits where space constraints favor the compact L‑layout.
WinGD 8W-X92
8W-X92
· 45440.0 kW · low-speed two-stroke diesel
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
45440
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (~6 450 kW per cylinder) reduces engine length for a given output.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO, MDO/MGO and, in dual‑fuel variants, LNG or methanol.
  • Thermal efficiency of 51–53 % (Tier III mode) gives low specific fuel consumption (≈160‑167 g/kWh).
  • Proven class approval and IMO Tier II compliance; Tier III achievable with SCR.
  • Common‑rail injection provides precise combustion control and lower emissions.
Weaknesses
  • Complex electronic control system (WECS‑9520) has documented servo‑oil and fuel‑leak issues requiring rigorous monitoring.
  • High‑pressure cooling‑water and SCR systems add maintenance burden and risk of leaks.
  • Large physical size and weight limit retrofit options on existing vessels.
  • Thermal‑stress related cylinder‑head cracking reported under rapid load changes (70‑80 rpm range).
  • Initial capital cost is higher than older low‑speed designs.
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerUltra‑large Container Ship (>10 000 TEU)Capesize Bulk CarrierLNG Carrier (dual‑fuel X92DF variant)Large Ro‑Ro / Cruise vessels
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)DNV class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need very high power in a compact low‑speed engine, require fuel flexibility for future decarbonisation, and operate primarily at design load where the efficiency advantage is realised. Avoid if: budget constraints prohibit higher upfront cost, vessel size limits installation of large low‑speed engines, or operating profile involves prolonged low‑load periods that increase thermal stress.
Use Cases: The X92 family is installed on newbuilds of ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container ships and modern LNG carriers where high power density, fuel flexibility and compliance with stringent emission regulations are mandatory. Dual‑fuel versions are increasingly selected for vessels targeting future low‑carbon fuels such as LNG or methanol.
9W-X92
· 51120.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
51120
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density – approx. 6 450 kW per cylinder
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈167 g/kWh) and thermal efficiency of 51–53 %
  • Multi‑fuel capability (HFO/MDO, LNG dual‑fuel, methanol) for future‑proofing emissions compliance
  • Proven operational record – ~1 million engine hours across >70 vessels
  • IMO Tier II standard; Tier III achievable with SCR
Weaknesses
  • Complex electronic control and servo systems prone to oil leaks (WECS‑9520 issues)
  • Cooling‑water and scavenge system leakage points require rigorous inspection
  • Turbocharger and air‑cooler fouling can increase pressure drop and temperature
  • Tier III compliance adds SCR system cost and space requirements
  • High initial capital outlay compared with smaller 4‑stroke alternatives
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC crude carriersLarge container ships (≥15 000 TEU)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel variant)Methanol carriers (X92DF‑M)Very large bulk carriers (>200 k DWT)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)DNV GL class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high propulsion power with excellent fuel efficiency and the ability to run on low‑carbon fuels (LNG, methanol) while meeting Tier III emission limits. Avoid if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost or if vessel size/power requirement is modest enough for a smaller 4‑stroke engine.
Use Cases: The X92 powers deep‑sea tankers, ultra‑large container vessels and LNG carriers as their main propulsion unit, often in new builds targeting future emission regulations or in retrofits where dual‑fuel capability is required to reduce bunker costs and carbon footprint.
WinGD 10W-X92
10W-X92
· 56800.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
56800
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power per cylinder (≈6.45 MW/cylinder) reduces overall engine length for a given output
  • Thermal efficiency of 51‑53% lowers fuel consumption compared with older low‑speed designs
  • Fuel flexibility – HFO/Diesel, LNG dual‑fuel and methanol options allow compliance with future emission regulations
  • Proven operational record (>1 million service hours across ~70 engines) gives confidence in reliability
  • Compact L‑configuration eases installation in vessels with limited engine‑room width
Weaknesses
  • Common‑rail injection and WECS‑9520 control system are complex; documented oil/fuel leaks require strict maintenance discipline
  • High‑pressure SCR and cooling‑water circuits add auxiliary plant complexity and increase spare‑parts inventory
  • Large bore/stroke (920 mm × 3468 mm) results in a heavy engine block, limiting suitability for smaller vessels
  • Thermal‑stress cracking of cylinder‑head bridges reported under rapid load changes; requires careful monitoring
  • Dual‑fuel LNG capability demands additional fuel storage and handling infrastructure on board
Typical Vessels: Crude oil tanker (VLCC, Suezmax)Product tankerLNG carrier (dual‑fuel version)Container ship (>10 000 TEU)Bulk carrier (large capesize)
Certifications: IMO Tier II (standard fuel mode)IMO Tier III (with SCR in dual‑fuel mode)DNV GL Class approval for low‑speed marine diesel engines
Decision Guide: Choose if you need very high power density, want the option to run LNG or methanol to meet future emission caps, and have a maintenance team experienced with complex common‑rail/control systems. Avoid if vessel size limits engine weight/space, your crew lacks expertise in SCR/LNG fuel handling, or you prefer a simpler medium‑speed engine for lower upfront cost.
Use Cases: The 10W‑X92 is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large ocean‐going vessels where high shaft power and fuel flexibility are critical – e.g., VLCCs and Suezmax tankers using HFO, LNG carriers running dual‑fuel to meet IMO Tier III in emission control areas, and ultra‑large container ships seeking maximum efficiency per cylinder.
WinGD 11W-X92
11W-X92
· 62480.0 kW · low-speed 2-stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
62480
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density – ~6 450 kW per cylinder.
  • Fuel flexibility: can run on HFO, MDO/MGO and dual‑fuel LNG or methanol variants.
  • Thermal efficiency of 51–53% (up to 60% in optimal load range).
  • IMO Tier II compliance standard; Tier III achievable with SCR for strict emission zones.
  • Proven fleet presence – over 70 engines in service with ~1 million operating hours.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and weight demand deep engine rooms and robust foundations.
  • High capital cost compared with smaller low‑speed engines.
  • Dual‑fuel variants require complex high‑pressure LNG infrastructure and skilled crew.
  • Known maintenance sensitivities: control‑system oil leaks, cooling‑water leaks, turbocharger oil seepage, and cylinder‑head thermal cracking.
  • SCR system adds additional space, consumables (urea) and operational complexity for Tier III compliance.
Typical Vessels: VLCC/ULCC crude oil tankersLarge container ships (>15 000 TEU)Very large bulk carriers (>150 k dwt)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel X92DF variant)Methanol carriers (X92DF‑M variant)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)DNV class notation (standard for WinGD main engines)
Decision Guide: Choose the 11W‑X92 when a vessel requires very high propulsion power, fuel flexibility and must meet stringent emission limits (Tier III) on long voyages. Avoid it for smaller ships where engine size, weight and cost outweigh benefits, or where LNG/methanol bunkering infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: The X92 family powers the main shafts of ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container vessels and bulk carriers, providing reliable high‑speed service on global trade routes. Dual‑fuel versions are installed on new LNG and methanol carriers to exploit low‑carbon fuels while retaining compliance with emission control areas.
WinGD 12W-X92
12W-X92
· 68160.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X92
Bore (mm)
920
Stroke (mm)
3468
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
68160
Speed (rpm)
80
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
920
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3468
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
70–80 RPM bei MCR
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO/Diesel (X92-B), LNG Dual-Fuel (X92DF, X92DF-2.0 low-pressure, X92DF-HP high-pressure), Methanol (X92DF-M-1.0), MDO/MGO optional
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (aktive Orderbestände ~200 Schiffe, ~70 Motoren im Betrieb mit ~1 Mio. Betriebsstunden; Lieferungen bis 2025/2026, X92DF-HP erste Lieferungen 2028)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: WECS-9520 Steuerungssystem-Ausfälle (dokumentierte Mängel in Servoöl-Lecks, Kraftstoff-Lecks, Drossel-Einspritzventile)
  • Area: Kühlwasserleckagen in Zylindern und Abgasventilversteller-Mängel; Inspektionsroutine für Hochdruck-SCR-System erforderlich
  • Area: Lager und Kolbenkühlung-Öltemperatur-Überwachung kritisch; Kondensatfluss an Wassertrenner zu hoch (Scavenging-Abkühlsystem-Fouling)
  • Area: Thermobelastungsrisse im Zylinderkopf (Ventilbrücke): Zyklische thermische Belastung bei Lastwechseln 70-80 RPM; Abgasventil-Sitzflächen-Verschleiß erfordert Sc
  • Area: Turbolader-Ölaustritt und Lecks; Scavenge-Luftkühler-Verschmutzung (Luftseite: Druckabfall, Temperaturanstieg; Wasserseitenverockerung)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific output – ~6 450 kW per cylinder
  • Fuel flexibility: HFO/MDO, LNG dual‑fuel (including low‑pressure and high‑pressure variants) and methanol options
  • Thermal efficiency of 51–53 % at 60‑90 % load, reducing fuel consumption
  • Proven operational record – >70 engines in service with ~1 million operating hours
  • IMO Tier II compliance as standard; IMO Tier III achievable with SCR
Weaknesses
  • Complex dual‑fuel and after‑treatment systems increase installation cost and require specialised crew training
  • Documented maintenance hotspots: control‑system oil leaks, cooling‑water leaks, turbocharger oil leakage and cylinder‑head thermomechanical cracking
  • Large physical envelope limits retrofitting into existing hulls with space constraints
  • Higher upfront capital expenditure compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives
  • SCR system needed for Tier III emissions adds further weight and operational complexity
Typical Vessels: VLCC / ULCC TankersLarge Container Ships (10 000+ TEU)Bulk Carriers (>180 kt)LNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Methanol‑capable product carriers
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with SCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >65 MW low‑speed power with fuel flexibility and are prepared to invest in dual‑fuel infrastructure and SCR for strict emission zones. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room space, budget constraints preclude the higher capital cost, or a simpler medium‑speed four‑stroke solution is preferred.
