"> Cargo Securing Equipment - Equipment Database

Cargo Securing Equipment

medium 5 models total

Cargo securing equipment holds twist locks, lashing rods, turnbuckles and bridge fittings that lock containers or general cargo to the deck and to each other, converting stack weight into forces the ship's structure can actually absorb. On a container ship, it decides whether the top tier survives a beam sea.

Read more — Cargo Securing Equipment explained

What sets cargo securing equipment apart

Cargo securing equipment does one job: turn a stack of boxes or a piece of break-bulk cargo into a load path the ship's structure can absorb. Unlike lashing bridges or fixed pedestals, which are part of the hull structure, this is the loose and semi-permanent gear a stevedore or crew member fits by hand for each voyage — twist locks, lashing rods, turnbuckles, D-rings, wire lashings and chain binders. The engineering behind it is simple statics, but the consequences of getting it wrong are not: a container that breaks loose in a seaway can take out the row next to it before anyone on the bridge notices the stack angle has changed.

Container securing arrangement
Plan view of two stacked deck containers showing twist locks at the corner castings, bridge fittings joining adjoining containers and diagonal lashing rods with turnbuckles anchored to deck sockets.

Main components

Twist locks

Semi-automatic or fully automatic twist locks engage the corner castings of adjacent containers and resist vertical separation. Semi-automatic types need a lashing gang to manually rotate the handle closed; fully automatic types lock on contact when the crane lands the box and release with a lanyard from deck level, which is standard on modern container tonnage to cut the time gangs spend between bays.

Lashing rods and turnbuckles

Rods run diagonally from the corner casting down to a foundation socket or lashing bridge, tensioned by a turnbuckle. Rod length is matched to bay and tier — a rod cut for tier 2 will not tension correctly at tier 4, so rod sets are colour-coded or numbered by most operators to stop the wrong length going on in the dark.

Lashing bridges and D-rings

Fixed steel bridges between bays give lashers a working platform and a mid-height securing point, halving the effective span a rod has to cover. On general cargo and ro-ro tonnage, deck-welded D-rings and pad eyes serve the same role for chain or wire lashings over machinery, vehicles or project cargo.

Selection and sizing

Securing arrangements are calculated, not guessed, using the vessel's approved Cargo Securing Manual (CSM). The variables that drive the calculation are stack weight, stack height, GM and roll period, expected wind and sea state for the trade, and the maximum permissible lashing force (MSL) of each component. Key figures a purchaser checks before ordering replacement gear:

  • Break load and MSL stamped on the rod or twist lock — MSL is typically 50% of break load
  • Corrosion allowance built into wire diameter for open-deck exposure
  • Corner casting type the twist lock is rated for
  • Rod thread standard — mixing metric and imperial turnbuckle threads on one bay is a recurring yard error

Regulations and class

The Cargo Securing Manual is required under SOLAS Ch. VI/VII and must be approved by the flag state or a recognised organisation before it is used on board. It specifies the exact type, quantity and MSL of securing gear for every stowage position, and replacement gear has to match what the CSM lists or the arrangement needs re-approval. The IMO/ILO/UNECE Guidelines for Packing of Cargo Transport Units cover securing inside the box itself, a separate responsibility chain from deck securing that often gets confused with it during cargo claims.

Typical faults

FaultConsequence
Worn or bent twist lock conesLock does not fully engage, container can lift under roll
Corroded or kinked lashing wireReduced break load, sudden failure without warning
Wrong rod length used at a tierRod cannot reach correct tension angle, lashing effectively slack
Turnbuckle threads seized from salt exposureGang cannot tension the lashing, position left under-tensioned

What to look for in a supplier

  • Certificates of test for break load and MSL traceable to a batch, not just a type approval
  • Stock matched to the corner casting types actually fitted on the trading containers
  • Galvanising or coating specification suited to the trade — North Atlantic exposure eats plain steel fast
  • Ability to supply a full CSM-matched set rather than mixed lengths that force the crew to improvise on deck

Count the gear back in after every discharge port — a lashing set quietly short three rods becomes the gang's problem at midnight in a swell, not the office's problem in daylight.

