Moss spherical tanks, GTT membrane containment and Type C pressure vessels are three different answers to holding liquefied gas independent of the hull, and the choice between them shapes everything from boil-off rate to how the ship itself can be built.
The 19 models with the most complete data of 19 in Cargo Tank (Moss, Membrane, Type C). Every row links to full specifications, documents and service notes.
All 10 manufacturers with models of Cargo Tank (Moss, Membrane, Type C). Names with a manufacturer page open it; the others open a search across the full library.
All manufacturersThe other equipment types in this category.
A Moss tank is a free-standing sphere resting on a cylindrical skirt, structurally independent of the hull and built to IGC Code Type B rules, which allow it to survive a partial loss of insulation without immediate risk. GTT membrane containment uses a thin corrugated stainless steel or Invar membrane bonded to insulation panels that are in turn supported by the hull structure itself, so the tank shape follows the hull rather than the hull being shaped around a sphere. This is why membrane LNG carriers have a more conventional…
A Moss tank is a free-standing sphere resting on a cylindrical skirt, structurally independent of the hull and built to IGC Code Type B rules, which allow it to survive a partial loss of insulation without immediate risk. GTT membrane containment uses a thin corrugated stainless steel or Invar membrane bonded to insulation panels that are in turn supported by the hull structure itself, so the tank shape follows the hull rather than the hull being shaped around a sphere. This is why membrane LNG carriers have a more conventional, boxy hull form and generally more usable cargo volume for the same overall dimensions. Type C tanks are pressure vessels, cylindrical or bi-lobe, built to conventional pressure vessel codes and used mainly on LPG and smaller LNG or ethylene carriers where cargo can be carried at higher pressure with less deep refrigeration, trading insulation complexity for a simpler, more robust tank.
Aluminium or 9% nickel steel sphere, supported on an equatorial skirt, with polyurethane foam insulation applied externally and a domed deck house structure, the characteristic visible spheres, protecting the tank top.
Primary barrier, the thin corrugated membrane in direct contact with cargo, an insulation space, a secondary barrier designed to contain cargo for a defined period if the primary fails, and a second insulation space bonded to the inner hull.
Thick-walled pressure vessel, typically 9% nickel steel or stainless steel, with saddle or skirt supports, insulated where deeper refrigeration than fully pressurised carriage requires.
Common to all three types: cargo that absorbs heat boils off and must be reliquefied, used as fuel, or burned off, sized differently depending on the containment type's insulation performance.
The decision sits mostly with the shipyard and owner at newbuild stage rather than something chosen later, since it defines the hull. Type C is chosen for LPG, ethylene and smaller-scale LNG where pressurised or semi-refrigerated carriage suits the trade. Membrane is now dominant for large LNG carriers because of its cargo volume efficiency. Moss spheres remain in service on older LNG tonnage and some specialist trades, valued for tank independence and inspection access, but few new Moss ships have been ordered in recent years as membrane technology has closed the boil-off gap.
All three fall under the IGC Code, which classifies containment systems as Type A, B or C based on the level of secondary barrier protection required and the consequences assumed from a leak. Type B systems, Moss spheres and some membrane designs, require a partial secondary barrier or drip tray; Type C tanks, being fully independent pressure vessels of proven design, generally need no secondary barrier because a leak is not expected to threaten the hull. Class societies survey tank structure, insulation condition and boil-off performance on a periodic basis, with membrane systems subject to specific in-service inspection regimes agreed with the system licensor.
| Type | Typical fault | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Moss sphere | Insulation degradation or damage to the foam jacket | Rising boil-off rate, increased reliquefaction plant load |
| Membrane | Primary barrier fatigue cracking at corrugations after repeated thermal cycling | Cargo migrating into insulation space, detected by gas sensors before reaching the secondary barrier |
| Membrane | Insulation panel bonding failure | Localised cold spot on hull, hull steel temperature monitoring alarm |
| Type C | External corrosion under insulation cladding | Wall thinning found at survey, requiring cladding removal to assess |
| All types | Boil-off rate creeping above design | Higher fuel gas consumption or more reliquefaction plant running hours than the voyage plan assumed |
Track boil-off rate trend over voyages, not just the single-voyage figure - a slow upward creep is usually insulation degradation long before it shows up as a visible defect at survey.
Tell us the manufacturer, the model and what you need — a part, a service call, a second opinion. Our desk asks the right suppliers from a network of over 114,000 companies and comes back with a quote or a sourcing plan, not a search page.
Yes. Every model page, every guide and every datasheet for this type is readable without an account. An account adds saved searches and requests, nothing is taken away.
Send us the nameplate. We identify it by hand, add it to the library, and if you need a part or a service, the request is already on our desk.
Yes. Tell us the manufacturer, the model and what you need — our desk asks the right suppliers from a network of over 114,000 companies and comes back with a quote or a sourcing plan.