Use Cases: The X92 family powers new‑build ultra‑large crude carriers, mega container vessels, large bulk carriers and modern LNG/methanol carriers where high power at low rpm, fuel agnosticism and future‑proof emissions compliance are critical. Operators value its proven reliability for long‑haul routes and the ability to switch between conventional oil fuels and cleaner alternatives.
WinGD 5W-X82
5W-X82
· 22550.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
22550
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific output (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) allowing compact installation
  • Fuel‑flexible dual‑fuel variants (LNG, methanol, ammonia) support future emission regulations
  • Low operating speed (58–84 rpm) enables direct propeller drive without reduction gear
  • Excellent specific fuel consumption (≈155 g/kWh on HFO, 141 g/kWh LNG) for reduced bunker cost
  • Integrated WiCE condition‑monitoring system provides predictive maintenance
Weaknesses
  • Higher capital cost and complexity due to dual‑fuel gas handling and iCER emission control systems
  • Maintenance intensity increases with alternative‑fuel variants (high‑pressure gas injectors, methanol corrosion protection)
  • Requires dedicated fuel infrastructure on board (cryogenic LNG tanks or methanol/ammonia storage) which adds weight and space penalties
  • Sensitivity to fuel quality; strict specifications for low‑sulphur diesel and gaseous fuels
  • Large bore (820 mm) results in heavier reciprocating components compared with smaller‑bore engines
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierMethanol carrierAmmonia carrierLarge container ship (≥15,000 TEU)Very large bulk carrier / ULCC
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV Class Approved
Decision Guide: Choose the W‑X82 when you need high power density combined with fuel flexibility for future‑proofing against IMO carbon targets and you have space for alternative‑fuel storage. Avoid it on cost‑sensitive projects, in vessels operating short routes where LNG/methanol infrastructure is unavailable, or where added weight from dual‑fuel systems would compromise payload.
Use Cases: Main propulsion on newbuilds targeting IMO 2020+ compliance and the 2030 carbon‑reduction roadmap, especially long‑haul tankers and carriers that can exploit LNG, methanol or ammonia to lower emissions. Also suitable for retrofits where a power boost is required without adding reduction gears.
WinGD 6W-X82
6W-X82
· 27060.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
27060
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) with a compact 1440 mm cylinder spacing
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO and dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia
  • Very low operating speed (58–84 rpm) enables direct‑drive to the propeller without reduction gear
  • Efficient combustion: BSFC as low as ~155 g/kWh at part load on HFO and 141.8 g/kWh on LNG
  • Proven platform since 2019 with a long‑stroke design (820 mm bore, 3375 mm stroke) for high thermal efficiency
Weaknesses
  • Dual‑fuel systems add complexity – additional gas handling equipment and iCER methane‑slip control required
  • Piston cooling oil passages are prone to wear at high loads; requires close monitoring of piston‑rod clearance
  • Scavenging system is sensitive to fouling; any blockage can raise exhaust temperatures and affect turbo performance
  • Initial capital cost and spare‑parts logistics higher than for conventional medium‑speed engines
  • Large physical envelope compared with some newer ultra‑compact medium‑speed units
Typical Vessels: LNG carrierMethanol or ammonia carrierLarge container ship (≥15,000 TEU)Cruise linerBulk carrier (>80,000 dwt)
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL ClassificationABS Class Notation
Decision Guide: Choose the W‑X82 if you need a high‑power, low‑speed main engine with proven fuel flexibility for current heavy fuel oil and future alternative fuels (LNG, methanol, ammonia) and can accommodate the associated gas handling systems. Avoid it when vessel operators lack dual‑fuel infrastructure, prefer a simpler medium‑speed layout, or are highly constrained by initial cost and space.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on newbuilds that target IMO Tier III compliance and future decarbonisation pathways – e.g., LNG carriers using the X82DF‑1.0 variant, methanol‑powered bulk carriers with the X82DF‑M‑1.0, or cruise ships seeking direct‑drive efficiency while retaining the option to run on conventional oil if needed.
WinGD 7W-X82
7W-X82
· 31570.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
31570
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power output per cylinder (≈5.5–6.2 MW) enabling propulsion of ultra‑large vessels.
  • Fuel flexibility – same block can run on HFO, LNG or other dual‑fuel options (methanol, ammonia) with iCER emissions control for Tier III compliance.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈155 g/kWh at part load on HFO; ~142 g/kWh on LNG), improving operating economics.
  • Compact cylinder spacing (1.44 m) compared with predecessor X82‑B, allowing tighter engine room layouts.
  • Proven reliability and extensive class approvals (DNV, ABS, LR) with a mature global support network.
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and complex gas handling infrastructure required for dual‑fuel operation.
  • Increased maintenance focus on piston cooling oil channels and rod gland clearances; wear can appear early under high load.
  • Larger physical footprint than medium‑speed engines, limiting suitability for smaller vessels or retrofits with space constraints.
  • Sensitivity to fuel quality – strict HFO sulfur limits and LNG purity specifications must be met.
  • Dual‑fuel control systems add operational complexity and require specially trained crew.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC)Ultra‑Large Container Ships (≥15 000 TEU)Liquefied Natural Gas carriersLarge product tankersCruise ships and offshore support vessels requiring high power low‑speed propulsion
Certifications: IMO Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approvalABS Class approvalLloyd's Register (LR) approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 7W‑X82 when you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven fuel‑flexibility for newbuilds or conversions targeting IMO Tier III compliance and future decarbonisation pathways. Avoid it on small to medium vessels where capital cost, space constraints, or simpler medium‑speed engines provide a better economic fit.
Use Cases: The X82 family is installed in newly built VLCCs and ultra‑large container ships for main propulsion, often paired with LNG dual‑fuel systems on carriers seeking near‑zero sulfur emissions. It also appears in large cruise liners where the combination of high power and fuel‑flexibility supports long voyages with strict emission limits.
8W-X82
· 36080.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
36080
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) with low operating speed, reducing propeller gearbox size.
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO version and dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia, supporting IMO Tier III compliance via iCER technology.
  • Excellent thermal efficiency; BSFC as low as ~141.8 g/kWh on LNG (dual‑fuel) and ~155.7 g/kWh on HFO at part load.
  • Modular construction simplifies installation and major overhauls, shortening shipyard integration time.
  • Proven track record since 2019 with multiple vessel classes worldwide.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope (long cylinder spacing, heavy block) limits suitability for smaller vessels.
  • Higher capital cost than conventional single‑fuel low‑speed engines because of dual‑fuel hardware and control systems.
  • Complex piston cooling oil circuit; wear on piston‑bolts and rod glands requires diligent monitoring.
  • Dual‑fuel operation demands LNG (or methanol/ammonia) bunkering infrastructure and crew training.
  • Maintenance intensity typical of 2‑stroke crosshead designs – frequent inspections of scavenging system and turbochargers.
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container shipsCruise linersLNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Large bulk carriersVery large crude carriers (VLCC) and product tankers
Certifications: IMO Type CertificateDNV GL Classification ApprovalABS Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >35 MW of low‑speed propulsion power, want fuel flexibility for current HFO/MDO and future LNG/methanol/ammonia, or must meet IMO Tier III emissions on a large vessel. Avoid if the ship’s size or budget cannot accommodate the engine’s physical dimensions and higher upfront cost, or if dual‑fuel bunkering is unavailable.
Use Cases: The X82 family powers new‑build ultra‑large container ships (20 000+ TEU) using HFO/MDO, LNG carriers employing the X82DF‑1.0 for low‑emission operation, and next‑generation cruise vessels that plan to switch between LNG, methanol or ammonia as alternative fuels.
9W-X82
· 40590.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
9
Power (kW)
40590
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high power density – >40 MW from a single engine unit
  • Fuel flexibility: HFO/MDO standard version and X82DF variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈155 g/kWh on HFO, ≈142 g/kWh on LNG)
  • Integrated WiCE condition monitoring reduces unplanned downtime
  • Reduced cylinder spacing (1440 mm) compared with predecessor, improving hull integration
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dead‑weight; requires substantial engine room space
  • High capital cost and need for specialised dual‑fuel infrastructure on board
  • Maintenance intensity – piston rod gland clearance, piston cooling oil channels and servo‑oil system demand regular inspection
  • NOx emissions in HFO mode still require after‑treatment to meet Tier III in emission control areas
  • Limited supplier base for methanol/ammonia retrofits; fuel handling systems are still emerging
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (15k+ TEU)Large LNG carriers (X82DF)Crude oil tankers / VLCCsBulk carriers (>80 000 dwt)Cruise liners (fuel‑flexible variants)
Certifications: DNV Class – approved for main propulsionABS – type approval for dual‑fuel operationLR – classification society approvalIMO Type Approval – Tier II/III NOx compliance (depending on configuration)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need >40 MW of reliable low‑speed power, want fuel flexibility (especially LNG or future low‑carbon fuels), and can accommodate the engine room size and upfront cost. Avoid for small to medium vessels, where capital budget is tight, or when dual‑fuel bunkering infrastructure is unavailable.
Use Cases: The W‑X82 powers today’s newest ULCS and VLCCs, provides primary propulsion on LNG carriers using the X82DF-1.0/2.0 variants, and is being trialled on methanol‑ and ammonia‑capable cruise ships as part of decarbonisation programmes.