4 manufacturers · 5 models

SEC (Sweden)

2
SEC Automatic Twist Lock ATL
per container corner · Cargo Hold Equipment · semi‑automatic twist lock
Type
twist_lock
Safe Working Load (t)
25
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Spring mechanism failure
  • Corrosion/seizure
  • Handle breakage
Service: Semi-automatic operation. Annual inspection and greasing.
Spare Parts: SEC (Sweden): Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • Semi‑automatic operation speeds up locking/unlocking compared with fully manual locks
  • High SWL (≈25 t) provides greater margin for heavy cargoes
  • Spring‑assisted mechanism reduces crew fatigue during repeated cycles
  • Corrosion‑resistant construction suitable for marine environments
  • Compatible with standard ISO container corner fittings
Weaknesses
  • Spring mechanism can fail if not greased and inspected annually
  • Potential for corrosion or seizure in harsh saltwater conditions
  • Handle may break under overload or improper use
  • Higher purchase price than basic manual twist locks
  • Requires scheduled maintenance (greasing, inspection) to remain reliable
Typical Vessels: Container shipRo‑Ro vesselBulk carrier with containerised cargoOffshore supply vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if: you need faster securing cycles, higher load capacity, and have a maintenance programme for annual greasing. Avoid if: budget is tight, crew training on semi‑automatic devices is limited, or the vessel operates in extremely corrosive environments without adequate upkeep.
Use Cases: Commonly installed in cargo holds of containerships to secure stacked containers, on deck of Ro‑Ro vessels for securing vehicle decks, and on offshore supply ships where heavy modular units are locked to deck fittings.
SEC (Sweden) SEC Semi-Auto Twist Lock SATL
SEC Semi-Auto Twist Lock SATL
per container corner · Cargo Hold Equipment · semi‑automatic twist lock
Type
twist_lock
Safe Working Load (t)
25
Operation
semi_auto
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Lock mechanism jam
  • Corrosion/seizure
  • Spring failure
Service: Semi-automatic operation. Greasing monthly.
Spare Parts: SEC (Sweden): Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • Semi‑automatic operation reduces crew effort compared with fully manual locks
  • High safe working load (25 t) suitable for heavy unitised cargo
  • Compact design fits standard cargo‑hold lashing points
  • Simple maintenance – monthly greasing suffices when corrosion control is observed
Weaknesses
  • Lock mechanism can jam if debris or corrosion enters the housing
  • Spring fatigue may lead to loss of locking force over time
  • Requires regular preventive maintenance; neglect increases seizure risk
  • Limited to cargo types that accept twist‑lock engagement (e.g., containers, pallets)
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierTankers (including product and chemical carriers)General Cargo VesselOffshore Supply Vessel
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a high‑strength, semi‑automatic securing device that speeds up lashing while keeping the system simple and maintenance manageable. Avoid if your vessel operates in extremely corrosive environments without a strict greasing schedule, or if fully automatic locking is required for rapid turnaround.
Use Cases: Commonly installed on deck and in cargo holds to lock containers, pallets, heavy machinery, and other unitised loads during voyages; especially useful on vessels that carry mixed cargo where quick re‑securing between ports is advantageous.