WinGD 10W-X82
10W-X82
· 45100.0 kW · low‑speed 2‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
10
Power (kW)
45100
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very high specific power (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) at low rpm, ideal for large slow‑turning propellers
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO version and dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia
  • Advanced long‑stroke design (bore 820 mm, stroke 3375 mm) gives excellent thermal efficiency (BSFC ~155 g/kWh on HFO, ~142 g/kWh on LNG)
  • Integrated iCER emissions reduction system cuts methane slip by up to 50% and helps meet IMO Tier III NOx limits
  • Proven in service since 2019 with a growing fleet of container ships, tankers and cruise vessels
Weaknesses
  • Large physical envelope and high dead‑weight; requires substantial engine room space and structural support
  • Dual‑fuel systems add complexity (gas handling, pilot diesel system, additional control hardware)
  • Piston rod gland wear and piston cooling‑oil channel erosion need close monitoring at high loads
  • Scavenging and exhaust manifolds are sensitive to fouling; improper air‑receiver operation can raise exhaust temperatures
  • Higher capital cost compared with older low‑speed engines of similar power
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (≥15 000 TEU)VLCC / ULCC tankersLarge bulk carriersCruise liners (>150 m)Offshore support vessels with dual‑fuel capability
Certifications: IMO Tier III NOx compliance (via low rpm & iCER)DNV Class – approved for HFO and dual‑fuel operationABS Type Approval for LNG/methanol variants
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with built‑in fuel flexibility and future‑proofing for alternative fuels while meeting strict emission limits. Avoid if vessel size or budget cannot accommodate the large envelope, or if LNG/alternative‑fuel infrastructure is unavailable at intended ports.
Use Cases: The X82 series is typically installed on newbuilds of very large container ships, VLCC tankers and modern cruise vessels where a single low‑speed engine drives a large diameter propeller. Dual‑fuel versions are increasingly selected for ships targeting LNG or methanol as transition fuels, allowing operators to meet IMO 2020/2030 carbon targets without sacrificing power.
WinGD 11W-X82
11W-X82
· 49610.0 kW · 11‑cylinder low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead engine
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
11
Power (kW)
49610
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power per cylinder (≈5.5–6.2 kW per cylinder) enables compact installation for >45 MW class ships.
  • Fuel flexibility – standard HFO/MDO version and dual‑fuel variants for LNG, methanol or ammonia, supporting IMO Tier II/III emission targets.
  • Reduced cylinder spacing (1 440 mm) shortens overall engine length compared with predecessor X82‑B.
  • Proven low‑speed design gives excellent propeller efficiency and long service intervals.
  • Lower mean effective pressure in gas mode (≈17.3 bar) reduces mechanical stress and NOx formation.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical dimensions and high capital cost limit suitability for smaller vessels or retrofits with space constraints.
  • Dual‑fuel versions require complex fuel handling, storage and safety systems (LNG tanks, methanol/ammonia infrastructure).
  • Piston cooling oil passages are prone to wear under sustained high load; requires close monitoring of piston rod gland clearance.
  • Scavenging system is sensitive – fouling of air receivers or exhaust manifolds can raise exhaust temperatures and affect turbocharger life.
  • Maintenance intervals for servo‑oil system and cylinder liners are relatively short compared with slower‑speed designs.
Typical Vessels: Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC)Ultra Large Container Vessel (ULCV)Large Bulk Carrier (>180 k dwt)LNG Carrier (dual‑fuel X82DF variants)Methanol/Ammonia Fueled Future‑Fuel Ships
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (when equipped with SCR after‑treatment)DNV GL Class Approval
Decision Guide: Choose the W‑X82 when a newbuild or major retrofit requires >45 MW of propulsion power, benefits from fuel flexibility to meet current and future emission regulations, and can accommodate its length and weight. Avoid if vessel size limits engine room volume, budget constraints preclude dual‑fuel infrastructure, or a lower‑power, simpler engine is sufficient.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new large‑scale tankers, container ships and bulk carriers built for energy efficiency and low emissions; dual‑fuel X82DF versions are used on LNG carriers and emerging methanol/ammonia vessels to comply with IMO Tier III limits while retaining high power density.
12W-X82
· 54120.0 kW · low‑speed two‑stroke crosshead marine diesel
Model Family
W-X82
Bore (mm)
820
Stroke (mm)
3375
Cylinders
12
Power (kW)
54120
Speed (rpm)
84
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
820
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
3375
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
58 - 84 rpm (niedrige Drehzahl für Schiffspropulsion)
Fuel, V-configuration
HFO (Schweröl) / Diesel: X82-2.0 (MEP 22 bar), LNG (Flüssiggas): X82DF Varianten (MEP 17,3 bar R1 bei Erdgas), Methanol: X82DF-M-1.0, Ammoniak: X82DF-A-1.0 (Dual-Fuel)
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion: X82-2.0 (2023-03 MIM veröffentlicht), X82DF-1.0 (2021-09), X82DF-2.0 (2023-03), X82DF-M-1.0 (2024-06), X82DF-A-1.0 (2024-06). Legacy: X82-B (vorgänger, 1505mm Zylinderdistanz), frühe X82-D Bezeichnung (2019 Einführung, später X82-2.0 benannt)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kolbenbolzen-Wärmebeanspruchung und Verschleiß: Bei hohen Lasten können Verschleißerscheinungen an den Kolbenkühlung-Ölkanälen auftreten; inspiziere nach ersten
  • Area: Abgaskrümmer und Scavenging-System Verschmutzung: Verunreinigungen oder defekte Luftklappen im Scavenge-Luftreceiver führen zu erhöhten Abgastemperaturen; Turbo
  • Area: Methanbrenner (Slip) bei LNG-Dual-Fuel Betrieb: X82DF erzeugt bis zu 2-3% Methanbrenner bei Gasmode (vor iCER). X82DF-2.0 mit iCER reduziert um 50%; Überwachung
  • Area: Kolbenstangendichtung Leckageverschleiß: Regelmäßige Kontrolle der Piston Rod Gland Clearance beim Kolbenwechsel erforderlich; weiß-Metall-Schicht kann abnutzen
  • Area: Servo-Ölanlage Undichtigkeit: Servo-Ölpumpen und Druckregelventile können lecken; WiCE Kontrollsystem überwacht Servo-Öldruck kontinuierlich. Manuelle Ölpumpe m

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Very low specific fuel consumption (~155 g/kWh on HFO, ~142 g/kWh on LNG) delivering high propulsion efficiency
  • Multi‑fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, LNG and future fuels (methanol, ammonia) with the same hardware
  • IMO Tier III NOx compliance via iCER after‑treatment, reducing emissions without sacrificing power
  • Compact cylinder spacing (1440 mm) compared with predecessor X82‑B, saving engine‑room volume
  • Proven reliability and long service intervals from WinGD’s extensive fleet experience
Weaknesses
  • High capital cost and significant upfront investment for dual‑fuel infrastructure
  • Large physical dimensions and weight require substantial engine‑room space and structural support
  • Complex fuel handling and control systems demand highly trained crew and rigorous operational procedures
  • Piston cooling oil channels are prone to wear at high loads, requiring close monitoring and periodic overhaul
  • Maintenance of the scavenging system (air valves, exhaust manifolds) is critical; fouling can raise exhaust temperatures
Typical Vessels: Ultra‑large container ships (>15 000 TEU)Very large crude carriers (VLCC) and ULCC tankersBulk carriers over 150 kt deadweightLNG carriers (dual‑fuel version)Cruise liners and large Ro‑Ro vessels
Certifications: DNV Class ApprovedABS ApprovedIMO Tier III NOx complianceUSCG Type Approval (dual‑fuel variants)
Decision Guide: Choose the W‑X82 when you need >50 MW of propulsion power, want fuel‑flexibility for current and future low‑carbon fuels, and must meet IMO Tier III emissions without sacrificing efficiency. Avoid it if budget constraints prohibit the higher upfront cost or if vessel size limits can’t accommodate its large footprint.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on new‑build mega container ships seeking to comply with stringent NOx regulations, on LNG carriers that benefit from dual‑fuel operation, and increasingly on vessels being designed for methanol or ammonia as part of a decarbonisation strategy. Operators also select it for retrofits where existing low‑speed diesel plants need an upgrade to multi‑fuel capability.

Mitsubishi

16
5UEC33LSII
· 2650.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
UEC33LSII
Bore (mm)
330
Stroke (mm)
1050
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
2650
Speed (rpm)
215
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
330 (UEC33LSII), 370 (UEC37LSII)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1050 (UEC33LSII), 1290 (UEC37LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC33LSII: 215/157 min⁻¹; UEC37LSII: 76 min⁻¹ (nicht verifizierbar)
Fuel, V-configuration
Schweröl (HFO), Marinediesel
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreihe erfolgreich eingeführt (UEC33LSII: seit 1998, über 200 Stück in Betrieb); UEC37LSII: 19 Stück bestellt/ausgeliefert ab 2000; beide Serien auslaufend (Nachfolger: UEC-LSE/LSH)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kalte Korrosion (Cold Corrosion) an Zylinderliners durch Schwefelsäure-Kondensation bei Teillast — typisch bei Zweitakt-Dieseln; Schwefeldioxid aus Brennstoff b
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschleiß durch Salzwasserkorrosion — Pitting an Turbinen-Gehäuse durch Meerwasser-Einspeisung in Abgasleitung, Druckabbau durch Spaltvergrößerung
  • Area: Kolben/Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch Verschleppung (Scuffing) bei unzureichender Hydrodynamik-Ölfilm oder mangelhafte Spülluft-Qualität — Abrasive-Wear-Initiat
  • Area: Schwarze Abgase bei Teillast (Turbo-Lag-Phänomen) — Spüldruck erhöht sich erst, wenn Turbolader beschleunigt; zu viel Brennstoff → unvollständige Verbrennung, R
  • Area: Zylinderkopf-Wasserdichtung/Kühlung — Risse/undichte Kopfdichtungen ermöglichen Coolant-Eintrag in Kurbelgehäuse (Milchig-braune Ölverfärbung), Korrosion; Restr

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High torque at very low rpm eliminates need for high‑speed reduction gearing on large vessels.
  • Proven service record – over 200 units in operation since 1998, demonstrating reliability and ease of support.
  • IMO Tier II compliant out‑of‑the‑box; can meet Tier III with the LPSCR (Low Pressure SCR) package.
  • Fuel flexibility: runs on HFO as well as MDO, allowing cost‑effective bunkering options.
  • Optional Eco‑Engine variant provides electronic valve control for lower specific fuel consumption and emissions.
Weaknesses
  • Large dry weight (52–78 t) and overall dimensions limit installation to vessels with ample engine room space.
  • Low maximum speed (215 rpm) requires a reduction gear, adding cost and maintenance complexity.
  • Cold‑corrosion of cylinder liners can occur at part‑load or after fuel switches if sulphur compounds condense.
  • Turbocharger is exposed to seawater‑laden exhaust; improper sealing can cause pitting and pressure loss.
  • Scuffing risk on pistons/cylinder liners if oil film quality or scavenging air flow is inadequate, especially during transient loads.
Typical Vessels: Product tankerBulk carrier (30–80 kt)Container ship (up to ~8 000 TEU)General cargo vesselCruise liner (propulsion segment)
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with LPSCR option)
Decision Guide: Choose the 5UEC33LSII when a ship requires a proven low‑speed engine with high torque, fuel flexibility between HFO and MDO, and compliance with IMO Tier II (or Tier III with add‑on). It is ideal for vessels that already use reduction gears and have sufficient engine‑room volume. Avoid this model on high‑speed craft, vessels with strict weight/space limits, or operations dominated by low‑load profiles where cold‑corrosion and scuffing are major concerns.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on medium‑to‑large product tankers, bulk carriers and container ships that operate long voyages at economical speeds. Its robust construction and fuel flexibility make it attractive for operators seeking low operating costs while meeting emission regulations, especially in regions where heavy fuel oil remains prevalent.
6UEC33LSII
· 3180.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
UEC33LSII
Bore (mm)
330
Stroke (mm)
1050
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
3180
Speed (rpm)
215
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
330 (UEC33LSII), 370 (UEC37LSII)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1050 (UEC33LSII), 1290 (UEC37LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC33LSII: 215/157 min⁻¹; UEC37LSII: 76 min⁻¹ (nicht verifizierbar)
Fuel, V-configuration
Schweröl (HFO), Marinediesel
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreihe erfolgreich eingeführt (UEC33LSII: seit 1998, über 200 Stück in Betrieb); UEC37LSII: 19 Stück bestellt/ausgeliefert ab 2000; beide Serien auslaufend (Nachfolger: UEC-LSE/LSH)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kalte Korrosion (Cold Corrosion) an Zylinderliners durch Schwefelsäure-Kondensation bei Teillast — typisch bei Zweitakt-Dieseln; Schwefeldioxid aus Brennstoff b
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschleiß durch Salzwasserkorrosion — Pitting an Turbinen-Gehäuse durch Meerwasser-Einspeisung in Abgasleitung, Druckabbau durch Spaltvergrößerung
  • Area: Kolben/Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch Verschleppung (Scuffing) bei unzureichender Hydrodynamik-Ölfilm oder mangelhafte Spülluft-Qualität — Abrasive-Wear-Initiat
  • Area: Schwarze Abgase bei Teillast (Turbo-Lag-Phänomen) — Spüldruck erhöht sich erst, wenn Turbolader beschleunigt; zu viel Brennstoff → unvollständige Verbrennung, R
  • Area: Zylinderkopf-Wasserdichtung/Kühlung — Risse/undichte Kopfdichtungen ermöglichen Coolant-Eintrag in Kurbelgehäuse (Milchig-braune Ölverfärbung), Korrosion; Restr

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈3 MW per six cylinders) with good fuel efficiency (SFOC 179‑183 g/kWh).
  • Proven field record – over 200 units in service since 1998, widely supported by OEM service network.
  • Fuel flexibility: certified for HFO and MDO without major hardware changes.
  • Integrated exhaust turbocharger provides strong boost at low rpm, improving part‑load performance.
  • Available with both mechanical LSII camshaft control and the Eco electronic variant for finer fuel metering.
Weaknesses
  • Cold‑corrosion (scuffing) risk on cylinder liners during prolonged part‑load operation; requires strict water‑wash management.
  • Large dry weight (≈52–78 t) limits installation to vessels with ample engine room volume.
  • Maintenance intensive – crosshead, oil‑pump and turbocharger demand regular overhauls.
  • Tier III compliance only achievable with additional LPSCR after‑treatment, adding cost and space.
  • Limited maximum rpm (215/157 min⁻¹) makes the engine unsuitable for high‑speed applications.
Typical Vessels: Aframax / VLCC tankersPanamax & Capesize bulk carriersLarge container ships (8–12 k TEU)Ro‑Ro and car carriers above 30 000 dwt
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with LPSCR)
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with proven reliability on long‑haul tankers or bulk carriers and can accommodate its size and weight. It is also suitable when HFO operation and existing MDO flexibility are required. Avoid if the vessel demands higher rpm, strict Tier III emissions without extra after‑treatment, limited engine‑room space, or a lower maintenance burden.
Use Cases: The 6UEC33LSII is commonly installed on long‑range oil tankers (Aframax to VLCC) and large bulk carriers where low‑speed propulsion matches the ship’s propeller design. It also appears in high‑capacity container vessels that favour fuel‑oil flexibility and benefit from the engine’s robust torque curve for steady cruising speeds.
Mitsubishi 7UEC33LSII
7UEC33LSII
· 3710.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead marine diesel engine
Model Family
UEC33LSII
Bore (mm)
330
Stroke (mm)
1050
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
3710
Speed (rpm)
215
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
330 (UEC33LSII), 370 (UEC37LSII)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1050 (UEC33LSII), 1290 (UEC37LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC33LSII: 215/157 min⁻¹; UEC37LSII: 76 min⁻¹ (nicht verifizierbar)
Fuel, V-configuration
Schweröl (HFO), Marinediesel
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreihe erfolgreich eingeführt (UEC33LSII: seit 1998, über 200 Stück in Betrieb); UEC37LSII: 19 Stück bestellt/ausgeliefert ab 2000; beide Serien auslaufend (Nachfolger: UEC-LSE/LSH)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kalte Korrosion (Cold Corrosion) an Zylinderliners durch Schwefelsäure-Kondensation bei Teillast — typisch bei Zweitakt-Dieseln; Schwefeldioxid aus Brennstoff b
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschleiß durch Salzwasserkorrosion — Pitting an Turbinen-Gehäuse durch Meerwasser-Einspeisung in Abgasleitung, Druckabbau durch Spaltvergrößerung
  • Area: Kolben/Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch Verschleppung (Scuffing) bei unzureichender Hydrodynamik-Ölfilm oder mangelhafte Spülluft-Qualität — Abrasive-Wear-Initiat
  • Area: Schwarze Abgase bei Teillast (Turbo-Lag-Phänomen) — Spüldruck erhöht sich erst, wenn Turbolader beschleunigt; zu viel Brennstoff → unvollständige Verbrennung, R
  • Area: Zylinderkopf-Wasserdichtung/Kühlung — Risse/undichte Kopfdichtungen ermöglichen Coolant-Eintrag in Kurbelgehäuse (Milchig-braune Ölverfärbung), Korrosion; Restr

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈5.3 kW/L) with low specific fuel consumption (179–183 g/kWh) meeting IMO Tier II/III emissions
  • Proven field record – over 200 units in service since 1998, especially on product tankers and bulk carriers
  • Robust mechanical cam‑shaft control (LSII) offering reliable operation under heavy load conditions
  • Crosshead design separates crankcase oil from combustion gases, reducing cylinder wear and extending liner life
  • Optional Eco‑Variante electronic valve actuation provides up to 2 % additional fuel savings
Weaknesses
  • Cold‑corrosion (sulphuric acid condensation) risk at part‑load operation common to two‑stroke engines
  • Turbocharger exposed to seawater‑laden exhaust; requires diligent corrosion monitoring and periodic refurbishment
  • Dry weight between 52 t and 78 t limits installation on smaller hulls and increases structural reinforcement needs
  • Series is reaching end‑of‑life; spare parts availability may decline as UEC‑LSE/LSH successors replace it
  • Mechanical camshaft system adds moving mass, limiting rapid speed changes compared with fully electronic controls
Typical Vessels: Aframax product tankerSuezmax crude carrier (retrofit)Handymax bulk carrierContainer feeder (20–30 kt service speed)Cruise ship auxiliary propulsion
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with Low Pressure SCR option)
Decision Guide: Choose the 7UEC33LSII when you need a proven, high‑power medium‑speed engine that meets IMO Tier II/III emissions and can tolerate heavy load cycles – typical for product tankers, bulk carriers and feeder vessels. Avoid it if vessel weight margins are tight, if you require ultra‑low NOx without SCR retrofits, or if long‑term parts support is a primary concern given the model’s phase‑out status.
Use Cases: The engine is most often installed in newbuilds of 30–50 k DWT product tankers and 20–35 k DWT bulk carriers where a compact yet powerful medium‑speed unit is required. It also appears in retrofits of older Suezmax vessels seeking Tier III compliance via LPSCR, and in cruise ships as a main propulsion engine for moderate service speeds.