ABS

1
ABS Lashing Rod and Turnbuckle
SWL 25t · Cargo Hold Equipment · high‑tensile steel lashing rod with integrated turnbuckle
Type
lashing_rod
Safe Working Load (t)
25
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Thread corrosion
  • Turnbuckle seizure
  • Rod fatigue cracking
Service: Visual inspection before each voyage. Annual NDT for high-tier lashings.
Spare Parts: ABS: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • ABS class approval ensures compliance with classification standards
  • Integrated turnbuckle reduces part count and simplifies installation
  • Standardised dimensions allow interchangeability across vessels
  • 25 t SWL suitable for most medium‑weight cargoes in bulk and container ships
  • Clear visual inspection points as required by service notes
Weaknesses
  • Thread corrosion reported if protective coating is compromised
  • Turnbuckle can seize in harsh marine environments without regular lubrication
  • Fatigue cracking observed after many load cycles, requiring periodic NDT
  • Limited to 25 t SWL – not adequate for very heavy or oversized cargoes
  • Annual non‑destructive testing adds maintenance cost
Typical Vessels: Bulk CarrierContainer ShipGeneral Cargo VesselRo‑Ro ShipMulti‑purpose Vessel
Certifications: ABS Approval
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a proven, classification‑approved lashing solution for up to 25 t loads on ABS‑class vessels and can commit to regular visual inspections and annual NDT. Avoid if cargo weights exceed the 25 t rating, if operating in highly corrosive environments without robust maintenance, or when higher‑capacity turnbuckles are required.
Use Cases: Securing bulk commodities (coal, grain, ore) within holds, lashing deck cargo such as containers, heavy machinery, and project cargo on multi‑purpose vessels; commonly installed in cargo bays where space is limited and a compact integrated rod/turnbuckle is advantageous.

MacGregor

1
MacGregor MacGregor Cell Guide System
MacGregor Cell Guide System
per bay · Cargo Hold Equipment · fixed steel cell guide
Type
cell_guide
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Guide rail misalignment from loading impact
  • Weld cracking
  • Paint/coating failure
Service: Fixed guides in container holds. Inspect for damage at each drydock.
Spare Parts: MacGregor: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • Robust, high‑strength steel construction provides reliable guidance under heavy loads
  • Reduces container shift and damage during voyages, improving cargo safety
  • Low maintenance after installation; no moving parts
  • Proven design widely used on new‑build and retrofitted containerships
Weaknesses
  • Installation requires structural welding and may affect hull integrity if not engineered correctly
  • Misalignment can occur from impact loading, leading to guide rail wear or failure
  • Weld cracking and coating corrosion have been reported if inspection is neglected
  • Limited flexibility for vessels that use alternative lashing systems
Typical Vessels: Container ShipFeeder VesselPanamax / Post‑Panamax Containership
Decision Guide: Choose if: the vessel carries full container loads, requires high cargo alignment accuracy, and can accommodate structural welding during construction or drydock. Avoid if: the ship relies on flexible lashing only, has hull thickness constraints, or operating in environments where impact loading is extreme without adequate reinforcement.
Use Cases: Installed in new‑build containerships and retrofitted during scheduled drydocks to improve container alignment, reduce damage rates, and meet class society stability requirements. Commonly seen on large ocean‑going container vessels (10,000+ TEU) where cell guides are integral to the hold design.

TEC Container

1
TEC Bridge Fitting
per container tier · Cargo Hold Equipment · bridge fitting
Type
bridge_fitting
Safe Working Load (t)
30
Common Failures & Inspection Points
  • Lock mechanism failure
  • Corrosion
  • Cone seat wear
Service: For inter-container stacking. Annual inspection.
Spare Parts: TEC Container: Ersatzteile per Hersteller. Lead time: 3-8 Wochen. Dichtungen und Ventileinsätze an Bord vorhalten.
Strengths
  • High static working load of 30 t
  • Designed specifically for inter‑container stacking
Weaknesses
  • Lock mechanism can fail if not maintained
  • Susceptible to corrosion in harsh marine environments
  • Cone seat wear reported after prolonged use
Typical Vessels: ContainerGeneral Cargo
Decision Guide: Choose if you need a robust, 30 t bridge fitting for container stacking in standard cargo holds. Avoid if the vessel operates in highly corrosive conditions without a strict maintenance regime.
Use Cases: Installed on bulk‑carrier or container ship cargo holds to secure containers during loading, transit, and unloading, especially where multiple containers are stacked side‑by‑side.