8UEC33LSII
· 4240.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead low-speed marine diesel engine
Model Family
UEC33LSII
Bore (mm)
330
Stroke (mm)
1050
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
4240
Speed (rpm)
215
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
330 (UEC33LSII), 370 (UEC37LSII)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1050 (UEC33LSII), 1290 (UEC37LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC33LSII: 215/157 min⁻¹; UEC37LSII: 76 min⁻¹ (nicht verifizierbar)
Fuel, V-configuration
Schweröl (HFO), Marinediesel
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreihe erfolgreich eingeführt (UEC33LSII: seit 1998, über 200 Stück in Betrieb); UEC37LSII: 19 Stück bestellt/ausgeliefert ab 2000; beide Serien auslaufend (Nachfolger: UEC-LSE/LSH)
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Kalte Korrosion (Cold Corrosion) an Zylinderliners durch Schwefelsäure-Kondensation bei Teillast — typisch bei Zweitakt-Dieseln; Schwefeldioxid aus Brennstoff b
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschleiß durch Salzwasserkorrosion — Pitting an Turbinen-Gehäuse durch Meerwasser-Einspeisung in Abgasleitung, Druckabbau durch Spaltvergrößerung
  • Area: Kolben/Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch Verschleppung (Scuffing) bei unzureichender Hydrodynamik-Ölfilm oder mangelhafte Spülluft-Qualität — Abrasive-Wear-Initiat
  • Area: Schwarze Abgase bei Teillast (Turbo-Lag-Phänomen) — Spüldruck erhöht sich erst, wenn Turbolader beschleunigt; zu viel Brennstoff → unvollständige Verbrennung, R
  • Area: Zylinderkopf-Wasserdichtung/Kühlung — Risse/undichte Kopfdichtungen ermöglichen Coolant-Eintrag in Kurbelgehäuse (Milchig-braune Ölverfärbung), Korrosion; Restr

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈4240 kW) at very low rpm, ideal for direct‑drive propellers
  • Fuel flexibility – runs on HFO or MDO, with an Eco‑variant offering electronic control and lower emissions
  • Established reliability: >200 units in operation since 1998 with a long service record
  • Competitive specific fuel consumption (179–183 g/kWh) meeting IMO Tier II standards
  • L‑configuration provides a compact footprint for the power class
Weaknesses
  • Cold‑corrosion risk on cylinder liners during part‑load operation, especially with high‑sulphur fuels
  • Turbocharger susceptible to seawater corrosion if exhaust gas cleaning is not properly maintained
  • Scuffing wear possible if oil film quality or scavenging air supply is inadequate
  • Older design (UEC33 series) is being phased out; spare parts availability may decline over time
  • Two‑stroke crosshead engines require more intensive maintenance compared with modern four‑stroke dual‑fuel units
Typical Vessels: Aframax TankerPanamax Bulk CarrierProduct TankerChemical Tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (with LPSCR)
Decision Guide: Choose the 8UEC33LSII when you need proven high power at low rpm, fuel‑flexibility between HFO and MDO, and a track record of reliability on large tankers or bulk carriers. It is also suitable where IMO Tier II compliance is required and an Eco‑variant can meet stricter emission limits. Avoid this engine if the vessel demands the latest dual‑fuel technology, very low emissions without LPSCR, or if long‑term spare‑parts support for an outgoing series is a concern.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed on long‑haul crude and product tankers (Aframax to VLCC) and large bulk carriers where direct‑drive propulsion and fuel flexibility are critical. It also appears in chemical tankers that operate on heavy fuel oil but need the option to switch to marine diesel for emission‑controlled ports.
Mitsubishi 5UEC45LSE
5UEC45LSE
· 5000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed marine diesel
Model Family
UEC45LSE
Bore (mm)
450
Stroke (mm)
1350
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
5000
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
450 (UEC45LSE), 500 (UEC50LSE)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1930 (UEC45LSE), 2050 (UEC50LSE)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC45LSE: 130 min⁻¹ (Basis 6-Zyl). UEC50LSE: 93-124 min⁻¹ (Varianten)
Fuel, V-configuration
Marinediesel (Schweröl / IFO 380, ISO 8217 Spezifikation)
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreife Baureihe seit 2001 (UEC45LSE erstes Einschiff 2008), aktivbetrieb in Handysize/Supramax-Bulker und Tanker-Flotten
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Einspritzventil-Verschleiß (Verschleißmarken auf Ventilsitz/Ventilteller durch mangelnde Kühlung oder Oxidation)
    Check: Borescope-Kontrolle der Abgasventil-Sitze auf Kratzer/Verschleiß, Dye-Penetrant-Test auf Risse, Leckage-Messungen (Ventil sollte 15 min unter Druckluft dicht halten)
  • Area: Kolbenring-Verschleiß und Liner-Kratzspuren durch Schmierfilm-Unterversorgung (besonders bei Teillast-Betrieb)
    Check: Liner-Oberflächenkontrolle auf Kratzer/Furchen, Kolbenlauf-Gemietlich-messung, Schmiermittel-Durchflussrate prüfen (falsche Parameter für Teillastbetrieb)
  • Area: Abgastrennkühler-Verschmutzung (Öl-Film + Wasser-Ablagerungen, insbesondere bei Trocknungs-Störungen)
    Check: Druckabfall über Kühler messen, Lufttemperatur nach Kühler prüfen, Abtropf-Separator kontrollieren auf Wasser-Ansammlung
  • Area: Gleitlager-Abnutzung mit Weißmetall-Rauspressen durch Überbelastung (>10% Verschleiß kritisch)
    Check: Tägliche Kurbelgehäuse-Ölprobe auf Weißmetall-Partikel (>0.5 mm mit glatter Oberfläche beidseitig = Überbelastung), Lagerspiel-Kontrolle per Schieblehre
  • Area: Kurbelwellenschliff-Ermüdung durch Spannungskonzentrationen (Fatiguebruch selten, aber möglich an Feder-Übergangsradien)
    Check: Kurbellagerflanschen mit Fehlerlupe auf Risse prüfen, Kurbelwellen-Durchbiegungsmessung per Messtaster (Indikatorenset: <0.1 mm kritisch)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High power density – 5 000 kW from a five‑cylinder package fits vessels with limited engine room space.
  • Low specific fuel consumption (≈169 g/kWh) reduces operating cost on bulk and tanker trades.
  • Proven reliability of the UEC45LSE family, in service since 2008 on numerous Handysize/Supramax ships.
  • IMO Tier II/III compliant Eco‑variant with SCR/EGR for emissions control.
  • Flexible L‑arrangement allows easier integration with shaft line and auxiliary systems.
Weaknesses
  • Higher exhaust‑valve thermal load; requires rigorous borescope inspections and coolant maintenance.
  • Part‑load lubrication can be critical – increased risk of liner scuffing if oil flow is not optimised.
  • Five‑cylinder layout offers less redundancy than the six‑cylinder UEC45LSE version.
  • Large bore (450 mm) and long stroke result in a relatively heavy dry weight (~190 t), impacting overall ship weight distribution.
  • Requires low‑sulphur fuel or after‑treatment (SCR/EGR) to meet Tier III limits, adding system complexity.
Typical Vessels: Handysize bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrierProduct tanker (up to ~30 000 dwt)Offshore supply vesselSmall container feeder
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III (Eco‑variant with SCR/EGR)DNV GL Type Approval for main engines
Decision Guide: Choose the 5UEC45LSE when you need a compact, high‑efficiency engine for vessels up to ~30 000 dwt where space and fuel cost are critical. It is ideal for new builds targeting low emissions with SCR/EGR packages. Avoid it on ships that demand maximum redundancy (e.g., very large tankers) or where only heavy‑fuel‑oil without after‑treatment can be supplied.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed in Handysize and Supramax bulk carriers built between 2008–2022, powering vessels of 20 000–30 000 dwt on routes such as Europe‑South America dry‑bulk trades. It also appears in product tankers operating regional routes where emissions limits require Tier II/III compliance.
Mitsubishi 6UEC45LSE
6UEC45LSE
· 6000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel
Model Family
UEC45LSE
Bore (mm)
450
Stroke (mm)
1350
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
6000
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
450 (UEC45LSE), 500 (UEC50LSE)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1930 (UEC45LSE), 2050 (UEC50LSE)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC45LSE: 130 min⁻¹ (Basis 6-Zyl). UEC50LSE: 93-124 min⁻¹ (Varianten)
Fuel, V-configuration
Marinediesel (Schweröl / IFO 380, ISO 8217 Spezifikation)
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreife Baureihe seit 2001 (UEC45LSE erstes Einschiff 2008), aktivbetrieb in Handysize/Supramax-Bulker und Tanker-Flotten
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Einspritzventil-Verschleiß (Verschleißmarken auf Ventilsitz/Ventilteller durch mangelnde Kühlung oder Oxidation)
    Check: Borescope-Kontrolle der Abgasventil-Sitze auf Kratzer/Verschleiß, Dye-Penetrant-Test auf Risse, Leckage-Messungen (Ventil sollte 15 min unter Druckluft dicht halten)
  • Area: Kolbenring-Verschleiß und Liner-Kratzspuren durch Schmierfilm-Unterversorgung (besonders bei Teillast-Betrieb)
    Check: Liner-Oberflächenkontrolle auf Kratzer/Furchen, Kolbenlauf-Gemietlich-messung, Schmiermittel-Durchflussrate prüfen (falsche Parameter für Teillastbetrieb)
  • Area: Abgastrennkühler-Verschmutzung (Öl-Film + Wasser-Ablagerungen, insbesondere bei Trocknungs-Störungen)
    Check: Druckabfall über Kühler messen, Lufttemperatur nach Kühler prüfen, Abtropf-Separator kontrollieren auf Wasser-Ansammlung
  • Area: Gleitlager-Abnutzung mit Weißmetall-Rauspressen durch Überbelastung (>10% Verschleiß kritisch)
    Check: Tägliche Kurbelgehäuse-Ölprobe auf Weißmetall-Partikel (>0.5 mm mit glatter Oberfläche beidseitig = Überbelastung), Lagerspiel-Kontrolle per Schieblehre
  • Area: Kurbelwellenschliff-Ermüdung durch Spannungskonzentrationen (Fatiguebruch selten, aber möglich an Feder-Übergangsradien)
    Check: Kurbellagerflanschen mit Fehlerlupe auf Risse prüfen, Kurbelwellen-Durchbiegungsmessung per Messtaster (Indikatorenset: <0.1 mm kritisch)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific fuel consumption performance (≈169 g/kWh) – among the best in its power class.
  • Low operating speed (~130 rpm) enables direct‑drive large‑diameter propellers for better propulsion efficiency.
  • Proven reliability on Handysize, Supramax and Aframax vessels with extensive service history since 2008.
  • Flexibility to run on heavy fuel oil (HFO) or marine diesel oil (MDO) with optional Eco‑variant SCR/EGR for IMO Tier II/III compliance.
  • Robust crosshead construction simplifies maintenance of the crankcase and reduces cylinder wear.
Weaknesses
  • Large physical size and dry weight (~195 t) demand substantial engine‑room volume and structural support.
  • Requires high‑quality lubrication; white‑metal bearing wear can become critical if oil quality drops.
  • Two‑stage turbocharging adds complexity to the air‑system and needs careful monitoring for fouling.
  • Part‑load operation may increase cylinder liner/scuffing risk if fuel injection timing is not optimised.
  • Higher capital cost compared with newer medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Handysize bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrierAframax tankerProduct tanker (20–30 k DWT)General cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIDNV GL class approvalABS class approvalLR class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine with excellent fuel efficiency for large propeller drives on bulk carriers or tankers and you have sufficient engine‑room space. Avoid if vessel size constraints limit engine volume, if you require very fast start‑up cycles typical of medium‑speed engines, or if capital cost is the primary driver.
Use Cases: The 6UEC45LSE is typically installed on newbuild bulk carriers (30–45 k DWT) and Aframax/product tankers where direct‑drive propulsion maximises bollard pull and fuel savings. It is also selected for retrofits when a proven, low‑speed engine with existing spare‑parts logistics is preferred.
Mitsubishi 7UEC45LSE
7UEC45LSE
· 7000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
UEC45LSE
Bore (mm)
450
Stroke (mm)
1350
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
7000
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
450 (UEC45LSE), 500 (UEC50LSE)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1930 (UEC45LSE), 2050 (UEC50LSE)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC45LSE: 130 min⁻¹ (Basis 6-Zyl). UEC50LSE: 93-124 min⁻¹ (Varianten)
Fuel, V-configuration
Marinediesel (Schweröl / IFO 380, ISO 8217 Spezifikation)
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreife Baureihe seit 2001 (UEC45LSE erstes Einschiff 2008), aktivbetrieb in Handysize/Supramax-Bulker und Tanker-Flotten
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Einspritzventil-Verschleiß (Verschleißmarken auf Ventilsitz/Ventilteller durch mangelnde Kühlung oder Oxidation)
    Check: Borescope-Kontrolle der Abgasventil-Sitze auf Kratzer/Verschleiß, Dye-Penetrant-Test auf Risse, Leckage-Messungen (Ventil sollte 15 min unter Druckluft dicht halten)
  • Area: Kolbenring-Verschleiß und Liner-Kratzspuren durch Schmierfilm-Unterversorgung (besonders bei Teillast-Betrieb)
    Check: Liner-Oberflächenkontrolle auf Kratzer/Furchen, Kolbenlauf-Gemietlich-messung, Schmiermittel-Durchflussrate prüfen (falsche Parameter für Teillastbetrieb)
  • Area: Abgastrennkühler-Verschmutzung (Öl-Film + Wasser-Ablagerungen, insbesondere bei Trocknungs-Störungen)
    Check: Druckabfall über Kühler messen, Lufttemperatur nach Kühler prüfen, Abtropf-Separator kontrollieren auf Wasser-Ansammlung
  • Area: Gleitlager-Abnutzung mit Weißmetall-Rauspressen durch Überbelastung (>10% Verschleiß kritisch)
    Check: Tägliche Kurbelgehäuse-Ölprobe auf Weißmetall-Partikel (>0.5 mm mit glatter Oberfläche beidseitig = Überbelastung), Lagerspiel-Kontrolle per Schieblehre
  • Area: Kurbelwellenschliff-Ermüdung durch Spannungskonzentrationen (Fatiguebruch selten, aber möglich an Feder-Übergangsradien)
    Check: Kurbellagerflanschen mit Fehlerlupe auf Risse prüfen, Kurbelwellen-Durchbiegungsmessung per Messtaster (Indikatorenset: <0.1 mm kritisch)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈1245 kW per cylinder) with compact L‑series layout
  • Excellent fuel consumption for its class (SFOC ≈169 g/kWh)
  • Meets IMO Tier II/III emissions (Eco‑variants with SCR/LP‑EGR)
  • Robust white‑metal bearing design and proven reliability in bulk carrier/tanker fleets
  • Two‑stage MET turbocharger provides good boost across load range
Weaknesses
  • Large dry weight (≈161–243 t) requiring substantial engine room space
  • Higher operating speed (≈167 rpm) may limit propeller options compared with slower low‑speed engines
  • White‑metal bearing wear is sensitive to oil contamination and requires diligent monitoring
  • Complex two‑stage turbo system increases maintenance workload
  • Injector and exhaust valve wear can be accelerated under part‑load operation if cooling/lubrication is sub‑optimal
Typical Vessels: Handysize bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrierAframax tankerProduct tanker (30–80 k DWT)Medium‑size general cargo vessel
Certifications: IMO Tier IIIMO Tier III
Decision Guide: Choose the 7UEC45LSE when a medium‑sized bulk carrier or tanker needs around 7 MW of low‑speed power with high fuel efficiency and IMO Tier II/III compliance, and when engine‑room volume can accommodate its weight. Avoid if vessel size restricts space, if a lower rpm (≈120 rpm) engine is preferred for propeller optimisation, or if the operator seeks a four‑stroke design to minimise bearing wear.
Use Cases: The engine is installed in newbuild Handysize and Supramax bulkers and Aframax/product tankers built since 2008, often as the main propulsion unit delivering direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller. It is also selected for retrofits where Tier II/III emission limits must be met without sacrificing power density.
Mitsubishi 8UEC45LSE
8UEC45LSE
· 8000.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead
Model Family
UEC45LSE
Bore (mm)
450
Stroke (mm)
1350
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
8000
Speed (rpm)
167
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
450 (UEC45LSE), 500 (UEC50LSE)
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
1930 (UEC45LSE), 2050 (UEC50LSE)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
UEC45LSE: 130 min⁻¹ (Basis 6-Zyl). UEC50LSE: 93-124 min⁻¹ (Varianten)
Fuel, V-configuration
Marinediesel (Schweröl / IFO 380, ISO 8217 Spezifikation)
Status, V-configuration
Produktionsreife Baureihe seit 2001 (UEC45LSE erstes Einschiff 2008), aktivbetrieb in Handysize/Supramax-Bulker und Tanker-Flotten
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Einspritzventil-Verschleiß (Verschleißmarken auf Ventilsitz/Ventilteller durch mangelnde Kühlung oder Oxidation)
    Check: Borescope-Kontrolle der Abgasventil-Sitze auf Kratzer/Verschleiß, Dye-Penetrant-Test auf Risse, Leckage-Messungen (Ventil sollte 15 min unter Druckluft dicht halten)
  • Area: Kolbenring-Verschleiß und Liner-Kratzspuren durch Schmierfilm-Unterversorgung (besonders bei Teillast-Betrieb)
    Check: Liner-Oberflächenkontrolle auf Kratzer/Furchen, Kolbenlauf-Gemietlich-messung, Schmiermittel-Durchflussrate prüfen (falsche Parameter für Teillastbetrieb)
  • Area: Abgastrennkühler-Verschmutzung (Öl-Film + Wasser-Ablagerungen, insbesondere bei Trocknungs-Störungen)
    Check: Druckabfall über Kühler messen, Lufttemperatur nach Kühler prüfen, Abtropf-Separator kontrollieren auf Wasser-Ansammlung
  • Area: Gleitlager-Abnutzung mit Weißmetall-Rauspressen durch Überbelastung (>10% Verschleiß kritisch)
    Check: Tägliche Kurbelgehäuse-Ölprobe auf Weißmetall-Partikel (>0.5 mm mit glatter Oberfläche beidseitig = Überbelastung), Lagerspiel-Kontrolle per Schieblehre
  • Area: Kurbelwellenschliff-Ermüdung durch Spannungskonzentrationen (Fatiguebruch selten, aber möglich an Feder-Übergangsradien)
    Check: Kurbellagerflanschen mit Fehlerlupe auf Risse prüfen, Kurbelwellen-Durchbiegungsmessung per Messtaster (Indikatorenset: <0.1 mm kritisch)

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (≈8000 kW) at very low rpm, providing excellent propeller torque without oversized reduction gear.
  • Tier II/III emissions compliance with optional SCR/EGR for IMO regulations.
  • Robust MET two‑stage turbocharger and proven crosshead design give long service intervals and good durability under HFO load.
  • Well‑documented performance data (BMEP 22 bar, SFOC ~169 g/kWh) and extensive field experience in Handysize/Supramax fleets.
  • Flexible L‑configuration allows installation in confined engine rooms.
Weaknesses
  • Large dry weight (~195 t) increases overall vessel deadweight and may limit applicability to smaller hulls.
  • Part‑load operation can accelerate liner wear and piston‑ring scuffing if lubrication is not optimised.
  • White‑metal bearing wear requires regular oil analysis; excessive wear can lead to costly crankcase repairs.
  • Higher SFOC compared with the latest 4‑stroke low‑speed engines, affecting fuel cost on long voyages.
  • Limited rpm range (≈130–170 rpm) necessitates a reduction gear for many propeller designs.
Typical Vessels: Handysize bulk carrierSupramax bulk carrierHandymax product tankerSmall crude oil tankerOffshore supply vessel (high‑torque requirement)
Certifications: IMO Tier II/III
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑torque low‑speed engine for HFO operation on bulk carriers or tankers where weight and part‑load wear can be managed. Avoid if vessel size limits deadweight allowance, fuel efficiency is the primary driver, or fast‑start capability at higher rpm is required.
Use Cases: The 8UEC45LSE is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on Handysize and Supramax bulk carriers and medium‑size product tankers operating worldwide. It excels in routes with abundant heavy fuel oil availability and where robust, low‑rpm torque is essential for efficient propeller performance.
5UEC52LS
· 7400.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
UEC52LS
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1700
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
7400
Speed (rpm)
142
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power for a compact five‑cylinder layout – useful where space is limited
  • Electronic Control (ECL) improves fuel efficiency (SFOC ≈ 164–170 g/kWh) and emissions to meet IMO Tier II
  • Proven Mitsubishi reliability with extensive global service network
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on heavy fuel oil, MDO or blended low‑sulphur fuels
  • Relatively low dry weight for its power class (≈ 300 t), aiding vessel stability
Weaknesses
  • Production ceased around 2015; spare‑parts availability may be limited for some components
  • Exhaust‑valve fouling is sensitive to high‑sulphur fuels and low‑load operation
  • Turbo‑charger can become contaminated by ash/coal particles at part‑load, requiring frequent cleaning
  • Higher BMEP (≈ 20 bar) leads to accelerated piston‑ring and cylinder‑liner wear if maintenance is lax
  • Not suited for vessels needing >10 MW or Tier III emission compliance without after‑treatment
Typical Vessels: Product tanker (≤30 kt)Chemical tankerHandymax bulk carrierOffshore supply vesselSmall container ship / feeder
Certifications: ABS Type ApprovalDNV GL Class approvalIMO Tier II compliance (via Eco‑A2 SFOC rating)
Decision Guide: Choose the 5UEC52LS when you need ~7 MW of power in a compact footprint, require fuel flexibility and electronic engine control, and have access to Mitsubishi service support. Avoid it for new builds demanding >10 MW, Tier III emissions without SCR/after‑treatment, or where long‑term spare‑parts logistics for an out‑of‑production model are a concern.
Use Cases: The engine is commonly installed on early‑2010s Japanese‑flagged product and chemical carriers of around 30 000 DWT, as well as on offshore supply vessels that benefit from its compact size and electronic control. Operators value the balance between power density and fuel flexibility for routes with mixed fuel availability.
6UEC52LS
· 8880.0 kW · 2-stroke low‑speed crosshead engine with electronic control
Model Family
UEC52LS
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1700
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
8880
Speed (rpm)
142
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power (~9 MW) with a compact footprint for its class
  • Electronic Control Logic (ECL) improves fuel efficiency (SFOC 164–170 g/kWh, IMO Tier II compliant)
  • Proven reliability on large tankers and bulk carriers; long service intervals
  • Ability to run heavy fuel oil up to 5 % sulfur, supporting existing bunker infrastructure
  • Modular cylinder‑liner design simplifies major overhauls
Weaknesses
  • Large dry mass (≈300 t for the 6‑cylinder version) limits installation on weight‑sensitive vessels
  • Exhaust‑valve fouling risk when using high‑sulfur fuels without adequate filtration
  • Turbo‑charger susceptibility to ash and carbon build‑up during low‑load operation
  • Production of the LSII series ended around 2015; spare‑parts availability may decline
  • Lower rpm (142 rpm) restricts compatibility with newer high‑speed propeller or pod systems
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerPanamax & Capesize Bulk CarrierLarge Container Ship (≈10 000 TEU)Cruise ship (mid‑size) where low‑speed engines are preferred
Certifications: IMO Tier II (SFOC compliance)DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Classification
Decision Guide: Choose the 6UEC52LS when you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine that can run conventional heavy fuel oil with electronic control for better fuel efficiency and emissions. It is ideal for new builds or repowers of large tankers and bulk carriers where space is limited and long service intervals are valued. Avoid if the vessel requires higher shaft speed, dual‑fuel (LNG) capability, or if you anticipate difficulty obtaining spare parts due to the model’s phase‑out status.
Use Cases: The engine is most commonly installed on VLCCs, LR2 tankers and Panamax bulk carriers built between 2010 and 2020. It is also used in retrofits where owners seek a power boost while retaining existing HFO bunkering arrangements. Operators value its electronic control for fuel‑saving voyages and its compatibility with standard low‑speed propellers.
Mitsubishi 7UEC52LS
7UEC52LS
· 10360.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead diesel
Model Family
UEC52LS
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1700
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
10360
Speed (rpm)
142
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific output (~10 MW) suitable for medium‑size bulk carriers and tankers
  • Electronically controlled fuel injection, exhaust valve and cylinder lubrication (ECL) improves fuel efficiency and emissions (SFOC 164–170 g/kWh, IMO Tier II)
  • Proven track record in commercial service with Mitsubishi’s long‑standing engine family
  • Modular design allows 5‑ or 7‑cylinder configurations for flexible power scaling
  • Capability to run both HFO and MDO, offering fuel flexibility
Weaknesses
  • Exhaust valve fouling risk when using high‑sulphur fuels (Na₂SO₄, V₂O₅ deposits)
  • Turbocharger contamination at low‑load operation can reduce BMEP and efficiency
  • Piston‑ring wear leading to blow‑by and fuel dilution if cylinder liner lubrication is not tightly controlled
  • Cylinder liner corrosion under prolonged high‑sulphur combustion requires vigilant inspection
  • Bearing wear accelerated by oil contamination; demands regular oil analysis
Typical Vessels: Handymax bulk carrierProduct tanker (up to ~30 k DWT)General cargo vesselMedium‑size container ship (≈30–40 k TEU)
Certifications: IMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose the 7UEC52LS when you need a reliable ~10 MW main engine with electronic control, proven fuel flexibility and compliance with IMO Tier II emissions. Avoid it if your operation is predominantly low‑load, high‑sulphur fuel burning where exhaust‑valve and turbo fouling become critical, or if you require a more compact power unit for very small vessels.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on mid‑size bulk carriers and product tankers operating worldwide. Its electronic control system makes it attractive for owners seeking lower fuel consumption and emissions while maintaining the ability to use conventional heavy fuel oil in regions where cheaper fuels are available.
Mitsubishi 8UEC52LS
8UEC52LS
· 11840.0 kW · 2-stroke crosshead main engine with electronic control (ECL)
Model Family
UEC52LS
Bore (mm)
520
Stroke (mm)
1700
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
11840
Speed (rpm)
142
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • Electronic control (ECL) provides precise fuel metering and lower specific fuel consumption (164‑170 g/kWh, IMO Tier II).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces side forces on the crankshaft, extending bearing life.
  • Fuel flexibility – can run on HFO or MDO, allowing operation on a range of bunker grades.
  • High power density for an 8‑cylinder low‑speed engine (≈12 MW at 142 rpm).
  • Widely class‑approved and supported by Mitsubishi’s global service network.
Weaknesses
  • Large dry mass (~447 t for the 8‑cyl family) limits installation in vessels with tight weight budgets.
  • Exhaust‑valve and turbocharger fouling are common when using high‑sulphur fuels (>3 % S).
  • Low maximum speed (142 rpm) reduces flexibility for vessels that require higher shaft speeds or variable‑speed operation.
  • Piston‑ring blowby can increase oil contamination if cylinder wear is not tightly controlled.
  • Higher initial capital cost compared with medium‑speed four‑stroke alternatives.
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersProduct tankers (15–25 kDWT)Chemical tankersMedium‑size container ships (up to ~3,000 TEU)Offshore supply vessels with low‑speed propulsion
Certifications: IMO Tier II emission complianceDNV Class approvalABS classification
Decision Guide: Choose the 8UEC52LS when you need a proven, fuel‑flexible low‑speed engine delivering ~12 MW with electronic control and have the ability to manage exhaust‑valve/turbocharger maintenance for high‑sulphur fuels. Avoid it if vessel weight or space is severely constrained, if you require higher shaft speeds, or if operating exclusively on very high‑sulphur bunker without adequate fuel treatment.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed in new‑build medium‑size bulk carriers and product/chemical tankers where a low‑speed, directly coupled propeller arrangement is preferred. It also appears in retrofits where owners seek to upgrade from older two‑stroke units while retaining the benefits of electronic control and improved SFOC.
5UEC68LS
· 13500.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
UEC68LS
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2390
Cylinders
5
Power (kW)
13500
Speed (rpm)
100
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm – ideal for direct shaft‑driven propellers without reduction gearing.
  • Electronic control of fuel injection, exhaust valve and cylinder lubrication (ECL) improves fuel efficiency (SFOC ~165 g/kWh, IMO Tier II).
  • Robust crosshead design reduces side forces on the crankshaft, extending bearing life under high torque.
  • Proven Mitsubishi reliability record in long‑haul tankers and bulk carriers.
Weaknesses
  • Exhaust valve fouling is common when using high‑sulphur heavy fuel oil (Na₂SO₄, V₂O₅ deposits).
  • Turbocharger can become contaminated by ash particles during low‑load operation, leading to BMEP loss.
  • Piston‑ring wear and blow‑by increase with prolonged use of low‑quality fuel, requiring frequent crankcase inspections.
  • Large dry mass (~300 t for the 5‑cylinder version) demands substantial structural support in the engine room.
Typical Vessels: VLCCSuezmax tankerAframax tankerHandymax bulk carrierLarge product tanker
Certifications: IMO Tier II
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine for large oil or dry cargo carriers where direct drive and proven fuel efficiency are priorities. Avoid if the vessel will operate exclusively on ultra‑low‑sulphur fuels with minimal ash content, or if space/weight constraints favour medium‑speed or diesel‑electric solutions.
Use Cases: The 5UEC68LS is typically installed in long‑range tankers and bulk carriers of 70–120 kt deadweight, providing reliable propulsion on heavy fuel oil while meeting IMO Tier II emission limits. It is also used on new builds that require a single low‑speed engine to drive a large-diameter fixed-pitch propeller.
Mitsubishi 6UEC68LS
6UEC68LS
· 16200.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead with electronic control (ECL)
Model Family
UEC68LS
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2390
Cylinders
6
Power (kW)
16200
Speed (rpm)
100
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power for a six‑cylinder layout – ~16 MW in a compact footprint
  • Electronic control of fuel injection, exhaust valve and cylinder lubrication improves fuel efficiency and meets IMO Tier II emissions (SFOC 164‑170 g/kWh)
  • Proven Mitsubishi reliability with extensive service network worldwide
  • Fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil, MDO or blended ISO 8217 fuels up to 5 % sulfur
  • Lower vibration levels compared with older mechanically‑controlled versions
Weaknesses
  • Dry weight around 350‑400 t makes handling and installation demanding
  • Exhaust‑valve fouling is a known issue when using high‑sulfur fuels; requires frequent inspection/cleaning
  • Turbocharger can become contaminated by ash particles during low‑load operation, leading to BMEP loss
  • Crosshead design adds auxiliary systems (lubrication pumps, oil coolers) and increases maintenance workload
  • Limited rpm range (≈100 rpm) restricts use on vessels that need higher shaft speeds
Typical Vessels: Handymax / Supramax bulk carriersProduct tankers (10‑30 k DWT)Chemical tankers (small to medium size)Ro‑Ro and ferry vessels requiring low‑speed propulsionOffshore supply/anchor handling tug supply ships
Certifications: IMO Tier II emission complianceDNV GL class approvalABS class approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a medium‑power, low‑speed engine with proven Mitsubishi durability, electronic control for fuel savings and the ability to burn high‑sulfur HFO in regions where scrubbers are not installed. Avoid if vessel weight budget is tight, you operate primarily on ultra‑low‑sulfur fuels (reducing fouling benefits), or require higher shaft speeds typical of fast cargo ships.
Use Cases: The UEC68LS is most often installed as the main propulsion unit on 20‑30 k DWT bulk carriers and product tankers, where its compact six‑cylinder layout fits engine rooms designed for larger four‑cylinder units. It is also selected for retrofits of older vessels seeking improved fuel efficiency without a major hull redesign, and for offshore support ships that benefit from low‑speed torque and electronic monitoring.
7UEC68LS
· 18900.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead engine
Model Family
UEC68LS
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2390
Cylinders
7
Power (kW)
18900
Speed (rpm)
100
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power at very low rpm enables direct drive to a fixed‑pitch propeller without reduction gear.
  • Electronically controlled fuel injection, exhaust valve and cylinder lubrication (ECL) improves fuel efficiency and meets IMO Tier II NOx limits.
  • Proven track record in long‑haul tanker and bulk carrier applications with robust construction (dry mass ≈ 390 t for the 7‑cyl version).
  • Capability to burn heavy fuel oil up to 5 % sulfur, providing flexibility on fuel markets.
Weaknesses
  • Large dry weight increases overall ship weight and limits installation in smaller hulls.
  • Exhaust valves are prone to fouling when using high‑sulfur fuels; requires frequent inspection and cleaning.
  • Turbochargers can become contaminated under low‑load, low‑speed operation, leading to BMEP loss.
  • Complex electronic control system demands skilled maintenance personnel and higher spare‑part inventory.
Typical Vessels: Product TankerHandymax / Supramax Bulk CarrierMid‑size Container Ship (≈5 000 TEU)Cruise Ferry
Certifications: IMO Tier II NOx (MARPOL Annex VI)DNV GL Type ApprovalABS Type Approval
Decision Guide: Choose the 7UEC68LS when you need a high‑power, low‑speed engine that can run heavy fuel oil and meet IMO Tier II emission limits with electronic control. It is ideal for vessels with fixed propeller speed and long‑haul operating profiles. Avoid it on ships that operate predominantly at variable speeds, spend extensive time in low‑load conditions, or where maintenance resources for exhaust‑valve cleaning and turbocharger care are limited.
Use Cases: The engine is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on large merchant vessels such as product tankers, mid‑size bulk carriers and container ships that require direct‑drive, high thrust at low rpm. It is also used on cruise ferries where a single low‑speed engine can drive a large propeller for efficient long‑range service.
8UEC68LS
· 21600.0 kW · 2-stroke low-speed crosshead diesel engine
Model Family
UEC68LS
Bore (mm)
680
Stroke (mm)
2390
Cylinders
8
Power (kW)
21600
Speed (rpm)
100
Fuel Type
HFO/MDO
Configuration
L
Stroke Type
2-stroke
Bore (mm), V-configuration
600; 680; 530
Stroke (mm), V-configuration
2400 (UEC60LSE); 2690 (UEC68LSE); 2057 (UEC52LSII)
Speed (rpm), V-configuration
105; 79; 95 (UEC68LSE)
Fuel, V-configuration
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Blended fuels bis ISO 8217
Status, V-configuration
In Produktion (bis ca. 2015 LSE-Serie aktiv); LSII-Serie älter, schrittweise durch LSE/LSGi ersetzt
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Area: Exhaust valve fouling durch Natrium/Vanadium-Ablagerungen (Na2SO4, CaSO4, V2O5) bei schwerem Brennstoff mit hohem Schwefelanteil (bis 5%); unter Taupunkt konden
  • Area: Turbolader-Verschmutzung durch Kohle- und Ascheteilchen im Abgas bei Niedriglastarguetrieb, BMEP-Rückgang und Verbrennungsverschlechterung
  • Area: Kolbenringleckage und Brennstoffverdünnung (>2-3%) durch Verschleiß an Zylinderlauffläche/Kolbenringen, erhöhter Blowby und Öl-Kontamination
  • Area: Zylinderliner-Verschleiß durch korrosive Verbrennung bei schwefelhaltigem Brennstoff; Inspektionskriterium: Verschleiß nach Höhe der Gleitfläche, max. zulässig
  • Area: Wellenlager-Verschleiß durch Öl-Kontamination; wöchentliche Prüfung auf Wassereintritt (<2% zulässig) und 3-Monats-Analyse auf Verschleißmetalle (Fe, Cu) erford

Verifizierte Familien-Daten (Hersteller-Datenblaetter + Fachquellen, 2026-06). Teils klassen-allgemeine Inspektionspunkte — pro Eintrag Quelle.

Strengths
  • High specific power output (≈21 600 kW at only 100 rpm) suitable for very large ships
  • Electronically controlled fuel injection, exhaust valve and cylinder lubrication (ECL) improves efficiency and emissions (164‑170 g/kWh, IMO Tier II)
  • Robust L‑configuration provides compact installation footprint for high‑power applications
  • Wide fuel flexibility – can run heavy fuel oil up to 5 % sulfur as well as marine diesel oil
  • Proven track record in VLCCs and large bulk carriers with extensive spare‑parts support
Weaknesses
  • Very high dry mass (≈447 t for the 8‑cylinder version) increases installation weight and handling requirements
  • Crosshead design entails more auxiliary systems (e.g., crosshead bearing, separate lubrication circuits) and higher maintenance workload
  • Exhaust‑valve fouling is a known issue when using high‑sulfur fuels; requires regular inspection and cleaning
  • Turbo‑charger susceptibility to ash/particulate buildup at low loads can cause BMEP loss
  • Ring wear leading to blow‑by and fuel dilution if cylinder liner wear is not tightly controlled
Typical Vessels: VLCC / LR2 TankerVery Large Bulk Carrier (≥150 k DWT)Ultra‑large Container Ship (≥10 000 TEU)Cruise ship (large displacement)
Certifications: IMO Tier II emission complianceDNV GL classification approvalABS class approvalLloyd’s Register type approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, high‑power low‑speed engine for vessels >150 k DWT that must run heavy fuel oil and benefit from electronic control for fuel efficiency. Avoid if vessel size is moderate (<80 k DWT), weight budget is tight, or operational profile favours higher‑rpm medium‑speed engines with lower maintenance overhead.
Use Cases: The 8UEC68LS is typically installed as the main propulsion unit on very large tankers, bulk carriers and container ships where a single low‑speed engine can drive a fixed‑pitch propeller directly. It is also used in some cruise vessels that require high power with fuel‑flexibility for long voyages.